Samantha Bee ethers Bernie supporters
- Thread starter Drayonis
- Start date
You prefer Clinton over Sanders?
I prefer a bullfrog over Trump.
Duly notedHillary Supporters are playing checkers - bashing Bernie supporters calling them Bernie Bros and not embracing them is a recipe for a disaster but they are so self important they think that women will sweep them into the White House - good luck with that - instead of bashing Bernie Bros they need to spend 24/7 attacking Trump supporters -
This woman is an idiot -
This woman is an idiot -
You are delusional
Bernie supporters are the ones out of control. They are protesting Hillary with Trump supporters in some places.
Democrats kept silent long after they started #bernieorbust bs.
Bernie supporters blamed Arizona primary mess on Hillary when it was 100%republicans.
One reason for the long lines is the fact that the county went from 200 polling locations in 2012 to just 60 in 2016.
The alarm has been sounding for years on republicans plans to stop minorities from voting.
Then Bernie supporters protest a fundraiser for Democrats trying to take back house and senate.
It’s going to the congressmen and senators to try to take back Congress. And the reason that’s important and the reason it’s important to me is because we need, I’m a Democrat so if you’re a Republican, you’re going to disagree but we need to take the senate back because we need to confirm the Supreme Court justice because that fifth vote on the Supreme Court can overturn Citizens United and get this obscene, ridiculous amount of money out so I never have to do a fundraiser again. And that’s why I’m doing it.
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/04/17/hillary-clinton-sanders-dollar-bills/
Bernie supporters again acted like babies and blamed Hillary for Nevada. Proven false again
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-bernie-sanders-supporters-fraud-and-miscond/
Bernie supporters are sending death threats and you speak out against Berniebros???
You are an idiot.
Hillary has constantly tried to reach out to Bernie supporters.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ic-party-platform_us_57439500e4b00e09e89fdd8f
Last edited:
The left has similar tactics to the right in that they will pathologize, infantilize, or otherwise make fun of those in their own ranks that dont fall in line. The phenomenon of "Bernie Bros" doesnt exist, rather it is a faux target for the largely white,middle class feminist that support clinton. It helps push forward their "antipatriarchy" narrarative by giving it faux legitimacy and implying that Sanders supports the "old guard." This is a tactic also used by faux activist groups on the left when they want to seem legitimate to their massa, just substitute "bros" and the "patriarchal implications" with "black" or "anti-lgbt",etc.
Those on the right simply imply anyone not in line is a socialist,leftist,etc.
Either way the path of the USA has been decided,no politician will change that or thr conditions on the ground for americans (especially black ones) at large.
Those on the right simply imply anyone not in line is a socialist,leftist,etc.
Either way the path of the USA has been decided,no politician will change that or thr conditions on the ground for americans (especially black ones) at large.
So let me ask this ?
How do you know those are actually Sanders supporters calling and tweeting ?
How do you know those are actually Sanders supporters calling and tweeting ?
I really don't care about Hillary Supporters or Bernie Bros - I fucking want to beat Trump and if neither side get its act together - then Trump like Bush in 2000 will win and we will go through fucking hell - for more than a generation
the reason I am calling out Hillary Supporters is because she is the nominee and she needs to court the Bernie supporters not fucking bash them. I dont give a fuck what they do or say - she needs to be magnanimous and bigger than them. SHE NEEDS THEM - if they stay home - she LOSES - She has to make sure they dont stay HOME - Kiss their ass - Worse if they decide - Oh I am a Bernie Bros - fuck the white feminist now I am a Trump Bro -
Play Chess not checkers because trump is playing Jacks and he could still win
the reason I am calling out Hillary Supporters is because she is the nominee and she needs to court the Bernie supporters not fucking bash them. I dont give a fuck what they do or say - she needs to be magnanimous and bigger than them. SHE NEEDS THEM - if they stay home - she LOSES - She has to make sure they dont stay HOME - Kiss their ass - Worse if they decide - Oh I am a Bernie Bros - fuck the white feminist now I am a Trump Bro -
Play Chess not checkers because trump is playing Jacks and he could still win
This is part of the problem with the media and just slant politics...
Playing phone calls from nut jobs can be done with anybody lol.
We also know that it is rigged come on my G.
I very rarely watch TV when I did the major outlets definitely feels like they gave Hillary the nod from day 1.
Playing phone calls from nut jobs can be done with anybody lol.
We also know that it is rigged come on my G.
I very rarely watch TV when I did the major outlets definitely feels like they gave Hillary the nod from day 1.
How do you know it isn't the Republicans that aren't really behind pushing the #bernieorbust movement? They could working the wheels the whole time in order to convince those in the Bernie ranks that they need not vote in November if he doesn't get nominated.
Do you ever ask yourself that?
