Meet the Alt-Right 'Spokesman' Who's Thrilled With Trump's Rise

VAiz4hustlaz

Proud ADOS and not afraid to step to da mic!
BGOL Investor
Meet the Alt-Right 'Spokesman' Who's Thrilled With Trump's Rise

Just two weeks after Hillary Clinton delivered her August speechdecrying Donald Trump's ties to "an emerging racist ideology known as the 'Alt-Right,'" the Alt-Right movement's leaders host a press conference – a coming-out party of sorts – at Washington, D.C.'s tony Willard Hotel. Sponsored by the National Policy Institute, a small non-profit "dedicated to the heritage, identity, and future of people of European descent in the United States," the conference prominently features the institute's president, Richard Spencer, a trim and tidily dressed 38-year-old with grandiose ambitions to usher in a white "ethno-state." Spencer is joined by two older compatriots: Jared Taylor, the founder of the website American Renaissance, which promotes faux science claiming that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites, and Peter Brimelow, who once wrote for Forbes and National Review before founding VDare, an anti-immigrant site named after Virginia Dare, who is said to be the first British child born in the American colonies. The trio spends two hours holding forth on the Alt-Right's core beliefs and its growing notoriety in the age of Donald Trump.

"We want something heroic. We want something that is not defined by liberalism, or individual rights, or bourgeois norms. We want something that is truly European and truly heroic," Spencer says at the podium. "That is fundamentally what the Alt-Right is about." Race, he says, "is real. Race matters, and race is the foundation of identity."

The Alt-Right prides itself on its leaderless ethos, using social media to spread its ideology through viral memes and anonymous attacks on its enemies, real and imagined. But Spencer coined the term Alt-Right, back in 2010, and has since positioned himself as the movement's leading intellectual and most visible spokesman.

Post-conference, Spencer invites a cluster of journalists and Alt-Right fans for drinks at the staid hotel, where he relishes being the center of attention.

Spencer says he guesses women comprise only about a fifth of the Alt-Right – an imbalance that's obvious at the gathering, where there appears to be only one female follower amid the dozen or so men who cycle in and out.

No matter. Spencer tends to see women as manipulative figures who are best when submitting to Alt-Right virility. Women, he tweetedduring the first debate between Hillary Clinton and Trump, "should never be allowed to make foreign policy. It's not that they're 'weak.' To the contrary, their vindictiveness knows no bounds." Over drinks, he suggests that most women secretly crave Alt-Right boyfriends because they want "alpha genes" and "alpha sperm." When a man by the bar suggests someone should write a novel about "a liberal feminist studies major falling in love with a Richard Spencer type," Spencer suggests I write it.

More recently, in a podcast recorded after the exposure of the so-called Trump tape, Spencer scoffed at the "puritanical" criticism of Trump, saying it's "ridiculous" to call what Trump was talking about sexual assault. "At some part of every woman's soul," he said, "they want to be taken by a strong man." Pointing to how Trump said he had taken Nancy O'Dell furniture shopping, Spencer added, "Is this really the worst thing you've ever heard? In a way, he's like the most gentlemanly, kindly philanderer of all time."

Spencer has become more enthused as Trump has ramped up his claims about how his campaign represents an "existential threat" to "global special interests." After Trump's widely criticized speech in West Palm Beach last week, during which the GOP nominee alleged a "conspiracy" against the American people led by a "global power structure," Spencer tweeted, "The shackles are off, and Trump is getting radical. We've never seen a major postwar politician talk like this." He later amplified his appreciation of what he characterized as Trump "demystifying 'racism' and the financial power structure," concluding, "No matter what happens, I will be profoundly grateful to Donald Trump for the rest of my life."

At the Willard in September, over a Mint Julep followed by Manhattans, Spencer, whose free-wheeling style with journalists has made him the Alt-Right's "it boy," gabs about white nationalism and his disdain for electoral democracy. He also discusses why he supports Trump, and their shared respect for Vladimir Putin. "I admire Putin too," he says. "Who wouldn't?"

