Sopranos Goes Out With A Whimper

Swizz Heat said:
:lol: Niggas sound mad because there wasn't enough gunplay, violence, and someone gettin' shot up in the final episode. I guess niggas was expecting a Tony Montana ending. I'm not excited or upset about the ending, it ending in a way that just makes you wonder. Shooting and violence is easy to watch, but I think David Chase made you think and wonder.

Quote from Rasin in the Sun: "Never be afraid to sit down and THINK."

And like I said before and I'll say again, a fitting end to Tony will only be on the big screen. Even if the Sopranos don't make a movie, David Chase left the door open for many other options.

Co-sign
Looking back, I thought it was a BRILLIANT ending
I was a little pissed initially, but that quickly wore off
Niggas just want everything spoon fed to them and wanted to see blood and guts everywhere
Use y'all's imagination for once
 
If they do make a Sopranos movie, can you imagine the raping that is going to take place on that shit. That shit will be on every, torrent, blog, forum, and peer to peer site know to man. Cats are pissed the fuck off. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Amajorfucup said:
OWNED!

Thanks for debunking this bullshyt. Its hilarious the number of nonsensical and flat out bogus theories running around created by those who want to convince themselves that they were not pissed on by their beloved "Sopranos" braintrust.

Even funnier are those who are attempting to pass this garbage off as some act of "Genuis" or "Brilliance".

The last two seasons of the show have been an ongoing abortion and the series finale was utter crap. Chase has appeared disinterested and outright lazy as of late and has now slapped his loyal viewers in the face by ending this garbage in such a noncommittal, shiftless, and cowardly way.

This wasnt writting brilliance people. At best its a cheap way to hedge his bets while leaving open the option of further milking his cash cow when and if he needs or desires and at worse was a anticlimatic fulfilment of a contractual agreement.

Two thumbs down.
Co fucking sign
 
Amajorfucup said:
OWNED!

Thanks for debunking this bullshyt. Its hilarious the number of nonsensical and flat out bogus theories running around created by those who want to convince themselves that they were not pissed on by their beloved "Sopranos" braintrust.

Even funnier are those who are attempting to pass this garbage off as some act of "Genuis" or "Brilliance".

The last two seasons of the show have been an ongoing abortion and the series finale was utter crap. Chase has appeared disinterested and outright lazy as of late and has now slapped his loyal viewers in the face by ending this garbage in such a noncommittal, shiftless, and cowardly way.

This wasnt writting brilliance people. At best its a cheap way to hedge his bets while leaving open the option of further milking his cash cow when and if he needs or desires and at worse was a anticlimatic fulfilment of a contractual agreement.

Two thumbs down.

DING DING DING!!!!
I THINK WE HAVE WINNER
i think he went the same way david chappelle went with his show.
it got to popular...and instead of dealing with angry people talking about the shows failure.....they just leave it alone all together.
leave it open without a REAL ENDING!!
PURE BULLSHIT
i think they fell off track with the writing.
it seems like the last few seasons have been going every which-a-way
no steady story line
the last show was confusing the hell out of me
first everybody was on edge i.e. depressed looking...it looked like phil had upper hand...then phil gets killed and everybody seems to go back to normal.
like it was never a beef to begin with


ONCE AGAIN...PURE BULLSHIT
NO MATTER HOW MANY STORIES PEOPLE TELL IN THIS THREAD
I KNOW THE WIRE WONT GO OUT LIKE THAT
THE WIRE HAS A STEADY STORY..NO CONFUSEMENT FROM THAT CORNER
 
Princenubian said:
I think that like everyone else I was reaching for the remote to ee what went wrong at cablevision.

In the words of Paulie; that last 65 minutes they can give back to the Indians.

Actually 70 minutes if you count the time that I was sitting in front of a blank screen, credits rolling w/ my mouth wide open like I just received the baby pictures from Montana and she overcharged my Paypal account.

Just Kiddin Montana, when all is said and done it's you that has to live w/ u.
I thnk.

My $0.02
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Now that's some funny shit....
 
in the final credits the guy in who goes into the bathroom is credited as "PHIL'S SON" so tony was whacked.
also Tony's pops was killed the same way. Janus walked into the place and saw her father wacked. when tony walked in he saw himself sitting then saw janus. Also a guy who he assault in a gambling debt from a few seasons ago was in the restaurant.
When Meadow walks in she walks in on Tony getting wacked.
the cycle continues.
AJ becomes Tony
Carm becomes Tony's mom
Meadow becomes Janus.

The End is the beginning.
 
Maddbaron said:
in the final credits the guy in who goes into the bathroom is credited as "PHIL'S SON" so tony was whacked.
also Tony's pops was killed the same way. Janus walked into the place and saw her father wacked. when tony walked in he saw himself sitting then saw janus. Also a guy who he assault in a gambling debt from a few seasons ago was in the restaurant.
When Meadow walks in she walks in on Tony getting wacked.
the cycle continues.
AJ becomes Tony
Carm becomes Tony's mom
Meadow becomes Janus.

The End is the beginning.


WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!!


D Town Redd

- - - - - - -

Need some easy bread?

Get RICH giving away FREE STUFF
 
Tony didn't get killed, if anyone did it was the viewer.

you're looking Tony in the face, then boom, nothing.
 
BigDaddyBuk said:
Tony didn't get killed, if anyone did it was the viewer.

you're looking Tony in the face, then boom, nothing.

And we don't see it coming either, just like he said. I'm evenly divided between this idea, the Tony got clipped idea, and the idea that the show ends when it ends, and in their imaginary world, life goes on for the Sopranos and you draw your own conclusion.

Even if Tony doesn't get whacked though, eventually he would because no way Brooklyn tolerates the perception that North Jersey is strong enough to whack their boss and get away scott free.
 
:angry: I feel duped. I don't care how creative and genius the ending may be. I didn't like it. If Tony got killed, I want to see him killed.
THAT SHIT WAS PITIFUL! :eek: :smh: :( :confused: :hmm: :confused: :confused:
 
Article from Deadline Hollywood Daily


THAAAT'S What We Were All Waiting For? Angry 'Sopranos' Fans Crash HBO Website
66bgz0n.jpg


The line to cancel HBO starts here. What a ridiculously disappointing end lacking in creativity and filled with cowardice to The Sopranos saga. But if you're one of those who found it perversely interesting, then don't bother to read on. Even if David Chase, who wrote and directed the final episode, was demonstrating the existential and endless loop of Tony's life or the moments before the hit that causes his death, it still robbed the audience of visual closure. I am well aware of the internet chatter how the last episode all refers back to the first episode, as Chase himself said in an interview. To me, this is just a new version of listening to vinyl backwards and seeing if the words make sense! And if it were done to segue into a motion picture sequel, then that kind of crass commercialism shouldn't be tolerated. (I just checked with Chase's manager and Sopranos' executive producer Brad Grey, who tells me that Chase is living in France and "just taking time off. There is absolutely no discussion of the movie.") There's even buzz that the real ending will only be available on the series' final DVD. Either way, it was terrible. Apparently, my extreme reaction was typical of many series' fans: they crashed HBO's website for a time tonight trying to register their outrage. HBO could suffer a wave of cancellations as a result. (Already, the pay channel's replacement series like John from Cincinnati are getting panned.) Chase clearly didn't give a damn about his fans. Instead, he crapped in their faces. This is why America hates Hollywood.

Unlike some network series that end abruptly because broadcasters pull the plug without warning, The Sopranos has been slated for years to go off the air tonight. But instead of carefully crafted, this finale looked like it had been concocted in a day or two. (Some of the scenes were cut so abruptly, they caused whiplash.) Let's not forget that, in later years, Chase had to be dragged kicking and screaming back to the computer to write more episodes against his will even though The Sopranos made him rich beyond what's reasonable. Especially now that it's in syndication. (See my A&E's Profanity-Free Tony Soprano A Hit.) Also, Chase enjoyed manipulating audiences by leaving loose ends. Everyone remembers that famous episode where the Russian escapes in the woods only never to be heard from again ("The Pine Barrens"). Recently the actor who plays Paulie Walnuts revealed that a script contained a scene in which the Russian reappeared this year. "But when we went to shoot it, they took it out. I think David didn't like it. He wanted the audience just to suffer," the thesp said.

In this final episode, Chase needed to exert himself to a concoct an artful denouement. But he took the lazy way out. Aren't writers paid to write? The show we all loved deserved a decent burial. Instead, it went into a black hole.Already, some top TV critics are claiming that Chase fulfilled expectations by defying expectations. And the blogosphere is busy dissecting every final moment, with some wanting to see profundity in the screen going black because of Tony's beginning of the season conversation with Bobby -- you wouldn't even know it had happened: everything would just go black. Or making a game of the many foreshadowing moments -- the jukebox song below "Don't Stop Believing" was "Any Way You Want It". Or connecting dots inside the restaurant that the guy at the bar is supposed to be Phil's nephew Nikki Leotardo from Season 6, and the trucker in the hat in the booth was the brother of the guy who was robbed by Christopher in Season 2, and the boy scouts were in the train store when Bobby got shot last week, and so on. The Nielsen reality is that people don't watch TV anywhere near that closely anymore, much less remember what goes on from week to week, to give such a subtle ending its proper due. Besides, The Sopranos was not a show that went on inside your head. It was a richly visual series whose most memorable moments were graphic and in your face and damn proud of it. Like Tony, it was defiant. This was whimpering. If you're angry at wasting an hour, complain with your wallets.
 
Two words... Bull Shit.

Why do we all PAY for HBO to see a gotdamn TV show end. Chase bitched out and didn't have the courage to kill off Tony. Bitch move. Straight bitch move.
 
According to this the cat in the members only jacket at the restaurant was Nikki Leotardo Phil's nephew he whacks Tony...I hated the way the show ended but I didn't want to see Tony get shot either. Started watching season 1 tonight best show on tv for a long time....

img_ep86_01.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikki_Leotardo

Nicola (Nikki or Nicky) Leotardo is a fictional character on the popular T.V. Series, The Sopranos. Nikki is nephew to Brooklyn Crime Boss, Phil Leotardo. Loyal fans have speculated that it was Nikki who is the likely shooter and killer of Tony Soprano in the controversial series finally.


In the Season finale, an Italian man in a Members Only jacket suspiciously looks at Tony. This man then goes to the restroom and shortly thereafter, the show ends abruptly, leaving viewers to watch only a black screen. Death indicated by a sudden blackness was both referenced in a conversation between Tony and Bobby on a boat as well as in the series pilot.


Nikki was never a main character on the show. He appeared in only 2 other episodes and debate exists as to whether he was credited in the sit down with Phil in determining the fate of Vito following his outing. Nikki is credited only as "guy in Members Only jacket" in the series finale. His only other appearance was in the "Members Only" episode (Episode one of Season 6). It is interesting to note that this was the episode in which Phil Leotardo becomes boss of the Lupertazzi Crime Family formally overseen by Johnny Sacramoni. The "Members Only" episode is also the one in which Tony Soprano was shot (the first time) by his Uncle for mistaken identity of Junior's rival, Pussy Malenga. It was Pussy Malenga who was to be killed in Artie Bucho's restaurant in the Series Pilot. In this episode, Tony states that it is in poor taste to make a hit in a restaurant because it affects business, and to protect his friend, he instead has Silvio blow up the restaurant. We learn in "Members Only" that Phil still has hard feelings regarding the death of his younger brother, Jimmy, at the hands of Tony Soprano's cousin, Tony Blundetto. Nikki's appearance in these episode show the pivotal moments of disintegrating ties between the family. Phil also references his older brother, Nikki Senior, who was killed in an automobile accident "in North Jersey" in 1976.