But Bernie doesn't? Come the fuck on, I read hateful tweets, terrible messages from Bernie supporters I know online daily. Stop pretending that Bernie supporters aren't Tea Party 2.0!
I didn't say who it is.
The bottom line is it is stupid for a supporter to do because that costs support .
The actions discredit what he is trying to do.
So it makes more sense to me that it's the work of agent provocateurs regardless of what end game they are seeking.
So once again I ask how do you know they are Sanders supporters ?
We have seen the same thing when it comes to BLM. trying to associate negative actions as being connected to them.
Are they on his staff ?
So because you are told that they are Bernie Supports they are ?
It's also funny how you and the other Hillary Sistas never reported that Bernie shit on those who did this.
Guess that wouldn't fit the dirty by association huh ?
Bernie or bust? The lessons of 1968
By Jim Bendat and Steve Lubet
Updated 3:42 PM ET, Tue May 24, 2016
(CNN)On a warm August night in 1968, the two of us joined thousands of other young people in front of Chicago's Hilton Hotel, braving tear gas and billy clubs to demand an end to the Vietnam War. While delegates to the Democratic Convention remained sheltered inside, with police and National Guard troops protecting the entrances, we shouted "Bring the Troops Home" and "The Whole World is Watching."
We didn't realize it at the time, but our most consequential chant was "Dump the Hump," derisively aimed at Vice President Hubert Humphrey, who had until then refused to distance himself from the war policies of President Lyndon Johnson. We wanted to change how the government worked -- and it turned out that we did, although far from the way that we wanted.
The Democrats had been fighting among themselves throughout 1968. President Johnson had been poised to run for another term, but Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota announced in late 1967 that he would challenge Johnson on an anti-war platform. Many college students took up McCarthy's cause, and the challenger nearly won the first primary, in New Hampshire on March 12.
Four days later Sen. Robert F. Kennedy of New York, sensing that Johnson was vulnerable, decided to run. Then, suddenly, on March 31, Johnson announced that he was withdrawing from the race. There was little secret to Johnson's motivation: by dropping out, he would avoid the embarrassment of losing his party's nomination, and he could join party bosses such as Chicago mayor Richard J. Daley in support of Vice President Humphrey
Humphrey didn't officially announce his candidacy until April 27, conveniently too late to enter any of the nation's fourteen primaries. (Delegates from the other 36 states were chosen in party conventions that were typically dominated by local political bosses.) Consequently, the big primary elections that spring -- most notably, Indiana, Oregon and California -- were contests between McCarthy and Kennedy. Then came Kennedy's assassination, on the same night as the California primary, leaving McCarthy as the only anti-war challenger to Humphrey.
That August, the Democratic National Convention took place in Chicago. Humphrey, despite having won zero primaries, easily won the nomination, which seemed as though it had been rigged from the beginning. Young people, and some who were not so young, flooded the streets and parks in protest. The cops responded by cracking heads, in what Connecticut Sen. Abraham Ribicoff called "Gestapo tactics."
When Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey squared off in the 1968 election, along with third party candidate George Wallace, the biggest issues were the Vietnam War, civil rights, and anticipated vacancies on the U.S. Supreme Court.
As undergrads at Northwestern, neither of us could yet vote in1968 (the voting age was still 21 at the time) but it would not have mattered. Many thousands of Democrats had been alienated by the "police riot" at the Chicago convention, and they stayed away from the polls out of "principle." The two of us surely would have done the same.
Why Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should watch 'All the Way' (Opinion)
To us, Humphrey, Nixon and Wallace were all pro-war, with no meaningful difference between them. Humphrey's leadership in the civil rights movement seemed like ancient history, and his association with LBJ was more than enough to condemn him in our eyes. We wanted to change the world, and we thought we had a lot of answers -- none of which involved picking the lesser of evil candidates.
We were immature and shortsighted in 1968, rejecting Humphrey even when he belatedly announced his opposition to the war.
Nixon was elected by a narrow margin. He escalated the war and invaded Cambodia. He appointed Warren Burger as chief justice of the Supreme Court, as well as William Rehnquist, who would serve on the court for the next 33 years. Nixon's criminality subverted the 1972 presidential election, for which we are still paying a price in national cynicism. American history would have been dramatically different -- and far better -- if Humphrey had won.
The president who takes office on January 20, 2017 will most likely have at least one Supreme Court vacancy to fill, and probably more. The rights of today's children -- to vote, to control their reproductive lives, to have access to health insurance -- will be determined by those justices for decades to come.
