America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Socialist

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

Poor states tend to have far less industry/natural resources.

Those states tend to vote republican because that's the best way to keep taxes low.


So why do they have less industry?

Natural resources? Kentucky, West Virginia, coal. Alabama, Tennessee, iron ore? Do you know anything?
 

actinanass

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

So why do they have less industry?

Natural resources? Kentucky, West Virginia, coal. Alabama, Tennessee, iron ore? Do you know anything?

There's heavy regulation on coal right now.

Alabama, and Tennessee are simple states. Meaning, their mentality is "we don't need much, we don't want much". Most of the successful folks from those states tend to move away.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali


Sometimes, its better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.


 

actinanass

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali


Sometimes, its better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.



My statement comes from family that lived in both Alabama, and Tennessee.

I will admit, they're kinda backwards.

You can correct the Alabama comment since you might know a lot more than I do personally.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali


Sometimes, its better to keep one's mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.



I believe this adequately sums up your comments.
 

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

Alabama, and Tennessee are simple states. Meaning, their mentality,... Most of the successful folks from those states tend to move away.


Can't add much more to this thread. Point made!

end_ca-250x166.jpg
 

RoomService

Dinner is now being served.
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

good drop
 

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

source: Raw Story

Nearly 1 in 4 young children now live in poverty in U.S.



The number of children living in poverty in the United States increased by 2.6 million since the recession began in 2007, bringing the total to an estimated 15.7 million poor children in 2010, according to researchers from the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire.

The researchers estimate that nearly 1 in 4 children under the age of 6 now live in poverty.

Big cities and rural areas have the highest rates of poverty among young children. Thirty-one percent of children under age 6 in America’s cities and 30 percent of young children in rural areas are poor.

In contrast, 19 percent of young children living in the suburbs are poor.

“It is important to understand young child poverty specifically, as children who are poor before age 6 have been shown to experience educational deficits, and health problems, with effects that span the life course,” the researchers said.

The report was based on the U.S. Census Bureau annual report on poverty, which outlined the dramatic decline in income and employment in the U.S. The definition of poverty was an annual income of $22,314 for a family of four, and $11,139 for a single person in 2010.

The census data showed the median annual household income falling 2.3 percent to $49,445. The 46.2 million Americans living in poverty is the highest amount since the Census began recording the statistic 52 years ago.

Researchers found that the number of children living in poverty increased from 14.7 million in 2009 to 15.7 million in 2010.

The South has the highest rates of child poverty at an estimated 24.2 percent, and the Northeast has the lowest rates at an estimated 17.8 percent.

Mississippi has the highest percentage of children living in poverty at 32.5 percent and New Hampshire has the lowest percentage of children living in poverty at 10 percent.

“That child poverty is continuing to rise in the aftermath of the recession highlights the necessity of policies that can support vulnerable children and families,” the researchers said. “Congressional concerns over the federal debt have already resulted in an agreement that will force significant cuts to domestic spending, including many programs that serve children and families.”

“Though budget cuts are unavoidable, policy makers should carefully consider how cuts are distributed, keeping America’s most vulnerable families in mind as the effects of the recession reverberate, as demonstrated by high child poverty rates.”

The research was conducted by Jessica Bean, Beth Mattingly and Andrew Schaefer. The full report is available here (PDF).

 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali


It's really not that difficult to understand why "low information" poor voters vote for the RepubliKlans, especially when you factor in the Christian evangelical indoctrination they are subjected to 24/7, which implores them to reject science (the earth is only 6,000 years old) — including evolution, and tells them to just get ready to meet Jesus in the clouds —the rapture. The oligarchs who run the business and politics of the southern states have the same mindset as the antebellum slavocracy elite who criminalized teaching slaves how to read or write and pumped ‘white jesus’ religion into their property. Today the racket is the same, keep the people as dumb as possible, put rush & hannity & beck & <s>FOX</s> FAKE news on as many stations as possible, open as many pimp pastor mega-theaters as possible, ban the sale of sex toys, classify a $9.00 an hour job at Wal-Mart as a middle class job and sit back and watch the neo-slaves vote for any RepubliKlan wack-job whose name is on the ballot. ‘Dem Demo-rats are ungodly you know’ Praise Jesus.


<img src="http://www.bartcop.com/educated-states.jpg" width="950">


<hr noshade color="#333333" size="4"></hr>

mitt-BS-mountain4.jpg


<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="6"></hr>

iqwbdICaT7Mi9.jpg
 
Last edited:

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

Are these states considered conservative or liberal?
 

Greed

Star
Registered
For a better future, live in a red state

FOR A BETTER FUTURE, LIVE IN A RED STATE (50:30)
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2013

When it comes to things like the economy, taxes, health care and education, is it better to live in a red state or a blue state?

Some argue that red-state tendencies toward lower taxes and less regulated, more free-market systems make them ideal places to work and raise a family. But others counter that residents of blue states are wealthier, have more educational opportunities and benefit from a commitment to a social safety net.

