White farmers sue U.S. government over stimulus for black farmers...........

Coldchi

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
but here's the kicker, hypocrisy, and greed......

The Trump administration created the market facilitation program (MFP) to offset the effects of the trade war, directing about $24 billion to American farmers. About 99.5% of the initial payments went to white farmers.
In 2020, the USDA established the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP) to provide billions in financial aid to farmers impacted by the coronavirus pandemic. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that as of October 2020, nearly 97% of the $9.2 billion in CFAP aid that had been distributed went to white farmers. Furthermore, white farmers received on average eight times more in aid ($3,398) than the average Black farmer ($422).

now these mufuckas wanna sue, cuz black farmers are being given $4 billion in subsidies??? FOH!!



White farmers sue U.S. government over stimulus for 'socially disadvantaged farmers'

A group of American farmers, all of them white, is suing the government for race-based discrimination, alleging that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s loan forgiveness program for farmers of color is a violation under the Constitution.

“All of my clients just want to be treated equally,” Daniel Lennington, deputy counsel and lead attorney for the lawsuit, told Yahoo Finance. “They’re not looking for any special treatment. If there is a loan forgiveness program, they want it to be open to everyone, regardless of race. And if the USDA would like to formulate the loan forgiveness program to help farmers who have a particular need, my clients would be all in favor of that.”

The program, which allocated roughly $4 billion for "socially disadvantaged farmers, ranchers, or forest landowners," is part of a larger stimulus bill signed into law amid the coronavirus pandemic.

"Socially disadvantaged" in this case is defined as relating to groups "subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities."
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack previously stated that Biden administration policies aim to "root out whatever systemic racism and barriers may exist at the Department of Agriculture directed to Black farmers, socially disadvantaged farmers, and people who live in persistently poor areas of rural America."

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack holds a press briefing in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC. on May 5, 2021. (Photo by Nicholas Kamm / AFP)
Eligible farmers would see up to 120% of their outstanding debts paid off as a result of the American Rescue Plan, with the extra 20% going toward taxes associated with the outstanding debt. An additional $1.01 billion in the bill will be provided for outreach, training, education, technical assistance, grants and loans, and funding for improving land access.

Lennington asserted that the plaintiffs are "all for USDA fixing its past racism with programs that are targeted to the victims of that racism. We would love for USDA to go out and find those farmers it discriminated against, and even their children, and make it up to them. But this law is specifically not targeted to the victims of race discrimination.”

The lawsuit argues that the Constitution “forbids discrimination by the federal government against any citizen because of his race.” Therefore, according to the plaintiffs, any race-based classifications “must be subjected to the most rigid scrutiny.”
John Boyd, president of the National Black Farmers Association, told Yahoo Finance that the lawsuit “shows the troubling pattern, and it looks like we’re going back in time in history where they just don’t want Blacks to have anything and be willing to be treated with dignity and respect. That’s it."

Farmer John W. Boyd Jr. criticized the lawsuit. (Photo by Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images)

'Eight out of 10 Blacks in the state of Texas who applied for federal aid were denied'
Boyd stressed that Black farmers were facing problems related to discrimination and lack of government support long before the pandemic.
“I’ve been trying to get debt relief for Blacks and other farmers of color for over 30 years,” he said. “This wasn’t a new request at all. When I first heard about the [new lawsuit], I immediately thought about history where Blacks were enslaved, Native Americans lost all their land at the great of many white men.”
There were nearly 1 million Black farmers in 1920, the most ever. As of April 2019, there are roughly 45,500 Black farmers, which account for 1.3% of the population, the Guardian reported. Those farmers own just 0.52% of farmland in the country, while making less than $40,000 a year (compared to white farmers who make over $190,000 annually).

The agriculture commissioner for the state of Texas, Sid Miller, also filed a lawsuit against the stimulus program for farmers of color, calling it unconstitutional.

Asked about Miller's lawsuit, Boyd noted that "eight out of 10 Blacks in the state of Texas who applied for federal aid were denied. So instead of filing a suit to complain for white farmers, why isn’t he doing something to help Black farmers in his very own state obtain access to credit that USDA and other state agencies where he could be more helpful to farmers of color there?”
 

tallblacknyc

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Animosity.. that is 1 of the best words to describe certain demographics of people for centuries and that’s definitely 1 of the best representation of negativity in humans the past decade.. bunch of bitch ass people observing another individual and catching feelings when they can mind their biz and spend more energy working on themselves or situation.. cacs historically carry this gene when observing others
 

husband73

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
That CAC piece of shit Stephen Miller is behind this shit. White farmers have been eating off of the government for decades and then want to pull this and claim victim the only time that the system doesn't explicitly look out for them.
Steven Miller is behind a lot of racial shit in the background. That big headed Great Kazoo head MUTHAFUCKA lookin ass
 

jack walsh13

Jack Walsh 13
BGOL Investor
Steven Miller is behind a lot of racial shit in the background. That big headed Great Kazoo head MUTHAFUCKA lookin ass
:roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2:

