The Money Chase

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="6"><center>The money chase</font size>
<font size="4">The scramble for money is an early and critical test for
presidential candidates. The Democratic nomination can
be shaped — and maybe won or lost — in the next few
months, even though the campaigning goes on largely
behind closed doors in exclusive clubs, wealthy
neighborhoods and swanky hotel rooms</font size></center>

By ROB CHRISTENSEN
Raleigh News & Observer
Politics | Wednesday, February 14th, 2007 |

Mark Erwin has gotten the why-I’m-gonna-be-the-next-president-of-the-United-States sales pitch in person from Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Edwards and John McCain.

The Charlotte, N.C., businessman, a registered independent, ruled out contributing to McCain, a Republican senator from Arizona, on philosophical grounds. But he is torn between Edwards, the home boy and former senator, and Clinton, whose husband, an old golfing buddy, appointed him U.S. ambassador to several small islands in the Indian Ocean.

So he is sending checks to both.

“I’ve made it clear to both campaigns,” Erwin said. “I have split loyalty.”

Winning the support of deep-pocketed donors such as Erwin is critical for Edwards as he seeks to compete with the powerful money machine being assembled by two other Democrats, Sen. Clinton of New York and, to a lesser extent, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, who has fresh-faced appeal.

The scramble for money is an early and critical test for presidential candidates. The Democratic nomination can be shaped — and maybe won or lost — in the next few months, even though the campaigning goes on largely behind closed doors in exclusive clubs, wealthy neighborhoods and swanky hotel rooms.

If the candidates don’t raise millions of dollars in early 2007, they might not even make it to the starting line next January, when the first actual votes are cast in the Iowa caucuses.

Presidential elections have long been expensive, but the spending in 2008 is expected to leave all previous campaigns in the dust. It is a wide-open race. Also, the cost of TV advertising and organizing is rising, and the key state primaries and caucuses will be clustered early in a fast and furious selection process.

For the major presidential candidates, fund-raising has become all-consuming.

“They should be spending more time fund-raising than sleeping,” said Tad Devine, a senior strategist for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry in 2004. “If you want to win, you must spend almost all your time raising money.”

Four years ago, Edwards established himself as a serious contender for the Democratic presidential nomination when he raised $7.4 million during the first three months of 2003 and led the field. Clinton plans to raise $15 million in the first quarter and $75 million for the year, said Blake Zeff, a Clinton spokesman. Typically candidates low-ball their predictions.

John Catsimatidis, a New York businessman and member of the Clinton finance committee, predicted that Clinton would raise twice as much money as her nearest competitor.

“It’s very formidable, especially with the former president behind it,” Catsimatidis said. “Who’s going to refuse a phone call from Bill Clinton? The same thing was done by George Bush Sr. for his son in 2000. George Bush Sr. was so well-respected.”

The Edwards campaign has not announced a fund-raising goal. But Edwards’ money people say at least $50 million is needed to be competitive with Clinton.

“I’ve heard Hillary and them plan to raise $100 million,” said Wade E. Byrd, a Fayetteville, N.C., trial lawyer and Edwards fund-raiser. “We don’t have any such plans. But we do think half of that is probably going to be necessary. It’s just mind-blowing.”

John Collins, a Texas trial lawyer and fund-raiser for Edwards, said Edwards is off to a good start. But he does not underestimate the difficulty of keeping pace with Clinton.

Edwards must raise nearly $1 million per week just to be competitive, he said.

“It will be a tough uphill battle,” Collins said.

Which is why Edwards has scheduled 24 fund-raisers over 19 days in February. Edwards is starting behind Clinton, who not only has a wide range of contacts from her White House days but also has more than $11 million left from her 2006 Senate re-election campaign. Edwards did not begin fund-raising until January, having spent 2006 helping raise $8.5 million for Democratic candidates and causes.

Both Clinton and Edwards have announced they will not participate in the public financing system during the primaries. That will deprive them of public money but will let them bypass an estimated $50 million primary spending limit. Obama is weighing whether to do the same.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/wp/2007/02/14/2085
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>
Hollywood Stars Attend Obama Fundraiser
</font size></center>



Obama_2008.sff_CADD109_20070220194322.jpg



Feb 20, 9:15 PM (ET)
Associated Press
By MICHAEL R. BLOOD

ANGELES (AP) - Checks from Hollywood's A-list stars such as George Clooney, Eddie Murphy and Barbra Streisand added up to an expected, one-night take of $1 million for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

Three of the entertainment industry's biggest names - DreamWorks studio founders Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen - planned a private, Beverly Hills fundraiser for the freshman senator from Illinois.