While gridlock and division in Washington make it difficult for either party or ideology to set the policy agenda, single-party government prevails in three-quarters of the states. In 24 states Republicans control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, and in 13 states Democrats enjoy one-party control. Comparing economic growth, education, health care, quality of life and environment, and the strength of civil society, do red or blue states win out?

FOR THE MOTION

Hugh Hewitt
Radio Host, The Hugh Hewitt Show
Hugh Hewitt is a lawyer, law professor, and broadcast journalist whose nationally syndicated radio show is heard in more than 120 cities across the U.S. every weekday afternoon. Hewitt is a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, and has been teaching constitutional law at Chapman University Law School since it opened in 1995. He is the author of a dozen books, including two New York Times bestsellers. Hewitt writes daily for his blog, HughHewitt.com, which is among the most visited political blogs in the U.S., and is a weekly columnist for The Washington Examiner and Townhall.com. Hewitt served for nearly six years in the Reagan Administration in a variety of posts, including Assistant Counsel in the White House and Special Assistant to two Attorneys General. He lives in southern California.

Stephen Moore
Editorial Board Member, The Wall Street Journal
Stephen Moore joined The Wall Street Journal as a member of the editorial board and the senior economics writer in 2005. In March 2013 he became a Fox News Channel commentator. He is the founder and former president of the Club for Growth, which raises money for political candidates who favor free-market economic policies. Moore has served as a senior economist on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee, as a budget expert for the Heritage Foundation, and as a senior economics fellow at the Cato Institute. He was a consultant to the National Economic Commission in 1987 and the research director for President Reagan's Commission on Privatization. Moore is the author of six books, including Who’s the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, Taxes, and Wealth in America (2012).

AGAINST THE MOTION

Gray Davis
37th Governor of California
Joseph "Gray" Davis was overwhelmingly elected the 37th governor of California in 1998, winning 58% of the vote. As Governor, he made education a top priority, signing legislation to strengthen California's K-12 system by establishing the Academic Performance Index to increase accountability in schools, and expanding access to higher education with a record number of scholarships and college loans. These reforms improved student achievement scores for six consecutive years. Davis was also proud to fund and establish Institutes of Science and Innovation in partnership with the University of California and leading private industry; these Institutes are appropriately named after the Governor. Today, Davis is Of Counsel at Loeb & Loeb, LLP, a member of the bi-partisan Think Long Committee, a senior fellow at the UCLA School of Public Affairs, and Honorary Co-Chair of the Southern California Leadership Council. He has also served as lieutenant governor, state controller, and state assemblyman. He began his public service as a captain in the U.S. Army, earning the Bronze Star for meritorious service in Vietnam.

Michael Lind
Co-Founder, New America Foundation
Michael Lind is a co-founder of the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., where he is the policy director of its Economic Growth Program and Next Social Contract Initiative. A columnist for Salon, he has been a staff writer or editor at The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine, The New Republic, and The National Interest and contributes frequently to The New York Times and the Financial Times. He is the author of a number of books of history, political journalism, fiction, and poetry, including Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States (2012). Educated at the University of Texas and Yale, Lind has taught at Harvard and Johns Hopkins. Lind is a fifth generation native of Texas, where he worked for the state legislature and where he plans to retire, notwithstanding the lamentable political culture of the Lone Star State.

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/de...m/908-for-a-better-future-live-in-a-red-state
 

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: For a better future, live in a red state

FOR A BETTER FUTURE, LIVE IN A RED STATE (50:30)
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2013

When it comes to things like the economy, taxes, health care and education, is it better to live in a red state or a blue state?

Some argue that red-state tendencies toward lower taxes and less regulated, more free-market systems make them ideal places to work and raise a family. But others counter that residents of blue states are wealthier, have more educational opportunities and benefit from a commitment to a social safety net.

While gridlock and division in Washington make it difficult for either party or ideology to set the policy agenda, single-party government prevails in three-quarters of the states. In 24 states Republicans control the governorship and both houses of the legislature, and in 13 states Democrats enjoy one-party control. Comparing economic growth, education, health care, quality of life and environment, and the strength of civil society, do red or blue states win out?

FOR THE MOTION

Hugh Hewitt
Radio Host, The Hugh Hewitt Show
Hugh Hewitt is a lawyer, law professor, and broadcast journalist whose nationally syndicated radio show is heard in more than 120 cities across the U.S. every weekday afternoon. Hewitt is a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, and has been teaching constitutional law at Chapman University Law School since it opened in 1995. He is the author of a dozen books, including two New York Times bestsellers. Hewitt writes daily for his blog, HughHewitt.com, which is among the most visited political blogs in the U.S., and is a weekly columnist for The Washington Examiner and Townhall.com. Hewitt served for nearly six years in the Reagan Administration in a variety of posts, including Assistant Counsel in the White House and Special Assistant to two Attorneys General. He lives in southern California.

