FBI files: MJ spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys

[PLEX]

I feel sorry for any and all BGOL members who MJ molested, or that he had over for a visit to witness while he was molesting someone, which is the only way they could know for a fact he did anything. I hope you all get the necessary help u need. Personally, I never believed the shit, especially after Mike passed and the very first victim said his father forced him to make those accusations. The dude's father wanted Mike to get a script he wrote pushed through to some major Hollywood head, and Mike just didn't have that kinda clout. So he found another way to get money out him. I know it can't be impossible to believe that the higher ups would create some shit in order to taint their image. Either way, none of us know what's factual or not. We can only speculate and state an opinion. 100

 

[Rythm]

Fuck the Daily Jews and the Fuck Boys Incorporated. They have been working hand in hand destroying black people socially, economically and politically for decades. If MJ was really on that fuckery then fuck him too. I'm just not buying that shit because the Daily Jews and filthy fucking FED's are saying it.

 

[World B Free]

now read the article here:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2013/06/3...-british-press-heres-the-real-story-from-2005

 

[World B Free]

now read the rest of the article:

http://mjandjustice4some.blogspot.com/2013/06/sabotaging-legacy-disproving.html

 

[dirtyd]

No doubt people tried to extort him especially the 1st public allegation wih the doctor's son.

But we also watched grown assed Michael crawling into bed with a fucking 12 year old on national TV.

Raise your hands if you would keep your kids alone around MJ.

I wouldn't leave my kids alone with any grown ass man unless he was my brother or father.

 

[World B Free]

Sunday, 30 June 2013

The Mirror, the People, and the settlement that never was...



It's a funny thing. Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.

Leading the way has been The Mirror in the UK. A few weeks ago, contemporaneous emails presented at trial showed that AEG boss Randy Phillips had 'slapped' Michael Jackson because he was scared about attending a press conference. Slapped him and screamed at him 'so loud the walls shook'.

The shocking revelation was widely ignored by the press. Several days after the evidence was heard in open court, only one outlet had summoned the courage to publish the evidence. AP did not include the testimony in its daily missive from the courtroom. The wire's reporter claimed on twitter he had been out of the courtroom sending emails when the testimony occurred.

It was only when fans started making noise about the 'cover-up' on sites like Twitter that other media companies grudgingly published the comments. AEG-sponsored newspapers like the Mirror, though, bizarrely tried to paint Michael Jackson as the bad guy. According to the first line of the Mirror's story, Jackson 'needed to be slapped'. Interestingly, the Mirror was a lot faster to publish a story last year accusing Janet Jackson of slapping a minor. A story which turned out to be a lie.

This weekend - days after Jackson's son took the stand and testified that he saw Phillips in his home while his father was not there, behaving 'aggressively' towards Jackson's doctor - the Mirror's Sunday edition, called the People, is at it again. It has published a highly misleading story about some 'FBI files' which allegedly show Michael Jackson was witnessed molesting children by multiple Neverland employees. The 'FBI files' also detail a supposed settlement with a young accuser in 1992 - before the Jordy Chandler case.

In reality, the story is a nonsense; a birds nest of mangled and misstated accusations which are neither 'new' nor 'exclusive', despite the People's repeated claims that they are. In fact, the documents are not 'FBI files' at all. This is a flat-out lie. Moreover, the claims have all been in the public domain for a very long time, some having been discredited two decades ago.

Of course, most readers won't bother to fact-check the story. Why would they? The newspaper is supposed to do that before publishing it. Sadly, it seems other media outlets can't be bothered either. Britain's Mail newspaper has already rehashed the story, evidently making no attempt to investigate its veracity before doing so.

I could go into a whole lot of detail about the claims made by the People - and the various lazy journalists who will copy and paste its story hundreds, or perhaps thousands of times onto their own websites and into their own newspapers in the coming days. But what is the point? The info is already in the public domain.