Y8ChYD.jpg
 

phanatic

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Equality feels like oppression for this schlubs. They should have been fighting for their farming brothers initially instead of saying "I got mine, fuck everyone else.".
They been winning in a rigged game for so long that when the playing field is EVEN they feel cheated
That holds true for every aspect of life in this WORLD
 

easy_b

Look into my eyes you are getting sleepy!!!
BGOL Investor
Cac mentality in just about everything involving black progress is "we can have it but not you and we'll do everything we can to make sure you never do". :mad:
Yep this is why I am glad they put this in the bill because black farmers got screwed last year when Trump tried to do this. People we have a very long way to go in this country it’s going to get a little worse as the white population decrease.
 

arnoldwsimmons

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Damn, damn, damn...

Judge halts billions in debt relief for farmers of color as conservative group for White farmers sue

By Andrea Salcedo

June 11, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. CDT

In the months since Congress included around $4 billion in the latest stimulus bill to forgive loans for Black and other minority farmers, thousands of them have been pushing to finally see the money. The Department of Agriculture promised to start paying for loans this month.

But now, that relief is again on hold thanks to a lawsuit brought by a conservative group on behalf of White farmers, who argue the program is unconstitutional because it discriminates against them.

On Thursday, a federal judge in Wisconsin sided with the plaintiffs and issued a temporary restraining order on the program.
“The Court recognized that the federal government’s plan to condition and allocate benefits on the basis of race raises grave constitutional concerns and threatens our clients with irreparable harm,” Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which filed the lawsuit, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

A spokesperson with the U.S. Department of Agriculture did not immediately respond to a message from The Washington Post late on Thursday.

The assistance program, which was passed by the Senate in March as part of the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion stimulus relief package, sought to correct long-standing disadvantages faced by Black, Latino, and other minority farmers in getting loans from banks and the government. As covid-19 disproportionately affected communities of color, those groups also had a more difficult time accessing relief programs due to systemic racism and other issues, the Biden administration argued.

“Over the last 100 years, policies were implemented that specifically twisted in a way that disadvantaged socially disadvantaged producers,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said. “There’s no better example of that than the covid relief efforts. Billions of dollars went to White farmers, because the system is structured in a way that gives them significant advantages.”
Relief bill is most significant legislation for Black farmers since Civil Rights Act, experts say

When the package passed, advocates told The Post that it was a major step toward correcting a century of mistreatment of Black farmers, with some describing it as reparations for a long history of racial oppression.

“This is the most significant piece of legislation with respect to the arc of Black land ownership in this country,” said Tracy Lloyd McCurty, executive director of the Black Belt Justice Center, which provides legal representation to Black farmers.

But the program, which was opposed by all 49 GOP senators, faced quick legal challenges. In April, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group based in Milwaukee, sued on behalf of five White farmers and ranchers, including Adam Faust, a double amputee and the owner of a dairy farm near Chilton, Wis. (The suit has since grown to include 12 farmers as plaintiffs.)
“There should absolutely be no federal dollars going anywhere just based on race,” Faust told the Journal Sentinel after joining the suit.

White farmers in other regions of the country have also sued against the debt relief program.

In April, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller formed the America First Legal Foundation to sue in Texas on behalf on behalf of Sid Miller, a White farmer who is also the Texas agriculture commissioner. The lawsuit claimed that the USDA program “disrupts our common progress toward becoming a more perfect union.”

The Wisconsin group’s lawsuit noted that the White farmers could make additional investments in their property, expand their farms, and purchase equipment and supplies if they were eligible for the loan forgiveness benefit.

“Because plaintiffs are ineligible to even apply for the program due solely to their race, they have been denied the equal protection of the law and therefore suffered harm,” according to the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, Judge William Griesbach of Wisconsin’s Eastern District, who was appointed by George W. Bush, issued the temporary restraining order.

Meryl Kornfield contributed to this report.
 

phanatic

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Damn, damn, damn...

Judge halts billions in debt relief for farmers of color as conservative group for White farmers sue

By Andrea Salcedo

June 11, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. CDT

In the months since Congress included around $4 billion in the latest stimulus bill to forgive loans for Black and other minority farmers, thousands of them have been pushing to finally see the money. The Department of Agriculture promised to start paying for loans this month.

But now, that relief is again on hold thanks to a lawsuit brought by a conservative group on behalf of White farmers, who argue the program is unconstitutional because it discriminates against them.

On Thursday, a federal judge in Wisconsin sided with the plaintiffs and issued a temporary restraining order on the program.
“The Court recognized that the federal government’s plan to condition and allocate benefits on the basis of race raises grave constitutional concerns and threatens our clients with irreparable harm,” Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which filed the lawsuit, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

A spokesperson with the U.S. Department of Agriculture did not immediately respond to a message from The Washington Post late on Thursday.