The lineup of celebrities writing checks read like a red carpet's who's who - Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington and Ben Stiller among others.

Tickets to the fundraiser are $2,300, the maximum individual donation to a federal campaign, or $4,600 for a couple. A later, private dinner at Geffen's home is being held for fundraisers who brought in at least $46,000 for the evening.

The fundraiser underscored the intense competition among the party's leading 2008 candidates for Hollywood dollars and endorsements. The entertainment industry is a perennial source of cash for Democrats, with big names often donating to multiple campaigns while withholding formal endorsements until later.

Spielberg, for example, is a host of the event but has not made an endorsement. Katzenberg and Geffen are backing Obama.

The movie, television and recording industries gave $33.1 million to federal candidates and parties in 2004, with much of that coming from Hollywood, according to the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics.

Obama's display of celebrity sizzle and campaign dollars challenges any assumptions that Hollywood dollars would default to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who has longstanding ties to the industry, along with her husband, former President Clinton.

"I think this guy is for real," said longtime Democratic consultant Garry South, who is unaligned in the 2008 race. "I was skeptical at first, but something is going on here. ... Whether it can sustain itself remains to be seen."

Before the closed-door fundraiser, the Illinois senator was scheduled to speak to a crowd, potentially numbering in the thousands, at a public rally in Los Angeles.

Clinton will be pulling in Hollywood dollars next month, when a fundraiser is scheduled at the home of supermarket tycoon Ronald Burkle, a longtime friend and fundraiser for her husband.

In addition to money, the state has taken on new importance in presidential politics with lawmakers poised to move its primary to Feb. 5 from June.

Among other candidates, Republican Rudy Giuliani was in the state earlier this month. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is planning to appear Wednesday with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in the Los Angeles area to discuss climate change.

Obama was on a three-day swing through California, his first since announcing his candidacy. He also held a fundraiser in La Jolla, near San Diego,

Beside the celebrity giving, checks have come in from studio bosses, including Paramount Pictures studio chief Brad Grey; Richard Cook, chairman of Walt Disney Studios, and Ron Meyer of Universal Studios.


http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20070221/D8NDQMUG0.html
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Obama To Report Over 100,000 Donations
In First Quarter</font size></center>


BarackObama.com
Posted April 1, 2007 10:05 AM

Senator Barack Obama's presidential campaign has received over 100,000 donations in the first quarter of 2007, the campaign's website reports. 83,531 individuals donated to Senator Obama's campaign for a total of 108, 095 donations.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/04/01/obama-to-report-over-100_n_44707.html
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4">
First Quarter 2006 (January-March) Fundraising Totals:

</font size>
- Hillary Clinton:

$26 million; transferred $10 million left over from her senate re-election campaign, giving her a fundraising total of $36 million for the first quarter - a record for a non-election year.​

- John Edwards:
$14 million - twice what he raised in the same quarter for his 2004 bid for the presidency.​

- Barack Obama:
Numbers not yet published; deadline for publishing is April 15th​

Mitt Romney
$23 million​

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
15 million, including some $10 million in March alone.​

John McCain
has yet to release figures.​

Bill Richardson
$6 million​

Joseph Biden
About $3 million​

Christopher Dodd
$4 million and added $5 million more from his Senate account, bringing his first-quarter total to $9 million​


Items of Interest
John Kerry - had $10.2 million in his campaign coffers by the end of the first quarter of 2003, the year before the 2004 elections.

This is the first year that all the major candidates have rejected public financing for their campaigns - and the spending limit that comes with it - in favour of the right to solicit unlimited private funds.​

Sources: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/02/wclinton102.xml; http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aMj54a65hFjY&refer=home
 
Last edited:

kjxxxx

Star
Registered
QueEx said:
<font size="4">
First Quarter 2006 (January-March) Fundraising Totals:

</font size>
- Hillary Clinton:

$26 million; transferred $10 million left over from her senate re-election campaign, giving her a fundraising total of $36 million for the first quarter - a record for a non-election year.​

- John Edwards:
$14 million - twice what he raised in the same quarter for his 2004 bid for the presidency.​

- Barack Obama:
Numbers not yet published; deadline for publishing is April 15th​

Mitt Romney
$23 million​

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
15 million, including some $10 million in March alone.​

John McCain
has yet to release figures.​

Bill Richardson
$6 million​

Joseph Biden
About $3 million​

Christopher Dodd
$4 million and added $5 million more from his Senate account, bringing his first-quarter total to $9 million​


Items of Interest
John Kerry - had $10.2 million in his campaign coffers by the end of the first quarter of 2003, the year before the 2004 elections.