Those who hate Jackson will adopt the People's story as evidence for their case. Those with an interest in hearing both sides of Jackson's case will already know that these claims were debunked a long time ago. Nobody else will even bother to research the story. The People's readers buy the newspaper because they like and trust it. They, as intended, will believe this story and will not question it.

Briefly, however, for the record:

1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviews compiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part.

2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence.

The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but were destroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously.

3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again.

This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'.

Contrary to the People's claim, investigators knew about and investigated these tapes as part of their probe into Jackson in 2003/4, in which they were assisted by the FBI. Despite all of their resources, neither the Californian police nor the FBI was ever able to locate any evidence that any child besides Jordan Chandler or Jason Francia ever received a settlement.


http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/the-mirror-people-and-settlement-that.html

 

[Amajorfucup]

That does not mean anything.

Paula Deen's lawyers should have settled too, instead of letting a $100 m enterprise burn to ashes. They had the bitch giving sworn depositions and shit

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[IT IS WHAT IT IS]

I'm not caping for this Dude no matter who is saying it. Where there is smoke there is fucking fire and beside, this clown spent millions to try to look 'white' so motherfuckers claiming black defense are fucking idiots!!! It's amazing how fucked up shit is always deflected to try and use color or racism to defend it! I don't give a damn what color you are, child molestation is sick and should be punishable by fucking Death! And just because someone else fucked up (the Elvis reference), doesn't make what MJ or anyone else did less fucked up!!

Fuck him, and fuck anybody who tries to deflect what he has done by using the bullshit race or discrimination argument to lessen the impact! Tired of hearing that bullshit whenever an issue comes up too... Get the fuck off of the damn soapbox!!!

 

[Lola]

I feel sorry for any and all BGOL members who MJ molested, or that he had over for a visit to witness while he was molesting someone, which is the only way they could know for a fact he did anything. I hope you all get the necessary help u need. Personally, I never believed the shit, especially after Mike passed and the very first victim said his father forced him to make those accusations. The dude's father wanted Mike to get a script he wrote pushed through to some major Hollywood head, and Mike just didn't have that kinda clout. So he found another way to get money out him. I know it can't be impossible to believe that the higher ups would create some shit in order to taint their image. Either way, none of us know what's factual or not. We can only speculate and state an opinion. 100

Not to mention said father killed himself shortly after MJ death...the media kept that one quiet though.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

Funny how the people who take the word of "anonymous sources", "secret" "purported files" and gossip tabloids are accusing other people--who do not hold those sources as credible--of thinking emotionally and not being objective. Word?

most sensible post in this thread.

 

[World B Free]

Funny how the people who take the word of "anonymous sources", "secret" "purported files" and gossip tabloids are accusing other people--who do not hold those sources as credible--of thinking emotionally and not being objective. Word?

yeah, it's all about Critical Thinking Skills.....

 

[tallblacknyc]

I wouldn't leave my kids alone with any grown ass man unless he was my brother or father.

truth.com

 

[Tom Slick]

No matter how he looked, MJ seriously got treated like a Black Man. When he paid somebody off to avoid scandal, he's guilty. And when he went to court to prove his innocence, he's guilty.

 

[Tom Slick]

GTFOH

Tom Sneddon spent MILLIONS trying to find something on MJ and they never found one fucking shred of evidence to ever convict him.

Tom Sneddon is a COLD man.

 

[BenQ]

 

[Tripster]

Some of you all are vehemently defending a grown man who has ADMITTEDLY slept in the same bed with children who are NOT HIS KIN, and somehow have deluded yourself into thinking there is some vast conspiracy to "frame" him.

This is why you hear about young girls and boys who grow up carrying the knowledge of being molested when they were children, but never being able to say anything because no one would believe them at the time.

I don't fuck around when it comes to pedophilia. I don't fuck around when it comes to grown as men sleeping in the bed with children that aren't his. Maybe MJ gets a PASS for that shit from some of you all....not me. Fuck that.

