Bush Picks Alito for Supreme Court

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="6"><center>Bush Picks Alito for Supreme Court</font size></center>

BUSH_SCOTUS_.sff_NY109_20051031072133.jpg

This undated photo provided by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the 3rd Circuit shows Judge Samuel A. Alito of the U.S.
Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. President Bush is nominating
Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, The Associated Press has
learned, choosing a long-time federal judge embraced by judicial
conservatives to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
(AP Photo/U.S. Court of Appeals - 3rd Circuit)

Oct 31, 7:48 AM (ET)

By RON FOURNIER

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush, stung by the rejection of his first choice, will nominate conservative judge Samuel Alito to replace moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in a bid to reshape the Supreme Court and mollify his political base, officials said Monday.

The choice was likely to spark a political brawl. Unlike the nomination of Harriet Miers, which was derailed by Bush's conservative allies, Alito faces opposition from liberal Democrats.

Bush planned to announce the nomination at 8 a.m. EST. Wasting no time, the White House arranged for Alito to go to the Capitol after the announcement.

The schedule called for Senate Majority Leader Bill First to greet him and accompany the nominee to the Capitol Rotunda to go to the coffin of the late civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks.


So consistently conservative, Alito has been dubbed "Scalito" or "Scalia-lite" by some lawyers because his judicial philosophy invites comparisons to conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. But while Scalia is outspoken and is known to badger lawyers, Alito is polite, reserved and even-tempered.

The White House hopes the choice mends a rift in the Republican Party caused by the failed nomination of Miers, a Bush loyalist, and puts his embattled presidency on a path to political recovery.

With the rebuke of Miers, the rising death toll in Iraq, his slow-footed response to Katrina and last Friday's indictment of top vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Bush's approval ratings are at the lowest ebb of his presidency.

Polls show Democrats and most independents don't approve of his job performance, leaving the conservative wing of his party the only thing keeping Bush afloat politically.

Miers bowed out last Thursday after three weeks of bruising criticism from members of Bush's own party who argued that the Texas lawyer and loyal Bush confidant had thin credentials on constitutional law and no proven record as a judicial conservative.

If he is confirmed by the Senate, Alito would join another Bush pick on the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts. O'Connor, who is retiring, has been a decisive swing vote in a host of affirmative action, abortion, campaign finance, discrimination and death penalty cases.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to preview Bush's remarks, said Alito was virtually certain from the start to get the nod from the moment Miers backed out. The 55-year-old jurist was Bush's favorite choice of the judges in the last set of deliberations but he settled instead on someone outside what he calls the "judicial monastery," the officials said.

Bush believes that Alito has not only the right experience and conservative ideology for the job, but also has a temperament suited to building consensus on the court. A former prosecutor, Alito has experience off the bench that factored into Bush's thinking, the officials said.

"The president has made an excellent choice today which reflects his commitment to appoint judges in the mold of Scalia and Thomas," said Kay Daly, president of the conservative Coalition for a Fair Judiciary.

"It's a pretty predictable move from a politically crippled president," said Democratic consultant Jim Jordan. "Toss out a judicial extremist to pacify his base and provoke a fight that he hopes changes the subject away from indictments and Iraq and Katrina and a soft economy."

While Alito is expected to win praise from Bush's allies on the right, Democrats have served notice they will fight it. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, said Sunday that Alito's nomination would "create a lot of problems."

Unlike Miers, who has never been a judge, Alito, a jurist from New Jersey, has been a strong conservative voice on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush, seated him there in 1990.

Judicial conservatives praise Alito's 15 years on the Philadelphia-based court, a tenure that gives him more appellate experience than almost any previous Supreme Court nominee. They say his record shows a commitment to a strict interpretation of the Constitution, ensuring that the separation of powers and checks and balances are respected and enforced. They also contend that Alito has been a powerful voice for the First Amendment's guarantees of free speech and the free exercise of religion.

Liberal groups, on the other hand, note Alito's moniker and say his nomination raises troubling concerns, especially when it comes to his record on civil rights and reproductive rights. Alito is a frequent dissenter on the 3rd Circuit, one of the most liberal federal appellate benches in the nation.

In the early 1990s, Alito was the lone dissenter in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a case in which the 3rd Circuit struck down a Pennsylvania law that included a provision requiring women seeking abortions to notify their spouses.

"The Pennsylvania legislature could have rationally believed that some married women are initially inclined to obtain an abortion without their husbands' knowledge because of perceived problems - such as economic constraints, future plans or the husbands' previously expressed opposition - that may be obviated by discussion prior to the abortion," Alito wrote.

The case ended up at the Supreme Court where the justices, in a 6-3 decision struck down the spousal notification provision of the law. The late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist cited Alito's reasoning in his own dissent.