The assistance program, which was passed by the Senate in March as part of the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion stimulus relief package, sought to correct long-standing disadvantages faced by Black, Latino, and other minority farmers in getting loans from banks and the government. As covid-19 disproportionately affected communities of color, those groups also had a more difficult time accessing relief programs due to systemic racism and other issues, the Biden administration argued.

“Over the last 100 years, policies were implemented that specifically twisted in a way that disadvantaged socially disadvantaged producers,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said. “There’s no better example of that than the covid relief efforts. Billions of dollars went to White farmers, because the system is structured in a way that gives them significant advantages.”
Relief bill is most significant legislation for Black farmers since Civil Rights Act, experts say

When the package passed, advocates told The Post that it was a major step toward correcting a century of mistreatment of Black farmers, with some describing it as reparations for a long history of racial oppression.

“This is the most significant piece of legislation with respect to the arc of Black land ownership in this country,” said Tracy Lloyd McCurty, executive director of the Black Belt Justice Center, which provides legal representation to Black farmers.

But the program, which was opposed by all 49 GOP senators, faced quick legal challenges. In April, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group based in Milwaukee, sued on behalf of five White farmers and ranchers, including Adam Faust, a double amputee and the owner of a dairy farm near Chilton, Wis. (The suit has since grown to include 12 farmers as plaintiffs.)
“There should absolutely be no federal dollars going anywhere just based on race,” Faust told the Journal Sentinel after joining the suit.

White farmers in other regions of the country have also sued against the debt relief program.

In April, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller formed the America First Legal Foundation to sue in Texas on behalf on behalf of Sid Miller, a White farmer who is also the Texas agriculture commissioner. The lawsuit claimed that the USDA program “disrupts our common progress toward becoming a more perfect union.”

The Wisconsin group’s lawsuit noted that the White farmers could make additional investments in their property, expand their farms, and purchase equipment and supplies if they were eligible for the loan forgiveness benefit.

“Because plaintiffs are ineligible to even apply for the program due solely to their race, they have been denied the equal protection of the law and therefore suffered harm,” according to the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, Judge William Griesbach of Wisconsin’s Eastern District, who was appointed by George W. Bush, issued the temporary restraining order.

Meryl Kornfield contributed to this report.

Conservatives keep saying "the democrats are the real racists" as they continuously do racist stuff.
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Damn, damn, damn...

Judge halts billions in debt relief for farmers of color as conservative group for White farmers sue

By Andrea Salcedo

June 11, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. CDT

In the months since Congress included around $4 billion in the latest stimulus bill to forgive loans for Black and other minority farmers, thousands of them have been pushing to finally see the money. The Department of Agriculture promised to start paying for loans this month.

But now, that relief is again on hold thanks to a lawsuit brought by a conservative group on behalf of White farmers, who argue the program is unconstitutional because it discriminates against them.

On Thursday, a federal judge in Wisconsin sided with the plaintiffs and issued a temporary restraining order on the program.
“The Court recognized that the federal government’s plan to condition and allocate benefits on the basis of race raises grave constitutional concerns and threatens our clients with irreparable harm,” Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which filed the lawsuit, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

A spokesperson with the U.S. Department of Agriculture did not immediately respond to a message from The Washington Post late on Thursday.

The assistance program, which was passed by the Senate in March as part of the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion stimulus relief package, sought to correct long-standing disadvantages faced by Black, Latino, and other minority farmers in getting loans from banks and the government. As covid-19 disproportionately affected communities of color, those groups also had a more difficult time accessing relief programs due to systemic racism and other issues, the Biden administration argued.

“Over the last 100 years, policies were implemented that specifically twisted in a way that disadvantaged socially disadvantaged producers,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said. “There’s no better example of that than the covid relief efforts. Billions of dollars went to White farmers, because the system is structured in a way that gives them significant advantages.”
Relief bill is most significant legislation for Black farmers since Civil Rights Act, experts say

When the package passed, advocates told The Post that it was a major step toward correcting a century of mistreatment of Black farmers, with some describing it as reparations for a long history of racial oppression.

“This is the most significant piece of legislation with respect to the arc of Black land ownership in this country,” said Tracy Lloyd McCurty, executive director of the Black Belt Justice Center, which provides legal representation to Black farmers.

But the program, which was opposed by all 49 GOP senators, faced quick legal challenges. In April, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group based in Milwaukee, sued on behalf of five White farmers and ranchers, including Adam Faust, a double amputee and the owner of a dairy farm near Chilton, Wis. (The suit has since grown to include 12 farmers as plaintiffs.)
“There should absolutely be no federal dollars going anywhere just based on race,” Faust told the Journal Sentinel after joining the suit.