Nikki Jr. was reportedly semi-retired in Florida. He apparently never made it past Soldier and instead was a contact for drug running in Boca Raton. This is why Tony would not have recognized him and also the chosen shooter. Nikki's contact in Boca was pinched and it is assumed that his killing of Tony Soprano is both an attempt to rise in the Lupertazzi Crime Family as well as obtain revenge for the murder of both his uncles.
 
SugahKaine said:
I guess we're supposed to make up our own endings.

I have a feeling this is a ploy to make us get the DVD set, with the real "unseeen ending" of the Sopranos.

Agree
 
The Greatest TV Drama of the Past 25 Years, Round Two: The Sopranos vs. The Shield

05_dramaderby-9-sopranos-shield.w529.h352.jpg


Michael Chiklis is American cheese to James Gandolfini's aged Parmigiano, lunchmeat to Gandolfini's veal cutlet, malt liquor to Gandolfini's Glenlivet 12. That's what plenty of viewers were thinking when Chiklis won the Emmy for Best Actor in a Drama Series in 2002. Most of us hadn't even seen The Shield at that point, and had barely heard of FX, the upstart, non-premium cable channel it rode in on. To add insult to injury, Chiklis didn't mention his character Vic Mackey's obvious debt to Tony Soprano in his acceptance speech. Since 1999, when The Sopranospremiered on HBO, the drama had single-handedly made the small screen safe for well-intentioned thugs like Vic. Thanks to Gandolfini (and David Chase, of course), Tony Soprano quickly became the gold standard for the conflicted man-child, the haunted ogre, the vulnerable but punishing patriarch. Gandolfini was rewarded for his efforts by winning the Emmy in 2000 and 2001, and again in 2003, the year after Chiklis did, in true Tony Soprano grind-your-face-into-the-pavement style. So in 2002, as Chiklis got choked up and sang the praises of "his cast," many of us wondered how this strange little bald man could've snagged a golden statuette just by serving up his sweaty, conflicted, corrupt-cop copycat sauce.

Then we caught up. Or rather, we were tossed into the churning sea of suspense and awkward camaraderie and uncertainty and temptation and guilt that is The Shield. The notion that Vic Mackey was a cheap imitation of Tony Soprano soon felt as quaint as the décor in Artie Bucco's restaurant. In fact, Vic represented a completely different sort of beast from Tony. Instead of blithely bashing in kneecaps with a baseball bat in order to keep the McMansion humming and the Scotch flowing, Vic was a working-class guy with serious marital and money problems, not to mention a kid with autism. And Vic initially strayed from protocol to sidestep the pointless bureaucracy of the police department, thereby sending as many "bad guys" to jail as possible.

Yes, much like your average 6-year-old, Vic Mackey loved calling criminals "bad guys." There was something almost intoxicating about that: The cop who veers off the book over and over, but does so for the sake of "sending bad guys to jail." This was how Vic saw it, anyway, conveniently overlooking the part where he skimmed from the bad guys' stash to line his own pockets. In fact, Vic's absurd knack for casting himself as one of the good guys became part of the spectacle. It was transfixing to watch a cop taking bribes, seizing cash and drug evidence, roughing up gang members on the sly, turning off surveillance cameras, kicking in doors without a warrant, all the while clinging to this very crude notion of the world as split neatly into two sides, the good and the bad, and somehow still casting himself as a hero. As he slipped farther down this ethically questionable path, Mackey reminded his boys (with indoctrination techniques that would've made Jim Jones blush), "Hey, we're the good guys, here" and "We're just doing this for our families." Every time they wanted out, he pulled them back in. Vic, their mean daddy, the Great Santini of all dirty cops, was the kind of guy who could plant evidence, blackmail a city official, and beat someone with a tire iron, and consider it all an honest day's work.

One of the great pleasures of The Shield, of course, was watching Vic Mackey realize (in slow motion, as the world around him spun faster and faster), that he wasn't one of the good guys, not even remotely. He might've recognized this long ago, having shot and killed a fellow cop who was snitching on the strike team in the show's pilot episode. Instead, after being stalked by the vicious head of the Armenian mob and having his strike team disbanded, Vic began to see that he'd moved so far past operating within ethical boundaries that he couldn't quite wake up in the morning unless he first sliced off someone's ear or stuck a loaded gun in someone's mouth or hung someone up by a chain in the middle of an abandoned warehouse.

Sure, Mackey was hounded by guilt, and he was stumped, over and over again, by how to wriggle out of tight situations without mowing down everyone in sight with a semi-automatic. But there was something else in play: Mackey was unbelievably good at what he did for a living, particularly the dirty stuff. The joy of The Shield lies not just in the show's breakneck pace, not just in the naturalistic, stuttery chatter between realgood cops (who were never rewarded for it) Claudette and Dutch, not just in the unforgettable performances by CCH Pounder and Glenn Close and Forest Whitaker, not just in that catchy, super-aggro theme song (Dat-datta-datta-daaah!) that could keep you up all night, watching one episode after another. The real joy of The Shield lies in the fact that Vic Mackey loved his job.

While Tony Soprano sulked and second-guessed himself, Vic Mackey was all squinty focus, running through his flanking maneuvers, anticipating various twists and turns in the battle, soothing this guy while making that guy disappear, collecting aces in the hole, studying his enemies' weaknesses. Vic Mackey was a strategic mastermind who was always in the zone. Watching The Shield, with its smart plotting and quick pace and surprise twists, was at once addictive and satisfying. Although, at first glance, Vic could look like a simpler, less complicated bad guy, over the course of seven seasons he proved himself to be a twitchy, obsessive-compulsive, savior-complex narcissist with a hell of a work ethic.

In other words, he was just like you and me.

You watch The Shield not to savor creator Shawn Ryan's use of music or parallel imagery or masterful dialogue, then. You watch it because you can't stop watching it. And you can't stop watching it because you want to see Vic Mackey land on his feet, one more time. You hate the guy. You really do. But you love him, too, and you want him to win. You want that creepy, controlling, murderous, sexist bald man to win, win, win, and win again, God help you. And he does win again and again.

Until the series finale, when Vic finally loses. (For the uninitiated,spoilers follow.) Sure, he lands on his feet again, but only by selling everyone he cares about up the river in the process. Vic secures an immunity deal for himself by implicating his only remaining friend (and partner) Ronnie, and by confessing every last one of his countless sins over the years, as his colleagues look on, slack-jawed in disbelief. Meanwhile, Vic has driven his best friend Shane to kill his wife, his kid, and himself, and Vic's ex-wife and kids have joined witness protection, ensuring that Vic will never see them again. In the final scene of the show, we find Vic stuck behind a desk in a gray cubicle where he'll spend the rest of his career. Vic does pull a gun out of his desk, demonstrating that he's not going to take his fate lying down. But it's clear that his days of gaming the system are over.

We witness the end to Vic Mackey's story, in other words. And there's a moral there: Bad guys eventually pay the price for their misdeeds.

The same cannot be said for Tony Soprano's story. But then, the feeling you get from watching The Shield is very different than the one you get from watching The Sopranos. Unlike the satisfaction and fist-pumping high that accompanies Vic Mackey in all of his inglorious glory, a great episode of The Sopranos leaves you feeling stunned, like you've just witnessed something precious and fleeting, a true work of art. To merely consider Tony Soprano, sitting by his pool, waiting for the ducks to come home, is to be sent into a state of moody contemplation. To recall the ugliness and loneliness of Tony's divorce from Carmela, the way he loomed around his old house like a clumsy stranger, the way he struggled to connect with his alienated kids, is to be sent into paroxysms of fear over the uncertainty of marriage and family, those two pillars of American life.

But so many scenes from The Sopranos packed an enormous emotional punch: Tony mooning over his racehorse, Pie-O-My; Tony dreaming of former buddy Big Pussy as a talking fish on ice; Tony spotting the child's seat in the back of Michael's totaled SUV and realizing that the world would be better off without his screwed-up nephew in it.

Even the sight of Tony disaffectedly tossing back drinks while naked girls half-heartedly twirl in the background, the way he did in so many episodes, ushers up mixed feelings about the lonely nature of success. David Chase treated us to scenes that were so thoughtfully crafted and beautifully enacted, so rich with melancholy and depravity that they had the power to stir up the deepest wells of longing and regret. If Vic Mackey was the very satisfying anti-hero of a genre page-turner, then Tony Soprano was more like the complex protagonist of a literary classic.

Tony's fragility, his brooding, his nostalgic fixation on childhood loomed in every scene. He was a character who wriggled free every time you tried to pin him down, who created more messes than he cleaned up, and who left us with more questions than answers. Even though he might casually kill someone and go grab lunch afterwards, the base level of denial he had to maintain took a grueling psychic toll on him that could only be temporarily numbed by women and alcohol. In Tony, we confronted the naïve hopes of a boy, butting up against the crushing weight of adult responsibility and the dizzying temptations of escapism. Chase may have sought, more than anything else, to unearth the blindly ignorant violence of these men, their sickness and selfishness reflected in the thoughtless nature of their crimes. But Tony was the one character who recognized the darkness and cruelty of his world. He bore the weight of that recognition, and it showed in his heavy stride, his clumsy hands, his defeated face.

Ultimately — in so very American a fashion — Tony held off the darkness for one more day with … onion rings and Journey. That was Chase's not-very-ambiguous-after-all ending: Tony Soprano wasn't treated to sweet rest, courtesy of a shotgun to the back of the head. No. Instead, he was damned for all time, damned to shove fried stuff in his face while trading pointless small talk, haunted by a song from his glory days.

Plenty criticized Chase for the way he chose to end The Sopranos — not by offing Tony or sending him to jail or wrapping up what some saw as unfinished threads of that saga, but by keeping Tony suspended in sap forever. But Chase's choice wasn't a cynical one. It was an artist's choice (more specifically, the kind of choice an artist makes when he's not self-consciously wondering what an artist would choose). Chase treated us to a character who embodied so many American weaknesses: Pure selfishness rationalized through misguided notions about "family," brute force rationalized by illusions about "loyalty," macho superiority and sexism rationalized by romantic notions about patriarchal birthright, guilt and self-hatred numbed through alcohol, music, drugs, junk food, and sports trivia. And after shoving this lovable, sick, childlike, horrifying mirror in our faces week after week, he refused to kill Tony or even seal his fate, to let us put it all behind us and move on. Like the very best scenes from The Sopranos, which were so full of sadness and humor and beauty that they're impossible to forget, that last image of Tony's face, frozen in time forever, made it impossible to forget Tony and what he did to our view of ourselves as Americans, at the end of our glory days.

Although he presented his own twisted mirror on the American dream, embodying the paternalistic arrogance that good intentions always justify dirty deeds, Vic Mackey never quite achieved the same resonance that Tony Soprano did. Even though Vic was just as memorable as Tony, from his dodgy compulsion to hedge rather than come clean to his peculiar mix of self-delusion and grandiosity, we can close the book on Vic Mackey the way we fall out of touch with an old friend from high school. We can't forget the thrills and suspense of The Shield's reckless joy ride, but we can move on. Vic was a blast, but those days are gone now.

Tony, though, still loiters in our psyches. Like a dead father or brother, like a lost love, like the better or worse version of ourselves that stood in for us once upon a time, Tony is still in that goddamn diner, shoving onion rings in his mouth. Even at its most surreal or perverse, the mournful palate ofThe Sopranos always felt dangerously personal. The Shield may be the most dynamic cop drama in TV history, but The Sopranos bestrides the narrow world of cop dramas like a colossus. We'll take Tony Soprano to the grave with us. Damn you, David Chase!

Winner: The Sopranos

http://www.vulture.com/2012/03/drama-derby-the-sopranos-vs-the-shield.html
 
The Sopranos’ at 20: David Chase and His Writing Team Reflect on Resonating Across Generations
By SCOTT HUVER
Scott Huver
Scott's Most Recent Stories

VIEW ALL
sopranos-david-chase.jpg

CREDIT: CHASE: REX/SHUTTERSTOCK
Twenty years ago, HBO was only beginning to establish its now-sterling reputation as a provider of top quality original series that took viewers to places network programs simply couldn’t dare venture. But soon enough David Chase’s “The Sopranos” would break out as a signature series and inspire a whole new wave of antihero-led programming.

