Arrest photo of young activist Bernie Sanders emerges from Tribune archives

Free 4 year college just like the Indians have.

5 year Car loan of $20,000 at 0% interest

After college complete $150,000 30 year home loan at 0% interest.

Food stamps for life
Free child care and senior care

All these programs would run for 100 years to offset years slavery and discrimination.


I like your list

here is mine:

Free 4 year college education to any federally funded college or university

All African Americans should make a minimum of $25 an hr. The government will subsidize the salaries if the person works for a small business.

No income taxes

Free health care, dental, and childcare for black families who make 100k or less. Those who makes more will pay a subsidized rate.

Build black Levittowns that has the same requirements for whites in the early 1900s
1. To qualify you must be married
2. You must not have a criminal history
3. You must be employed
4. Low interest rates on all homes/no money down/government pays all closing costs, etc.
5. The maximum cost for a home is 75k
 
Its not a deflection... It's part of OUR problem! Its never enough, and thats part of why shit is fucked up as well. All we do is whine and complain:

Here you go, and after I post this, post evidence of YOUR involvement Bruh, pics and whatever else you got... :popcorn:

Endorsed Jesse Jackson, Spoke Up For Palestinians: In 1988, Jesse Jackson was the first competitive black candidate for the Democratic nomination for the presidency. He came under fierce attack for his advocacy of Palestinian statehood. Sanders came to his aid, organizing Vermonters and winning the state for Jackson. Sanders was asked about Jackson’s comments on Palestine and defended him, saying that the Israeli assault on Palestinians was “reprehensible.”

Strongly Condemned Police Violence Over the Past Year: One criticism of Sanders is that he avoids talking about police violence in favor of talking about the economy. While the economy forms the bulk of his pitch, he has repeatedly condemned police violence during the duration of the Black Lives Matter movement. Here he is in mid-August 2014, before frontrunner Clinton ever spoke about the issue. Here (8/20/14) are (8/24/14) a (8/18/14) few(6/6/2015) more (4/30/2015) examples (6/2015).

Achieved High Ratings From Leading Civil Rights Organizations: A frequent critique of Sanders is that he is from a very white state. While this is true, he certainly has not ignored issues that matter to people of color. In 2002, he achieved a 93 percent rating from the ACLU and a 97% rating by the NAACP in 2006.

Condemned And Opposed Welfare Reform and Dog Whistle Politics:While President Bill Clinton and most Democrats in Congress supported so-called welfare reform politics, Sanders not only voted against this policy change, but wrote eloquently against the dog whistle politics used to sell it, saying, “The crown jewel of the Republican agenda is their so-called welfare reform proposal. The bill, which combines an assault on the poor, women and children, minorities, and immigrants is the grand slam of scapegoating legislation, and appeals to the frustrations and ignorance of the American people along a wide spectrum of prejudices.”

Called For End to War On Drugs, For-Profit Prisons and Migrant Detention Quotas:Sanders supports decriminalizing marijuna, and believes the war on drugs to be a failure. Additionally, he has vowed to end for-profit prisons and immigrant detention quotas.

Put Out Detailed Plan to End Economic Crisis in Minority Communities: Many argue that Sanders views the issue of racial justice in too myopic a fashion by focusing on the economy. But polling of both Latinos and African Americans shows that jobs and the economy is either their top concern or tied for their top concern. Gallup polling shows that 13 percent of Hispanics say immigration is their top concern; 47 percent say the economy is. Meanwhile, among black Americans, 13 percent say “race relations” is their top concern, tied with “unemployment/jobs,” an additional 10 percentage points go to the “economy in general.” Combined, economic concerns make up 23 percentage points while race relations compose 13 percent. If you add in healthcare, at 6 percent, another major Sanders theme, it gets you up to 29 percent. Add in poverty at 7 percent and education at 5 percent and you’re up to 41 percent of African Americans naming Bernie Sanders’ top issues as their top issues.

