Oath Keepers leader and 10 others charged with 'seditious conspiracy' related to US Capitol attack

[lightbright]

In this Sunday, June 25, 2017 file photo, Stewart Rhodes, founder of the citizen militia group known as the Oath Keepers speaks during a rally outside the White House in Washington.

(CNN)The Justice Department has charged 11 defendants with seditious conspiracy related to the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, including the leader of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes.
Rhodes' lawyer, Jonathan Moseley, confirmed the arrest.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

Oath Keepers leader and 10 others charged with 'seditious conspiracy' - CNNPolitics

 

[Spawn]

MAGA!!!!!!

 

[Blkops]

Xcactor that ain't you is it?

 

[mangobob79]

They're the first to be charged with sedition!! Thats very heavy , now fox can't change the narrative

 

[lightbright]

They're the first to be charged with sedition!! Thats very heavy , now fox can't change the narrative

Remember.... it was BLM and Antifa sprinkled throughout the "peaceful" demonstration that did the horrible act

 

[HeathCliff]

Xcactor that ain't you is it?

Both sides right?

 

[easy_b]

 

[Knuckles666]

All true and yet, the head of HYDRA is still free!

 

[ballscout1]

 

[Gazoo]

...Black people in the Oath Keepers...

Never mind. I have no words.

 

[hocjo2626]

xfactor/ xfaggot just shit herself

 

[trstar]

Officially a terrorist group

 

[mangobob79]

...Black people in the Oath Keepers...

Never mind. I have no words.

I'm sure they're all foreign "pieces of trash " blacks ,all the black Republicans of the past 50 years were all foreign blacks who al collectively ally themselves with anything that fights against native blacks

 

[Gazoo]

I'm sure they're all foreign "pieces of trash " blacks ,all the black Republicans of the past 50 years were all foreign blacks who al collectively ally themselves with anything that fights against native blacks

IDK btuh... Owens and Elder would probably join.

I think I have their names correct.

 

[easy_b]

 

[mk23666]

...Black people in the Oath Keepers...

Never mind. I have no words.

Yep, there were Blacks in the Confederacy too. Little did they know that if their side had won, they would be immediately returned to a life of servitude and/or a second or third class citizenship (or worse) by any random White person who didn't give a shit about any vow or contract their master had promised them for fighting in the Civil War for the South.

 

[mangobob79]

IDK btuh... Owens and Elder would probably join.

I think I have their names correct.

Elder gotta be an immigrant but even tho Owens is also native black only her virgin island (an American colony) side that makes up her fuckery

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

Yep, there were Blacks in the Confederacy too. Little did they know that if their side had won, they would be immediately returned to a life of servitude and/or a second or third class citizenship (or worse) by any random White person who didn't give a shit about any vow or contract their master had promised them for fighting in the Civil War for the South.

Nah.

Blacks did not serve in the Confederate Army as combat troops. Blacks were not merely not recruited; service was actively forbidden by the Confederacy for the majority of its existence. Enslaved blacks were sometimes used for camp labor, however.

 

[Jumbodicc]

Why they tell you 11 people were charged but only tell you one white dude name? Bitch ass media stay saving these cac

 

[The Plutonian]

In this Sunday, June 25, 2017 file photo, Stewart Rhodes, founder of the citizen militia group known as the Oath Keepers speaks during a rally outside the White House in Washington.

(CNN)The Justice Department has charged 11 defendants with seditious conspiracy related to the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, including the leader of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes.
Rhodes' lawyer, Jonathan Moseley, confirmed the arrest.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

Oath Keepers leader and 10 others charged with 'seditious conspiracy' - CNNPolitics

Which basically doesn’t mean shit. They’ll get 5 months like the other asshole. Waste of time and money. No terrorist charges? Man fuck y’all! I wish they had succeeded and killed at least one politician. Dumb shit

 

[mangobob79]

IDK btuh... Owens and Elder would probably join.

I think I have their names correct.

Elder gotta be an immigrant but even tho Owens is also native black only her virgin island (an american colony is the side that makes up her fuckery

 

[dugington]

I'm sure they're all foreign "pieces of trash " blacks ,all the black Republicans of the past 50 years were all foreign blacks who al collectively ally themselves with anything that fights against native blacks

The sarcasm will definitely be overlooked by some.