Dark, funny, bold, ambitious, quirky, addictive: the mob family drama with the repellent yet compelling New Jersey capo Tony Soprano at the center was all of those things and more. And the show ushered in a glorious new era of television — one that celebrated rich, sharply delineated characters that didn’t always say what they thought or act in their own best interests, as well as gloriously cinematic storytelling fueled by striking visuals and sweeping camerawork, and, of course, a deeply flawed protagonist that, despite despicable acts, inspired deep relatability with the audience.





The Sopranos” soon dominated conversations at water coolers, dinner parties and then-nascent chat rooms, and its symbolism and deeper meanings were dissected in college classrooms, academic thesis and other intellectual analyses. It was, in short, the ultimate harbinger of everything that TV would soon become. Two decades later, the profound impact of “The Sopranos” on television storytelling, the industry itself and the way viewers watch TV continues to reverberate sharply.



RELATED
'The Sopranos' 20th Anniversary Reunion: Cast, Producers Remember James Gandolfini
'The Sopranos' Movie Star Teases Upcoming Prequel



But, the series started which much humbler beginnings — and lower expectations, even from the creator himself.

“I didn’t think it was gonna be a success at all,” Chase tells Variety. “The whole thing was a surprise. We worked on the first season…all year. The show was completed by the time it hit the air…and I remember Edie Falco saying, ‘Well, I guess that’s it for us?’ And I said, ‘Yeah, I think so.’ … Thankfully I was wrong.”

Here, Chase and key members of his “Sopranos” family reflect on the series’ seismic effect.

Humble Beginnings

Robin Green: Near the end of filming [the pilot] David said, “What do you think is gonna happen?” I said to him, “It’ll either change the face of television forever, or sink like a stone.” That was my opinion, and he rolled his eyes and said, “Wow, hopefully somewhere in between.” We really didn’t know, but we knew that we loved it.

Chase: I asked HBO and Brillstein-Grey if they would put on a little screening at MGM Studios with some Italian food, and they wouldn’t pay for it, so I did it myself, and it was mostly my friends, but they laughed a lot. … They seemed to really enjoy it, and I thought, “Wow, I didn’t think it was that strong.”

Green: In the subbasement of the Tower Records in Times Square, there was a screening room. That’s where we had the premiere. When we saw all the faces on the people who came out of the theater, even my highbrow friends were just aglow. They were all excited. … We went around the corner to John’s Pizza, that was where we had the first premiere party. A modest beginning.





Chase: When it finally aired, all the reviews were ecstatic except for one bad review, and it was somebody from the TCA [who] made a joke that I was floating in some bay in Miami, or something. But that’s when I really knew it, right from the first.



Michael Imperioli: The reviews when it went on the air were so over the top and hyperbolic that “Saturday Night Live” did a skit on the reviews. They didn’t do a spoof of the show, they did a skit about the reviews of the “The Sopranos” that were so ridiculously good for a TV show that it was way out of the ordinary. Then we knew. Those reviews that were across the board raves forced the public to watch it, basically.

Chase: After the first season I didn’t know if we’d be coming back at all. I thought we were gonna be canceled, but we weren’t canceled. I came back from quite a long vacation in Europe, and everybody in America seemed to be saying, “Where’s Pussy?” And that completely stoned me, you know? I wasn’t prepared for that at all, and I knew it was something unusual.

Pop Culture Phenomenon

Winter: I didn’t anticipate how much the episode “Pine Barrens” was going to resonate with people. I knew it was really fun and funny when we did it, but the whole run between Paulie, Tony and Christopher when they’re on the phone and Tony’s trying to explain that the guy they’re looking for was in the interior ministry, and he killed 16 Chechen rebels, and then that whole thing being misconstrued by Paulie as the guy killed Czechoslovakians, and he was an interior decorator. I’ve heard that quoted back a million times, and people just really love that episode so much. We were howling on the set watching it unfold in front of us.

Green: My favorite lines that we wrote [were] in “Knights in White Satin Armor”: “Is this the handsome boy? I like my new pony boots, Tony. Do you like my pony boots, Tony?” Or “He disrespected the Bing” — that went viral.

Imperioli: Sitting on the dog, that really kind of pushed a lot of buttons. You can gun down 20 people, shoot them up full of bullets and stuff, and people won’t blink an eye. You sit on a dog and people complain about it for years!





Chase: The thing I liked best was the fact that there were “Sopranos” parties. I tried not to read about the show too much. I didn’t read or watch stuff about the show. I really tried very hard to be the boy in the bubble about that. I don’t know how successful I was, but the “Sopranos” parties I thought was a great thing. It made me really happy.

Landress: When you watch a movie for two hours it might stay with you, but those people are gone. The thing about “The Sopranos” was that every Sunday night people could go home have their ziti, cannoli parties, have a glass of wine and feel like their friends were coming over. They knew “The Sopranos” were going to entertain them. They wanted those people over on Sunday night.

Winter: When we got into Mad Magazine, that was the highlight for me. That said everything. The artist did “A Mad Magazine Behind the Scenes look at ‘The Sopranos,’” and it was caricatures of the entire cast and David. And I had every actor and David sign it for me, and I’ve got that hanging in my office. Also, “MADtv” did a great parody early on as well that I thought was great.

Chase: There were porno movies made of it, and that was great! It was fun.

Breaking the Rules and Raising the Bar

Chase: I was prepared to take the risks, and I was convinced that that was the way to go. I just wanted to do it. … Mostly it was the storytelling. It was the pace of the storytelling and the length of the storytelling. I was very happy to see that that people were gravitating toward it. Our show sometimes moved much more slowly than a network show — sometimes more quickly, but mostly more slowly, and I like the idea that was successful with an audience.

Mitchell Burgess: When we wrote the scripts, we really tried to best each other. It was still very fresh the second year and third year. We really were trying to do the best work we could possibly. We really worked like maniacs. Everybody did.

Green: We wanted to keep up the standard that we had set. That standard was just to make it as good as we could and have as much fun as possible, and make it as entertaining and thought-provoking as possible.





Terence Winter: It was writing more the way people actually speak in real life. People very often don’t say what they mean. They lie to each other. They speak in half sentences. They misuse words, and they come at things in very oblique ways in a lot of subtext where you talk to each other. In network TV, you basically have to say exactly what you mean, and say exactly what you think the moment you think it as a character, and it’s got to be crystal clear, and you’ve got to repeat the information 10 times. God forbid there’s anybody in the audience who doesn’t understand what you’re trying to say. On “The Sopranos,” it was very different. For the first time, I felt like I was writing exactly the way I would speak, or the way I imagined these characters would speak, and that was OK — that was encouraged.

Ilene S. Landress: I came from film…and it was before there was a ton of television in New York. I knew that David had worked in television but had this love of movies and really wanted this movie crew and I really only knew how to hire a movie crew because there really wasn’t a television crew. People who came from huge movies all of a sudden were getting the feedback from people how much they were loving the show, and all of a sudden all these people who film snobs, myself included, are realizing that more people are watching this television show than probably any film you’ve ever worked on. … It really became the example of, “Hey, wait a second — doing television isn’t some sort of compromise.”

Imperioli: “The Sopranos” basically brought a cinematic quality to television that had been there very rarely — maybe “Twin Peaks.” That had not been explored very much. It was a type of cinema that, obviously, Scorsese and Coppola and those things had — it has that pedigree, and I think that was really engaging for a lot of people.

Chase: HBO liked it – we didn’t have to fight for it very much. It’s all about the money, you know? All that stuff is more expensive. The reason everything used to look like “Marcus Welby” is because it was cheap. Two people talking in an office is cheap, so when you take it outside and do something other than car chases, when you have scenes on bridges or boats — the kinds of things you saw on “The Sopranos” cost more.





Winter: It really opened up the world of television writing, and elevated it to the point where it blurred the lines between movies and TV. Not only did it blur the lines…in terms of drawing actors to the medium who traditionally wouldn’t want to do TV. Actors were lining up, saying, “Give me something like that. Where do I sign?”

Imperioli: Around that time I had started to get a little bit of success as a writer, mainly because of Spike Lee directing a script that I co-wrote called “Summer of Sam.” At the same time we had just finished the first season of “The Sopranos” and I really fell in love with the show, all the characters. I took a shot and did a spec script of “The Sopranos” and showed it to David, and he took a lot of what I wrote in that spec and we brought it what was happening in Season 2. I just was so taken by the writing and by all the characters that I wanted to be involved that way.

Burgess: Our language went to hell for quite a few years, too.

Green: It’s true. I had to tell Mitch to stop saying “f—” in public.

Instant Icons

Winter: Among other writers, as soon as I got the job people were envious. Everybody in the writing community knew what the show was and loved it, and was really excited for me. And then as the show became more and more popular, as soon as you said, “We worked on ‘The Sopranos,’” people had questions: “What’s James Gandolfini like?” and “What’s it like working on that show?”

Landress: HBO was pretty big into boxing business. A whole bunch of us went to a boxing match at Madison Square Garden. The audience was waiting for the fight to start and they saw Jimmy [James Gandolfini] and Michael and Vinny Pastore. This crowd at Madison Square Garden started cheering for the cast and everyone was sort of taken aback. And one of the actors was like, “Oh God. This is kind of like a thing.” Whenever you have three or four of them together people would go pretty crazy.

Imperioli: Meeting people I had idolized for many years and having them know and appreciate my work, like the Rolling Stones and Lou Reed and Patti Smith, Al Pacino, great people like that, that was a real thrill, to have that kind of respect come back at you. I hung out the whole night with Keith Richards and Ron Woods in Toronto after a concert talking about everything under the sun until dawn. Just the three of us all night long, just talking and getting to know each other. That was a “pinch me” moment.





Chase: We had a birthday party for Tony Sirico at a comedy club in Brooklyn, and there were all these people lined up outside -– just a crowd of people just to see everybody come in. And this guy who was a friend of Tony’s, he was on stage and said, “This is the Guinea Beatles.” And I thought, “Well, okay.”

Landress: It was the yearly meeting of shrinks, psychoanalysts, in New York City and there were like 600 people lined up at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel to enter a ballroom to watch an interview with Dr. Melfi, whose a shrink on TV. She’s not really a shrink, but there were all these analysts lined up.

Winter: Early on in shooting Season 2, we did a scene on a location in New Jersey with Michael Imperioli and Drea de Matteo, and they had walked onto the set, and there was a crowd of people on the street behind some barricades who all started to applaud when they saw them. And Michael and Drea looked at each other, like in disbelief: They couldn’t believe how much the show had taken off. All the actors told me, all during Season 1, nobody had any idea what this was, what was being shot, just that a TV show was being shot on the street, and they didn’t have anybody paying attention. And as the series went on, every time we shot on location, there were huge crowds of people.

Imperioli: It does take a certain level of adjustment, I think, both for me and my family. Overwhelmingly it was positive, but you just have to be a little bit more private and protective of your privacy. New York is a town where you spend a lot of time out on the streets, going from one place to another. You’re out there, and you just have to have a little bit kind of a protective layer over yourself, a little bit of a thicker skin to deal with lots of people coming your way. To be honest I think a lot of people had difficulty separating me from the character. I think that went for a lot of us on the show. I think in some ways people felt we were like “Jersey Shore” — like they found us at the mall or something and put it on television without fully realizing most of us had had long careers as actors.





Chase: [The actors] all acquitted themselves really well. When something was published about them it was usually funny and usually really good on their part and it was more than I could have ever imagined.