This is part of what's wrong with us as a race. We defend the WRONG muthafuckas. I don't give a fuck how many records he sold....if you fuck with children, that's IT for me.

Some of y'all talking about PROOF. Like even if there WAS a hidden camera with MJ molesting a child, shiny glove and all, some of y'all muthafuckas would STILL claim it wasn't him. Sheeit...its still bitches claiming it wasn't R. Kelly in that video HE made....denial like a muthafucka.

Ain't no more evidence from Sandusky, than there is from MJ, but where there was smoke there was fire with Sandusky, but y'all turn a blind eye to MJ. Ain't a muthafucka on this BOARD claiming Sandusky was set up or those kids were lying....and there is no physical evidence. But we don't need it...because we know some molestation shit when we see it.

But somehow MJ is held to a different standard.

I don't give a fuck about a legacy (ala "let him rest in peace") when you been molesting and sleeping with boys. Fuck that. You gets no special place when you do that shit. I'm not an apologist for child molesters.

FOH with that shit.

 

[Lola]

Some of you all are vehemently defending a grown man who has ADMITTEDLY slept in the same bed with children who are NOT HIS KIN, and somehow have deluded yourself into thinking there is some vast conspiracy to "frame" him.

This is why you hear about young girls and boys who grow up carrying the knowledge of being molested when they were children, but never being able to say anything because no one would believe them at the time.

I don't fuck around when it comes to pedophilia. I don't fuck around when it comes to grown as men sleeping in the bed with children that aren't his. Maybe MJ gets a PASS for that shit from some of you all....not me. Fuck that.

This is part of what's wrong with us as a race. We defend the WRONG muthafuckas. I don't give a fuck how many records he sold....if you fuck with children, that's IT for me.

Some of y'all talking about PROOF. Like even if there WAS a hidden camera with MJ molesting a child, shiny glove and all, some of y'all muthafuckas would STILL claim it wasn't him. Sheeit...its still bitches claiming it wasn't R. Kelly in that video HE made....denial like a muthafucka.

Ain't no more evidence from Sandusky, than there is from MJ, but where there was smoke there was fire with Sandusky, but y'all turn a blind eye to MJ. Ain't a muthafucka on this BOARD claiming Sandusky was set up or those kids were lying....and there is no physical evidence. But we don't need it...because we know some molestation shit when we see it.

But somehow MJ is held to a different standard.

I don't give a fuck about a legacy (ala "let him rest in peace") when you been molesting and sleeping with boys. Fuck that. You gets no special place when you do that shit. I'm not an apologist for child molesters.

FOH with that shit.

Smoke with fire??? WTF..that sick bitch Sandusky was SEEN sodomizing a young boy in the shower. No one has EVER seen MJ touch a child.

 

[Mad Genius]

and its some stupid asses that will take this bullshit as "proof" even though the "sources" are anonymous..and run with it as fact.

here's a quote from the article i bet those idiots missed:

The Daily News obtained FBI files on Jackson in 2009 under the Freedom of Information Act. Those files contained no mention of the sordid documents obtained by Sunday People.

 

[Tripster]

Smoke with fire??? WTF..that sick bitch Sandusky was SEEN sodomizing a young boy in the shower. No one has EVER seen MJ touch a child.

But YOU didn't see him....now did you. You still have to rely on the testimony of someone who said they saw him. But a child SAID that MJ fondled and gave him oral sex...he didn't have to SEE shit....the shit HAPPENED to him. I READ the fucking report.

But since his folks were paid $20 million to claim it was a lie, then the shit didn't happen.

What muthafucka on this EARTH who DIDN'T do shit, is going to PAY $$$$! You pay...you're guilty in my book...especially some shit like that. Same with Eddie Long. I don't give a fuck what nobody say.

Delusional.