"I love empire, I love power, I love achievement," he goes on, growing animated. Spencer loves imperialism so much, he says, that he'll sometimes "get a boner" reading about Napoleon.

"Trump sincerely and genuinely cares about Americans, and white Americans in particular."

I first meet Spencer at the Republican National Convention in July, at a party headlined by Milo Yiannopoulos, the Breitbart editor and self-described "dangerous faggot" who tours college campuses to rail against "social justice warriors," political correctness and the left in general. (Spencer perceives Yiannopoulos as a fellow traveler of sorts, but not truly Alt-Right; he does, however, see Yiannopoulos' followers as ripe for Alt-Right recruitment.) The crowd, Spencer later notes, is populated by lots of Alt-Right "shitlords" – a form of high praise on social media that designates true believers. They're wildly excited about a speech by far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who's attending the convention as a guest of the Tennessee Republican Party. After a lengthy diatribe about "so-called leaders" who've allowed "Eurabia" to be overrun by Muslims and who "do not defend our liberty, our sovereignty, our values, our national identity," Wilders elicits loud chants of "Trump! Trump! Trump!"

After the speeches, as the crowd mingles, Spencer reflects on the significance of what he sees as Trump's affinity for white nationalism. "It's not so much about policy – it's more about the emotions that he evokes," he says. "And emotions are more important than facts. Trump sincerely and genuinely cares about Americans, and white Americans in particular."

Spencer is ebullient over how Trump has legitimized his movement. "It's not just about 'deport illegals' or 'stop illegal immigration,'" he says. "It's about the sense – the existential sense – of, Are we a nation? He's brought an existential quality to politics."

He, and other Alt-Right activists, would never have attended a political convention in the past, Spencer tells me, but with Trump, "now we have something at stake."

Trump, Spencer believes, has exposed the Republican Party's id. "The Trump phenomenon expresses a fundamental truth," he says. "It's an unspoken truth, and that is that the Republican Party has won elections on the basis of implicit nationalism and not on the basis of the Constitution, free-market economics, vague Christian values and so on. Even a leftist would agree with that statement. Like, Trump has shown the hand of the GOP. The GOP is a white person's populist party." Unlike Trump, though, the party is "embarrassed of itself."

After Trump tapped Breitbart chair Steve Bannon as campaign CEO in August, the Alt-Right instantly became a fixture in political conversation. (Bannon boasted to me at the RNC that Breitbart is "the platform for the Alt-Right.") Yet for Spencer, who sees Breitbart as having only "elective affinities" with the Alt-Right, the real turning point was Clinton's speech on the Alt-Right the following week. Spencer speculates that she aimed, with her speech, "to bleed the GOP of upper-middle-class whites who are embarrassed by their race." Clinton is not just a political adversary, in Spencer's view – she's "cagey" in her effort to reach the traditional conservatives he and his followers call, pejoratively, "cuckservatives" or "cucks," a reflection of their view that conservatives have been so "de-masculinized" that they've lost the ability to stand up for their principles.

Raised in Dallas, where he attended a private boys' school, Spencer graduated from the University of Virginia, and went on to earn a Masters in humanities from the University of Chicago and study toward a doctorate, never completed, at Duke. He briefly worked as an assistant editor at The American Conservative magazine, starting in 2007, which he says "really changed my life" – "it was the first time I was, even in a small way, a professional ideologue." Scott McConnell, a former colleague at the publication, says that when Spencer worked there, he "was interested in a lot of the European conservatives, many from the anti-democratic tradition. So he doesn't buy into egalitarianism."

