More liberal spin!!!
What about those whom have given up
What a hypocrite!![]()
Coming to your dads defense?
Obama announce his intentions to run again. What are you most proud of? Oh yeah the Eric Holder shifted the 911 bomber case to the military. What an ass.
I guess Bush was right again.
Also, Obama made you look like an ass again
Vote hope and change again!!!
![]()
<font size="5">
U.S. economy adds 216,000 jobs,
unemployment drops to 8.8%</font size>
![]()
More liberal spin!!!
What about those whom have given up. Many of the jobs once counted aren't even being considered anymore.. If you're point was valid, why are 44 million on the government tit.
Title of Thread said:Economy Slowly Improves; Gunner Hates it
State-run media tells you things are improving.
Yet,
gas prices are still sky high...
wars are being fought all over Africa...
empty storefronts are everywhere...
office buildings are emptying out...
malls are still dying...
foreclosures are continuing...
home prices are still dropping...
but somehow things are improving.
I suppose if state-run media said unemployment dropped to 3%, people would take that at its word too.
All of this evidence and yet the State thinks anyone belives this propaganda.
Reuters, ABC News, Huffington Post, CNBC, CNN, Bloomberg, and the rest of you scum... no one believes you.
You didn't see the 2008 financial crash, so you lost all your credibility.
State-run media tells you things are improving.
Yet,
gas prices are still sky high...
wars are being fought all over Africa...
empty storefronts are everywhere...
office buildings are emptying out...
malls are still dying...
foreclosures are continuing...
home prices are still dropping...
but somehow things are improving.
I suppose if state-run media said unemployment dropped to 3%, people would take that at its word too.
All of this evidence and yet the State thinks anyone belives this propaganda.
Reuters, ABC News, Huffington Post, CNBC, CNN, Bloomberg, and the rest of you scum... no one believes you.
You didn't see the 2008 financial crash, so you lost all your credibility.
Post contrary information, please.
When you don't have the facts on your side; argue the law.
When you don't have the law on your side; argue the facts.
When you have neither on your side (as in the case above); just confuse the two.
I wouldn't hold my breath.
When you don't have the facts on your side; argue the law.
When you don't have the law on your side; argue the facts.
When you have neither on your side (as in the case above); just confuse the two.
I wouldn't hold my breath.
I won't.
It should be noted that it was this same "state run" (I have many complaints about the modern news media but being state run isn't one) media that reported when the unemployment rate was over 10%. Where was the skepticism then?
That's the best you have?
Obama supporters are as blindly loyal as those Tea Party clowns. Purely emotional and very little reason.
Before I deluge you with the evidence of Obama's total ineffectiveness, let me introduce you to http://www.shadowstats.com.
If you want to check gas prices, just go to your local gas station. Average gas prices have been higher under President Obama, then any President in United States history.
I know Obama supporters love to drink his kool-aid, but he has been horrible for the black community. Obama is like every other white President of the last 50 years.
Why would any black person support Obama, after a disastrous 3 years, other than a paycheck or emotions?
You actually believe they are telling you the truth?
Wow.
But, it is that naivete that typifies Obama supporters.... clueless as hell, or emotional train-wrecks, or Jesus-freaks looking for their personal savior in the half-white President.
Looking for hope in an elected political official who is paid to do a job. That's kind of pathetic.
The disaster started before he took over.
And since when is the President responsible for gas prices. I didn't think it was fair to blame it on Bush when they went up under him and it's not fair to put it on Obama now (by the way, gas was higher in my area under Bush. I still haven't paid $4 a gallon gas like before).
What's pathetic is being selectively skeptical. I don't recall seeing doubt from you when the numbers were bad but here you are as they show improvement.
When you don't have the facts on your side; argue the law.
When you don't have the law on your side; argue the facts.
When you have neither on your side (as in the case above); just confuse the two.
That's the best you have?
No, but you haven't proven that you deserve anything more.
Your dislike for the president simply because, as YOU said, he's "half-white" and "he's not black" etc., ad nauseam, is obvious in all of the nonsensical, child-like, hate-permeated things you have to say.
Say something worth responding to, and I will.
Otherwise, you were dismissed, awhile ago.
sabe ¿
A month ago, we joked when we said that for Obama to get the unemployment rate to negative by election time, all he has to do is to crush the labor force participation rate to about 55%. Looks like the good folks at the BLS heard us: it appears that the people not in the labor force exploded by an unprecedented record 1.2 million. No, that's not a typo: 1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month! So as the labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million. Which means that the civilian labor force tumbled to a fresh 30 year low of 63.7% as the BLS is seriously planning on eliminating nearly half of the available labor pool from the unemployment calculation.
Well, since you have all the answers, I guess there is nothing more you can learn.
If another 40 million Americans of working age can be 'not counted' by the BLS, the unemployment rate will drop to approximately 2%.
The Labor Department estimated on Friday that the economy gained 243,000 jobs.
The department also estimated that the economy lost 2,689,000 jobs in the month.
The difference in the two numbers is in seasonal adjustment. Employment always falls in January, as temporary Christmas jobs end. So the government applies seasonal adjustment factors in an effort to discern the real trend of the economy apart from seasonal fluctuations. The actual survey showed the big loss in jobs. The seasonal adjustments produced the reported gain of 243,000 jobs.
A reason to doubt the number is that there has been a tendency in this cycle for the seasonal factors to overstate moves, in both directions. Labor mobility is down, as fewer workers quit to seek better jobs and employers both hire and fire fewer people than they used to do. If the seasonal adjustment was too large, then the gain should be smaller.
Is this a change in methodology? - or is this the same methodology thats been used for some time ? ? ?
Since people vote their pocketbook, Obama is responsible.
If he thinks differently, he will get an education this November after people are paying $4+/gallon this summer.
Obama had the best opportunity possible in 2009 to address the gas problem. Instead, he focused on healthcare. Well, that decision he made in 2009 will have to be paid in 2012.
This country was built on $1.25/gallon gas. It is not profitable at $3/gallon, let alone $4/gallon.
That's because Obama-lovers weren't announcing sunshine in the middle of a thunderstorm.
The economy is S**T! Coming up with some imaginary numbers, without anything to back them up, and saying "look, everything is fine now!" just shows how much contempt Obama has for the intelligence of voters.
But, he knows some of them well enough that they'll believe whatever his state-run media says regardless of reality.
I think you are in the minority. Most people are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore.
Just ask the Occupy movement about that (never saw that under Bush).
Is this a change in methodology? - or is this the same methodology thats been used for some time ? ? ?