After “Sopranos”

Chase: It was interesting to see where [the writers] took it when “The Sopranos” was over, but I wasn’t that interested in being a writing teacher. All I cared about was that they worked on the show and that the shows that they wrote worked really well. I hoped that they will all be successful later in their lives, but that was not really a big concern of mine. When I saw what they did, I was completely blown away. … I’m proud of the work that came after it. “Mad Men,” I think, was a great show, and “Boardwalk Empire.” I’m proud of all that stuff.

Green: It gave us real credibility. We were credible before that because we’d done “Northern Exposure” — we had certain reputation from shows like that…but this really put us on the map.

Burgess: it changed the whole how people conceived us. There were very few writers of it. … That’s the reality of it. People would listen to us. I remember the first pilot [Robin and I] did for CBS after that: we just literally went and thought of an idea, told them and went and wrote a pilot. They never even saw outlines.

Green: We’re still dining out on it.

Winter: It made the rest of my career possible, I know that…it was because of my involvement in the Sopranos that allowed me to do “Boardwalk Empire” and “Wolf of Wall Street” and “Vinyl,” and everything I’ve done since. From a non-cynical, non-mercenary point of view, the greatest perk truly was those 10 years of working with all those people, and I just made dear, dear, lifelong friends. “The Sopranos” will be the thing I compare everything else I ever do to. No matter how great my career gets, or what else I do, I always think back to those years as the highlight.

Landress: When people say, “Oh, what do you do?” I say, “I produce films and television shows.” And they say, “Oh, is it anything I’ve ever heard of?” Even if they haven’t watched it, they’ve pretty much heard of it. … HBO was doing this marathon the other night and I flipped on the TV finally started watching. I thought, “God, there’s a lot of great stuff in here that really holds up.”





The Long Shadow

Winter: Very easily this could’ve ended up being a network show that pulled all kinds of punches, and I’m not even talking about the violence and the language. Some of David’s early responses from networks were, “Oh, did he really have to see a psychiatrist? It makes him look weak,” things like that. It’s like that was exactly the point. This was a human being, and David wanted to explore every aspect of that person, and had he not stuck to his guns and just gone and done it on a network, we wouldn’t be having this conversation today.

Green: I had Alan Ball come up to me at a party and say that it had inspired him to do “Six Feet Under.” I don’t remember the exact metaphor that he used, but the chains had been taken off, and it freed his expression up. … I feel a tremendous sense of pride. It was very gratifying experience. I’m proud of the work we did, all of us.

Winter: I could see the landscape of TV changing, when you had shows like “The Shield” and “Breaking Bad” – not just the anti-heroes thing, but things that became more cinematic, just deeper levels of writing. I could proudly point to ‘The Sopranos” as something that David created and that I was involved with, and say, “Wow, we really had an impact on so many other things.” I feel less of it today. I feel certainly there is still a ton of network TV that maybe doesn’t aspire to be anything more than what it is, and that’s totally fine…but you’ve come to expect great TV now from various places, and certainly shows like “The Crown” and “Game of Thrones” are hugely cinematic and incredibly well-written, and just beautiful shows. I don’t know that those could exist without “The Sopranos.”

Imperlioli: “The Sopranos,” “Mad Men” and “Breaking Bad” were really three big ones that kind of changed the landscape of storytelling, and you had three male leads who were relatively unknown to the public. They were known in the industry, and maybe to other actors, but the public certainly didn’t know, and the three of those people became huge stars. Now, if any of those things were to be pitched to Netflix or HBO or any of those things, I’m sure they’d be packaged with big stars. Ultimately what kind of originated as this movement with actors that were relatively unknown and kind of an anti-Hollywood movement has become very much like the Hollywood studio system. You can’t make a big movie unless you have movie stars, and that’s happening more and more on television.





Burgess: People are still talking about it. It’s still very viable. That was one of the things I asked myself 20 years ago, whether this thing would live. … Somebody told us at HBO once that the Sopranos was like “The Godfather” in the sense that no matter how many times people had seen scenes, when they’d flip through the channels, they stopped on “The Sopranos” and “The Godfather” to watch.

Imperioli: There’s a whole generation of viewers that are watching it for the first time, who were too young to see it when it was on the air because they were kids. Some of them are in the business, some of them are not, some of them are cinephiles and TV-philes, and they’re blown away by it. For a show that’s 20 years old I think says an awful lot, because a lot of stuff that’s that old does not make an impact anymore. That’s kind of blown my mind a little bit.

Chase: It was much more [rewarding] than I thought it ever would be…[but it was about] how me, David Chase, was able to make TV, and I wasn’t really aware that I was changing TV at the time. Since then I’ve been told that it changed TV, but when it was happening, I didn’t feel that way. I knew it was something different. I knew it was something new, and I was glad about that, but I didn’t say to myself, “Gee, you’re changing TV.”
 
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articl...agool-the-italian-new-jersey-accent-explained

How Capicola Became Gabagool: The Italian New Jersey Accent, Explained
A linguistic exploration.
BY DAN NOSOWITZ
NOVEMBER 05, 2015
How Capicola Became Gabagool: The Italian New Jersey Accent, Explained
4a31829v.jpg

Mulberry Street, where New York's Little Italy is centered, c. 1900. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/LC-USZC4-1584
323,738
“Don’t eat gabagool, Grandma,” says Meadow Soprano on an early episode of The Sopranos, perhaps the most famous depiction of Jersey Italian culture in the past few decades. “It’s nothing but fat and nitrates.” The pronunciation of “gabagool,” a mutation of the word “capicola,” might surprise a casual viewer, although it and words like it should be familiar to viewers of other New Jersey–based shows like Jersey Shore and The Real Housewives of New Jersey, where food often drives conversation. The casts are heavily Italian-American, but few of them can actually speak, in any real way, the Italian language. Regardless, when they talk about food, even food that’s widely known by the non-Italian population, they often use a specific accent.

And it’s a weird one. “Mozzarella” becomes something like “mutzadell.” “Ricotta” becomes “ree-goat.” “Prosciutto” becomes “pruh-zhoot.” There is a mangling of the language in an instantly identifiable way: Final syllables are deleted, certain consonants are swapped with others, certain vowels are mutated in certain places.

Most immigrant groups in the United States retain certain words and phrases from the old language even if the modern population can’t speak it. But for people outside those groups, and even, often, inside them, it’s next to impossible to pick out a specific regional accent in the way a Jewish American says “challah” or a Korean-American says “jjigae.” How can someone who doesn’t speak the language possibly have an regional accent?


ADVERTISING
Yet Italian-Americans do. It’s even been parodied. On an episode of Kroll Show, comedian Nick Kroll’s character Bobby Bottleservice, a Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino–type, describes his lunch in this thick accent, eliminating the final syllable of each item. “Cap-uh-coal,” he says, pointing at capicola. “Mort-ah-dell,” he says, as the camera pans over a thin, pale arrangement of mortadella. “Coca-coal,” he finishes, as the camera moves over to a glass of Coke. “Capicola,” made famous in its mutation by The Sopranos, gets even more mutated for comedic effect on The Office, where it becomes “gabagool.”

image.jpg

Gabagool? Over here! CORINA DANIELA OBERTAS / ALAMY STOCK PHOTO
I spoke to a few linguists and experts on Italian-American culture to figure out why a kid from Paterson, New Jersey, who doesn’t speak Italian, would earnestly ask for a taste of “mutzadell.” The answer takes us way back through history and deep into the completely chaotic world of Italian linguistics.

Enjoying This Story?
Get our latest, delivered straight to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.

“One thing that I need to tell you, because this is something that is not clear even for linguists, let alone the layperson—the linguistic situation in Italy is quite complicated,” says Mariapaola D’Imperio, a professor in the linguistics department at Aix-Marseille University who was born in Naples and studied in Ohio before moving to France. The situation is so complicated that the terms used to describe pockets of language are not widely agreed upon; some use “language,” some use “dialect,” some use “accent,” and some use “variation.” Linguists like to argue about the terminology of this kind of thing.

The basic story is this: Italy is a very young country made up of many very old kingdoms awkwardly stapled together to make a patchwork whole. Before 1861, these different kingdoms—Sardinia, Rome, Tuscany, Venice, Sicily (they were called different things at the time, but roughly correspond to those regions now)—those were, basically, different countries. Its citizens didn’t speak the same language, didn’t identify as countrymen, sometimes were even at war with each other. The country was unified over the period from around 1861 until World War I, and during that period, the wealthier northern parts of the newly-constructed Italy imposed unfair taxes and, basically, annexed the poorer southern parts. As a result, southern Italians, ranging from just south of Rome all the way down to Sicily, fled in huge numbers to other countries, including the United States.

About 80 percent of Italian-Americans are of southern Italian descent, says Fred Gardaphe, a professor of Italian-American studies at Queens College. “Ships from Palermo went to New Orleans and the ships from Genoa and Naples went to New York,” he says. They spread from there, but the richest pockets of Italian-Americans aren’t far from New York City. They’re clustered in New York City, Long Island, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and in and around Philadelphia.

image.jpg

New York’s Little Italy, c. 1900–10. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/LC-D418-9351
Yet those Italians, all from southern Italy and all recent immigrants in close proximity to each other in the United States, wouldn’t necessarily consider themselves countrymen. That’s because each of the old Italian kingdoms had their own … well, D’Imperio, who is Italian, calls them “dialects.” But others refer to them in different ways. Basically the old Italian kingdoms each spoke their own languages that largely came from the same family tree, slightly but not all that much closer than the Romance languages, such as French, Spanish, or Portuguese. The general family name for these languages is Italo-Dalmatian. (Dalmatian, it turns out, refers to Croatia. The dog is from there, too.) They were not all mutually comprehensible, and had their own external influences. Calabrian, for example, is heavily influenced by Greek, thanks to a long Greek occupation and interchange. In the northwest near the border with France, Piedmont, with its capital of Turin, spoke a language called Piedmontese, which is sort of French-ish. Sicilian, very close to North Africa, had a lot of Arabic-type stuff in it. I use the past tense for these because these languages are dying, quickly. “Dialects do still exist, but they’re spoken mainly by old people,” says D’Imperio. (Sicilian put up more of a fight than most.)

During unification, the northern Italian powers decided that having a country that speaks about a dozen different languages would pose a bit of a challenge to their efforts, so they picked one and called it “Standard Italian” and made everyone learn it. The one that they picked was Tuscan, and they probably picked it because it was the language of Dante, the most famous Italian writer. (You can see why calling these languages “dialects” is tricky; Standard Italian is just one more dialect, not the base language which Calabrian or Piedmontese riffs on, which is kind of the implication.)

Standard Italian has variations, like any other language, which we’ll call accents. Someone from Sicily would have a Sicilian accent, but when speaking Standard Italian, a person from Milan will, hopefully, be able to understand them, because at a basic level, they’ll be using a language with the same structure and a vocabulary that is mostly identical.

image.jpg

Mulberry Street in more recent years. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/LC-HS503-699
But this gets weird, because most Italian-Americans can trace their immigrant ancestors back to that time between 1861 and World War I, when the vast majority of “Italians,” such as Italy even existed at the time, wouldn’t have spoken the same language at all, and hardly any of them would be speaking the northern Italian dialect that would eventually become Standard Italian.

Linguists say that there are two trajectories for a language divorced from its place of origin. It sometimes dies out quickly; people assimilate, speak the most popular language wherever they live, stop teaching their children the old language. But sometimes, the language has a firmer hold on its speakers than most, and refuses to entirely let go. The Italian dialects are like that.

“I grew up speaking English and Italian dialects from my family’s region of Puglia,” says Gardaphe. “And when I went to Italy, very few people could understand me, even the people in my parents’ region. They recognized that I was speaking as if I was a 70-year-old man, when I was only 26 years old.” Italian-American Italian is not at all like Standard Italian. Instead it’s a construction of the frozen shards left over from languages that don’t even really exist in Italy any more, with minimal intervention from modern Italian.