This isn't a standard ANYONE would accept from Leroy or Roy down the street. If Leroy admits he sleeps with kids in the bed...there would be muthafuckas with pitchforks and flames at his door.

But not MJ. FOH.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

duh..

fuckin fbi... they just want a reason to release those nude photos...they have.

it was no secret they got money, but thats because it was cheaper to pay them thirty five million then to pay his lawyers triple that and to lose out on time and on his level time is millions...


fbi is full of shit always have always will be..


their fucking greatest most powerful fbi agent every was a gotdam cross dressing panty wearing mullatto..their fuckin HEAD QUARTERS is named after this freak..

and folks listen to these clowns...


oh the illusion of power is some mind numbing shit!!

in fact their true name is

"Federal Bureau of Illusions"..

fbi hey feds find any missing children lately... Let this man rest in peace, put down the fuckin donuts and go solve some fuckin crimes your fuckin criminals..

wasting taxpayer dollar on this shit... they fucking getting paid to do this shit?

hey how about invesigate some bankers you fuckin federal buereau of useless idiots.

we need a civilian audit military to audit these muthafuckas..

if this is what hey wasting tax payer dollars on while towers get blown up and marathons get barbcued, I think its time we shut em down along with anything federal and keep going up the ladder, till we see the whole gluttonous elitst central banking mafia, and their pig farm of gluttony...


this is jsut a fucking major bullshit distraction and lets you know what ht fbi is really about..

and it aint good news for citizens...

again when was the last time the feds found a missing person..

I can show you a kemetic man with no job that can do in one day, what yall cant do it fuckin decades.....

federal bureau of I like donuts.

 

[Mad Genius]

But YOU didn't see him....now did you. You still have to rely on the testimony of someone who said they saw him. But a child SAID that MJ fondled and gave him oral sex...he didn't have to SEE shit....the shit HAPPENED to him. I READ the fucking report.

But since his folks were paid $20 million to claim it was a lie, then the shit didn't happen.

What muthafucka on this EARTH who DIDN'T do shit, is going to PAY $$$$! You pay...you're guilty in my book...especially some shit like that. Same with Eddie Long. I don't give a fuck what nobody say.

Delusional.

This isn't a standard ANYONE would accept from Leroy or Roy down the street. If Leroy admits he sleeps with kids in the bed...there would be muthafuckas with pitchforks and flames at his door.

But not MJ. FOH.

its clear that you are going to believe whatever you want regardless of what anyone says. when you're rich, you can afford to pay to make shit go away. when those 1st allegations popped up, MJ was at his absolute peak. he didnt want to stall his career out by dealing with a drawn out court battle, so he settled. this happens far more often than you apparently realize when it comes to rich people. turns out those allegations were false according to the accuser who said his father forced him to say it.

rich people are often sued for bullshit that they end up settling out of court for. michael jackson was no different. the man was sued 100's of times for various bullshit during his lifetime. there is not even one credible case that has been alleged against the man. not one. and until that day, the man is innocent.

by the way....the difference between sandusky and mj is that people actually witnessed sandusky molesting kids. the people that accuse sandusky can give detailed descriptions of the man's naked body. there is tons of evidence against sandusky...whereas there is none on mj. there is only one person accusing mj of anything (wade robson) and he's not credible at all since he's repeatedly said in the past that mj never tried anything with him. so basically, you're entire reasoning holds no weight. just admit you dont like the guy because you dont have anything to back up what you believe.

