{~~~Guns, Guns and Mo' Guns - The Right To Keep And Bear Arms~~~}

How the fuck could I miss this thread!

I want this gun and whole set up. Not sure what it is

morgan6.jpg
 
Looks like a glock with a streamlight on the rail :dunno:

You can get it from $100 to $250 depending on what kind you want
 

Her name is Ja-Mes :lol:

I know her teachers were all kinds of confused during roll call and she hated that shit

Her reaction was sort of funny and cute.

I wish she had more ass for those leggings.
 
That x-change kit is cost prohibitive for a gun with a "horrible" trigger that I can replace for less than the cost of the kit.

X-change kit is $399. LNIB P250 posted is $275.

I'll wait and let my first Sig be a different one

I'd suggest a P226 (9mm). It's probably the best shooting Sig, I have owned.
 
Her name is Ja-Mes :lol:

I know her teachers were all kinds of confused during roll call and she hated that shit

Her reaction was sort of funny and cute.

I wish she had more ass for those leggings.

That ass was good for me...need more of this on gun vids :D:D
 
.40 cal.

Many say they're too snappy & not good on followup shots, but it seems like most here have a .40 (or a few) in some configuration.

What's your best .40 cal shooter? Or best experience with .40?
 
Sentra, MPX vs. Scorpion?
In my opinion, the Sig MPX wins.

Pros and Cons

Scorpion magazines are cheaper ($20 vs. $40), but the feed lips can crack and you have to contact CZ for warranty replacement. Sig mags are far better quality (made by Lancer) but supply hasn't caught up yet. Bore axis for both guns are nearly identical so the sight picture is nearly identical. The Sig has better sights and better grip angle in the pistol configuration. The Scorpion ergonomics are better in the SBR configuration. The Scorpion selector switch digs into your hand (can be removed or ground down). Scorpion has less blow-back with a suppressor, but I don't run either suppressed. On an average range trip running 3 mags each, I prefer the Sig's ergonomics. The Scorpion's trigger is slightly better, but just by a hair. I have yet to have any malfunctions with either gun after close to 1500 rounds each. For me, at 25+ yards, the Sig is more accurate, especially with follow-up shots. Below 25 yards, both guns can produce really tight groups.

In a SHTF situation, I would grab the Sig first!
 
My Scorpion has run flawlessly and I got my mags directly from CZ for cheap. How much does MPX cost? I have heard of folks having issues them...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkr
 
My MPX was $1100. Magazines are running about $45. I have dropped both mags during rapid fire/ reload and cracked the Scorpion mags. CZ replaced them at no cost. Both guns are great quality and function flawlessly. My personal preference is the MPX.
 
My Scorpion has run flawlessly and I got my mags directly from CZ for cheap. How much does MPX cost? I have heard of folks having issues them...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkr

I've had my F1 returned on my EVO3 for about 3 months, and have fired exactly 0 rounds....:smh:
 
I was thinking about getting a EVO or an SPX, but I decided to keep the money for the UPCOMING MDR. (don't know the release date yet) BTW, I am using the 9mm barrel for the tavor to fulfill the need for a pistol caliber carbine.
desert-tech-mdr1.jpg
 
I have and had several bullpups. (ps90, kriss, ksg, and tavor) I hope the MDR will not be a bullpup I will have not had.
 
I was thinking about getting a EVO or an SPX, but I decided to keep the money for the UPCOMING MDR. (don't know the release date yet) BTW, I am using the 9mm barrel for the tavor to fulfill the need for a pistol caliber carbine.
desert-tech-mdr1.jpg

those are around like $1,800 aint they??
 
Back
Top