There’s a spectrum to all this, of course. Somebody, even in their 70s or 80s, who was born in Italy and lived in the United States can still be understood in Italy. But Italian has undergone huge standardization changes in the past few decades, and it’ll be hard for modern Italian speakers to understand them, even harder than if somebody showed up in New York today speaking in 1920s New Yorker “Thoity-Thoid Street” slang and accent.

For whatever reason, foods and curse words linger longer in a disrupted language. I think of my own complete lack of knowledge of Yiddish, with my lousy vocabulary made up entirely of words like blintzes, kugel, kvetch, nudnik, and schmuck. If you can’t eat them or yell them, foreign words don’t often stick around.

Italian-American Italian is a construction of the frozen shards left over from languages that don’t even really exist any more.
Ann Marie Olivo-Shaw, who grew up on and studied the sociolinguistics of Long Island, thinks the various pockets of southern Italian immigrants could understand each other, sort of, a little. (Jersey Italians are not, linguistically, distinct from New York or Rhode Island or Philadelphia Italians when speaking Italian.) Generally being fairly close in proximity, even if they were only speaking similar languages, they would necessarily have some cultural similarities. Culinarily similarities also abound: less meat-heavy, more like Provence or Greece in the use of seafood, vegetables, and even, rare for western Europe, spice. (Capicola and mozzarella are, probably, creations of southern Italy, though there are versions elsewhere and Italians love to argue about who invented what.)

And they shared some qualities linguistically as well. Let’s do a fun experiment and take three separate linguistic trends from southern Italian dialects and combine them all to show how one Standard Italian word can be so thoroughly mangled in the United States.

First: “The features that you’ll find across a lot of these dialects, and one that you still hear a lot in southern Italy today, is vowels at the ends of words are pronounced very very softly, and usually as more of an ‘uh’ vowel,” says Olivo-Shaw. D’Imperio is a little more extreme, calling it “vowel deletion.” Basically, if the final syllable is a vowel? You can get rid of it. Vowel deletion is common in many languages, and is done for the same reason that, sometimes, vowels are added: to make the flow from one word to another more seamless. It’s easiest, in terms of muscle movement, to transition from a vowel to a consonant and vice versa. A vowel to a vowel is difficult. In English, that’s why we have “a” versus “an” in phrases like “a potato” or “an apple.” Some Italian words that would follow food words, such as prepositions or articles, would start with a vowel, and it’s easier to just remove it so you don’t have to do the vowel-to-vowel transition.

The stereotypical Italian “It’s a-me, Mario!” addition of a vowel is done for the same reason. Italian is a very fluid, musical language, and Italian speakers will try to eliminate the awkwardness of going consonant-to-consonant. So they’ll just add in a generic vowel sound—“ah” or “uh”—between consonants, to make it flow better.

Second: “A lot of the ‘o’ sounds will be, as we call it in linguistics, raised, so it’ll be pronounced more like ‘ooh’,” says Olivo-Shaw. Got it: O=Ooh.

image.jpg

Nothing like fresh “mutzadell.” PICTURE PARTNERS / ALAMY STOCK PHOTO
And third: “A lot of what we call the voiceless consonants, like a ‘k’ sound, will be pronounced as a voiced consonant,” says Olivo-Shaw. This is a tricky one to explain, but basically the difference between a voiced and a voiceless consonant can be felt if you place your fingers over your Adam’s apple and say as short of a sound with that consonant as you can. A voiced consonant will cause a vibration, and voiceless will not. So like, when you try to just make a “g” sound, it’ll come out as “guh.” But a “k” sound can be made without using your vocal cords at all, preventing a vibration. So “k” would be voiceless, and “g” would be voiced. Try it! It’s fun.

Okay so, we’ve got three linguistic quirks common to most of the southern Italian ancient languages. Now try to pronounce “capicola.”

The “c” sounds, which are really “k” sounds, become voiced, so they turn into “g.” Do the same with the “p,” since that’s a voiceless consonant, and we want voiced ones, so change that to a “b.” The second-to-last vowel, an “o” sound, gets raised, so change that to an “ooh.” And toss out the last syllable. It’s just a vowel, who needs it? Now try again.

Yeah. Gabagool.

If you were to go to southern Italy, you wouldn’t find people saying “gabagool.” But some of the old quirks of the old languages survived into the accents of Standard Italian used there. In Sicily or Calabria, you might indeed find someone ordering “mutzadell.” In their own weird way, Jersey (and New York and Rhode Island and Philadelphia) Italians are keeping the flame of their languages alive even better than Italian-Italians. There’s something both a little silly and a little wonderful about someone who doesn’t even speak the language putting on an antiquated accent for a dead sub-language to order some cheese.

“Language is so much a part of how we identify,” says Olivo-Shaw. “The way we speak is who we are. I think that for Italians, we have such a pride in our ancestry and such a pride in our culture that it’s just kind of an unconscious way of expressing that.”

Correction: An earlier version of the story had the wrong age for Fred Gardaphe.

This story was updated with new images and minor edits on October 25, 2018.
 

ow Do You Follow The Sopranos?
David Chase returns to the masterpiece he’s been unable to escape since it went off the air 14 years ago.
By Matt Zoller Seitz@mattzollerseitz
Illustration: Hellovon
David Chase is telling stories again. The 76-year-old creator of The Sopranos is seated at the kitchen table of a production office in Santa Monica, eating takeout Mexican food and telling me about the time his paternal grandfather, Joseph Fusco, confessed to killing a man. Fusco told the story to a then-12-year-old Chase, who had been sent to Fusco’s apple farm in Hudson, New York, for a week during summer vacation. They were sitting in the kitchen one night after dinner, green apples piled in a bowl between them. “He was telling me he murdered a guy in Buffalo,” Chase recalls. “They got in an argument in a bar. They went outside.” Things escalated — Fusco hit him in the head with a brick. The other guy was a romano — Roman — though not from his grandfather’s area. “Fusco was bad news. Bad guy.” Chase pauses a moment, staring at his rice and beans in a Styrofoam box. “Who knows if it’s true?” he says finally. “But why would you tell that to an 12-year-old kid who’s staying with you? Who the fuck does that?”
My Week In New York
A week-in-review newsletter from the people who make New York Magazine.

Everything about the anecdote is uncut Chase, from the intensifying violence of the confrontation (you can imagine Chase’s grandfather grabbing the brick off a pile in the bar’s parking lot after realizing he might lose the fight) to the chilling mundanity of a then-middle-aged man relating it to his grandson. It makes me think of all the horrific but realistically awkward brutality meted out during The Sopranos’ eight-year run — Tony (James Gandolfini), eyes swollen from having Raid sprayed into them, killing another mobster by strangling him and smashing his head against a tiled kitchen floor. It’s also the kind of moment that happens throughout the series’s forthcoming prequel, The Many Saints of Newark, a panoramic gangster film set in the late ’60s and early ’70s in Newark, New Jersey, directed by Alan Taylor and co-written by Lawrence Konner, both Sopranos veterans. The film follows junior mobster Christopher Moltisanti’s (Michael Imperioli) father, Newark mob soldier Dickie Moltisanti (Alessandro Nivola), who was discussed in the original but never portrayed onscreen.
In the 14 years since The Sopranos ended, Chase has only done one other project: the 2012 rock-and-roll roman à clef Not Fade Away. He started to write a Sopranos movie in the summer of 2018, following 11 years of turning down requests from Warner Bros. to make a theatrical spin-off. “Even when Jim was alive, there was talk about doing a literal prequel, with us playing ourselves maybe ten years earlier,” recalls Imperioli, who reprises the role of Christopher as a disembodied voice in a cemetery. “Jim was like, ‘What, are we gonna wear wigs and girdles, like Star Trek?’ ” Chase was also wary — ever since The Sopranos, all Hollywood wanted from him was more gangster stories. His attitude was “never — but also, never say never.” Gandolfini’s death, in 2013, didn’t shut the door. He settled on Dickie Moltisanti as a way to reenter the Sopranos universe without rehashing the same characters and situations.

The Many Saints is a fall-of-the-old, rise-of-the-new gangster picture, with Dickie struggling to hold on to his position in changing times. But the emotional backbone of the movie is Dickie’s toxic mentorship of the young Tony, played as a teenager by Gandolfini’s son, Michael. It’s in this plotline that Chase gets to revisit themes that were at the center of the show: the familial, biological, cultural, and historical forces that shape our personalities, for better or worse, in large ways and small, often without our consent or even our knowledge, and how the arc of each person’s life starts to seem incoherent and absurd once you realize it’s all just a collection of poorly sourced, often self-serving anecdotes about people who might not even be alive to corroborate the facts.
Chase has an image as a pessimist provocateur, and he played that up during the run of the show. He did cameos as a bored Italian sneering at Sopranos character Paulie Walnuts in a Naples café and the voice of God tormenting Tony. He sat for magazine portraits that suggested marble sculptures of doomed Roman senators. He has a look that makes people ask “What are you so depressed about?” even if he isn’t actually sad in that moment. He’s got a warm, lighthearted, even goofy side. Chase loves bad puns and slapstick mayhem. If he takes a liking to you, he’ll text or call just to stay in touch, sometimes at unexpected moments. He’s quick to laugh — an almost childlike giggle that becomes a doubled-over cackle when the jokes turn really dumb. But from my perspective — that of someone who has known David for more than 20 years, ever since I was writing about TV for the Newark Star-Ledger, the paper that the bathrobe-clad Tony Soprano used to pick up at the end of his driveway — I sense depths of melancholy whenever he circles the reality that he’s pushing 80 and can’t tell all his untold tales in the time he has left, and that even if he could, he’d have trouble getting them made.

From left: James Gandolfini and David Chase. Photo: Getty ImagesMichael Gandolfini and David Chase. Photo: Barry Wetcher/HBO/Barry Wetcher
David is as complicated as any of his fictional creations. He’s a hardware-store owner’s son who had few artistic role models in his family and tried in his youth to be a rock-and-roll musician and then a film director. He settled into network-TV writing in the 1970s and later moved to cable, where he created an uncategorizable series that transformed the industry. “It really challenged movies as vehicles for characterization, honestly,” says Corey Stoll, who plays young Uncle Junior in The Many Saints. “It’s rare that you could reach the depths of characterization in two hours that you could with 86 hours of a show as complex as The Sopranos.
But any expectation that David would have industry carte blanche after the end of The Sopranos disappeared once the streaming revolution came, shifting the media spotlight away from anti-hero-driven stories set in some version of reality and recentering it on unscripted dramas, competition shows, and blockbuster documentary series; epics like Game of Thrones and The Crown, where the sheer hugeness of the production was part of the appeal; and shows that celebrated compassion and kindness, like Parks and Recreation, Schitt’s Creek, and Ted Lasso. “I read an article the other day about Ted Lasso. It basically went, ‘Thank you, Ted Lasso, for relieving us of all these scumbags!’ ” David says, then laughs. “I wanted to say, ‘I wasn’t the one making you watch those other shows, the ones with all the scumbags! You did that to yourself!’ ”
Even as David has worked diligently behind the scenes to try to get different sorts of projects into the pipeline, it seems like he has made peace with the fact that The Sopranos was the big one, the first-line-in-the-obituary work, the Citizen Kane of TV, add your own superlatives here, and, inevitably, a hothouse of critical and scholarly analysis (including the book I co-wrote with Alan Sepinwall, The Sopranos Sessions) and a fandom as belligerent as anything surrounding Marvel, DC, or Star Wars. (People still fight online over whether the finale’s cut-to-black means Tony died.) David has participated in Sopranos podcasts, including Talking Sopranos, the one co-hosted by former cast members Imperioli and Steve Schirripa; he reads new essays on The Sopranos and eagerly discusses them with former Sopranos collaborators. During the lockdown, a number of pieces were published by queer and trans writers embracing the show, like Chingy Nea’s The Sopranos Belongs to the Gays Now” and P. E. Moskowitz’s “I Couldn’t Imagine Being Happy. But I Could Imagine Being Carmela.” When I asked David if he agreed with the premise that masculinity and femininity were performances, he laughed and said, “They are absolutely performing, and it is often absurd.”
David Chase is Schrödinger’s showrunner, of two minds on almost everything. Outwardly, he expresses deep gratitude for The Sopranos’ medium-altering success, but I’ve always sensed ambivalence about the realization that it created a bottomless appetite for more Sopranos stories, not necessarily more David Chase stories.