This validates Sanders’ strategy of looking to the economy as the top concern of minority communities. He has put out a detailed strategy to target unemployment across America and particularly to attack Hispanic and black youth unemployment, which he introduced in August 2014, long before he announced for president.

-----

Your turn, pics, etc. of YOUR involvement in the 'movement' Bruh :popcorn:


So you have nothing that he VOTED on.....well except the crime bill that Bill Clinton created.

What I do find interesting is this tidbit from his home state:

Back in 2006, the Vermont Partnership for Fairness and Diversity, a Brattleboro-area civil rights organization, hosted a Candidate Night. The race for the open U.S. Senate seat betweenBernie Sanders and Richard Tarrant, a Republican and one of the wealthiest people in the state, had grown increasingly acrimonious.

The audience of African-American activists and other Vermonters of color should have been a friendly one for the socialist congressman.

Instead, remembers Curtiss Reed Jr., the executive director of the group, it became something of a showdown. Sanders “was just really dismissive of anything that had to do with race and racism, saying that they didn’t have anything to do with the issues of income inequality,” Reed told The Daily Beast.

“I think Bernie tends to run away from racial and ethnic issues,” said Vaughn Carney, a corporate lawyer and a leader in the state’s black community. Carney has voted for Sanders in every election but is backing Hillary Clinton this year.

“Racial profiling is a fact of life here. Vermont incarcerates black people at the fourth-highest rate in the U.S., but no one talks about that. I have been beating on that drum for a while now, and I hoped that Bernie would up that mantle, but he has not. He is like a lot of Vermonters who like to congratulate themselves on how progressive they are but sweep these issues under the rug.”

Carney met with Vermont’s other senator, Patrick Leahy, as well as the state’s lone congressional representative about these concerns. Sanders’s office didn’t respond to his efforts, Carney said.

Other civil rights leaders said much the same—that Leahy seemed far more responsive than Sanders. “Overall we felt as though Sen. Leahy was interested in keeping informed on our issues,” said Reed, a compliment he did not pay to his other senator.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...bernie-sanders.html?via=mobile&source=twitter

Interesting how the Black people of his own state say Sanders ignores them. But this is who you want to place your faith??
 
Evil-Hilary-Clinton1.jpg
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Why is it when asked DIRECTLY about racism he avoids the question?


One day after civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton sat down for a meetingwith Sen. Bernie Sanders, he remains unconvinced that the Democratic presidential candidate is adequately addressing the issue of race in income equality.

"One of the things that I was saying to Senator Sanders is saying that you've got to deal with income inequality and wages is fine, but what about the race element of that?" Sharpton said Thursday on MSNBC's Morning Joe. "He did not address that directly," Sharpton added.

As it stands right now, Sharptonsays, all he is hearing from Sanders is "rhetoric" and him "talking about his ideology," but he has yet to hear "a list or enumeration of the kind of things we can do to redress or overturn these things." That, he says, is what he pushed Sanders to do in their sit-down over breakfast in Harlem Wednesday. "Are you going to talk about affirmative action?" Sharpton said. "Are you going to talk about racial disparities in terms of promotions and access to capital?"

http://theweek.com/speedreads/60532...ers-what-about-race-element-income-inequality
 
^^^^Yo just vote for Ted Cruz or something and be done , your anti Bernie shit is real crazy. Yet you call everybody else a stan? You're in every Sanders thread going off on some weirdo shit.
 
Why is it when asked DIRECTLY about racism he avoids the question?


One day after civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton sat down for a meetingwith Sen. Bernie Sanders, he remains unconvinced that the Democratic presidential candidate is adequately addressing the issue of race in income equality.

"One of the things that I was saying to Senator Sanders is saying that you've got to deal with income inequality and wages is fine, but what about the race element of that?" Sharpton said Thursday on MSNBC's Morning Joe. "He did not address that directly," Sharpton added.