 

[Mad Genius]

duh..

fuckin fbi... they just want a reason to release those nude photos...they have.

it was no secret they got money, but thats because it was cheaper to pay them thirty five million then to pay his lawyers triple that and to lose out on time and on his level time is millions...


fbi is full of shit always have always will be..


their fucking greatest most powerful fbi agent every was a gotdam cross dressing panty wearing mullatto..their fuckin HEAD QUARTERS is named after this freak..

and folks listen to these clowns...


oh the illusion of power is some mind numbing shit!!

in fact their true name is

"Federal Bureau of Illusions"..

fbi hey feds find any missing children lately... Let this man rest in peace, put down the fuckin donuts and go solve some fuckin crimes your fuckin criminals..

wasting taxpayer dollar on this shit... they fucking getting paid to do this shit?

hey how about invesigate some bankers you fuckin federal buereau of useless idiots.

we need a civilian audit military to audit these muthafuckas..

if this is what hey wasting tax payer dollars on while towers get blown up and marathons get barbcued, I think its time we shut em down along with anything federal and keep going up the ladder, till we see the whole gluttonous elitst central banking mafia, and their pig farm of gluttony...


this is jsut a fucking major bullshit distraction and lets you know what ht fbi is really about..

and it aint good news for citizens...

again when was the last time the feds found a missing person..

I can show you a kemetic man with no job that can do in one day, what yall cant do it fuckin decades.....

federal bureau of I like donuts.

i hate to ruin your rant but...the fbi didnt have anything on mj. the files they call "fbi files" weren't from the fbi at all. they were from a scummy private investigator who paid people to tell stories.

 

[Dannyblueyes]

Michael Jackson has been dead for about three years now and not one single person has come forward to accuse him of molestation since. There's no more payoffs, no lawsuits, no secrets to protect, and still no accusers?

MJ might have been a creepy weirdo, but he was no diddler.

 

[Upgrade Dave]

now read the article here:

http://www.showbiz411.com/2013/06/3...-british-press-heres-the-real-story-from-2005

now read the rest of the article:

http://mjandjustice4some.blogspot.com/2013/06/sabotaging-legacy-disproving.html

Sunday, 30 June 2013

The Mirror, the People, and the settlement that never was...



It's a funny thing. Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.

Leading the way has been The Mirror in the UK. A few weeks ago, contemporaneous emails presented at trial showed that AEG boss Randy Phillips had 'slapped' Michael Jackson because he was scared about attending a press conference. Slapped him and screamed at him 'so loud the walls shook'.

The shocking revelation was widely ignored by the press. Several days after the evidence was heard in open court, only one outlet had summoned the courage to publish the evidence. AP did not include the testimony in its daily missive from the courtroom. The wire's reporter claimed on twitter he had been out of the courtroom sending emails when the testimony occurred.

It was only when fans started making noise about the 'cover-up' on sites like Twitter that other media companies grudgingly published the comments. AEG-sponsored newspapers like the Mirror, though, bizarrely tried to paint Michael Jackson as the bad guy. According to the first line of the Mirror's story, Jackson 'needed to be slapped'. Interestingly, the Mirror was a lot faster to publish a story last year accusing Janet Jackson of slapping a minor. A story which turned out to be a lie.

This weekend - days after Jackson's son took the stand and testified that he saw Phillips in his home while his father was not there, behaving 'aggressively' towards Jackson's doctor - the Mirror's Sunday edition, called the People, is at it again. It has published a highly misleading story about some 'FBI files' which allegedly show Michael Jackson was witnessed molesting children by multiple Neverland employees. The 'FBI files' also detail a supposed settlement with a young accuser in 1992 - before the Jordy Chandler case.

In reality, the story is a nonsense; a birds nest of mangled and misstated accusations which are neither 'new' nor 'exclusive', despite the People's repeated claims that they are. In fact, the documents are not 'FBI files' at all. This is a flat-out lie. Moreover, the claims have all been in the public domain for a very long time, some having been discredited two decades ago.

Of course, most readers won't bother to fact-check the story. Why would they? The newspaper is supposed to do that before publishing it. Sadly, it seems other media outlets can't be bothered either. Britain's Mail newspaper has already rehashed the story, evidently making no attempt to investigate its veracity before doing so.

I could go into a whole lot of detail about the claims made by the People - and the various lazy journalists who will copy and paste its story hundreds, or perhaps thousands of times onto their own websites and into their own newspapers in the coming days. But what is the point? The info is already in the public domain.