 

[lightbright]

Which basically doesn’t mean shit. They’ll get 5 months like the other asshole. Waste of time and money. No terrorist charges? Man fuck y’all! I wish they had succeeded and killed at least one politician. Dumb shit

They gonna make examples of these cacs...... seditious conspiracy is usualy a very tough case to prove, but thank God these are in modern times and we have the internet and other things.... like stupid cacs that make all kinds of evidence and videos...... and the ones that rat and squeal to save their asses..... crackers are going to get some time.... they continued to plan after Jan 6th


.

 

[scullydog]

Nah.

Blacks did not serve in the Confederate Army as combat troops. Blacks were not merely not recruited; service was actively forbidden by the Confederacy for the majority of its existence. Enslaved blacks were sometimes used for camp labor, however.

I disagree with you. I got into it at a conference over research I found that proved differently. No, there were several black regiments that march from New Orleans and fought for the confederacy. A lot of enslaved brothers were the replacement soldiers for their white confederate owners. White historians try to hide that shit, but the true is real. It was a lot of black slave owners in Louisiana and a few in Mississippi that are historically documented.

 

[Wobble Wobble]

Three things:
1 They followed a leader who lost an eye due to a negligent discharge. They facing a couple decades in federal prison for following a dickhead.

2 They're facing charges in Washington, DC! Those juries are mostly, if not completely black - even with gentrification.

3

I disagree with you. I got into it at a conference over research I found that proved differently. No, there were several black regiments that march from New Orleans and fought for the confederacy. A lot of enslaved brothers were the replacement soldiers for their white confederate owners. White historians try to hide that shit, but the true is real. It was a lot of black slave owners in Louisiana and a few in Mississippi that are historically documented.

Bruh, it's not a matter of disagreeing. Southern KKKrackers know that slavery was wrong, and are defensive about what their ancestors did. They will latch on to anything to try and deflect from the truth: Slavery was wrong, the United States is hypocritical to have been founded on "all men are created equal" while there were slaves, they are embarrassed by the fact that they went to war against the United States to defend the institution (every single state's declaration of war against the United States said they were doing it because of slavery) and they wanted to extend the practice of chattel slavery westward.

They cannot defend the indefensible. So they throw up such bile, all of which have been explained. It was the Confederacy's law that a soldier who owned a slave could bring the slave along to clean and dig. Those Black men were often captured by the North and reported that they were there against their will, or escaped as soon as they could. There is one - repeat, one - photo of a black man in a confederate uniform, and judging by the smiles of the secessionist soldiers around him, they were having a good time laughing at him.

As for the New Orleans regiments, you neglected to say they struggled to fill those units - 35 guys is not a regiment, and you have to ask how long did those units last and what did those units do: It was only a matter of months and they were never trusted to be on the frontlines. Lastly, the US Army arrived three months after the "regiments" were created and they promptly surrendered and volunteered for the US Army, wherupon their ranks swelled as the Creoles of southern Louisiana had no doubts about where they stood with White people.

Lastly, two months before the war finally ended, and the campaign restarted after the winter frost and snow, the Confederate congress DID approve the creation of Black units. That's after 500,000 southern white boys had been killed and there was no hope of winning. The congres had debated arming Black men (as opposed to the Louisana Creoles, which was a local Louisiana decision) but it had been rejected several times.

Lastly, if you continue to say the above, you are lower than Candace Owens, Clarence Thomas and the Black man that stands behind Trump at every rally with the "Blacks For Trump" sign. Or you are a white man, here to provoke us.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

I disagree with you. I got into it at a conference over research I found that proved differently. No, there were several black regiments that march from New Orleans and fought for the confederacy. A lot of enslaved brothers were the replacement soldiers for their white confederate owners. White historians try to hide that shit, but the true is real. It was a lot of black slave owners in Louisiana and a few in Mississippi that are historically documented.

Bruh, it's not a matter of disagreeing.

Right

@scullydog Where is this info? Your word for it aint evidence.

 

[scullydog]

Right

@scullydog Where is this info? Your word for it aint evidence.

LOL, Look it up. There are a couple of current sources that document this information. I got my info from primary sources from Southern located archives, but it is true. Archives in Louisiana and Mississippi will do the trick. There was a lot of talk about black folk being docile and didn't revolt in historical circles. Turns out there was a lot of it during the early to mid 1800s. All across the South AA was burning shit down. African America's journey has been a real one in America.

 

[scullydog]

Three things:
1 They followed a leader who lost an eye due to a negligent discharge. They facing a couple decades in federal prison for following a dickhead.

