BOOM!!!!
Secret FBI recordings accuse Martin Luther King Jr of having 40 extramarital affairs, watching & l..
- Thread starter the_male_feminist
- Start date
BOOM!!!!
Yeah man. Hebrew Israelites have to be some of the dumbest fucks I have ever come across. Christians and Muslims are real close though so don't get it fucked up. To see Negros so devoted to a culture that plaigerized and usurped another African culture is beyond disturbing. Those fucking Hebrews sold out indigenous Africans and in time even there own was enslaved by the ancestors of the same people they got in bed with. Noah culture doomed us so called Black people across the globe.
He had side peices... Hell all the Kennedys did too... But they like to keep quiet about that shit...
Where the rape came in at. I only saw outside marital affairs. And no been a fan. Saying whatever they got to say don’t change that. And him witnessing supposedly witnessing a rape ain’t even a lil bit of enough to discredit his work.
Keep trying while we rising
Yeah people are complex and weird as fuck. The laughing about rape part is a stretch but even if it were True, just shows how people can do extreme good and extreme bad. Wouldn't surprise me and wouldn't change my views. Be hard to know if it wasn't a fake in this day and age.
I do know people tend to turn regular people into legends, and sanitize them to the point where when you hear they did regular shit it's surprising. Someone on this board could be some amazing media figure , then they find all their posts later , gawking at fat asses and telling fucked up stories under anonymity lmao
Op would you let MLK hit your cooch... I mean you let legless nigs suck on your tits for $5 breakfast meals...a historic civil rights leader would be a huge upgrade for you... Prob get more views on your triple digit YouTube channel
I asked her the same shit and she ignored it. Fuzzy hustling those $5 tit sucks
Right on, bruh!! They wont drop anything on Hoover, because he was part of the deception agenda!! But thats a whole different thread!!
White America still hasn't figured it out. No one gives a shit if he was less than perfect.
And Trump married a sex trafficked, lesbian porn model, that worked in the US illegally AND beat his former wives.
MLK was a man, not a damn Deity
Let me know when the tapes on Hoovers sexual homosexual, cross dressing realities are released.
Anyone still going to a Catholic church, or Michigan State, or joined the Boy Scouts lately?
Yeah fuck this fake attack shit
MLK was a man, not a damn Deity
Let me know when the tapes on Hoovers sexual homosexual, cross dressing realities are released.
Anyone still going to a Catholic church, or Michigan State, or joined the Boy Scouts lately?
Yeah fuck this fake attack shit
The civil rights hero was also heard allegedly joking he was the founder of the
'International Association for the Advancement of P***y-Eaters'
on an agency recording that was obtained by bugging his room
LOL
whoever wrote this is crazy.
but funny.
where's the tapes at?
'International Association for the Advancement of P***y-Eaters'
on an agency recording that was obtained by bugging his room
LOL
whoever wrote this is crazy.
but funny.
where's the tapes at?
I don't believe a GODDAMN THING a CAC tells me about a black man.
And any dumb ass motherfucker who calls himself black and supports the feminist movement which was started by the female faction of the KKK has no weight in a conversation about MLK.
Nobody here is worried about who a man long dead was fucking in the past. That's a very feminine trait. Gossip girl shit.
The man's contribution to black America as well as all of America is unquestionable.
Any one or ten of you kniggas that think you have done more than him, PLEASE step up so you can get laughed the fuck offa BGOL.
His actions have made it possible for all of your 1st world, retroactive critiques of his sex life. Stop dick monitoring.
Oh, and here's why you can't believe any "newly discovered tapes"
...because they can easily be fake. Can't believe anything you hear anymore.
And any dumb ass motherfucker who calls himself black and supports the feminist movement which was started by the female faction of the KKK has no weight in a conversation about MLK.
Nobody here is worried about who a man long dead was fucking in the past. That's a very feminine trait. Gossip girl shit.
The man's contribution to black America as well as all of America is unquestionable.
Any one or ten of you kniggas that think you have done more than him, PLEASE step up so you can get laughed the fuck offa BGOL.
His actions have made it possible for all of your 1st world, retroactive critiques of his sex life. Stop dick monitoring.
Oh, and here's why you can't believe any "newly discovered tapes"
...because they can easily be fake. Can't believe anything you hear anymore.
Last edited:
Look at you, all..
Your threads are pointless like dry pussy. You’re too emotional about trying to shame a black icon. What man who can do more than 3 push-ups name himself a the male feminist?
Enjoying wiping front to back, whichyo yoga pants wearin ass!
Where this rapping gif from?
Wait fuzzy a bitch?
Speak on it, Son!
the right reverend doctor martin luther king, jr, was an old religious, cowardly, white man-fearing and now adulterous uncle tom.
i'm glad he was shot and killed.
long live my heroes malcolm x, patrice lumumba, nat turner, denmark vesey and gabriel prosser.
i'm glad he was shot and killed.
long live my heroes malcolm x, patrice lumumba, nat turner, denmark vesey and gabriel prosser.