This is the first year that all the major candidates have rejected public financing for their campaigns - and the spending limit that comes with it - in favour of the right to solicit unlimited private funds.​

Sources: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/02/wclinton102.xml; http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aMj54a65hFjY&refer=home

Kinda funny how the left wing was all for campaign financing reform to curb the Republicans who were considered the party with the big wigs and deep pockets. Isn't it nice how everyone wants to go to business as usual. No restrictions on financing. So the poor candidate still has no shot.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
What is even funnier are those who rail because Rome hasn't been torn down in a day. Would you turn off the tap when its your turn to drink? Maybe the new crew will turn it off after they've quinched their thrist - that way, neither side loses because of money dehydration.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4">
Updated First Quarter 2006 (January-March) Fundraising Totals:

</font size>
- Hillary Clinton:

$26 million; transferred $10 million left over from her senate re-election campaign, giving her a fundraising total of $36 million for the first quarter - a record for a non-election year.​

- John Edwards:
$14 million - twice what he raised in the same quarter for his 2004 bid for the presidency.​

- Barack Obama:
$25 million in the first quarter of his presidential campaign, just below the total of Democratic rival and top fundraiser Hillary Clinton.

Obama's take helps fortify his position as a frontrunner with Clinton in the race for the Democratic nomination.​

Mitt Romney
$23 million​

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani
15 million, including some $10 million in March alone.​

John McCain
$12.5 million​

Bill Richardson
$6 million​

Joseph Biden
About $3 million​

Christopher Dodd
$4 million and added $5 million more from his Senate account, bringing his first-quarter total to $9 million​


Items of Interest
John Kerry - had $10.2 million in his campaign coffers by the end of the first quarter of 2003, the year before the 2004 elections.

This is the first year that all the major candidates have rejected public financing for their campaigns - and the spending limit that comes with it - in favour of the right to solicit unlimited private funds.​

Sources: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/02/wclinton102.xml; http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aMj54a65hFjY&refer=home http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=arHvxHy_oU7U&refer=home
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Unlike every other candidate running for president except Dennis Kucinich, <b>Obama's campaign has taken NO PAC money, and none from federal lobbyists.</b>

25 million dollars from more than 100,000 contributors, including my $2,300, with contributions as small as 5 dollars.

<b>Peeps, this acheivement scares the shit out of all the "establishment politicians". </b>

The "establishment politicians" killed Howard Dean & they will try to kill Obama.

The sad reality is that these Obscene amounts of money being raised turns the United States democratic republic into a pornocracy. Public financing of campaigns is dead.

The traditional way that “establishment politicians” have offered-their-services (prostituted themselves) is to go for the big $$$$ bundled $$$$ contributions.

If, and it’s a BIG IF……
If the Obama campaign can continue to avoid PAC and federal lobbyist money and increase it’s ‘retail’ contributions it will ironically tilt the ‘political system’ back towards the citizens of America.

You have 35 million Americans who watch a silly program like American Idol. If 10% of them become infected with “Obama Fever” and click the contribute button on their computers or cells, potentially Obama raises 200-300 million dollars of small contribution retail cash.

This is the ‘threat’ Howard Dean posed to the “establishment politicians”. Barack, whose campaign operation and personal charisma supersedes anything Dean had, turns that ‘threat’ into a viable scenario. Team Clinton & all the “establishment politicians” are very, very, worried.<p>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="8"></hr>
<br>
224_cartoon_clinton_obama_fundraising_large.jpg
 
Last edited:

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Originally posted: April 5, 2007
<h1>Obama finds success breeds more</h1>

Posted by John McCormick at 2:35 p.m. CST, revised 6:13 pm CDt

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2007/04/obama_finds_suc.html
<b>
In political fundraising, success often yields more success.

Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign said Thursday that it took in an additional $435,000 via the Internet during the 24-hour period that followed its Wednesday morning announcement that he had raised $25 million during the first quarter.