2 They're facing charges in Washington, DC! Those juries are mostly, if not completely black - even with gentrification.

3


Bruh, it's not a matter of disagreeing. Southern KKKrackers know that slavery was wrong, and are defensive about what their ancestors did. They will latch on to anything to try and deflect from the truth: Slavery was wrong, the United States is hypocritical to have been founded on "all men are created equal" while there were slaves, they are embarrassed by the fact that they went to war against the United States to defend the institution (every single state's declaration of war against the United States said they were doing it because of slavery) and they wanted to extend the practice of chattel slavery westward.

They cannot defend the indefensible. So they throw up such bile, all of which have been explained. It was the Confederacy's law that a soldier who owned a slave could bring the slave along to clean and dig. Those Black men were often captured by the North and reported that they were there against their will, or escaped as soon as they could. There is one - repeat, one - photo of a black man in a confederate uniform, and judging by the smiles of the secessionist soldiers around him, they were having a good time laughing at him.

As for the New Orleans regiments, you neglected to say they struggled to fill those units - 35 guys is not a regiment, and you have to ask how long did those units last and what did those units do: It was only a matter of months and they were never trusted to be on the frontlines. Lastly, the US Army arrived three months after the "regiments" were created and they promptly surrendered and volunteered for the US Army, wherupon their ranks swelled as the Creoles of southern Louisiana had no doubts about where they stood with White people.

Lastly, two months before the war finally ended, and the campaign restarted after the winter frost and snow, the Confederate congress DID approve the creation of Black units. That's after 500,000 southern white boys had been killed and there was no hope of winning. The congres had debated arming Black men (as opposed to the Louisana Creoles, which was a local Louisiana decision) but it had been rejected several times.

Lastly, if you continue to say the above, you are lower than Candace Owens, Clarence Thomas and the Black man that stands behind Trump at every rally with the "Blacks For Trump" sign. Or you are a white man, here to provoke us.

Because I said black folk fought for the confederacy I am lower than Candace Owens? You got me fucked up, I don't like the shit, but this is the same type of shit going on now, fuck coons honoring a lost cause. I wanted to expose that shit when I was doing this shit professionally. Motherfucker, I am a Garveyite. Born and bread and ready to move the fuck on and live my African dream, but I also wanted to tell the story how it was. There are newspaper articles in several southern newspapers during the war that discussed the use of black soldier and propagated it. Do you realize there was a group of black slave owners in Louisiana and Mississippi that was ready for the war and they supported it with their money? And the regiments in New Orleans that were created by rich black residents of New Orleans were filled with black men. It was more than 35 people. Go look that shit up in the archives. Again, I did not research this shit because I thought it was something to be proud of, I wanted to exposed the madness of this shit. It just lets you know that money will bring out the strangest shit. Those rich black folk wanted to keep what they had and supported the people they believed that could help them keep it. There were also a few white people that opposed the war. They did it because they knew they had it good in the Union and knew they would lose everything they had if they fought. You know what, they were right.

 

[BKF]

...Black people in the Oath Keepers...

Never mind. I have no words.

You're surprised by this?
I always expect atleast one "good negro" to be a part of the white supremacist movement. White supremacist need their tools and some black folk are willing to be helpful.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

LOL, Look it up. There are a couple of current sources that document this information. I got my info from primary sources from Southern located archives, but it is true. Archives in Louisiana and Mississippi will do the trick. There was a lot of talk about black folk being docile and didn't revolt in historical circles. Turns out there was a lot of it during the early to mid 1800s. All across the South AA was burning shit down. African America's journey has been a real one in America.

Bullshit. If you introduce information youre responsible for citing said information.

Otherwise youre a liar and a propagandist.

Cant stand grown men who lie to other grown men.

 

[BKF]

Three things:
1 They followed a leader who lost an eye due to a negligent discharge. They facing a couple decades in federal prison for following a dickhead.

2 They're facing charges in Washington, DC! Those juries are mostly, if not completely black - even with gentrification.

3


Bruh, it's not a matter of disagreeing. Southern KKKrackers know that slavery was wrong, and are defensive about what their ancestors did. They will latch on to anything to try and deflect from the truth: Slavery was wrong, the United States is hypocritical to have been founded on "all men are created equal" while there were slaves, they are embarrassed by the fact that they went to war against the United States to defend the institution (every single state's declaration of war against the United States said they were doing it because of slavery) and they wanted to extend the practice of chattel slavery westward.