Two fold strategy of white supremacists,
- Undermine Black achievement
- Tarnish the image of Black heroes
We should be doing the same to them. We should be tarnishing the image of all the presidents who owned slaves, all of the cacs behind Jim Crow and other anti-black laws. We should be going in on their beloved reverends and ministers that supported slavery for having no moral back bone. Furthermore, we need to destroy the image of there most beloved generals like robert lee. In my daughters 3rd grade text book, the author says that robert lee knew slavery was wrong but wanted to fight for his side so his loyalty is to be commended.
Last edited:
The unknown child being fathered doesn't seem true. How would you keep something like that secret for more than 50 years? No way a mother doesn't eventually tell the child as an adult that their father was Dr. King.
The Kennedy 's sex history has been reported on for years. I think every known Kennedy had bern involved in a scandal.
fuck that niggaah! he was an agent!
New Documentary about Dr. King and the FBI release on his bday...
NY Times article
CRITIC’S PICK
‘MLK/FBI’ Review: King, Hoover and the Tale of the Tape
Sam Pollard’s fascinating documentary chronicles the F.B.I. director’s obsession with the private life and political affiliations of the civil rights leader.
The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., as seen in Sam Pollard’s documentary “MLK/FBI.”Credit...IFC Films
By A.O. Scott
FIND TICKETS
When you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.
In some ways, “MLK/FBI,” Sam Pollard’s new documentary, tells a straightforward story suggested by the title. Drawing on long-secret documents — and anticipating the eventual release of recordings held in the National Archives — the film chronicles the F.B.I.’s surveillance and harassment of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
From the March on Washington in August 1963 until his assassination in April 1968, King was a subject of almost obsessive interest to the bureau and its director, J. Edgar Hoover. Reams of paper, miles of audio tape and countless hours were spent tracking the civil rights leader’s every action and utterance. Hoover viewed him as a singular threat to national security and was determined to diminish his influence.
That much — including wiretaps and bugs in hotel rooms — is fairly well known. But Pollard, drawing on David J. Garrow’s controversial book “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.: From ‘Solo’ to Memphis,” layers startling details about Hoover’s campaign against King with thoughtful interpretations of its meaning. The result is at once suspenseful, visually engrossing and intellectually bracing. It also raises urgent, sometimes uncomfortable questions about power, privacy and the ethical challenges of examining the past.
WATCHING: Recommendations on the best TV shows and films to stream and watch.
Sign Up
Those challenges are signaled at the outset, as Garrow and other scholars — notably Beverly Gage of Yale and Donna Murch of Rutgers — ponder the status of the F.B.I. tapes, in particular those that reveal King’s sex life, as historical evidence. The recordings won’t be available until 2027, but they are generally believed to document frequent infidelities. Can the tapes be trusted? How will their contents affect King’s reputation? The answers offered by the experts are nuanced and cautious, with some — including former F.B.I. officials — arguing that it would be better if the tapes remained unheard.
That’s an argument for the present and the future, about what we should know and how we should handle that knowledge. In a sense, the main work Pollard and his sources undertake is to establish a context for those debates. The voices he gathers are not always in agreement, either about facts or about meaning. Much remains to be discovered and disputed. By entwining the histories of law enforcement, activism and institutional politics, “MLK/FBI” provides new ways of looking at what might seem like old news.
“Looking” is the key word. Pollard, whose long résumé as a producer, editor and director includes “Two Trains Running,” “4 Little Girls” and “Eyes on the Prize,” balances the prose of historical discourse with cinematic poetry. Rather than subject the viewer to talking-head interviews, he matches the thoughts of scholars and the reminiscences of survivors with news footage, still photographs and occasional clips from old movies. The speakers, who include King’s close associates Clarence Jones and Andrew Young as well as Garrow, Murch and Gage, don’t turn up onscreen until the very end. They are narrators rather than characters.
That simple decision focuses attention on the actual players, who come to dramatic life through Pollard’s artful direction. Hoover and King are hardly obscure figures — a lot of movies have been made about both of them — but you understand each one a little better when you look at them side by side. You’re reminded of how deeply entrenched Hoover was in the American government, and how much power he wielded, but you also observe a man consumed perhaps as much by fear as by ambition or Machiavellian calculation. To him, King represented disorder, communism, the disruption of racial hierarchies and sexual norms.
King, for his part, emerges as a young leader — he was 26 at the time of the Montgomery bus boycott, 35 when he won the Nobel Prize, 39 when he died — fighting a risky battle on multiple fronts. Hoover’s surveillance was intended to ensure King’s failure, and at the time, white public opinion favored Hoover. It shouldn’t be forgotten that King was met with suspicion and hostility — even from ostensibly liberal leaders and commentators — especially after he publicly opposed the Vietnam War. The FBI, for its part, was widely viewed with reverence.