Alito, an Italian-American who grew up in Trenton, N.J., has a resume filled with stepping stones to the high court. He was educated at Princeton University and earned a law degree from Yale University, the president's alma mater.

---

White House reporter Deb Riechmann and special correspondent Dave Espo contributed to this report.


http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20051031/D8DJ15AG0.html?PG=home&SEC=news
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
global_header_04.gif


<font size="6"><center>Samuel Alito Jr.</font swize></center>


Posted 7/19/05
By Bret Schulte

Nicknamed "Scalito" for views resembling those of conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito Jr. is a favorite son of the political right. Appointed in 1990 by George H.W. Bush to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Alito has earned a reputation for intellectual rigor and polite but frequent dissent in a court that has been historically liberal. His mettle, as well as a personable demeanor and ties to former Republican administrations, has long had observers buzzing about his potential rise to the high court. "Sam Alito is in my mind the strongest candidate on the list," says Pepperdine law Prof. Douglas Kmiec. "I know them all . . . but I think Sam is a standout because he's a judge's judge. He approaches cases with impartiality and open-mindedness."

A New Jersey native, the 55-year-old Alito received a bachelor's degree from Princeton and graduated from Yale Law School. He worked in the solicitor general's office during the Reagan administration and was a U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey when George H.W. Bush nominated him to the Third Circuit. His 15 years on the bench have been marked by strong conservatism on a case-by-case basis that avoids sweeping opinions on constitutionality.

In 1997, Alito authored the majority opinion upholding a city's right to stage a holiday display that included a Nativity scene and a menorah because the city also included secular symbols and a banner emphasizing the importance of diversity. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Alito was the sole dissenter on the Third Circuit, which struck a Pennsylvania law that required women seeking abortions to consult their husbands. He argued that many of the potential reasons for an abortion, such as "economic constraints, future plans, or the husbands' previously expressed opposition . . . may be obviated by discussion prior to abortion." The case went on to the Supreme Court, which upheld the lower court's decision 6 to 3.

Alito's conservative stripes are equally evident in criminal law. Lawrence Lustberg, a New Jersey criminal defense lawyer who has known Alito since 1981 and tried cases before him on the Third Circuit, describes him as "an activist conservatist judge" who is tough on crime and narrowly construes prisoners' and criminals' rights. "He's very prosecutorial from the bench. He has looked to be creative in his conservatism, which is, I think, as much a Rehnquist as a Scalia trait," Lustberg says.

Some observers say that Alito cannot be easily pigeon-holed. In Saxe v. State College Area School District, Alito, writing for the panel, argued that the school does not have the right to punish students for vulgar language or harassment when it doesn't disrupt the school day. "Sam struck that down as a violation of free speech," Kmiec says. "That's not a conservative outcome."

Off the bench, friends and colleagues describe Alito as quiet and self-effacing with a wry sense of humor. He is a voracious reader with a particular love for biographies and history. With his wife, Martha, he has a son in college and a daughter in high school. "He's mild mannered and generous and family oriented," Lustberg says. "I don't agree with him on many issues, but I have the utmost respect for him. No one can question his intelligence or integrity."

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050719/19alito.htm
 

Greed

Star
Registered
what brawl?

tell us again what the democrats have to gain from a fight?

he will get confirmed regardless. they wont filibuster.

the democrats will energize a base that will vote for them no matter what anyway.

so, how will this entice new voters to their party so they can win in 2008?

or are they just in it for moral victories.
 

Greed

Star
Registered
Alito Advised Against Panther Case Appeal

Alito Advised Against Panther Case Appeal
By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
49 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Supreme Court hopeful Samuel Alito recommended against appealing a ruling that revived a Black Panther Party lawsuit against the government nearly a quarter-century ago, according to documents released Wednesday.

Alito, working in the Justice Department at the time, argued that the department could win the case in a lower court.

"None of the legal issues presented by this case seems to warrant Supreme Court review," Alito wrote on Nov. 19, 1981, while he was working for the solicitor general's office. The memo was among another batch of Alito papers released Wednesday by the National Archives.

Unlike other Alito documents, the 291-document release sparked little to no interest from the groups promoting or opposing the federal appellate judge's nomination to the Supreme Court. President Bush picked him as the replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in late October.

Liberals have questioned whether Alito has the proper judicial temperament and ideology to replace O'Connor. Some have said Alito's views on issues such as voting rights and abortion could provoke a filibuster unless he allays their concerns about his commitment to civil rights at his confirmation hearings, beginning Jan. 9.

The Black Panthers' lawsuit accused government officials of conspiring against the militant group and its members for years. A federal judge had thrown out the lawsuit because the Black Panther officials refused to reveal the names of party members whose names weren't already public as part of the case, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed that decision. The appeals court ordered the judge to reconsider the case.