We have heard the "Bernie or Bust" slogans of many Sanders supporters, who threaten never to vote for Clinton in the general election. That would be a horrible mistake. The principled opposition to Hubert Humphrey was deeply misguided in 1968, with monumental consequences for the nation and the world. We can only hope that Sanders and his supporters -- of all ages -- will heed the lesson that we learned so bitterly once Nixon was in the White House.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/24/opini...ssons-of-1968-opinion-lubet-bendat/index.html
By Jim Bendat and Steve Lubet
Updated 3:42 PM ET, Tue May 24, 2016
(CNN)On a warm August night in 1968, the two of us joined thousands of other young people in front of Chicago's Hilton Hotel, braving tear gas and billy clubs to demand an end to the Vietnam War. While delegates to the Democratic Convention remained sheltered inside, with police and National Guard troops protecting the entrances, we shouted "Bring the Troops Home" and "The Whole World is Watching."
We didn't realize it at the time, but our most consequential chant was "Dump the Hump," derisively aimed at Vice President Hubert Humphrey, who had until then refused to distance himself from the war policies of President Lyndon Johnson. We wanted to change how the government worked -- and it turned out that we did, although far from the way that we wanted.
The Democrats had been fighting among themselves throughout 1968. President Johnson had been poised to run for another term, but Sen. Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota announced in late 1967 that he would challenge Johnson on an anti-war platform. Many college students took up McCarthy's cause, and the challenger nearly won the first primary, in New Hampshire on March 12.
Four days later Sen. Robert F. Kennedy of New York, sensing that Johnson was vulnerable, decided to run. Then, suddenly, on March 31, Johnson announced that he was withdrawing from the race. There was little secret to Johnson's motivation: by dropping out, he would avoid the embarrassment of losing his party's nomination, and he could join party bosses such as Chicago mayor Richard J. Daley in support of Vice President Humphrey
Humphrey didn't officially announce his candidacy until April 27, conveniently too late to enter any of the nation's fourteen primaries. (Delegates from the other 36 states were chosen in party conventions that were typically dominated by local political bosses.) Consequently, the big primary elections that spring -- most notably, Indiana, Oregon and California -- were contests between McCarthy and Kennedy. Then came Kennedy's assassination, on the same night as the California primary, leaving McCarthy as the only anti-war challenger to Humphrey.
That August, the Democratic National Convention took place in Chicago. Humphrey, despite having won zero primaries, easily won the nomination, which seemed as though it had been rigged from the beginning. Young people, and some who were not so young, flooded the streets and parks in protest. The cops responded by cracking heads, in what Connecticut Sen. Abraham Ribicoff called "Gestapo tactics."
When Richard Nixon and Hubert Humphrey squared off in the 1968 election, along with third party candidate George Wallace, the biggest issues were the Vietnam War, civil rights, and anticipated vacancies on the U.S. Supreme Court.
As undergrads at Northwestern, neither of us could yet vote in1968 (the voting age was still 21 at the time) but it would not have mattered. Many thousands of Democrats had been alienated by the "police riot" at the Chicago convention, and they stayed away from the polls out of "principle." The two of us surely would have done the same.
Why Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should watch 'All the Way' (Opinion)
To us, Humphrey, Nixon and Wallace were all pro-war, with no meaningful difference between them. Humphrey's leadership in the civil rights movement seemed like ancient history, and his association with LBJ was more than enough to condemn him in our eyes. We wanted to change the world, and we thought we had a lot of answers -- none of which involved picking the lesser of evil candidates.
We were immature and shortsighted in 1968, rejecting Humphrey even when he belatedly announced his opposition to the war.
Nixon was elected by a narrow margin. He escalated the war and invaded Cambodia. He appointed Warren Burger as chief justice of the Supreme Court, as well as William Rehnquist, who would serve on the court for the next 33 years. Nixon's criminality subverted the 1972 presidential election, for which we are still paying a price in national cynicism. American history would have been dramatically different -- and far better -- if Humphrey had won.
The president who takes office on January 20, 2017 will most likely have at least one Supreme Court vacancy to fill, and probably more. The rights of today's children -- to vote, to control their reproductive lives, to have access to health insurance -- will be determined by those justices for decades to come.
We have heard the "Bernie or Bust" slogans of many Sanders supporters, who threaten never to vote for Clinton in the general election. That would be a horrible mistake. The principled opposition to Hubert Humphrey was deeply misguided in 1968, with monumental consequences for the nation and the world. We can only hope that Sanders and his supporters -- of all ages -- will heed the lesson that we learned so bitterly once Nixon was in the White House.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/24/opini...ssons-of-1968-opinion-lubet-bendat/index.html
For them to not exist, there sure are a lot of them on social media harassing people. I've seen black tweeters directly harassed. Also just check out ElonJamesWhite and Rodimus Primes' timeline from netroots 2015. Elon's wife just had a baby, so right now his focus is on that, but search his name and some of the interactions he has had.