The campaign says the contributions came from more than 4,600 people, including nearly 4,300 who had not previously given.</b>

Obama’s campaign collected nearly as much during January, February and March as Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who raised $26 million during the quarter. That news rocked the Democratic race Wednesday, making it clear that none of the candidates will enjoy the early dominance the former first lady had been trying to establish.

The 4,600 new donors to Obama (D-Ill.) represents roughly a 5 percent increase in the 100,000 donors the campaign reported during the entire first three months of the year. About a quarter of his money during the quarter came through the Internet.

Obama’s campaign also reported a healthy surge of contributions in the final 36 hours leading up to the March 31 deadline. During that period, the campaign says $900,000 came in over the Internet from 8,600 donors, including 7,500 who had never previously contributed.

The online success in recent days coincided with a lunch event Wednesday for Chicago-area lawyers at the Palmer House Hilton, where conservative estimates placed the take at $500,000.

Clinton’s campaign declined to say what has happened to its fundraising since Obama’s announcement Wednesday. "We have been doing very well online," said Clinton spokesman Phil Singer. "But I’m not going to get into particular figures."
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Donors Linked to the Clintons Shift to Obama</font size></center>

New York times
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and ARON PILHOFER
Published: April 16, 2007

WASHINGTON, April 15 — As Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton seeks to reassemble the Democratic money machine her husband built, some major fund-raisers long associated with her and him have signed on with Senator Barack Obama.

Among the biggest fund-raisers for Mr. Obama’s campaign are as many as a half-dozen former guests of the Clinton White House. At least two are close enough to the Clintons to have slept in the Lincoln bedroom.

At minimum, a dozen were major fund-raisers for President Bill Clinton. At least four worked in the administration and one, James Rubin, is a son of a former Clinton Treasury secretary, Robert E. Rubin. About two dozen of the top Obama fund-raisers have contributed to Mrs. Clinton’s Senate campaigns or political action committee, some as recently as a few months ago.

A list of about 130 of Mr. Obama’s top fund-raisers, released by his campaign Sunday, showed the extent to which the Democratic Party establishment, once presumed to support Mrs. Clinton, has drifted into her rival’s camp, lending the early stages of the Democratic primary campaign the feeling of family feud.

Those donations helped propel Mr. Obama above Mrs. Clinton in fund-raising for the Democratic primary season. Mrs. Clinton, once the presumed heir to the party structure her husband built, trailed Mr. Obama by $5.7 million in primary fund-raising, according to reports filed Sunday with the Federal Election Commission.

Still, her campaign relied on a narrow band of rich and devoted supporters to beat Mr. Obama in a wider measure of total fund-raising: contributions for both the primary and the general election.

Phil Singer, a Clinton campaign spokesman, said the drift of former supporters of Mr. and Mrs. Clinton to Mr. Obama was inevitable considering the president’s dominance of the party during the 1990s.

“Most Democrats who were politically active in the 1990s had ties to the Clinton administration, and we are pleased to have much of their support today,” Mr. Singer said.

The campaign filings released Sunday reflect fund-raising and spending for the first three months of 2007, and are seen as a crucial indicator of the strength of the various candidates as they head into brutally long combat in the runup to the caucuses and primaries early next year.

Mrs. Clinton’s filings also suggested that she is running a relatively frugal campaign, at least by the standards of some leading Republican primary contenders. And with $10 million left from her Senate race, Mrs. Clinton ended the first quarter with a primary war chest of about $23 million and $6.9 million for the general election. Mr. Obama’s campaign, having raised $24.8 for the primaries, had about $18.2 million in the bank and an additional $1 million for the general election.

A review of Mrs. Clinton’s general election fund-raising also indicates the depth of her dependence on a relatively narrow base of wealthy and committed donors. A review of her filing indicates that about 5,100 of her supporters contributed three quarters of her total $26 million take for the quarter.

More than 5,100 gave the legal limit of about $2,300 to her primary campaign, contributing a total of over $11.7 million — nearly two thirds of her primary fund. What is more, nearly 3,000 of those who had already hit the $2,300 limit for the primary also contributed an additional $2,300 to make up the $6.9 million in her general election fund as well, adding up to $19 million for those elite donors.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign also released its own list of 84 bundlers who had each collected $100,000 or more in checks for her campaign, together accounting for at least $8.4 million.