He later served as managing editor of the far-right magazine Taki's, and created the website AlternativeRight.com, which gave the movement its name, in 2010. He took over the National Policy Institute in 2011. Spencer's wife, Nina Kouprianova, who also writes under the pen name Nina Byzantina, is a Russian scholar who has translated the work of Russian far-right theorist and Putin ally Alexander Dugin, and
criticized Western media coverage of Putin as "unjustifiably critical." In 2014, the conservative Daily Caller denounced her as "the wife of a well-known American fascist and white nationalist" who pushed "anti-Kiev talking points" while discussing events in Ukraine in an appearance on the Kremlin-backed, English-language outlet Russia Today.

Spencer is the closest thing the Alt-Right has to an official spokesman, a role he brushes off as inconsistent with the movement's freewheeling, anti-establishment culture – yet one he clearly enjoys. Taylor says in an interview that he, Spencer and Brimelow are the most recognized faces of a movement whose size and reach is difficult to measure because its growth has been fueled online, and often by anonymous social media users. But while Taylor and Brimelow have strived to give white nationalism an aura of intellectualism over the years, they lack, in their 60s, the youthful looks, pop-cultural fluency and rhetorical audacity that has made Spencer, three decades younger, the face of a newer, Internet-fueled white nationalism that is undergoing a rebirth. Spencer, wrote Hunter Wallace, the pen name of neo-Confederate white nationalist Brad Griffin, on the influential white nationalist site Occidental Dissent, is the Alt-Right's "acknowledged leader." Spencer sees his moving of white nationalism beyond the margins and Trump's "gusto" as evidence that white nationalist ideas resonate with Trump's base. "I wouldn't want to go back to the old white nationalism when no one was listening to us," he said recently. "I want to be in a place where our ideas are entering the mainstream."

Those ideas boil down to open racism. The Alt-Right, Spencer says, "opposes the basic ideas behind the Civil Rights Act." He's called Martin Luther King Jr. "the god of white dispossession," the latter being one of the Alt-Right's major obsessions. True "shitlords" are gripped by the fear that white people in America are being "dispossessed" by immigration and multi-culturalism, to the point that they face an imminent "white genocide." Spencer has called anti-discrimination laws "the enemy of all tradition, not just the Anglo-Saxon American society it has helped destroy."

"No matter what happens, I will be profoundly grateful to Donald Trump for the rest of my life."

The Alt-Right, in Spencer's formulation, signals a sharp break from Ted Cruz-style Christian right politics, which frames the United States as a Christian nation, as well as Ron Paul-style libertarianism that portrays government as an oppressive, freedom-crushing behemoth. So Spencer says he is neither a libertarian nor a constitutionalist, but rather a "statist" – one with a weak commitment to constitutional democracy. "The important thing," he says, "is that the people in charge are people like me."

While Spencer reviles conservatives, he believes they secretly share his white nationalist beliefs. "Saying that you want a culture of life, or Christian values," he said in a recent podcast, "that's just basically saying you want to live in a white country that's normal and decent." Or, as he explains to me at the Willard, the Family Research Council's name already implies a call for "more white children." In Spencer's eyes, the Alt-Right is an "intellectual movement" so powerful that "in the future, we're going to be thinking for conservatives," whom he disparages not only as "cucks" but as "losers and dorks." This superior Alt-Right intelligence will eventually allow the movement to harness the institutions the religious right built, he believes, and entice religious conservatives into white nationalism. It would be easy enough, he says, because "there's not a single intelligent person in that entire world."

Despite Spencer's bluster, and the Alt-Right's seeming ubiquity this election cycle, thanks to Trump's embrace, this is a nascent movement, many of its activists still visible only through anonymous Twitter accounts and Reddit posts that help distribute racist and anti-Semitic memes. That anonymity, Taylor says, is still necessary because political correctness marginalizes their "racialist" views, and Alt-Righters fear for their livelihoods and even their lives. Still, Spencer claims he has a "hard core" of hundreds or perhaps thousands of people who attend his periodic conferences, some of which are private, and that a "five- or six-figure number" of individuals read his commentary website, Radix, and listen to his conversational podcasts; he also has some 18,000 Twitter followers. Spencer claims analytics show a far larger, "seven-figure number" of people read his tweets because they're so widely circulated. "In terms of who knows about the Alt-Right and has a vague inkling about what we believe," he says, "that's like an eight-figure or nine-figure number now, thanks to Hillary," who he says bolstered the Alt-Right's visibility with her August speech.