David has been annoyed for years by news articles and a Wikipedia entry (belatedly corrected) stating that his father changed the family’s name from DeCesare to Chase. This was especially painful for David in the early aughts, when Italian American anti-defamation activists protested The Sopranos. Some treated the creator’s anglicized last name as evidence that he was an assimilated, sellout Italian — the kind Tony Soprano denounced as “a medigan.” What really happened was a love story. It unfolded long before his father was born.
David Chase’s grandmother Teresa Melfi — as in Sopranos shrink Dr. Melfi (Lorraine Bracco) — was once married to a man named DeCesare. “His real name was Guillermo or Joseph, I don’t know — let’s call him Keith,” David says dismissively. Teresa Melfi, then 29, and Keith DeCesare, who was much older, were living in Providence, Rhode Island, in the 1920s when they rented an upstairs room to a 19-year-old Italian immigrant named Joe Fusco, future killer of that poor bastard up in Buffalo. Joe and Teresa started an affair that continued in secret for years. Teresa had two children by Joe, which she passed off as her husband’s — “the fake DeCesare kids,” David calls them. These were David’s future father, Henry, and his future aunt, Evelyn. “After that, Fusco and my grandmother cleared out of Providence and took all the kids and moved to Newark and changed the name to Chase so they couldn’t be tracked,” he says.
David rarely tells that story as it occurred. But he alluded to it on the show in the subplot in which Paulie Walnuts learns that the woman he always thought was his mother was really his aunt. Paulie’s birth mother’s last words are the same ones Teresa Melfi spoke to Henry Chase, David’s father, on her deathbed: “I was a bad girl.”
I point out that he has sort of retold the story again in The Many Saints in coded form. The movie begins with Dickie’s loathsome father, Newark mobster “Hollywood” Dick (Ray Liotta), going to Italy and bringing back a much younger bride, Giuseppina Bruno (Michela De Rossi). It’s clear she and the younger Dickie are attracted to each other, even though Dickie tries to act disinterested, and that the tension is going to cause serious problems. “What do you mean?” David says immediately when I float this theory. He thinks about it for a moment, then laughs. “Holy shit. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah — my grandmother fucking the lodger!”
Both The Many Saints and The Sopranos are really David Chase stories: seriocomic generational yarns about how your family fucks you up no matter how much you love them, lean on them, and come to their aid in crisis. “What I connect to is what’s always at the heart of a Sopranos story,” says Vera Farmiga, who plays the young version of Tony’s mother, Livia. “A nutty family filled with heated arguments and hurtful disputes, picking fights and pressing each other’s buttons, and the unconditional love that binds them together in a giant mess.” These family sagas are embellished with crime elements and therapeutic concepts as well as constant talk of the parceling and distribution of money, a vulgar ritual that David finds characteristically American and fascinating. But the heart is always the relationships between family members, biological or criminal, and how the pathologies of families and the cultures that shape them can warp sacred bonds into something nasty and sad: ground zero for the next generation’s curses and blessings. Hamilton veteran Leslie Odom Jr., who plays Dickie’s rival Harold McBrayer, expands the word family to include the nation, which is likewise obsessed with past glories and lineage and in denial about its crimes. Odom, who modeled his performance on his own grandfather Lenny, who migrated from South Carolina during Jim Crow looking for job opportunities, says that, to him, The Sopranos is “about who gets to be an American, and that’s all about how you get to be in the family and what you have to do to stay in it.”
I wasn’t the one making you watch those other shows, the ones with all the scumbags! You did that to yourself!
The Dickie-centric The Many Saints echoes the cycle of malignant parenting laid out in the series: Greek tragedy as black comedy. Nivola compares Dickie’s story to that of Oedipus Rex: The main character starts to understand his own primary role in his misfortunes, predicts a bad end for himself, and takes steps to prevent it, but the gods intervene to make sure he succumbs anyway. So too in the original: The characters are responsible for their own misery, but they also seem cursed. The hateful family matriarch, Livia (Nancy Marchand), plots filicide and nearly gets asphyxiated by her own son, a brute who subsequently almost throttles his stalkerish girlfriend, Gloria Trillo (Annabella Sciorra), who is essentially his mom reincarnated. Tony eventually asphyxiates his own surrogate son, Christopher, in a crime of opportunity following a car wreck. Even dead, Christopher is justifiably pissed at being betrayed by a surrogate father, describing Tony as “the guy I went to hell for.” Seeing Dickie’s story play out makes The Sopranos feel like a horror movie about generational trauma replaying itself: A gangster is murdered before his young son can know him, and three decades later, that same son, who has grown up to become a gangster just like his dad, is murdered before his young daughter can know him. In David’s world, as in ours, the curse of bad parenting is forever paid forward.
The surrogate-father relationship between Dickie and young Tony is a preview of the relationship Tony will have three decades later with Chrissy. Dickie acts as an emotional sounding board for Tony and recognizes that the boy’s intelligence and dynamism marks him as a person who should have a life beyond crime; but at the same time, Dickie revels in Tony’s hero worship and basks in his appreciation after he gifts the boy high-end stereo speakers that fell off the back of a truck. It’s a mirror of adult Tony’s behavior on the series, trying to tough-love Chrissy into going into rehab and prove himself a reliable enough leader to take over the family someday, while at the same time drafting him for mob hits, body disposals, and, most harrowingly, the cover-up of the murder of his own fiancée. Chrissy, like Tony before him, is human clay, misshapen by an older adult whose pure love is poisoned by greed, ego, and rage.
I ask David if his own immediate family was ever violent like the ones depicted on The Sopranos. He says no, not like that, but there was emotional violence from his mother, Norma, who had Livia Soprano’s knack for prying her way into people’s minds, and from his father, Henry Chase, who wasn’t a raging bull like Johnny Boy Soprano but had a temper and spanked David sometimes (“I guess these days that’s considered violence”). After the show ended, he backtracked on the easily digestible narrative he’d served up to the press in the early days, about what a miserable, destructive person his mother had been and how scarring it was growing up with her. “After some reflection, I came to the conclusion that, basically, I had a happy childhood,” he now says. When I press him on that assertion, it becomes clear he’s talking mainly about growing up middle class and educated in mid-20th-century American cities and suburbs, not about living with his mother, who “was hysterical, but she was also hysterically funny,” as he once told 60 Minutes.
“Isn’t that how it always goes, though?” he says simply when I ask if it’s possible to reconcile the contradictions. “Nothing is ever just one way.”
I’ve noticed this a bit more in the time I’ve known David — this tendency to examine things up to a point and then back away. It’s striking because although The Sopranos expressed that sensibility in the characters it created and the stories it told, David didn’t — at least not consistently. Our conversations in the early years were more like arguments or attempts to answer a question or solve a problem. David seems increasingly inclined to let things roll off his back and then tell me another story.

During our talk in Santa Monica, David revisits one of his greatest hits, about a housepainter who lived near his hometown of North Caldwell, New Jersey, whom he calls John Pucillo — “the town idiot, in a way: addicted to every kind of fucking drug, would accost people in restaurants and interrupt rock-and-roll shows, a maniac.” If the man’s story doesn’t ring a bell for Sopranos fans, it’s because David never told it directly (and, on the advice of his lawyer, uses a pseudonym to describe him). He took it apart like a sculptor dismantling a junker car, using the scrap for a half-dozen pieces spanning 25 years. In the 1970s, David says, Pucillo gave drugs to a young woman who was associated with a “mid-level” mobster and was subsequently whacked by a couple of young hoods who wanted to impress said mobster; they invited Pucillo to a house to estimate the cost of painting the garage, murdered him on the spot, drove the corpse to some nearby woods for burial, then abandoned Pucillo’s car in a Newark airport parking lot. A few days later, paranoid that a hiker had seen them, they went back to the woods, dug up the body, and reburied it elsewhere. They were caught and eventually confessed to the crime. This Coen-brothers-like story of delusional dimwits gave David and The Sopranos writing staff material for multiple story arcs, including the shooting of Christopher in “Full Leather Jacket,” the near-lethal tantrum of Mustang Sally in “Another Toothpick,” and the death of Adriana in an episode titled “Long Term Parking.” David also used pieces of the Pucillo murder when he was a young writer on The Rockford Files in the 1970s, in an episode he now describes as a “backdoor pilot” for The Sopranos. He has been strip-mining stories of his family and former community for five decades now.
The lode is so rich it’s far from depleted. He wants to write a movie based on the story of his grandmother, the lodger, and the origin of the Chase family name. In 2012, he reteamed with HBO to make A Ribbon of Dreams, about two men and a woman who meet on a movie set in the 1910s, sparking the creation of two entertainment-industry dynasties that span the evolution of motion pictures up to the present day (he ultimately said no because of the low budget that was offered). He and another Chase Films producer, Nicole Lambert, currently have a pilot for a series called Strategic Service about how women flooded into the workplace during World War II. Other unproduced David stories are features or seeds of features, smaller in scale. Stuff in the filing cabinet, waiting for the light of day. Unfortunately, it appears the entertainment industry is even less interested in his pitches for intimate films about plausibly real human beings than it was when he was struggling to break into the movie business in the 1980s.
Does he think his chances of a green light would improve if he tossed some Sopranos connections into the projects, however contrived or obligatory? “That’s not a question I really want to ask myself,” he says. During the show’s run, he batted around an idea for an episode about a Rutgers University graduate student who stops by the Soprano home to gather material for a longitudinal study and inadvertently reveals a family secret to Tony: that one of his dad’s stints in prison was really a stay in a mental hospital. Depending on how The Many Saints does, David could picture dusting off the story of Johnny Boy Soprano’s time in a psych ward and seeing if anyone wants it, but it’s clear that it’s not a burning obsession for him right now.
I ask him if he could ever picture doing a “gangster-adjacent” show about northern New Jersey in the 1960s that used familiar characters to lure people in but was mostly about a noncrime world populated by characters from David’s notes and files. He seems flattered even one person would wish for such a show. “Do you think somebody would want to watch that?” he asks me skeptically. “Honestly?”
The Sopranoswill be forgotten, because eventually everything will be, including you and me.
It’s a shame Not Fade Away came and went without much fanfare. The film’s lack of crime elements throws the David Chase–ness of the rest of it into sharper relief and offers a glimpse of what a world filled with Chase films and series might look like. Set in North Jersey in a time frame that overlaps with that of The Many Saints, it’s about a Chase-like rock-and-film-loving teenager (John Magaro, who would go on to play young Silvio Dante in The Many Saints) who gradually turns into his adult self without being cognizant of all the signposts of his development. I call it “the David Chase secret decoder ring” for understanding David’s mentality as a storyteller who likes to put unreconciled contradictions in front of audiences and let them sit with them and who is fanatically determined to avoid doing what the audience probably wants or expects. I recommend Not Fade Away to any Sopranos fan who insists that the cut-to-black ending of The Sopranos can only mean “Tony got shot.” Not Fade Away has a similarly opaque finale and includes a scene in which characters representing the young David Chase and his then-girlfriend and future wife, Denise Kelly, go to an art-house theater to watch Michelangelo Antonioni’s Blow-Up — the head-scratcher ending of which was a major influence on The Sopranos — and discuss how the lack of musical score in a scene makes them feel. The Sopranos didn’t have a score either. It used needle-drop songs sparingly, and often in a Kubrick-Scorsese, pushing-against-the-drama way, because David hated how most Hollywood productions were constantly “helping” the story along. “I want people to think and feel, but I don’t want to tell people what to think or how to feel,” he once told me. It’s like the ending of Citizen Kane: What nearly everyone thinks is the solution to the main character’s enigma is, to quote Orson Welles, “dollar-book Freud,” burning up the instant we lay eyes on it. “So it was the sled, huh,” says Adriana in an episode in which Carmela’s film club screens Kane, ribbing the sorts of viewers who, in just a few years, would insist that the final cut-to-black could only mean one thing. “He shoulda told somebody.”
Critics took Not Fade Away seriously, but some reviews treated it as a curiosity, an afterthought, or a kind of post-Sopranos indulgence. There were complaints that it was too rushed, too blurry with character and incident, and too coy about letting the audience know what the story meant to the storyteller. David worries that some of the same complaints could be applied to The Many Saints of Newark. “A lot of people said of Not Fade Away, ‘It should’ve been a series,’ ” David says. “Some people are already saying that about The Many Saints of Newark. I find myself reading that and thinking, Why? Why should it have been a series? Because the story takes place over a long period of time? Because there’s too many characters? I have a screenplay I spent a year and a half on, and my agent and one other person who have read it have said it’s overwhelming, it’s too much. Too many stories. To me, it’s a story about a girl and her boyfriend.”
When you’ve created one of the greatest TV shows of all time, the criticisms are often comparisons. But David waves away my suggestion that the success of The Sopranos was a curse as well as a blessing. “I have nothing but gratitude for the show’s success and all that it’s brought me, and to my mind, it’s all blessings,” he says. But over the years, I’ve listened raptly as he has described a film or show he’s developing, only to be disappointed along with him when the industry didn’t think it was worth funding. That’s life, of course. If The Sopranos has taught us anything, it’s that the universe could not care less what any of us wants.
When I ask David if he thinks The Sopranos will stand the test of time like some of the popular artworks that captured his imagination when he was starting out, he quickly says “no.” “In the end,” he says, “nothing stands the test of time. Not art, not film, not music. TV seems to have a shorter shelf life than some other art forms. Of course The Sopranos will be forgotten, because eventually everything will be, including you and me.” He acknowledges the monumental nature of his achievement while constantly reminding us — and himself — that monuments crumble. Sometimes he sounds like Tony’s wife, Carmela (Edie Falco), in “Cold Stones,” the season-six episode in which she visits Paris with her friend Rosalie Aprile (Sharon Angela) and comes to terms with the inevitability of death and the ephemerality of her life compared with the sweep of history. “We worry so much,” she sobs. “Sometimes it feels like that’s all we do. But in the end, it just gets washed away.”
David recently relocated from New York to Santa Monica with his wife because he wants to be closer to his daughter, the actress Michele DeCesare (whom Sopranos fans may know as Meadow’s friend Hunter Scangarelo). And also because “I just felt that New York was changing. There was scaffolding everywhere you wanted to walk. They were constantly building these new buildings that were 50 stories high. There still used to be great little bars and restaurants and great little stores that survived, selling different kinds of cheese or something. Now that’s all gone. It was all becoming a mall.”
And what can you do, really? Not much. That’s part of the human story: accepting what you have no control over and moving ahead as best you can.
By way of illustration, David tells another story, about the time that Mad Men creator and former Sopranos producer Matthew Weiner asked legendary TV producer Norman Lear to tell him the greatest lesson he ever learned. “Lear said, ‘The two words that came way too late in my life were ‘Over. Next,’ as in, ‘That’s over … Next!’ And then he said, ‘Don’t wait till you’re my age to learn that.’ ”
 