Mr. Obama, whose campaign has focused attention on its small contributions, also depended heavily on a relatively small base of bigger contributors. About 4,800 supporters gave the maximum $2,300 to his primary campaign, accounting for a total of about $11 million, nearly half his total. About 75 of those donors gave another $2,300 to his general election fund.

The list of top fund-raisers his campaign released included 130 bundlers who had each raised $50,000, for a total exceeding $6.5 million, about a quarter of his total.

Aside from suggesting a potentially unseemly dependence on a small elite, such early reliance on a relatively small number of large donors can be risky to a campaign’s future momentum. Big donors quickly reach the contributions limits set by campaign finance laws.

Still, Mr. Obama’s campaign is hoping to tap into its wide network of smaller donors. The campaign said in a statement that it had received contributions from more than 104,000 individuals, far more than any other Democratic or Republican primary campaign this year. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign said had received contributions from 60,000 individual donors, 80 percent of whom gave less than $100.

Mr. Obama has also outpaced the other campaigns in fund-raising over the Internet, which holds the promise of a continuing flow of small contributions raised at little cost. His campaign said it raised more than $6 million over the Internet from 50,000 donors. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign said it raised about $3 million over the Internet and about $3 million from direct mail.

Midnight Sunday was the deadline for campaigns to file their first-quarter financial reports with the Federal Election Commission. The leading Republicans filed ahead of the deadline, but the Democrats waited until late Sunday.

The primary campaign of former Senator John Edwards said in its filing that he had spent less than $3 million of the $13 million he raised in the quarter, leaving him with $10.7 million in the bank. He raised less than $1 million for the general election.

Mr. Edwards’s campaign said that he raised about $3.3 million over the Internet, while Mrs. Clinton has raised $4.2 million.

David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Washington, and Aron Pilhofer from New York. John M. Broder and Jeff Zeleny contributed reporting from Washington, and Patrick Healy from New York.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/us/politics/16donate.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>In The Money</font size></center>

CBS News
Jul 2, 2007

(Political Animal) IN THE MONEY....In some ways, measuring presidential candidates by their fundraising totals is just about the ultimate in political inside pool. The typical American doesn't know or care how much money a campaign raises -- but the numbers are carefully scrutinized by reporters, candidates, staffers, and major donors.

It's not necessarily fair, and fundraising conditions can change, but candidates who fall behind in fundraising are perceived, usually accurately, as struggling overall. Candidates who fill their coffers well are perceived as credible and strong.

And candidates who raise over $30 million in the second quarter the year before the presidential election are a force to be reckoned with.


Sen. Barack Obama raised $31 million for his presidential primary campaign over the past three months, surging past Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's fundraising machine by nearly $10 million for the quarter to take the lead in contributions in the crowded Democratic field.Obama became the first Democrat to surpass $30 million in a quarter during a non-election year, a feat his campaign said was accomplished not just with help from wealthy, traditional donors but also with a strong showing among small contributors.... In addition to Obama's haul for the primary, he collected $1.5 million for the general election, for a total of $32.5 million raised over the past three months.​

Hillary Clinton got a fairly significant head start on 2007 fundraising by transferring $10 million from her Senate campaign account -- and Obama still surpassed her. Over the first six months of the year, Obama raised nearly $56 million for primary spending, followed by Clinton's $50 million. Edwards is third with about $22 million, followed by Richardson with roughly $13 million, and Dodd with about $12 million.

Obama's haul, however, is clearly the big story. Marc Ambinder's analysis sounds about right to me: "There is no other way to put it: not only did Sen. Barack Obama set a record for single quarter donations by a Democratic candidate, but his fundraising total -- $31M from 154,000 new donors -- imposes an obligation on all of us who cover the race: we need to figure out why the 'national' frontrunner, Hillary Clinton, isn't generating as much excitement as her chief competitor."

And what of the fundraising for the Republican presidential candidates? No one in the GOP field has released their numbers yet, but none of the Republicans is expected to be anywhere close to Obama (or Clinton, for that matter).

In the first quarter, all the Dems outraised all the Republicans, $78 million to $53.6 million. This quarter, the disparity should grow even larger.

We're going to be hearing quite a bit about an "enthusiasm gap" between Clinton and Obama, but let's also not lose sight of the same gap between Dems and the GOP.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/02/politics/animal/main3005273.shtml
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Obama, Clinton Have $30 Million-Plus </font size></center>

Monday July 16, 2007 4:16 AM
By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton ended the first half of the year with more than $30 million each for the presidential primaries, a formidable financial performance for the two leading Democratic White House contenders.

