Not sure about the data. I do know that George Zimmerman and Trevor Dooley got very different verdicts for similar cases. Self defense claim worked for George and not for Trevor. Trevor showed his gun (wrong to do), but then walked away and was tackled by a younger white dude, then shot him in the scuffle. All witnesses including the dead guys daughter said that was how it happened. Zimmerman follwed a guy doing nothing wrong, profiled him (wrong to do) and SAYS the guy knocked him down and got on top of him and banged his head on the sidewalk and shot the guy in the scuffle.
Two men, two different verdicts. Two different sets of jurors too, I know, but still, the vastly different outcomes say something.
Massive overreaction? Ok, that's your belief...but although I'm not prone to overreacting about stuff myself, this case hits home for me. I've been profiled many many times. Spent my teen years living in a white neighborhood, and had people looking at me sideways for not looking like I belonged there, etc. I know without any doubt that if that was me walking down the street that night, George would have called the cops on me and followed me (black hoodie almost never leaves my body during the winter).... and I would feel threatened just like Trayvon did. Probably would have confronted the guy following me even sooner. Something tells me that if I had taken the gun out of the hands of the guy following me and killed him (cause I'm not a 17 year old boy), that jury would not give my self defense claim the same consideration they gave to Zimmerman's claim.
edit: quick search for stats on the race thing yielded this. Not sure if it has been debated or anything for veracity, but the source is legit:
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts...ole-in-floridas-stand-your-ground-law/1233152