Arguments for and against. HIs statements are sweeping but not entirely without merit or untrue.
My Sister is an educator at an elite institution and often sees what happens when minority students from underperforming or less academically rigorous schools who gained A's and such mostly because lower standards were at these school, or whose teachers began prepping the standard rounds of admittance tests very early on giving them a false diagnostic, and are in turn admitted under minority target goals set by the University administration who for the best of reasons were trying to ensure heterogeneity in the student body.
A statistically significant number - not all - but a % that is much higher than their non-minority counterparts end up having to spend the 1st academic year in remedial college courses ... mostly in Math and the Language & Communication arts (English, grammar, sentence structure, how to write a paper and cite, etc.). Then comes the mental challenge itself of the highly rigorous coursework.
Many struggle for years until they get up to speed. Some will drop out realizing they were not properly equipped and head to a less challenging university. Some will become completely crushed and leave school not returning because they know they didn't have the "smarts" to hack that level of work and were basically being lied to by their teachers and charter schools.
It is a dicey thing Affirmative Action. I personally would still rather have it in place and not need it, then to need it and not have it.
This is true. Just ask any minority dean at any historically white institution. The bottom line is any kind of "action" really needs to be done BEFORE they get to college. But no one wants to tackle K-12 education and the disparities that exist there.