Deep-pocket donors and well-funded institutions have defined modern conservatism, in Spencer's view. But he is counting instead on the raw enthusiasm of the Alt-Right. If the Heritage Foundation, a leading conservative think tank, is like an "elephant," he says, the Alt-Right is a "flea," capable of "getting people excited and crazy" about its white ethno-state ambitions.

Building a movement strong enough to reshape American politics by organizing anonymous racists on Twitter would be without precedent – but Trump's rise to the top of the Republican presidential ticket makes it seem, to Spencer, deliciously plausible. "It might not happen in my lifetime," Spencer says, "but yes, people like me are going to define the civilization. Because we've done it in the past, and we're the ones who want to rule."

http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...ght-spokesman-thrilled-by-trumps-rise-w443902
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
the 'Alt-Right

"an emerging racist ideology"

. . . prides itself on its leaderless ethos, using social media to spread its ideology through viral memes and anonymous attacks on its enemies, real and imagined

. . . ideas boil down to open racism. The Alt-Right, Spencer says, "opposes the basic ideas behind the Civil Rights Act." He's called Martin Luther King Jr. "the god of white dispossession," the latter being one of the Alt-Right's major obsessions.


. . . fear that white people in America are being "dispossessed" by immigration and multi-culturalism, to the point that they face an imminent "white genocide."

Spencer has called anti-discrimination laws "the enemy of all tradition, not just the Anglo-Saxon American society it has helped destroy."


. . . Thrilled With Trump's Rise . . .


. . . "No matter what happens, I will be profoundly grateful to Donald Trump for the rest of my life."


Thanks for posting this article. Should be REQUIRED READING.

AND, those who subscribe to the "Colin Rule" should be banished until they repent -- for their neglect of duty.


.
 

MASTERBAKER

༺ S❤️PER❤️ ᗰOD ༻
Super Moderator
Inside The Alt-Right: An Explainer
By Richard Stockton on February 10, 2017
The alt-right has come from nowhere to reshape Western politics. Who are these people, what do they want, and where do they want to take the U.S.?
alt-right-trump-tank.jpg

Jason Heuser/Etsy

A specter has begun to haunt European and American politics: the alt-right. All the powers of old Europe and the American two-party system are working to exorcise this specter, but it has leaped off of the internet forums and discussion threads where it started with one goal: radically remaking politics in the West.

The Origins Of The Alt-Right
alt-right-bbc-pepe.jpg

BBCThe alt-right has raised hackles in establishment media circles. Here, a reporter for the BBC narrates a story about movement mascot Pepe the Frog.

The reactionary movement now called the alt-right (its members generally resent the term; many reject any label for what they are) started when several threads of right- and left-wing thought converged in places like 4chan’s /pol/ board.

Some anonymous users – who tend to be young, white, straight, and male – came out of an older conservatism that had grown sick of George W. Bush’s neoconservative agenda. Others were left-leaning libertarians who believed that the progressive left had begun to unfairly single out straight white men in stump speeches and policy.

Plenty of new recruits had little to no experience with politics, and just absorbed the current ideas on the boards as part of an atmosphere of fun and very un-PC joking around. Young men who had gotten the message that their demographic comprised the single identity in the West that was not entitled to special legal or social protection, as well as older breadwinners who didn’t like the cultural changes of the last 50 years, came together to effectively invent a new ideology in reaction against the less-pleasant elements in society.

Many of them came to strongly identify this new outlook as National Socialism, or “NatSoc,” a term that means something different for them than it does for most people.