Alito noted that nothing in the trial court was "decided against the government with finality."

And "even if the Supreme Court were to agree with our arguments, it would not follow that dismissal of the complaint would be the appropriate sanction," he wrote.

The Supreme Court thought otherwise. The Justice Department went on to appeal the case to the high court, which ordered the Black Panther lawsuit thrown out.

Alito did note that he could see a reason to take the case to the Supreme Court, considering its high-profile nature.

"This is not an ordinary lawsuit, and the issues may consequently take on added significance," Alito said. "While I am convinced that the individual legal issues do not warrant the filing of a petition action, I recognize that a decision to the contrary has something to recommend it."

The Black Panther Party had sued several federal officials, saying that since 1968 the directors of the CIA and the FBI, attorneys general, Treasury secretaries, postmasters general, IRS commissioners and other government officials had conspired to destroy the Black Panthers.

One of those sued was then-CIA director and soon-to-be-president George H.W. Bush, father of the current president.

Alito worked for the solicitor general's office in 1981-85, and also as deputy assistant U.S. attorney general from 1985-87 before becoming a federal prosecutor and judge.

Many of the documents released Wednesday by the National Archives simply indicate that Alito was copied in on internal Justice Department memos, or are photocopies of decisions that were made by federal judges while Alito was working for the department during the Reagan administration.

The Archives said it found the documents in the files of former Justice Department officials while processing Freedom of Information Act requests.

Republican leaders are pushing for a Jan. 20 confirmation vote in the full Senate.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051228...MlI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Alito Advised Against Panther Case Appeal

<IFRAME SRC="http://www.factcheck.org/article369.html" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.factcheck.org/article369.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited:

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Alito Advised Against Panther Case Appeal

<IFRAME SRC="http://www.factcheck.org/article370.html" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.factcheck.org/article370.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited:

Greed

Star
Registered
Re: Alito Advised Against Panther Case Appeal

lets hope the dems dont sell out this time like they did with roberts. 44 no-votes is the standard, not 20-something.
 

Greed

Star
Registered
i have tons of shit to do right now, but these hearing are outstanding and better than the roberts hearing.

you should be hearing in the news about the 5 minute argument that just happen between kennedy and specter over a procedural issue no less.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4">
A video clip of the tirade between Senators Kennedy
and Specter is contained in the the CNN article below:
</font size>



<IFRAME SRC="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/11/alito/index.html" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/11/alito/index.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited:

Greed

Star
Registered
Top Democrats move to block Bush high court nominee

Top Democrats move to block Bush high court nominee
Thu Jan 26, 10:30 PM ET

Leading Democrat Senators John Kerry and Ted Kennedy said they would try to block Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito by preventing a vote on him with a filibuster.

Former presidential candidate Kerry announced from Switzerland that he wanted to block President George W. Bush's conservative nominee with the stalling tactic to prevent "an ideological coup" on the high court.

"Judge Alito will take America backward, especially when it comes to civil rights and discrimination laws," Kerry said is a statement.

Kennedy, Kerry's fellow Massachusetts senator, also called for a filibuster on Alito when the Senate is called to vote, probably early next week.

"We owe it to future generations of Americans to oppose this nomination. If Judge Alito is confirmed ... the progress of half a century on the basic rights of all Americans is likely to be rolled back."

In a statement, Democratic leaders said that Kerry was lobbying fellow senators in hopes of being able to round up the 41 votes needed to successfully prevent the Senate from holding a final up-or-down confirmation vote on Alito.

Alito earlier this week won a critical vote in a Senate committee vetting his nomination, but now must win the approval of the full Senate, which currently is debating his nomination.

All but a few Democrats in the 100-seat Senate are united in opposition against the 55-year-old conservative, saying they fear Alito, if he joins forces with other conservatives on the US high court, will undo years of liberal court rulings.

A successful filibuster would deal Bush a second defeat in trying to fill the vacant court slot. His previous nominee, White House aide Harriet Miers, was forced to withdraw after a backlash from conservatives.

But Republicans hold a decided 55 to 44 seat majority in the chamber, with one independent senator voting mostly with Democrats.

In addition, three Democrats have said they will support Alito, leading some Democrat senators to say a move to block Alito would probably fail.

But while most Republicans support Alito, several have expressed reservations over his conservative views on abortion, protection of civil rights, and limits on the powers of the presidency.

The Republican National Committee quickly denounced the filibuster effort Thursday, branding it "thoughtless bomb throwing."

"To even suggest a filibuster against a nominee as qualified as Judge Aliot reflects a philosophy so out of touch that it's bordering on reckless," the group said in a statement.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2006012...zSFOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 

Greed

Star
Registered
Democrats Squabble Over Alito Filibuster

Democrats Squabble Over Alito Filibuster
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
Fri Jan 27, 10:24 PM ET

Long-smoldering Democratic dissension flared openly Friday as liberals sought support for a last-minute filibuster of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito against the advice of leaders worried about a backlash in the 2006 elections.