Drea de Matteo Answers All Our Questions About That Episode of The Sopranos
By Mara Reinstein
Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photo: HBO
Warning: Spoilers ahead for one of the biggest spoilers in modern TV history.
Her Emmy statue used to be displayed in a bathroom. “I was that guy who had to downplay everything,” Drea de Matteo explains. Then she moved it into her office and placed it on a stack of books on the floor, where it now resides. But honestly? All these years later, she’s still processing the whole thing. “It’s too big for me to wrap my head around it,” she says. “Like, how did I get this far? I was a mess of a kid and now I’m here with a fucking Emmy? Like, holy shit, when I won I almost died.”

Of course, mastering the art of the onscreen death is how and why de Matteo earned that 2004 Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series trophy in the first place. And it’s perfectly fine to admit that you’re still not over what happened. Her demise on The Sopranos, as seen in the episode “Long Term Parking,” remains the disturbing highlight on an iconic mob series that dispatched many of its characters with cruel regularity.
My Week In New York
A week-in-review newsletter from the people who make New York Magazine.

The trouble starts when her big-haired, bighearted Adriana La Cerva befriends a fellow mall rat (Lola Glaudini) who happens to be an undercover FBI agent. Once under the thumb of the Feds, Adriana’s coerced into giving up information relating to her Mafia connections — which includes her fiancé, Christopher Moltisanti (Michael Imperioli), the made-man nephew of one Tony Soprano (James Gandolfini). The secrets come in dribs and drabs until Adriana gets entangled in a murder cover-up at her Crazy Horse nightclub. Her solution? Spill all to Christopher in the hopes that he’ll join her in the Witness Protection Program. This plan ends with our dear sweet Adriana scampering on all fours in the middle of the secluded woods as Tony’s consigliere Silvio Dante (Steven Van Zandt) squeezes the trigger. (The company line: She dumped Christopher and impulsively moved away; her car may still be loitering in Newark airport’s long-term-parking lot.)
“I’m really proud of it,” the actress says of her role. “We changed the history of TV with that show, and I know my character was iconic. My daughter once looked up what I did and told me, ‘Oh my God, Mom!’” Now 50, de Matteo — who, for the record, does not speak in Adriana’s unrefined New York dialect — has gone on to make her mark in the likes of Desperate Housewives, Justified, Shades of Blue, and, most recently, the Amazon series Paradise City. And yes, she’s beyond excited to see the upcoming Sopranos origin-story film The Many Saints of Newark, in which Christopher appears as an innocent cooing baby circa the mid-1970s. So we asked her to divulge all the details about her infamous TV exit.

Do you realize how painful it is to rewatch this episode, even for research purposes?
I know. She was a good girl.
She didn’t deserve to die!
I agree! Saint Adriana. She was the show’s sacrificial lamb.
So let’s do the math. Adriana meets the agent in an episode that aired in the spring of 2002. She dies two years later at the tail end of season five. When did you learn her days were numbered?
You know, I went to series creator and executive producer David Chase at the beginning of season five because I wanted to direct a film during the hiatus. He looked at me and said, “I’ll get back to you.” And I thought, “Am I effing myself?” Like, I hope he’s not mad at me now because I wanted to do something that was not Sopranos related. In a lot of ways, I was his baby. I came in as a day player, and the role grew because he loved the character and loved me and gave me the chance of a lifetime. I didn’t want him to think I was too big for my britches.
Then he lowered the boom?
I’ll never forget it. So everybody on the show who was about to get whacked always got brought into his office, and there’s a conversation and then he takes that person to dinner. Usually it’s the men. He’s like the Godfather in that sense. But in my situation, he sat me on a curb in between shooting the episode where Adriana is in a neck brace. He said to me, “I’m going to shoot it two ways: You escape in your car, and you get killed. Nobody will know how it’s going to end until the episode comes out because we have confidentiality issues on the show.” But the truth was that I was going to be killed. And they aired both scenarios in the episode because Adriana imagined that she was free.
What were your initial thoughts upon reading the script?
I remember thinking that I was going to be happy that I was not going to have to cry again and could relax. I was very burned out because back in those days I was very Method. I took things maybe too seriously. And shooting that season, I really lived with Adriana because I gave it my all and was in turmoil. But I have to say, the actual death scene was nothing for me at that point. The scene I really struggled with was the one where I confessed to Christopher.
Well, he responds by flying into a rage and punching you and almost choking you to death. What was your relationship with Michael like at that point?
Michael and I definitely hung out a lot. I always say that everything I learned about acting was from working so closely with him. When I came on, he was the easiest, most generous actor and so patient with me about hitting marks and all kinds of things not part of my repertoire. So I felt safe with him and was able to explore and become an actor. I mean, I remember in season one, David Chase came over to me at craft services and goes, “You know, people in the editing room think you and Michael are really a couple.” But we barely knew each other at that point! I said that maybe it’s because we both have enormous eyebrows.
How did you guys approach such an intense scene?
He had a hard time with a lot of the violence that season. One time he had to grab me by my hair and drag me across the room using a harness. But the harness broke. I was sitting on the floor and crying, because I’m in the moment, and finally told him, “I’m not going to sit here and wait. You’re dragging me by my hair and you’re going to be okay with it.” He said, “I can’t do that.” And I said, “Yes, you can.” And we did it. So for the confession scene, I told him, “I don’t want to do more than one take so you need to not be careful. I’ll kick you in the nuts as a signal if you need to get off me.” And he was like, “I can’t.” And I said, “Then don’t, fine.”
You’re saying it was all faked?
Well, the punch is a fake. But you can’t fake choking because they have a camera right on your face. So when he started choking me, I pushed my neck up into his hands as hard as I could to choke myself, so that my eyes would pop and my face would swell. It’s pretty good! The 50-year-old version of myself might not do that. But I loved that scene. It was like a cleansing because she finally just gets to say what she needed to say for so long.
That sight of Adriana alone in the driver’s seat of her car looking so peaceful is one of the most heartbreaking fake-outs in TV history.
There was a scene shot for that episode where Christopher is hysterically crying and tells Tony everything and Tony says, “I’ll handle it.” I went to the writers and said that you can’t air it because then everyone will know that Adriana is walking into her own death. We needed her to go out with a bang, and we owe her that much. Stevie backed me, but I’m not sure about Michael. And they took out the scene because they realized it was a better way to keep people on the edge of their seats and used the scene as a flashback in the next season.
When we do see the reality, Adriana is riding shotgun with Silvio and in tears. Is she crying because Tony told her that Christopher had attempted suicide or because she knew that he had betrayed her?
I think it starts one way because she is filled with guilt, and then she quickly realizes what is happening. The crying ramps up when he makes that turn off the interstate and she knows that her fate is sealed.
Drea, was there any way Adriana could have avoided that fate?
She didn’t know how to navigate the situation. She could have gone straight to Tony Soprano from the beginning and they could have played the feds together. That’s what his kids would have done. But she wasn’t savvy like that or some grand manipulator. But Christopher also shouldn’t have been so impulsive and thought it through a little bit!
Seriously! Why was she so loyal to that guy?
Adriana’s purpose on the show was innocence, and she was filled with love. You know, a lot of fans looked at the show from the aspect of the gunshot; they didn’t understand what was happening underneath the surface. I would be walking on the street and people were like, “You fucking rat, you junkie bitch, you deserve what you got.”
Is it true Steven Van Zandt didn’t want to drag you out of that car?
It’s fair to say that I held every male character’s hand who destroyed Adriana’s spirit. Nobody wanted to do it, but I needed my side of the street to be easy, and the only way to do this was for them to help me and just go for it. Stevie understood that in the end, but boy, he didn’t want to do it at all!
Do you take all this resistance as a weird compliment, in that they cared about you so much?
Well, that should be the norm in life! They did care about me, but a lot had to do with seeing the character go. Everyone knew this was going to change the trajectory of the show. These antiheroes that you’ve loved for so many years? You’re really going to see them for the monsters that they are. Subscribing to that school of thought was key to understanding the show.
Did David Chase take you out to a good-bye dinner like he did for everyone else?
I got nothing. Well, I got a pinball machine and lots of flowers. But no dinner. Maybe because I’m a woman, I don’t know. To be honest, dinner with David Chase and all the dudes? Like, it would be uncomfortable for all of us. I was so fucking shy that it was like pulling teeth even getting me to the read-throughs.
Was it weird to watch the rest of the series unfold? Christopher ends up marrying and having a baby.
It was weird. Like, Oh, this new woman gets to have a baby? I couldn’t have a baby! But when Tony kills him after a car crash, I saw it as karma.
What are your thoughts on Adriana’s legacy? Has it been a burden for you professionally?
It’s never easy after you come up with a huge show like that because the expectations are so high. It usually takes a long time for people to erase that from their psyche, and it hasn’t been easy for me to find the roles that I love. But now I just want to play a character like that all over again because it was the richest with the most layers. And that accent was the most fun.
I must say, it is a little disarming to hear you not pronounce the name as “Chris-ta-fuh.”
I hated saying it at the time because I thought it sounded forced! I even asked David Chase if I could just say “Chrissy” instead. But now when I sign autographs, I sign “Christopher” with like 80 h’s at the end.
 