On a personal level, many in the alt-right put their ideologically informed opinions about life to work. Many prize physical fitness, as well as abstention from drugs and alcohol and pre- or extra-marital sex. They’re a literate group, with many college graduates and bookworms coming together with political junkies, news groupies, and academic theorists.

NatSocs cherish their anonymity – which is hardly surprising, given the views they hold – and they actively avoid “revealing their power level” in polite company. Many believe that the white race is under threat, and that they have the obligation to marry, raise a large number of children, and roll back society’s “degeneracy” by whatever means.

These are not illiterate skinheads, and they are definitely not the KKK; these are ordinary people who keep friends of all races and political persuasions, but who will support mass deportations and the undoing of feminism, gay liberation, and the welfare state if they get the chance.

The Leaders Of The Alt-Right
alt-right-trump-bomb.jpg

The alt-right overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump in 2016. Believers worked to aid his campaign wherever they could, and after the election they took a great deal of pleasure in mocking their opposition.

Since the alt-right became a cultural phenomenon, beginning around 2012, several public figures have sprung up to speak for it. Milo Yiannopoulos of Breitbart News is perhaps the most famous spokesman, but most people within the movement reject him along with the alt-right label he embraces.

NatSocs are fiercely iconoclastic, and the idea of having a high-profile mascot is anathema to their anonymous culture.

Other figures who buzz around the publicly visible tip of the alt-right iceberg include Stefan Molyneux, whose YouTube channel has more than half a million subscribers, Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars, and Jared Taylor of American Renaissance.

Members treat virtually all of the self-appointed voices of the alt-right as living jokes, though sometimes they will give these self-appointed leaders a respectful mention if they’ve said or done something perceived as useful to the cause.

The heart of the alt-right is an unknown number (certainly in the tens of thousands, maybe a lot more) of online commenters who swarm in a chaotic mass over 4chan and other anonymous internet forums. They are active in social media and maintain a large presence on YouTube, where many administer channels, under multiple pseudonyms, devoted to posting and reposting (when they inevitably get shut down) lectures by Holocaust deniers such as David Irving and Dr. William Luther Pierce.

Alt-right adherents very rarely meet in person, and the movement remains very much an online phenomenon. As one anonymous source put it during an interview that required us both to set up burner Gmail accounts for the purpose:

“I was privately thinking of myself as a National Socialist for a while, thinking that nobody around me could find out because the world would end. Like, what happens if my boss or my coworkers find out what I think? Then one day my boss just dropped a chance remark that only could have come from [an alt-right site]. After that we got to talking and found out we’d been posting in the same places for months without knowing it.”


Consensus And Dissent
alt-right-pepe-shamrock.jpg

4 ArchivePepe the Frog has been a kind of mascot for the alt-right for years. Hillary Clinton was actually moved to bring him up in her now-infamous “basket of deplorables” speech.

The term “National Socialist” can be misleading. In popular use, the term is synonymous with Hitler, concentration camps, and World War II. Among the people who use this label now, however, the words are meant as literally as possible.

Nationalism is the consensus view among NatSocs. White nationalists broadly support the existence of white ethnostates and the (voluntary) separation of races and ethnicities. Their thinking is that white Europeans have built the civilization we live in, and people of other races are a poor fit for genetic or cultural reasons, which results in crime and disorder.

Civic nationalists dissent from this outlook. Their offer their loyalty first to the nation, rather than any one race or ethnic group. It is impossible to do a head count, but the civic nationalists may be somewhat more common, though less vocal, within the community. Both varieties of nationalists are hostile to the economic aims of globalism, resistance to which is more than enough to bind them together for now.

Socialism is more contentious. Some alt-right members are vehemently pro-free enterprise on a Ron Paul model. Others support a poorly defined variety of socialism that doesn’t take from the rich as much as it asks every level of society to help out.