Obama reported having about $34 million in primary cash on hand; Clinton reported $33 million.

Obama led in fundraising for the period covering April though June, raising $32 million for the primary election and nearly $800,000 for the general election, according to reports filed Sunday with the Federal Election Commission.

Clinton raised about $21.5 million for the primary and $5.6 million for the general election, her campaign said.

Neither candidate can use the general election money unless he or she wins the nomination.

John Edwards, the Democrat closest to the two fundraising leaders, reported having $12 million in the bank for the primary.

Obama enters the third quarter with more fundraising momentum than Clinton. Not only has he aggressively gone after money, he has also worked to expand his donor base. His efforts have netted him more than 250,000 donors for the year. Overall, he has raised nearly $59 million, with all but about $1.7 million devoted to the primary election.

Despite his vaunted base of small donors, Obama is a favorite among employees of some of the nation's largest investment banks and hedge funds. One of them, Kenneth C. Griffin, president of Chicago-based hedge fund Citadel Investment Group, gave Obama $4,600 this quarter, the maximum allowed. Other Citadel employees gave him $147,550.

Lehman Brothers employees gave Obama $160,760 this quarter; Goldman Sachs, $103,550; and JP Morgan Chase, $101,950. About half of Obama's fundraising total for the year comes from about 10,000 donors who have given him the maximum donation.

New York Sen. Clinton has raised $53 million, with $12.6 million of that usable only in the general election. Clinton boosted her revenue in the first quarter by transferring $10 million into her campaign from her Senate election account.

Obama reported $922,000 of debt at the end of the quarter and $16 million in spending for the quarter.

The Clinton campaign said it had spent $12.5 million. Its report had not been filed yet, so the campaign's debt, if any, could not be determined.

The campaigns had until midnight Sunday to file full financial reports to the Federal Election Commission.

Obama dramatically increased the size of his staff in the second quarter. His payroll went from less than $1 million in the first three months to $3.2 million in the second quarter. The campaign has hired more than 100 staffers and has 29 field offices in Iowa and six in New Hampshire.

Obama's campaign paid nearly $3 million for travel during the quarter and spent about $1.3 million in telemarketing, one of its top single expenses.

Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina and 2004 vice presidential nominee, raised about $8.8 million for the primary from April through June; he also raised $250,000 for the general election, money he can't use unless he becomes the Democratic nominee.

Overall, Edwards has raised $21.8 million for the primary and $1.3 million for the general election. While trailing Obama and Clinton, Edwards retained his place ahead of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut.

Dodd reported raising nearly $3.3 million with nearly $6.4 million in the bank. For the year, Dodd has total receipts of $12.1 million, which includes a $4.7 million transfer from his Senate campaign account. Richardson on Saturday reported raising $7 million in the second quarter and having a similar amount in the bank.

Among Republicans filing Sunday, Ron Paul, the Texas congressman running a long-shot campaign, reported raising nearly $2.4 million from April through June and ended the quarter with a similar amount in the bank.

The total is a remarkable showing for Paul, putting him ahead of Arizona Sen. John McCain in cash on hand. Paul still barely registers in public opinion polls and raised far less than McCain or the other leading Republicans. But his libertarian views and opposition to the war in Iraq have lit a fire among nontraditional contributors, particularly on the Internet.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who are leading the Republican field in money and in public opinion polls, reported their finances on Friday. McCain and most of the Democratic candidates had until midnight Sunday to file their reports.

Republican presidential candidates filing second quarter reports Sunday:

-Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas raised $1.4 million, slightly more than his campaign brought in during the previous quarter. The candidate reported having $460,236 in the bank.

-Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee raised $764,000 and had $437,000 cash on hand at the end of last month.

-Former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson raised $461,000. He reported nearly $122,000 cash on hand, but also listed debts and obligations of more than $127,000.

-Rep. Duncan Hunter of California raised $806,000 and had $213,000 cash on hand.

Lackluster performance in the second quarter already caused one Republican candidate to quit the race. Former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore announced Saturday he was withdrawing. On Sunday he reported $62,000 cash on hand and $129,000 in debts and obligations.