Sopranos Creator David Chase FINALLY Confirms What Actually Happened to Tony
By Sarah RumpfNov 3rd, 2021, 2:05 pm
33 comments


Photo by Evan Agostini/Getty Images.
David Chase, creator of HBO’s The Sopranos, is finally breaking his silence about the fate of his antihero Tony Soprano, confirming the meaning of the fade-to-black scene at the end of the series finale in a sprawling interview with the Hollywood Reporter.
Chase spoke with reporter Scott Feinberg about a variety of topics, including how his own mother was the inspiration for Tony’s difficult mother Livia, his experiences growing up on the periphery of “connected” families in New Jersey, and James Gandolfini’s “off the rails” audition for the lead role.
But it’s Chase’s discussion of that infamous final scene in the show that — at last! — puts to rest one of the longest-running debates in this era of prestige television that The Sopranos launched.
The series finale episode “Made in America” first aired on June 10, 2007 (spoilers follow, but come on, the show ended over a decade ago), and ends with Tony meeting his family at a local diner as “Don’t Stop Believin'” by Journey plays. Tony’s daughter Meadow, the last family member to arrive, enters the diner, causing the bell on the door to ring. Tony looks up and the camera cuts to black, ending the show with several seconds of silence.
The ending shocked some viewers, who worried their cable had suddenly cut out at the worst possible time, and sparked countless articles debating whether the ending really meant “lights out” for Tony or if the Mafia boss lived on.
Chase has avoided settling the debate for years, refusing to answer direct questions — until now.
Drum roll, please: Tony Soprano, in fact does stop believin’, stop breathin’, and just stop livin’, period, at the end of The Sopranos.
Feinberg brought up a 2018 book about the show by two reporters for the New Jersey Star-Ledger, and how they had asked Chase about the series finale. In the interview for the book, Chase had referred the final moments as “that death scene,” and Feinberg got him to confirm that was not a slip of the tongue (Feinberg’s quotes in bold, as in the original):
They interviewed you and asked you to talk about the June 10, 2007, series finale with of course, “Don’t Stop Believin’” and the famous cut to black. You said, “Well, I had that death scene in mind for years before.” A) Do you remember specifically when the ending first came to you? And, B) Was that a slip of the tongue?
Right. Was it?
I’m asking you.
No.
No?
Because the scene I had in my mind was not that scene. Nor did I think of cutting to black. I had a scene in which Tony comes back from a meeting in New York in his car. At the beginning of every show, he came from New York into New Jersey, and the last scene could be him coming from New Jersey back into New York for a meeting at which he was going to be killed.

Chase went on to describe how he had thought of the “notion” of how the show should end about two years beforehand, as he drove past a little restaurant near the airport, “and for some reason I thought, ‘Tony should get it in a place like that.’ Why? I don’t know.”
He added that he was surprised by how viewers fixated on the ending, and nothing else in the episode itself, describing it as “incredible” how it took over the news cycle.
“I had no idea it would be that much of an uproar,” said Chase. “And was it annoying? What was annoying was how many people wanted to see Tony killed. That bothered me.”
“They wanted to see it,” said Feinberg. “They wanted confirmation.”
“They wanted to know that Tony was killed,” Chase agreed. “They wanted to see him go face-down in linguini, you know? And I just thought, ‘God, you watched this guy for seven years and I know he’s a criminal. But don’t tell me you don’t love him in some way, don’t tell me you’re not on his side in some way. And now you want to see him killed? You want justice done? You’re a criminal after watching this shit for seven years.’ That bothered me, yeah.”
Listen to the interview below, or read a transcript at The Hollywood Reporter.
 

Bob LuPone, Broadway change-maker and The Sopranos actor, dies at 76

The Tony nominee was also the elder brother of theater legend Patti LuPone.

By Maureen Lee LenkerAugust 29, 2022 at 06:44 PM EDT

image




Robert "Bob" LuPone, the Broadway veteran and co-founder of the MCC Theater, died Saturday after a three-year battle with pancreatic cancer. He was 76.

His publicist confirmed the news to EW and provided a statement from the MCC Theater that said, "The MCC Theater community mourns the loss of our much loved and uniquely inspiring partner, colleague, and dear friend, Bob LuPone, who lived fearlessly and with great curiosity, good humor, a boundless passion for connection, and a whole lot of heart. We will miss him deeply and always."

The brother of theater legend Patti LuPone, Bob LuPone was a star of stage and screen in his own right. He earned a Tony nomination for his portrayal of Zach in the original production of A Chorus Line, while television audiences would recognize him as Dr. Bruce Cusamano, the physician of Tony Soprano and his family on The Sopranos.

LuPone was born July 29, 1946, in Brooklyn, New York. He showed an interest in performing from a young age, training as a dancer and studying at Juilliard, as well as studying acting under Uta Hagen.



He made his professional debut in a 1966 production of The Pajama Game starring Liza Minnelli, before making the move to Broadway in the 1968 production of Noel Coward's Sweet Potato.

His biggest break would come in 1976's Pulitzer Prize-winning musical A Chorus Line. Initially cast as Al, LuPone persuaded director and choreographer Michael Bennett to move him into the role of Zach when the original actor left the production. The role earned him a Tony Award nomination.

In 1986, LuPone founded the Manhattan Class Company along with casting director Bernard Telsey, LuPone's former student at NYU, and co-artistic director Will Cantler. Now known as MCC Theater, it's become a breeding ground for some of the stage's most provocative, groundbreaking work, including Reasons to be Pretty, The Other Place, The Snow Geese, and Wit.

While serving as co-artistic director of MCC for nearly 40 years, LuPone also continued his work as an actor, in Broadway productions such as A View from the Bridge, True West, and A Thousand Clowns. In addition to his stint on The Sopranos, he appeared on television in Sex and the City, Guiding Light, and All My Children, the latter of which earned him a Daytime Emmy nomination.

He also served as the director of the MFA drama program at the New School for Drama from 2005 through 2011 and served as president of the board of directors of A.R.T/New York.

"There's no better life," LuPone said in a 2019 interview with the Primary Stages Off-Broadway Oral History Project. "Despite the cost, there's no better life than a life in theater in New York City, with the community, with the ups and downs, with the fullness of life and creativity that you experience. Both positive and negative, with the joys and sorrows of inspiration. That's the reason to do any of this. And it's a great life… it's a great life."

In addition to his sister, LuPone is survived by his wife Virginia, his son Orlando, and his brother William.
 
Ain’t Nobody reading all that shit above smfh

I ain't got to read a damn thing to say FUCK VIC & the SHIELD he rode in on it! Don't anyone ever compare shitty endings with the Shield & the Sopranos.

It still pisses me off that Vic cop a plea and walked free. The entire rest of the strike team got fucked. Everybody got their comeuppance, except Vic.

Boo who, he lost his wife and kids. The rest of the strike team got FUCKED one by one and Vic took a deal and walked free.

Fuck Vic Mackey! No one deserved a bullet in the eye during their series finale more than Vic!
 

The Sopranos' James Gandolfini walked out of his intervention, dared HBO exec to fire him: 'Aw, f--- this'​

Former HBO CEO Chris Albrecht recalls the show's failed attempt to get its star into rehab in the new documentary "Wise Guy: David Chase and 'The Sopranos.'"
By Shania Russell

Published on September 8, 2024 12:42PM EDT




Menacing mobster Tony Soprano was key to the success of The Sopranos — and James Gandolfini knew it.

The three-time Emmy winner once wielded his critical role in the series by daring the network to fire him, former HBO CEO Chris Albrecht says. The heated moment came after the actor felt ambushed during an intervention meant to address his struggles with substance abuse.

"We did an intervention with him at my apartment in New York," Albrecht recalled in the new Max docuseries Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos. "That was to try to get him to go to a facility for rehab. We'd had a lot of friction by that point, and the ruse was that I was inviting Jimmy over so we could talk things through and kind of clear the air."

Actor James Gandolfini attends the premiere of Zero Dark Thirty at the Dolby Theatre on December 10, 2012 in Hollywood, California.

James Gandolfini.
Jason LaVeris/FilmMagic
The Sopranos creator David Chase returns to diner where infamous final scene was shot

Attendees included Gandolfini’s sisters and several of his castmates, said Albrecht, so the star was quick to figure out the situation. "He walked in, and he saw everybody sitting there, and he went, 'Aw, f--- this.' And he walked out," Albrecht said. "Everybody went, 'Jimmy, Jimmy!' And he turned to me and he went, 'Fire me,' and he left."

Gandolfini ultimately stuck with the show through its end, leading the mafia drama for six seasons from 1999 to 2007. Tony Soprano is still heralded as one of the most influential characters in TV history, and Gandolfini's performance was critically acclaimed at the time, earning him three Emmy Awards, five Screen Actors Guild Awards, and one Golden Globe Award.

Steven Van Zandt, who starred in the hit HBO drama as Silvio Dante, noted that the intervention was not the only occasion on which Gandolfini entertained the idea of leaving the series.

"He probably quit the show every other day. Maybe every day," said Van Zandt in the doc. "Every other day we would go to a bar and we would have the exact same conversation. We'd get drunk and [he'd] say, 'I'm done. I can't, I'm not going back.' And I would say, 'Okay, you got a hundred people depending on you here.' And he's like, 'Ah, yeah, yeah, okay.'"

Sign up for Entertainment Weekly's free daily newsletter to get breaking TV news, exclusive first looks, recaps, reviews, interviews with your favorite stars, and more.

James Gandolfini as Tony Soprano and Edie Falco as Carmela Soprano seek counseling in HBO's hit television series, The Sopranos

James Gandolfini and Edie Falco in 'The Sopranos'.
HBO
Many Saints of Newark star Michael Gandolfini was 'proud' of his dad after watching The Sopranos

Van Zandt added that while Gandolfini would usually be back to work the next day, he would also "disappear" for brief periods of time, when the pressure of leading the series "got to him."

His onscreen wife Edie Falco said, "He was incredibly invested in making that character believable, and unless you're really diligent you can end up taking your work home. And as an actor, that's not always a great idea."

The Sopranos creator David Chase went so far as to liken Gandolfini to the character he so famously portrayed. "He was really a good guy and really complicated," Chase said in Wise Guy. "You might say, and I'm not sure about this, maybe there was more Tony there than he wanted to admit. That it was too easy for him."

Gandolfini died of a heart attack on June 19, 2013, at the age of 51. Last year marked the 10th anniversary of his unexpected death, for which several of his costars shared heartfelt tributes.

"Forever grateful to have done so much work together, to have spent so much time in your company, and for all the generosity and kindness," wrote Michael Imperioli. "Miss you lots, as do so many on the planet."

Wise Guy: David Chase and The Sopranos is available to stream on Max, as are all six seasons of The Sopranos.
 
Back
Top