“MLK/FBI” is fair to all parties without being neutral or timid. In that regard, it’s an exemplary historical documentary — unafraid of moral judgment but also attentive to the fine grain of ambiguity that clings to the facts. It doesn’t force the preoccupations of the present onto the past, but rather invites you to think about how what happened then might help explain where we are now. The story took place a long time ago, but it isn’t finished.
MLK/FBI
Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 44 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on Apple TV, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters.
NY Times article
CRITIC’S PICK
‘MLK/FBI’ Review: King, Hoover and the Tale of the Tape
Sam Pollard’s fascinating documentary chronicles the F.B.I. director’s obsession with the private life and political affiliations of the civil rights leader.
The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., as seen in Sam Pollard’s documentary “MLK/FBI.”Credit...IFC Films
By A.O. Scott
- Jan. 14, 2021
FIND TICKETS
When you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.
In some ways, “MLK/FBI,” Sam Pollard’s new documentary, tells a straightforward story suggested by the title. Drawing on long-secret documents — and anticipating the eventual release of recordings held in the National Archives — the film chronicles the F.B.I.’s surveillance and harassment of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
From the March on Washington in August 1963 until his assassination in April 1968, King was a subject of almost obsessive interest to the bureau and its director, J. Edgar Hoover. Reams of paper, miles of audio tape and countless hours were spent tracking the civil rights leader’s every action and utterance. Hoover viewed him as a singular threat to national security and was determined to diminish his influence.
That much — including wiretaps and bugs in hotel rooms — is fairly well known. But Pollard, drawing on David J. Garrow’s controversial book “The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.: From ‘Solo’ to Memphis,” layers startling details about Hoover’s campaign against King with thoughtful interpretations of its meaning. The result is at once suspenseful, visually engrossing and intellectually bracing. It also raises urgent, sometimes uncomfortable questions about power, privacy and the ethical challenges of examining the past.
WATCHING: Recommendations on the best TV shows and films to stream and watch.
Sign Up
Those challenges are signaled at the outset, as Garrow and other scholars — notably Beverly Gage of Yale and Donna Murch of Rutgers — ponder the status of the F.B.I. tapes, in particular those that reveal King’s sex life, as historical evidence. The recordings won’t be available until 2027, but they are generally believed to document frequent infidelities. Can the tapes be trusted? How will their contents affect King’s reputation? The answers offered by the experts are nuanced and cautious, with some — including former F.B.I. officials — arguing that it would be better if the tapes remained unheard.
That’s an argument for the present and the future, about what we should know and how we should handle that knowledge. In a sense, the main work Pollard and his sources undertake is to establish a context for those debates. The voices he gathers are not always in agreement, either about facts or about meaning. Much remains to be discovered and disputed. By entwining the histories of law enforcement, activism and institutional politics, “MLK/FBI” provides new ways of looking at what might seem like old news.
- Dig deeper into the moment.
“Looking” is the key word. Pollard, whose long résumé as a producer, editor and director includes “Two Trains Running,” “4 Little Girls” and “Eyes on the Prize,” balances the prose of historical discourse with cinematic poetry. Rather than subject the viewer to talking-head interviews, he matches the thoughts of scholars and the reminiscences of survivors with news footage, still photographs and occasional clips from old movies. The speakers, who include King’s close associates Clarence Jones and Andrew Young as well as Garrow, Murch and Gage, don’t turn up onscreen until the very end. They are narrators rather than characters.
That simple decision focuses attention on the actual players, who come to dramatic life through Pollard’s artful direction. Hoover and King are hardly obscure figures — a lot of movies have been made about both of them — but you understand each one a little better when you look at them side by side. You’re reminded of how deeply entrenched Hoover was in the American government, and how much power he wielded, but you also observe a man consumed perhaps as much by fear as by ambition or Machiavellian calculation. To him, King represented disorder, communism, the disruption of racial hierarchies and sexual norms.
King, for his part, emerges as a young leader — he was 26 at the time of the Montgomery bus boycott, 35 when he won the Nobel Prize, 39 when he died — fighting a risky battle on multiple fronts. Hoover’s surveillance was intended to ensure King’s failure, and at the time, white public opinion favored Hoover. It shouldn’t be forgotten that King was met with suspicion and hostility — even from ostensibly liberal leaders and commentators — especially after he publicly opposed the Vietnam War. The FBI, for its part, was widely viewed with reverence.
“MLK/FBI” is fair to all parties without being neutral or timid. In that regard, it’s an exemplary historical documentary — unafraid of moral judgment but also attentive to the fine grain of ambiguity that clings to the facts. It doesn’t force the preoccupations of the present onto the past, but rather invites you to think about how what happened then might help explain where we are now. The story took place a long time ago, but it isn’t finished.
MLK/FBI
Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 44 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on Apple TV, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters.
Right on brotha write on!! That should be our theme!! But aint nobody listening!!!
this