In this model, if higher taxes are needed to create jobs, taxes may be raised and funds distributed to those who will work for it. Traditional welfare programs, however, are viewed as a dastardly, dependency-breeding trick that keeps individuals chained to government control. It is fair to say that, while an economically NatSoc state would have a safety net for the poor, there would be nothing resembling a “free ride” on offer.

A Modern Reactionary Movement
alt-right-philosophical-warfare.jpg

Alt-right forums are often rich sources of political and philosophical ferment. Needless to say, Friedrich Nietzsche is a perennial favorite.

On the political and social left, the word “reactionary” is an insult. Among the alt-right, it carries no such baggage. Virtually every member of the alt-right arrived where he is as a reaction against something he found repulsive in mainstream society, usually something liberal. One anonymous source put it this way:

“I’m a registered Democrat and I’ve been drifting further to the right ever since GamerGate happened. I’ve been disgusted with the media’s shameless dishonesty and liberal bias for years now.
They labeled video games I love misogynistic and screamed “gamers are dead!”
I thought the new Ghostbusters movie looked dumb and they labeled me a misogynist.
I supported Bernie Sanders and they labeled me a misogynist.
I hated the Clinton campaign by the end of the primaries.
For a while I wasn’t going to vote for anyone, but when the press unironically labeled Pepe the Frog as a hate symbol I realized the entire Democratic party was infantile and irredeemably stupid. So I voted for Trump.
Shadilay.”

A different commenter from the same forum expressed similar sentiments, but he seems to have come to the alt-right from the opposite direction:

“The leftists pushed too hard. White people are waking up to the bullshit and realizing the fuck job they have been getting. Why are white people the only race on earth not allowed to be proud? To take positive action to protect and progress their own race? Why are white countries the only ones on earth forced to absorb endless hordes of criminal immigrants? People have seen that none of the wealthiest Gulf countries have taken a single ‘refugee,’ and liberals are silent about it.”


The International Nationalist Alliance
alt-right-vote-online.jpg

An example of the meme activism the alt-right enjoys. This flier was circulated across social media platforms in an effort to get Hillary Clinton supporters to “vote” via Twitter.

There’s nothing new about nationalism, of course. What the alt-right brings to the table that is new, however, is an international scope that could only be possible in the Information Age. Nationalists of the last century, for instance, were almost always highly insular and unwilling or unable to connect with their like-minded counterparts in foreign countries.

Alt-right nationalists today don’t have that problem; Americans, for example, supported Brexit online last spring by crafting and circulating memes on social media and spreading alarming stories about the raising of an EU army and direct taxation on British citizens by the Brussels government.

Come summer, alt-right supporters in Britain and Western Europe returned the favor by poring over thousands of leaked emails, looking for dirt on Hillary Clinton. Both British and American NatSocs likewise lend aid and comfort to fellow nationalists fighting for influence in Austria, Germany, Greece, and other EU states.

By constantly talking to each other, middle- and working-class whites across the West keep informed about the minutiae of each others’ politics and present a united front that is seriously pushing back against the more isolated, more old-fashioned national power structures in each country.

It may seem odd for devoted nationalists to build a genuinely international movement, but members of the alt-right see themselves as diverse members of an extended white family. One commenter sums it up this way:

“We like diversity and wish to preserve it. We like to enjoy other cultures, their uniqueness and their exotism [sic]. This is why we are against globalism. We also noticed that 99% of the good things humanity enjoys are made by white people; this is why we like our people and wish to preserve our culture of open mindedness and innovation.”

In this context, alt-right adherents believe, the national and ethnic variations between Europeans are something to be honored and preserved, rather than made homogenous under the EU or swamped with mass immigration from Africa and Asia. Many on the alt-right even admit to admiring the foreign cultures of places such as Japan for its high level of development and unified cultural identity.

Agenda And Future
alt-right-white-nationalism.jpg

Members of the alt-right, often white nationalists, frequently use infographics and other memes (like the one above), always showing the data most favorable to the point they’re making, to influence an audience on social media.