--

Associated Press Writer Dan Strumpf in Chicago contributed to this article.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6781739,00.html
 

bromack1

Rising Star
Registered
QueEx said:
<font size="5"><center>Obama, Clinton Have $30 Million-Plus </font size></center>

Monday July 16, 2007 4:16 AM
By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton ended the first half of the year with more than $30 million each for the presidential primaries, a formidable financial performance for the two leading Democratic White House contenders.

Obama reported having about $34 million in primary cash on hand; Clinton reported $33 million.

Obama led in fundraising for the period covering April though June, raising $32 million for the primary election and nearly $800,000 for the general election, according to reports filed Sunday with the Federal Election Commission.

Clinton raised about $21.5 million for the primary and $5.6 million for the general election, her campaign said.

Neither candidate can use the general election money unless he or she wins the nomination.

John Edwards, the Democrat closest to the two fundraising leaders, reported having $12 million in the bank for the primary.

Obama enters the third quarter with more fundraising momentum than Clinton. Not only has he aggressively gone after money, he has also worked to expand his donor base. His efforts have netted him more than 250,000 donors for the year. Overall, he has raised nearly $59 million, with all but about $1.7 million devoted to the primary election.

Despite his vaunted base of small donors, Obama is a favorite among employees of some of the nation's largest investment banks and hedge funds. One of them, Kenneth C. Griffin, president of Chicago-based hedge fund Citadel Investment Group, gave Obama $4,600 this quarter, the maximum allowed. Other Citadel employees gave him $147,550.

Lehman Brothers employees gave Obama $160,760 this quarter; Goldman Sachs, $103,550; and JP Morgan Chase, $101,950. About half of Obama's fundraising total for the year comes from about 10,000 donors who have given him the maximum donation.

New York Sen. Clinton has raised $53 million, with $12.6 million of that usable only in the general election. Clinton boosted her revenue in the first quarter by transferring $10 million into her campaign from her Senate election account.

Obama reported $922,000 of debt at the end of the quarter and $16 million in spending for the quarter.

The Clinton campaign said it had spent $12.5 million. Its report had not been filed yet, so the campaign's debt, if any, could not be determined.

The campaigns had until midnight Sunday to file full financial reports to the Federal Election Commission.

Obama dramatically increased the size of his staff in the second quarter. His payroll went from less than $1 million in the first three months to $3.2 million in the second quarter. The campaign has hired more than 100 staffers and has 29 field offices in Iowa and six in New Hampshire.

Obama's campaign paid nearly $3 million for travel during the quarter and spent about $1.3 million in telemarketing, one of its top single expenses.

Edwards, the former senator from North Carolina and 2004 vice presidential nominee, raised about $8.8 million for the primary from April through June; he also raised $250,000 for the general election, money he can't use unless he becomes the Democratic nominee.

Overall, Edwards has raised $21.8 million for the primary and $1.3 million for the general election. While trailing Obama and Clinton, Edwards retained his place ahead of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut.

Dodd reported raising nearly $3.3 million with nearly $6.4 million in the bank. For the year, Dodd has total receipts of $12.1 million, which includes a $4.7 million transfer from his Senate campaign account. Richardson on Saturday reported raising $7 million in the second quarter and having a similar amount in the bank.

Among Republicans filing Sunday, Ron Paul, the Texas congressman running a long-shot campaign, reported raising nearly $2.4 million from April through June and ended the quarter with a similar amount in the bank.

The total is a remarkable showing for Paul, putting him ahead of Arizona Sen. John McCain in cash on hand. Paul still barely registers in public opinion polls and raised far less than McCain or the other leading Republicans. But his libertarian views and opposition to the war in Iraq have lit a fire among nontraditional contributors, particularly on the Internet.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who are leading the Republican field in money and in public opinion polls, reported their finances on Friday. McCain and most of the Democratic candidates had until midnight Sunday to file their reports.

Republican presidential candidates filing second quarter reports Sunday:

-Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas raised $1.4 million, slightly more than his campaign brought in during the previous quarter. The candidate reported having $460,236 in the bank.

-Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee raised $764,000 and had $437,000 cash on hand at the end of last month.

-Former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson raised $461,000. He reported nearly $122,000 cash on hand, but also listed debts and obligations of more than $127,000.

-Rep. Duncan Hunter of California raised $806,000 and had $213,000 cash on hand.

Lackluster performance in the second quarter already caused one Republican candidate to quit the race. Former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore announced Saturday he was withdrawing. On Sunday he reported $62,000 cash on hand and $129,000 in debts and obligations.