As it stands right now, Sharptonsays, all he is hearing from Sanders is "rhetoric" and him "talking about his ideology," but he has yet to hear "a list or enumeration of the kind of things we can do to redress or overturn these things." That, he says, is what he pushed Sanders to do in their sit-down over breakfast in Harlem Wednesday. "Are you going to talk about affirmative action?" Sharpton said. "Are you going to talk about racial disparities in terms of promotions and access to capital?"

http://theweek.com/speedreads/60532...ers-what-about-race-element-income-inequality
Fuck that old jew, he is very dismissive of our plight, one picture does not change that.
 
Nothing against Bernie but what he did 50+ years ago as a young man has nothing to do with how he plans to aid black folks today.What's his plan to stop cops from killing us with no consequence? What's the plan to stop the disproportionate arrest and imprisonment of black people? Plan to help black people build wealth in our community?

When asked about reparations he said it was "too divisive". This coming from a man who witnessed the harsh realities of treatment of black people based on race. He talks about helping the poor which is fine, but all black folk ain't poor yet we STILL are victims of White Supremacy.
Bottom line is if none of these candidates can speak to what their plan is to help BLACK PEOPLE( not " minorities "), they don't deserve our votes.
 
Last edited:
Nothing against Bernie but what he did 50+ years ago as a young man has nothing to do with how he plans to aid black folks today?What's his plan to stop cops from killing us with no consequence? What's the plan to stop the disproportionate arrest and imprisonment of black people? Plan to help black people build wealth in our community?

When asked about reparations he said it was "too divisive". This coming from a man who witnessed the harsh realities of treatment of black people based on race. He talks about helping the poor which is fine, but all black folk ain't poor yet we STILL are victims of White Supremacy.
Bottom line is if none of these candidates can speak to what their plan is to help BLACK PEOPLE( not " minorities "), they don't deserve our votes.

100% C/S.
 
So how should reparations be distributed?
Education reparations just like Native Americans. Free college. The money is cool, but if we don't know what to with it, it'll be flying right back out our communities. Free education, would has boost HBCU enrollment as well so the knowledge we acquire would benefit us and come from us. :yes:
 
Education reparations just like Native Americans. Free college. The money is cool, but if we don't know what to with it, it'll be flying right back out our communities. Free education, would has boost HBCU enrollment as well so the knowledge we acquire would benefit us and come from us. :yes:

Co sign but I wanted that negro to answer Lmaooo
 
Nothing against Bernie but what he did 50+ years ago as a young man has nothing to do with how he plans to aid black folks today.What's his plan to stop cops from killing us with no consequence? What's the plan to stop the disproportionate arrest and imprisonment of black people? Plan to help black people build wealth in our community?

When asked about reparations he said it was "too divisive". This coming from a man who witnessed the harsh realities of treatment of black people based on race. He talks about helping the poor which is fine, but all black folk ain't poor yet we STILL are victims of White Supremacy.
Bottom line is if none of these candidates can speak to what their plan is to help BLACK PEOPLE( not " minorities "), they don't deserve our votes.

Is reparations not divisive? We are in a nation that can't even give lip service to slavery and it's effects on American society. Probably like most people the idea of reparations for those who are descendants of the transatlantic slave trade hasn't been articulated in a manner in which people can relate. Secondly, reparations should not be strictly USA based. Most European nations should be involved too.
But hey... Don't participate in the electoral process whether it is local or national. No candidate is going to be 100% of what you want and everyone has their shortcomings but that is a piss poor reason to not doing anything and be dismissive. Honestly, if these things weren't so important then there would be no need to disenfranchise people, make it difficult or buy candidates.
Also, in this day and age you can not say what you will do for specific communities that doesn't benefit the general populace. So Sanders policies will have an effect on the black community.
 