White farmers in other regions of the country have also sued against the debt relief program.

In April, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller formed the America First Legal Foundation to sue in Texas on behalf on behalf of Sid Miller, a White farmer who is also the Texas agriculture commissioner. The lawsuit claimed that the USDA program “disrupts our common progress toward becoming a more perfect union.”

The Wisconsin group’s lawsuit noted that the White farmers could make additional investments in their property, expand their farms, and purchase equipment and supplies if they were eligible for the loan forgiveness benefit.

“Because plaintiffs are ineligible to even apply for the program due solely to their race, they have been denied the equal protection of the law and therefore suffered harm,” according to the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, Judge William Griesbach of Wisconsin’s Eastern District, who was appointed by George W. Bush, issued the temporary restraining order.

Meryl Kornfield contributed to this report.
Do we say told you so @VAiz4hustlaz @Soul On Ice

Hey @geechiedan @AllUniverse17
 

durham

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Damn, damn, damn...

Judge halts billions in debt relief for farmers of color as conservative group for White farmers sue

By Andrea Salcedo

June 11, 2021 at 6:05 a.m. CDT

In the months since Congress included around $4 billion in the latest stimulus bill to forgive loans for Black and other minority farmers, thousands of them have been pushing to finally see the money. The Department of Agriculture promised to start paying for loans this month.

But now, that relief is again on hold thanks to a lawsuit brought by a conservative group on behalf of White farmers, who argue the program is unconstitutional because it discriminates against them.

On Thursday, a federal judge in Wisconsin sided with the plaintiffs and issued a temporary restraining order on the program.
“The Court recognized that the federal government’s plan to condition and allocate benefits on the basis of race raises grave constitutional concerns and threatens our clients with irreparable harm,” Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which filed the lawsuit, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

A spokesperson with the U.S. Department of Agriculture did not immediately respond to a message from The Washington Post late on Thursday.

The assistance program, which was passed by the Senate in March as part of the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion stimulus relief package, sought to correct long-standing disadvantages faced by Black, Latino, and other minority farmers in getting loans from banks and the government. As covid-19 disproportionately affected communities of color, those groups also had a more difficult time accessing relief programs due to systemic racism and other issues, the Biden administration argued.

“Over the last 100 years, policies were implemented that specifically twisted in a way that disadvantaged socially disadvantaged producers,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said. “There’s no better example of that than the covid relief efforts. Billions of dollars went to White farmers, because the system is structured in a way that gives them significant advantages.”
Relief bill is most significant legislation for Black farmers since Civil Rights Act, experts say

When the package passed, advocates told The Post that it was a major step toward correcting a century of mistreatment of Black farmers, with some describing it as reparations for a long history of racial oppression.

“This is the most significant piece of legislation with respect to the arc of Black land ownership in this country,” said Tracy Lloyd McCurty, executive director of the Black Belt Justice Center, which provides legal representation to Black farmers.

But the program, which was opposed by all 49 GOP senators, faced quick legal challenges. In April, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative group based in Milwaukee, sued on behalf of five White farmers and ranchers, including Adam Faust, a double amputee and the owner of a dairy farm near Chilton, Wis. (The suit has since grown to include 12 farmers as plaintiffs.)
“There should absolutely be no federal dollars going anywhere just based on race,” Faust told the Journal Sentinel after joining the suit.

White farmers in other regions of the country have also sued against the debt relief program.

In April, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller formed the America First Legal Foundation to sue in Texas on behalf on behalf of Sid Miller, a White farmer who is also the Texas agriculture commissioner. The lawsuit claimed that the USDA program “disrupts our common progress toward becoming a more perfect union.”

The Wisconsin group’s lawsuit noted that the White farmers could make additional investments in their property, expand their farms, and purchase equipment and supplies if they were eligible for the loan forgiveness benefit.

“Because plaintiffs are ineligible to even apply for the program due solely to their race, they have been denied the equal protection of the law and therefore suffered harm,” according to the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, Judge William Griesbach of Wisconsin’s Eastern District, who was appointed by George W. Bush, issued the temporary restraining order.

Meryl Kornfield contributed to this report.
Ain't this about a bitch. This fucking country ain't shit.
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
yeah..me neither and the other numbnuts can't either but theyre still bitching and moaning becuz thats the point. Complain to just complain and call it activism.





whats sad is you STILL haven't shown were the bill is exclusive to just asians.







and if 45k asian farmers got 5 billion in debt relief you'd call it a big win for them. and if there was black american anti hate crime bill with only 50 million in funding for nation wide programs youd say it was pittance..then crawl thru the bill, discover than it doesn't benefit blacks exclusively and bitch and moan about that. But hey asians got a bill (that benefits every ethnic group) named after them so BIG WIN FOR THEM right:clap:
 
Top