--

Associated Press Writer Dan Strumpf in Chicago contributed to this article.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6781739,00.html

You're absolutely correct. The early "posturing" is about fund raising. Its estimated next year its gonna cost around 500 million to run a national campaign.

But now the million dollar question is, does money equal votes????
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Clinton, Obama raise $100 million</font size></center>

United Press International
Published: Jan. 1, 2008 at 9:36 AM


WASHINGTON, Jan. 1 (UPI) -- U.S. Democratic presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton raised more than $100 million for their campaigns in 2007.

Sources familiar with the financial operations of Sen. Clinton, D-N.Y., and Sen. Obama, D-Ill., said the candidates surpassed the $100 million mark in 2007 -- the first time two candidates have raised the amount before the nation's first primary, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Experts said Clinton and Obama's fundraising successes could be attributed to wealthy donors as well as smaller, private donations made via the Internet.

"It's unprecedented," said Michael S. Berman, organizer of former Vice President Walter Mondale's 1984 presidential bid. "What we did, it's not even relevant anymore. The amounts just keep growing. I don't know if there is an upper limit."

However, neither candidate quite reached President Bush's record for fundraising in a non-election year -- he raised $131.8 million in 2003.

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was the fundraising surprise on the Republican side, bringing in $20 million during the past three months, the Post said. Paul, who received a large portion of his funds through the Internet, lags behind his competitors in polls.


© 2008 United Press International. All Rights Reserved.


http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/01/01/clinton_obama_raise_100_million/7058/
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Obama raised 32 mil. in Jan

<font size="5"><center>Obama gains on McCain in Arizona fundraising</font size></center>

The Arizona Republic
by Ronald J. Hansen
Jul. 24, 2008 12:00 AM

Barack Obama quietly raised more money in Arizona last month for his presidential campaign than John McCain did, and the Illinois Democrat dominates the overall fundraising map in 43 states and Washington, D.C., records show.

Obama reported $432,000 in donations from Arizonans in June, compared with McCain's $313,000, based on an Arizona Republic analysis of Federal Election Commission records. Neither campaign properly codes all contributions with a state, making it impossible to know exactly where all donations came from.

Since last year, McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee, has raised at least $4.7 million from his fellow Arizonans, double what Obama reports from the state. But donations this year are nearly even: McCain's Arizona donors have given him $2 million. Obama's Arizona donors have given him just $66,000 less.

"Senator Obama has committed and enthusiastic supporters from all walks of life and every region of the country who help fund this campaign for change," spokeswoman Shannon Gilson said.

The McCain campaign did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

Obama also appears to be leading in Republican-friendly states such as Idaho and Utah, records show.

The June numbers suggest that, during his first full month as the presumptive Democratic nominee, Obama maintained the financial edge he had throughout his party's primaries.

In Arizona, Obama amassed his June contributions the way he has throughout the campaign: using plenty of small donors.

His average contribution for June in Arizona was $115. McCain's Arizona donors averaged $241. In his home state of Illinois, Obama has raised more than $20 million. McCain has raised $3.7 million there.

Despite June's fundraising victory in McCain's home state, Obama seems to face an uphill fight for votes in Arizona.

McCain led 49 percent to Obama's 40 percent in a June 25 poll of 500 likely voters by Rasmussen Reports. Obama trailed McCain in Arizona by 20 percentage points in an April poll.

State Democrats have noted a net gain of 50,000 registered voters for their party compared with Republicans since 2006. Overall, Republicans had a 110,000-voter lead at the beginning of June, state records show.

During a July 13 rally at his Phoenix campaign office, McCain remained upbeat about carrying the state.

"We're going to have to work hard not only here in the state of Arizona, but we're going to have to get the other states in the Southwest and the West," McCain told his supporters. Still, "I'm confident about Arizona."

Nationwide, McCain raised $16 million in June from individual donors, well short of the $50 million Obama logged for the month in his record-shattering campaign. Overall, McCain had $26 million in cash at the end of June. Obama had $71 million.

McCain's fundraising problem is offset by the continued effectiveness of the Republican National Committee. The RNC had $69 million at the end of June. The Democratic National Committee had $5 million available in the same period.


Reach the reporter at ronald. hansen@arizonarepublic.com or 602-444-4493.


http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2008/07/24/20080724mccainfunds0724.html
 
Top