Those who hate Jackson will adopt the People's story as evidence for their case. Those with an interest in hearing both sides of Jackson's case will already know that these claims were debunked a long time ago. Nobody else will even bother to research the story. The People's readers buy the newspaper because they like and trust it. They, as intended, will believe this story and will not question it.

Briefly, however, for the record:

1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviews compiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part.

2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence.

The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but were destroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously.

3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again.

This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'.

Contrary to the People's claim, investigators knew about and investigated these tapes as part of their probe into Jackson in 2003/4, in which they were assisted by the FBI. Despite all of their resources, neither the Californian police nor the FBI was ever able to locate any evidence that any child besides Jordan Chandler or Jason Francia ever received a settlement.


http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/the-mirror-people-and-settlement-that.html

So we're done here, right?

Mike might have been and he might not have been but there's nothing in this "new" story that suggests he was. OP's story discredited by the second page.

 

[Lucky7s]

Oprah said or it has been alleged that she said she knew in her gut as a molestation victim that he was guilty as fuck. Oprah may be a lot of things but a liar she ain't.

 

[Mad Genius]

Oprah said or it has been alleged that she said she knew in her gut as a molestation victim that he was guilty as fuck. Oprah may be a lot of things but a liar she ain't.

so we're supposed to believe oprah's gut? if she felt so strongly then why hasn't she said anything publicly?

 

[Tripster]

Notice how defenders are totally IGNORING the sleeping with kids part. Something he ADMITTED on camera.

Muthafuckas are quiet as a mouse about that shit. Fuck the FBI, fuck the media, fuck the money, fuck rumors, fuck extorters, fuck racism, fuck lawyers, fuck he/she said...this shit is FACT.

I guess its just eccentric behavior huh? Its the parents fault for letting it happen, huh? There's nothing pedophilic about a grown man sleeping with kids, huh?

MJ was just special, huh? Its MJ so its ok, huh? He never touched ONE kid he slept with, huh? Not one grab, or snuggle, huh? Even when he was BATHING with kids, huh? Shit was just normal, huh?

Why would a grown man WANT to sleep with kids if he isn't a pedo? Tell me where that happens ON PLANET EARTH?

GTFOHWTBS!

 

[Lola]

Michael Jackson has been dead for about three years now and not one single person has come forward to accuse him of molestation since. There's no more payoffs, no lawsuits, no secrets to protect, and still no accusers?

MJ might have been a creepy weirdo, but he was no diddler.

This. End of story.

 

[kain]

For 17 years the FBI tried to get MJ.
They failed.
I believe MJ paid those folks because they were going to hurt the bottom line. You could fight an allegation and lose $100 million or pay out $10 million. As a business decision, the choice is clear. As a question of legacy, people will talk until they lose interest.
RIP MJ.

 

[pmaybe]

If the FBI had the files...wouldn't they have arrested him??

 

[World B Free]

If the FBI had the files...wouldn't they have arrested him??

yah think?

 

[PLEX]

Not to mention said father killed himself shortly after MJ death...the media kept that one quiet though.

Very good point Lola.

 

[Flawless]

Michael Jackson has been dead for about three years now and not one single person has come forward to accuse him of molestation since. There's no more payoffs, no lawsuits, no secrets to protect, and still no accusers?

MJ might have been a creepy weirdo, but he was no diddler.

actually some white boy celebrity choreographer came out saying Michael fucked him couple times when he was a kid

 

[REDLINE]

Oprah said or it has been alleged that she said she knew in her gut as a molestation victim that he was guilty as fuck. Oprah may be a lot of things but a liar she ain't.

"Oprah said" & "Oprah's gut"

For some reason this is funny to me as end all be all opinion

 

[kinglickk]

so the parents rented out their kids' assholes @ about 1.46 mil each? Sick fucks! The world keeps turning.