Also on twitter search [URL='https://twitter.com/hashtag/EarnThisDamnVoteOrLose?src=hash']#EarnThisDamnVoteOrLose[/URL]
The abuse started way before Bernie started gaining numbers, before anyone actually thought he was a viable candidate. They also get abuse from Hillary supporters, but is no way near as bad.
Last edited:
Bernie needs to stop watching Veep on HBO.
Bernie Sanders Requests Kentucky Primary Recount
“The point is transparency,” Sanders’ aide Larry Cohen said on CNN.
05/24/2016 01:55 pm ET | Updated 55 minutes ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...y-primary-recount_us_574492dce4b0613b512b6db7
Bernie Sanders Requests Kentucky Primary Recount
“The point is transparency,” Sanders’ aide Larry Cohen said on CNN.
05/24/2016 01:55 pm ET | Updated 55 minutes ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...y-primary-recount_us_574492dce4b0613b512b6db7
Im not too familiar with twitter outside of what my cousins text me about but I see your point. However, i dont think their real world presence or voting potential is statistically significant to warrant this response outside of using their existence (and inflating their potential) for the reasons I outlined above. Im sure plenty of those people get harrased online and ignore it outside of election time, giving it focus now is a means to an end. Identify an enemy to unite your troops. Otherwise they serve no purpose and would be ignored like the racists online were mostly irrelevant like in obamas last campaign.
Now when I said I am not sure if I am gonna vote. Niggaz wanna take my head off, But who is really after our/my interests?! These white fucks wanna take pix with the mothers and wives of black men killed by cops, thats CACs way into the black community. FUCK THAT!!!
Life ethered Samantha Bee's face.
Bgol Coon Platoon!!!!!!!!!
Okay bruh, you're biased. Bernie supporters were calling black people all kinds of nasty racist shit when Hillary started to win the South. Don't pretend that didn't happen. Like I said Tea Party 2.0. "My way or the highway".
Don't vote, I'm sure Republicans are excited to hear this.
Coons unless we vote for Bernie right?
Trust me it was bad. Real bad. This wasn't just one or two times, it has been continuous even back to June and July of last year. Even if how Hillary is a poor candidate was being discussed, people would pop in with "Bernie Marched with King!!!" No one could tell us what he had done since then. Anyone who didn't immediately agree that Bernie was the biggest and best thing since the discovery of fire got a lecture about how black people don't know what's good for them. We were calling them Berniestans, someone else came up with Bernie Bros. It hasn't stopped. I proactively block people though, based on how ignorant they are acting toward others on twitter. You know black people joke when things get ridiculous and Rod kicked off a hashtag, #BernieSoBlack, though it has been mostly hijacked by Bernie supporters and racists now. If you can go back to the beginning, it was hilarious. He was even interviewed by vox. Note that this is from JULY 2015 http://www.vox.com/2015/7/20/9005855/black-twitter-bernie-sanders
This gif had me dying, and people were MAD...lol...
TWIBNation was fed up.
Full episode:
You should join twitter. It's a great platform. If I don't log in on a regular basis I miss out on a lot.
If u vote for anybody that's not named trump u are no coon.
Trust me bruh. I don't like Hillary, I just don't hate her.
Not biased at all. Fuck both candidates. My point is that these guys wont be given any political leverage or legitimacy on par with a "tea party" due to their temporary usefulness for hillary. I dont know why racism from the right or left suprises people.
Bernisoblack???? Lmbao wtf???
Shit sounds like comedy. Thanks for the debriefing. I see what you guys mean. The interesting thing is that guys like this probably blend in well with "progressive" blacks, they are not the gun totin folk the tea party is.
The truth of the matter is anybody who asks what has Bernie done doesn't really want to know as much as they want to marginalize his candidacy.
It's no secret what fuckery Hillary has done which is why they would rather use the she is not Trump and look all of Sander's supporters are racists lunatics.
I have said before that I am sure there are Sander's supporters who are racist and crazy but don't think for a second that all of Hillary's supporters are not.
The difference is that mainstream media and the DNC sets the narrative and will focus on what benefits their position.
We have heard very little about Honduras and Libya and the only reason you hear Iraq is it is already out and has been since 2007. And that narrative is it was a mistake and others made that mistake too but today she would not make the same type of decision.. But she did with both Honduras and Libya . Once is a mistake but what we have is an MO.
The mainstream media also didn;t cover how she as SOS used her position to fuck over Haiti and enrich her family .
But she isn't Trump and Sander's supporters are lunatics.
So if Bernie on the ballet u not voting?
Or u want to see Hillary only on that ballet
Fuck Samantha Bee AND Hillary.
If Bernie was winning and on the ballet then I'd vote for him no doubt. But he's not so....
Similar threads