Is reparations not divisive? We are in a nation that can't even give lip service to slavery and it's effects on American society. Probably like most people the idea of reparations for those who are descendants of the transatlantic slave trade hasn't been articulated in a manner in which people can relate. Secondly, reparations should not be strictly USA based. Most European nations should be involved too.
But hey... Don't participate in the electoral process whether it is local or national. No candidate is going to be 100% of what you want and everyone has their shortcomings but that is a piss poor reason to not doing anything and be dismissive. Honestly, if these things weren't so important then there would be no need to disenfranchise people, make it difficult or buy candidates.
Also, in this day and age you can not say what you will do for specific communities that doesn't benefit the general populace. So Sanders policies will have an effect on the black community.

No.

Only to racist/white supremacist suspects.
 
^^^^Yo just vote for Ted Cruz or something and be done , your anti Bernie shit is real crazy. Yet you call everybody else a stan? You're in every Sanders thread going off on some weirdo shit.

I just realised I've seen Darrkman over on Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/Blackfellas/) going just as hard against Sanders. :smh:

What the fuck did Bernie do to you man to make you hate him so much. lol

Nothing. I actually don't hate Sanders. However what does bother me is the blind loyalty people are giving him without so much as a question.

From before BLM confronted him I've felt like Bernie has been a bit shady. After the confrontation and the reaction of his base I realized what it was. Sanders platform of solving problems through economic programs is based on the theory that a lot of white people use to discount racism....that it's not about race but about class. White people love clinging to that theory because it absolves them of the fact that they are actively trying to keep a group down. If they say it's about class then the next thing they do is put themselves in the same boat as Black people.......poor whites have it just as bad as Black people. Now we as Black people know that's bullshit but look at Sanders....he truly believes that. That's why he never answered Sharpton and what he clung to in his home state. That kind of thinking is how white ppl had a middle class created for them and we were cut out of all of that (GI Bill, FHA loans, etc). We can very easily go right back....cause who would of thought ppl would be trying to suppress the Black vote....but voter ID laws try to do that RIGHT NOW.

It's not that I'm a fan of Clinton's it's just that I can see that Sanders is WAY WORSE a choice for the interests of Black people. The last thing I want is a career politician that has shown that he's actively avoided and ignored the Black vote and the issues important to Black people.

I won't even go into the issues of his white millennial base but the saying "You can tell the tree by the fruit it bears" is very appropriate at this point.

There's too much at stake to waste a vote on an old, white, Jewish guy that calls himself a socialist. Someone like that would never win the Presidency and Sanders knows it. He's just running to get the party to shift more Left but when he loses these assholes will stay home, won't vote and we'll end up with the same bullshit we got with the mid term elections except now we'll also have a Republican presidency as well.
 
for US blacks i think reparations should be done in a way to build the black community, free state college education is a good start for the long term mental health of the black community. then next they need to address the wealth gap, slaves never got land housing etc, give some of that shit to blacks for free. some federal land, or subsidise black housing. if a black man wants to buy a house for 300k let the feds kick in 200k and a 0% mortgage. as for how long to do it, slavery ran 400 yrs right?
shit I live in barbados and there is reparation talk here, i think england should just do the maths and cut cheques to the caribbean countries for similar programs
 
Is reparations not divisive? We are in a nation that can't even give lip service to slavery and it's effects on American society. Probably like most people the idea of reparations for those who are descendants of the transatlantic slave trade hasn't been articulated in a manner in which people can relate. Secondly, reparations should not be strictly USA based. Most European nations should be involved too.
But hey... Don't participate in the electoral process whether it is local or national. No candidate is going to be 100% of what you want and everyone has their shortcomings but that is a piss poor reason to not doing anything and be dismissive. Honestly, if these things weren't so important then there would be no need to disenfranchise people, make it difficult or buy candidates.
Also, in this day and age you can not say what you will do for specific communities that doesn't benefit the general populace. So Sanders policies will have an effect on the black community.

History has shown that if you don't account for racism you get burned as Black people. It has happened before and can happen again.
 
Man that's kool and the gang, but this nigga needs to break bread with them reparations...My people build your fucking country and babysitted your kids and yaw need to break bead like yaw did with other groups ain't done half the shit my people have done...Get the fuck outta here with this brown noising shit....Ain't getting my vote unless you breaking bread....

so who you gonna vote for? hillary/repubs ain't breaking bread for sure
 
History has shown that if you don't account for racism you get burned as Black people. It has happened before and can happen again.