Stephen Moore
Editorial Board Member, The Wall Street Journal
Stephen Moore joined The Wall Street Journal as a member of the editorial board and the senior economics writer in 2005. In March 2013 he became a Fox News Channel commentator. He is the founder and former president of the Club for Growth, which raises money for political candidates who favor free-market economic policies. Moore has served as a senior economist on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee, as a budget expert for the Heritage Foundation, and as a senior economics fellow at the Cato Institute. He was a consultant to the National Economic Commission in 1987 and the research director for President Reagan's Commission on Privatization. Moore is the author of six books, including Who’s the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, Taxes, and Wealth in America (2012).

AGAINST THE MOTION

Gray Davis
37th Governor of California
Joseph "Gray" Davis was overwhelmingly elected the 37th governor of California in 1998, winning 58% of the vote. As Governor, he made education a top priority, signing legislation to strengthen California's K-12 system by establishing the Academic Performance Index to increase accountability in schools, and expanding access to higher education with a record number of scholarships and college loans. These reforms improved student achievement scores for six consecutive years. Davis was also proud to fund and establish Institutes of Science and Innovation in partnership with the University of California and leading private industry; these Institutes are appropriately named after the Governor. Today, Davis is Of Counsel at Loeb & Loeb, LLP, a member of the bi-partisan Think Long Committee, a senior fellow at the UCLA School of Public Affairs, and Honorary Co-Chair of the Southern California Leadership Council. He has also served as lieutenant governor, state controller, and state assemblyman. He began his public service as a captain in the U.S. Army, earning the Bronze Star for meritorious service in Vietnam.

Michael Lind
Co-Founder, New America Foundation
Michael Lind is a co-founder of the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., where he is the policy director of its Economic Growth Program and Next Social Contract Initiative. A columnist for Salon, he has been a staff writer or editor at The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine, The New Republic, and The National Interest and contributes frequently to The New York Times and the Financial Times. He is the author of a number of books of history, political journalism, fiction, and poetry, including Land of Promise: An Economic History of the United States (2012). Educated at the University of Texas and Yale, Lind has taught at Harvard and Johns Hopkins. Lind is a fifth generation native of Texas, where he worked for the state legislature and where he plans to retire, notwithstanding the lamentable political culture of the Lone Star State.

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/de...m/908-for-a-better-future-live-in-a-red-state


:lol::lol::lol:
 

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Re: America's 10 Poorest States: Keep Voting Republican. At Least They Aren’t Sociali

source: NewsHounds

Fox Misleadingly Spins Higher ObamaCare Premiums In Red States


A featured FoxNews.com story yesterday was headlined, “ObamaCare’s red state rate squeeze.” A subtitle said, “Study finds Obamacare premiums will be highest in states that did not vote for President Obama, prompting some lawmakers to say it proves ‘law picks winners and losers’ across the country.” Such a byline invites the reader to venture forward to the article itself whereupon a plethora of nonsense is unleashed.

First off, we find the author of this “study” is the Heritage Foundation, which hasn’t exactly had the best record on reports recently. Fox’s Maxim Lott uncritically cites the study, saying premiums are set to go up 50% in blue states and 78% in red states. Although we do not yet fully know how the Affordable Care Act (“ObamaCare”) affects insurance premiums, much has been written about how the ACA isn’t responsible for rate hikes, or even lower premiums for many, even in red states. In fact, Reuters has called the pricing “apolitical.”

Citing Avik Roy, a member of the Manhattan Institute, Koch-funded, right wing think tank, Lott says that “regulations” are the reason that blue states are getting better deals. Unfortunately for Fox, the opposite is more probable. The more regulated blue states have taken a more active approach to the ACA and have been able to post better premiums under the law. Those states where (Republican-controlled) governments rejected setting up exchanges themselves, rejected the expansion of Medicaid, and in general did less to set the law up, are seeing worse outcomes—a very unfortunate fact for their citizens, especially since those same states often have higher numbers of uninsured and could benefit from the law more.

Lott goes on to complain, by citing a “Republican Senate staffer,” that red states are “subsidizing the blue states’ Medicaid expansion.” This is laughable. Blue states generally subsidize red states by paying more into federal taxes than they get back. The quote also seems to miss the point that the Medicaid expansion was an option which Republicans could have opted to take. The staffer even seemed to acknowledge what a good deal the expansion was since he or she noted that the federal government pays “90 cents of every dollar to expand Medicaid to include childless adults.” The lack of cognitive dissonance here is astounding.

Although Lott does quote a pro-ObamaCare spokeswoman who points out that the ACA does make it illegal to “yank” coverage from sick people, Roy dismisses that notion, telling the reader that situation never happens anyway. He said, “[Insurance companies yanking coverage] almost never happens unless you’ve lied on your forms.” However before the ACA, insurance companies could try to wiggle out of coverage, for instance, by counting C-sections or premature births as “pre-existing conditions.”

Finally FoxNews.com reminds us that Republicans want to scrap the law, though it gives no mention of what they would do in its place. Maybe that’s because they know more of the country favors expanding the law or keep it as is than repealing it.







FoxNews.com_Chris_Smith.png





http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/12/us-usa-healthcare-rates-idUSBRE99B03R20131012
 
Top