The alt-right is a new phenomenon, and its members are still working out the details of the world it wants to create. Some themes have already emerged, though.

In general, the alt-right supports strong family units and self-reliance. It opposes divorce, feminism, and other perceived obstacles to women becoming wives and mothers. Though very few of its members would prohibit women living independently, none of them sees this as ideal.

They oppose homosexuality, transgenderism, and other non-mainstream sexuality, along with pornography and other “degenerate” practices such as unwed parenting and polyamory. Laws and practices that support the traditional family, such as low unemployment among breadwinning husbands and elimination of the marriage tax penalty, enjoy unqualified support, while anti-family institutions, such as welfare programs and abortion, generally receive opposition.

Economically, the alt-right has no fixed position, but members will almost certainly support any model that promises national prosperity over globalist trade policies. Politically, the alt-right is openly gunning for the EU and the UN. They view these unelected transnational bodies as a direct threat to the nation state, and no amount of hostility to them is too much.

Culturally, the alt-right rejects much that is “modern,” especially in art and music. Religious feeling in the group varies between fundamentalist Christians and convinced atheists, but they are almost all very hostile to both Islam and Judaism as foreign intruders.

The year 2016 was a wild ride for politics and society, and the alt-right was arguably the driving force behind much of it. This year promises to be just as wild, and with Trump in the White House and a British general election scheduled for early May, which will almost certainly be a referendum on Brexit, the alt-right has no intention of sitting on the sidelines.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Alt-Right Gunman Ambush Police Officers
5 officers Shot, One of Them Fatally





Media Silence . . .

- He wasn’t Black Lives Matter

- He wasn’t Muslim


============================================================

The Alt-Right Gunman said he was running for sheriff

Jim Michaels,
Stephanie Duchneskie
and Krystyna Biassou,
USA TODAY Network
Jan. 2, 2018


A sheriff's deputy was killed and four officers were injured Sunday in suburban Denver when a gunman fired more than 100 rounds in an ambush-style attack.

The gunman was killed by additional officers who rushed to the scene. Police had been responding to a disturbance call at an apartment complex.

Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlock described it as an "ambush-style" attack on the officers.

They were "shot very, very quickly," he said. "They went down within seconds of each other."

“He knew we were coming, and we obviously let him know that we were there,” Spurlock said.

The gunman continued to fire as additional officers arrived at the complex.

Spurlock identified Deputy Zackari Parrish, 29, as the officer killed in the attack. He was married with two young children. He had been hit multiple times.

Parrish had been at the department about seven months and loved his job, Spurlock said.

The gunman was armed with a rifle, but Spurlock released no further details on the weapon. The incident is still under investigation; officials will view body camera footage and other evidence in coming days.

The four wounded deputies are hospitalized in stable condition. Two civilians were also injured in the shooting.

Spurlock said the injured civilians may have been bystanders in other apartments but cautioned he hadn't confirmed that yet.

Speaking to reporters Sunday afternoon, Spurlock identified the gunman as Matthew Riehl, 37, an armed forces veteran who had exchanged angry tweets with the sheriff's office. Police earlier said he was known to authorities but did not have a record of arrests.


The Gunman

Riehl was known to law enforcement, Spurlock said. He attended law school at the University of Wyoming, where a spokesperson said the school has been investigating social media rants he made against the school for months.

A firearms instructor, Robert Butler, says Riehl took his rifle classes over the summer. "He didn't show any signs of being violent or unstable," Butler said. He says the weapons in photos Riehl posted on Facebook belonged to Riehl.

Riehl's Facebook page was filled with images associated with the alt-right. He also posted a video online where he announced he was running for Douglas County Sheriff as a Libertarian. The Libertarian Party of Colorado said it had no contact with him.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...wn-after-being-called-scene-denver/993297001/


.​
 
Top