I never said that you don't account for it. It is your duty as a citizen to make your elected officials accountable. Honestly, it begins on the local level and extends to national politics. Your local politics has more of an effect on your daily life than national politics. So, if you are serious about making people accountable then it starts on the local level and these conversations should never pop up every 4 years about which candidate is this or that.
 
I never said that you don't account for it. It is your duty as a citizen to make your elected officials accountable. Honestly, it begins on the local level and extends to national politics. Your local politics has more of an effect on your daily life than national politics. So, if you are serious about making people accountable then it starts on the local level and these conversations should never pop up every 4 years about which candidate is this or that.
They aren't mutually exclusive. We can walk AND chew gum.
 
for US blacks i think reparations should be done in a way to build the black community, free state college education is a good start for the long term mental health of the black community. then next they need to address the wealth gap, slaves never got land housing etc, give some of that shit to blacks for free. some federal land, or subsidise black housing. if a black man wants to buy a house for 300k let the feds kick in 200k and a 0% mortgage. as for how long to do it, slavery ran 400 yrs right?
shit I live in barbados and there is reparation talk here, i think england should just do the maths and cut cheques to the caribbean countries for similar programs
110% C/S
 
They aren't mutually exclusive. We can walk AND chew gum.

I am not saying you should avoid one for the other. What am saying which is indicative of most liberal people is that there is a focus on the national elections while you can't get 10 people to show up for the school board elections and so you are caught in this cycle.
 
I am not saying you should avoid one for the other. What am saying which is indicative of most liberal people is that there is a focus on the national elections while you can't get 10 people to show up for the school board elections and so you are caught in this cycle.
i agree that both are important.

gotta be careful with those blanket statements though. Statements that "most xyz people" do anything should have to be qualified somehow.

When they can't be, said statements should be taken with an xxl grain of salt.
 
Is reparations not divisive? We are in a nation that can't even give lip service to slavery and it's effects on American society. Probably like most people the idea of reparations for those who are descendants of the transatlantic slave trade hasn't been articulated in a manner in which people can relate. Secondly, reparations should not be strictly USA based. Most European nations should be involved too.
But hey... Don't participate in the electoral process whether it is local or national. No candidate is going to be 100% of what you want and everyone has their shortcomings but that is a piss poor reason to not doing anything and be dismissive. Honestly, if these things weren't so important then there would be no need to disenfranchise people, make it difficult or buy candidates.
Also, in this day and age you can not say what you will do for specific communities that doesn't benefit the general populace. So Sanders policies will have an effect on the black community.

Who cares whether its divisive? That wasn't an issue when the Japanese got reparations from the US, or Native Americans, or even Bernie's own Jewish community. We are STILL being mistreated and slaughtered based solely upon race so it doesn't stop at slavery. Nowhere in my post did I say that you shouldn't vote locally. I'm speaking strictly about Sanders and what I'm saying is that every other group has been accounted for but us. Instead of voting for the lesser of two evils or voting because they say so, we need to make a statement that not speaking directly for us has consequences. We don't need him to be 100% of what we want, we just need him to speak on matters that affect us directly if he wants the black vote. Trickle down politics has not, and will not help us.

I do agree that the Euro nations should be involved as well but we need to get the conversation on the table and taken seriously period. Respect
 
i agree that both are important.

gotta be careful with those blanket statements though. Statements that "most xyz people" do anything should have to be qualified somehow.

When they can't be, said statements should be taken with an xxl grain of salt.

The reason I said most is just based off the numbers alone in local elections. A mayoral candidate in my town can win with less than a thousand votes with a voting population of over 10,000. So, the facts are that most people do not participate. If that weren't the case then Republicans would not have both houses and running stuff in the States considering there are more liberal Americans than not.
 
Back
Top