"I reject those notions that there ought to somehow be some political calculus about the future. ... The choice is now," said Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the party's 2004 presidential candidate and a White House hopeful for 2008. He said it was imperative to fight for "those people who count on us to stand up and protect them."

Two of the party's Senate leaders, Harry Reid of Nevada and Charles Schumer of New York, privately made clear their unhappiness with the strategy, even though they, too, oppose Alito's confirmation. And Rep. Harold Ford (news, bio, voting record), seeking a Senate seat in Republican-leaning Tennessee, dismissed the filibuster approach openly.

"It does not appear that there is any reason to hold up a vote. I hope my colleagues in the Senate will move quickly to bring this process to a dignified end," he said.

Despite a decision by Kerry, Massachusetts Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (news, bio, voting record) and others to try to block a final vote, leaders of both parties agreed that Alito's confirmation was assured for Tuesday. The 55-year-old appeals court judge would replace Sandra Day O'Connor, who has cast deciding votes in recent years in 5-4 rulings on controversial issues such as abortion rights, affirmative action and the death penalty.

Democrats fear he would shift the court rightward on those and other issues.

Because of moves by Kerry, Kennedy and others, supporters of Alito's nomination must produce 60 votes on Monday to advance his nomination — and an Associated Press tally shows at least 62.

That would clear the way for a final vote on Tuesday. The AP tally shows at least 53 Republicans and three Democrats intend to vote to confirm Alito, well over the required majority.

Reid announced he would side with Alito's critics on Monday, though on Thursday he had made clear his unhappiness with their strategy. "There has been adequate time for people to debate," he had said Thursday. "I hope this matter will be resolved without too much more talking."

Those remarks drew a pointed rebuttal from the NAACP and People for The American Way, two organizations that often work closely with Democrats in Congress. "With just two days of debate having passed, this must rank among the shortest debates for a controversial Supreme Court nomination in modern times," they said in a written statement.

Democrats have been arguing for several days whether to attempt a filibuster designed to keep Alito off the bench, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.

These officials said both Reid and Schumer of New York, who heads the party's effort to gain Senate seats in 2006, have stressed the drawbacks. Among them were the certainty of defeat, the impression of political weakness that would convey and the potential impact on candidates on the ballot in 2006 in Republican-leaning states. Both men oppose Alito's confirmation.

Israel Klein, Schumer's spokesman, said late in the day Friday that the New York senator "has privately expressed some concerns about how to move forward procedurally, but he strongly opposes Judge Alito's nomination and would support any attempts to keep him off the Supreme Court."

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat, sided with Kennedy, Kerry and others, contending Alito's record was troubling enough to warrant a filibuster, and that in political terms, core Democratic voters would be energized by a last-ditch stand.

Among the rank and file, there was opposition to a filibuster from several lawmakers, including liberal Barbara Mikulski of Maryland and North Dakota's Kent Conrad, a moderate who is on the ballot this fall in a Republican state.

Democratic officials said Mikulski had said during this week's closed-door caucus that the 2006 and 2008 elections were more important than a symbolic last stand that would fail to prevent Alito's confirmation. Her spokesman declined comment.

The officials who described the comments did so on condition of anonymity, citing the private nature of the discussions.

In an interview, Conrad said that in remarks to fellow Democrats at the caucus, he outlined several factors. These included Alito's strong backing from the American Bar Association, his uncontested confirmation 15 years ago to the appeals court, public opinion polls and the fact that Republicans had voted overwhelmingly to confirm Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer when President Clinton nominated them.

"So I put that all together and I find it makes it hard to justify a filibuster," Conrad said.

For the most part, Republicans were content to stand aside while Democrats aired their internal differences. But White House spokesman Scott McClellan couldn't resist a jab at Kerry, Bush's vanquished campaign rival from 2004.

"I think even for a senator, it takes some pretty serious yodeling to call for a filibuster from a five-star ski resort in the Swiss Alps," he said.

Kerry announced his support for a last stand against Alito from Switzerland, where he was attending the World Economic Forum. He flew home overnight to speak on the Senate floor.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060128...x1I2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 

Greed

Star
Registered
Re: Democrats Squabble Over Alito Filibuster

cloture vote is now on cspan...could be close.

and democrats arranged for one republican to have a car accident this morning in nevada so he'll miss the vote.





















what?
 

Greed

Star
Registered
Re: Democrats Squabble Over Alito Filibuster

72-25
53 repubs and 19 dems
 
Last edited:

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Democrats Squabble Over Alito Filibuster

<font size="4">

<center>
An amazing "absence" of racist controversy.

<font size>

</center>
 
Top