They cannot defend the indefensible. So they throw up such bile, all of which have been explained. It was the Confederacy's law that a soldier who owned a slave could bring the slave along to clean and dig. Those Black men were often captured by the North and reported that they were there against their will, or escaped as soon as they could. There is one - repeat, one - photo of a black man in a confederate uniform, and judging by the smiles of the secessionist soldiers around him, they were having a good time laughing at him.

As for the New Orleans regiments, you neglected to say they struggled to fill those units - 35 guys is not a regiment, and you have to ask how long did those units last and what did those units do: It was only a matter of months and they were never trusted to be on the frontlines. Lastly, the US Army arrived three months after the "regiments" were created and they promptly surrendered and volunteered for the US Army, wherupon their ranks swelled as the Creoles of southern Louisiana had no doubts about where they stood with White people.

Lastly, two months before the war finally ended, and the campaign restarted after the winter frost and snow, the Confederate congress DID approve the creation of Black units. That's after 500,000 southern white boys had been killed and there was no hope of winning. The congres had debated arming Black men (as opposed to the Louisana Creoles, which was a local Louisiana decision) but it had been rejected several times.

Lastly, if you continue to say the above, you are lower than Candace Owens, Clarence Thomas and the Black man that stands behind Trump at every rally with the "Blacks For Trump" sign. Or you are a white man, here to provoke us.

This is just commonsense without knowing any other details other than black folk in the confederacy were enslaved people. People with no rights to choose to join or not join the Confederate army in any compacity. Enslaved black folk were no different than the cannons and muskets used by confederate soldiers.

 

[scullydog]

Bullshit. If you introduce information youre responsible for citing said information.

Otherwise youre a liar and a propagandist.

Cant stand grown men who lie to other grown men.

Bitch made, it you want the information then you will have to research that shit like I did. I can tell you were to go. Mississippi Dept of Archives and History and the Louisiana Dept of Archives and History. That is your start, go to the newspaper microfilm and search from 1861-1865. Also look at the Union's General Civil War notes. I saw a few things in there that made me do the other research. There are several early 20th century histories that discuss this said topic. They have some good information that you might want to look at. Nonetheless, I research this topic when I was about 25-26 years old and I am now 50. Can I remember the direct citations from this research? No, but I can put you in the right direction if you so wish to go look at the information. Now, for anybody else that wants some of this smoke. I want you to know I wanted to know why would a motherfucker would turn his whole back on his people and fight for the wrong cause. Well, I find that there were a host of African American people who were slave owners themselves during the period. More than we want to count. You see, there are still a group of African Americans who will ride with the elites in this country. And they ain't them damn fools you see on TV carrying a Trump sign. They are quiet, and hidden but they are working their magic all over this world, let alone this country, for the people who are in charge. It is our job to expose them motherfucker and you have to go to the source to do so.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

Bitch made, it you want the information then you will have to research that shit like I did. I can tell you were to go. Mississippi Dept of Archives and History and the Louisiana Dept of Archives and History. That is your start, go to the newspaper microfilm and search from 1861-1865. Also look at the Union's General Civil War notes. I saw a few things in there that made me do the other research. There are several early 20th century histories that discuss this said topic. They have some good information that you might want to look at. Nonetheless, I research this topic when I was about 25-26 years old and I am now 50. Can I remember the direct citations from this research? No, but I can put you in the right direction if you so wish to go look at the information. Now, for anybody else that wants some of this smoke. I want you to know I wanted to know why would a motherfucker would turn his whole back on his people and fight for the wrong cause. Well, I find that there were a host of African American people who were slave owners themselves during the period. More than we want to count. You see, there are still a group of African Americans who will ride with the elites in this country. And they ain't them damn fools you see on TV carrying a Trump sign. They are quiet, and hidden but they are working their magic all over this world, let alone this country, for the people who are in charge. It is our job to expose them motherfucker and you have to go to the source to do so.

yeah so the proof you have...is not available.

i would have to travel to find it.

you are a cot damn lying ass buffoon.

fuck you.

 

[scullydog]

yeah so the proof you have...is not available.

i would have to travel to find it.

you are a cot damn lying ass buffoon.

fuck you.

No, you imbecile, it is available, but you will have to do the same shit I done, go and find it. You might not have to travel to do it. Archives have an interlibrary loan system. They let you borrow their shit, at a cost, and ship it to different libraries that work within that system. So, get off your ass and get to moving and prove me wrong.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

i'm a lying asshole.

i dont talk to bullshitters.

in fact let me put your bitch ass on ignore.

i HATE liars.