Women are used to and happy when men get fucked in divorce so they usually can’t see the rational portion or the man’s side.
Jesse Williams Ordered By Court To Pay Ex-Wife $40,000 Per Month Child Support....
- Thread starter Simply_Black
- Start date
Women are used to and happy when men get fucked in divorce so they usually can’t see the rational portion or the man’s side.
That sounds one sided. When a woman realizes her worth and wants to upgrade she's not penalized in the purse that way. How do you reconcile that difference?
Nah still a lot of assumptions
There are a lot of dudes who just assume they can't even win so why fight.
And again more assumptions about what's important to HIM
He wants to enjoy freedom and other women?
You forget who you're talking to lol.
And the funny thing is these mom's that win these big divorce settlements you know what they do? HIRE FULL TIME CARETAKERS with the money they're paid from their ex's so they can enjoy their freedom lmao
And that's the problem if its over its over but they would rather try and RUIN the person
There's no love there none.
This don't mean she should be left in the cold if she contributed TANGIBLY to what you do.
support shit don't count because you supposed to support each other in a relationship otherwise what's the point of being in a fucking relationship?
Actually not true... single dads are going to do the same thing single moms going to do... get with the grandparents or close relatives to have free childcare or get with some of their friends that have kids and just swap for free, but at the same time you're obligated to still pay a certain amount to that ex and in 100% of these high value cases such as this it's the man who doesn't get that childcare savings break. What I don't try to do is get in somebody's relationship which can be very complicated where we only see a portion of what the real issues are as there are three sides to every story.
I think at the end of the day it should all depend on the custody in a case like this... if it's joint physical and it's 50% parenting time across the board then it's no reason to pay an unequal amount of "support" for kids care monthly to keep the lifestyle the same.
But like I said about getting into relationships from divorce information that we get second hand as many different factors play of course like if she was a stay-at-home mom and sacrificed getting her education and work experience for family or did she help him getting certain major roles to get major money or was she the breadwinner in the beginning... or did she just refused to do shyt (work or sex) after he made it big from his efforts only...or did they have an agreement beforehand if they did decide to split, but yet he wanted to change the agreement after the pandemic happen because his work income is going to be a lot different? I've also seen this happen before where everything was cool leading up to a calm divorce then agreements want change and now it's a contested divorce.
It's all just opinion analyzation in general, but what I do know is courts could care less about the kids well-being as they want to make sure they suck up as much money from a divorce as possible especially a contested divorce as everybody's going to get paid good off the high earning man in a case like this i.e. accountants, lawyers, witnesses like psychologists, the jailing system, child support payment system, etc.
Moral of the story, be careful who you marry and why you marry?
So it feels better to give 40k a month a a woman who’s fine?
def. at least you know how you got there. Hand that shit over to a fat chick and yeh, how the fuck did I even fuck that to get here. So def.
Damn, Camille, I am surprised at you.
I could feel your response through the phone.
What do you know about this that we don’t?
It felt personal, as if emotion was overriding logic.
This part of the judicial system need overhauling right after the school to prison pipeline problem.
LMAO. Limitations of communicating in text. Or projection. I don't have strong feelings one way or the other. I don't get a cut. It would be one thing if Jesse were hurting or struggling to get by, but he isn't. So good for her. I mainly commented to piss off the menfolk here.
You’re not pissing us off, we know how women feel. Dr. Dre’s wife wants 2 million a month. We know how exactly how women feel, it would’ve shocked us if you said that the kids didn’t need 40k a month.
Bruh...Hey, ya gotta do what ya gotta do...
Now if somebody can produce that Turner Simpson and Brown Law Firm meme my life will be complete
There is a segment of BGOL that is always pissed if a man parts with money where a woman is concerned. It can be 15.00 for a carryout meal and they are mad he didn't get fucked and sucked "for free." They get even more upset if they see another woman rooting for her and complain of him "messing up the game" for the rest of the menfolk like him (read: broke kneegrowz.) It's pathetic and enjoyable to witness at the same time.
I haven't paid attention to Dre's divorce. That sounds a bit much, but isn't he a billionaire or close to it now? They've been together for like 25 years. Does he become as successful as he is without her holding down the home front? I'm not really interested in an answer to that, just pondering out loud.
Best wishes to both couples for an amicable parting and resolution. Y'all cam leave me out this discussion now.
AIN’T NO LEAVING THIS CONVERSATION!
I wish all couples an amicable parting and peaceful resolution.
We're in an age where spousal support is a dated concept that's just hanging on the books because society is becoming more and more woman-centric.
Women are graduating college in higher numbers and despite the $.77-to-the-dollar myth that has been repeated and debunked, there are still many programs set up in the U.S. to help women start businesses and integrate into the workforce. Alimony was set up to protect women from destitution in a time where a woman's reputation as a divorceé could ruin her and hold her back. That is not the case any more. Its a dated rule that needs to be abolished.
I'm all in favor of child support but alimony is a dated concept. Its not needed in the 21st century in the west.
Besides, according to feminism, its sexist. Where are all of those chest-beating feminists protesting this?
Women are graduating college in higher numbers and despite the $.77-to-the-dollar myth that has been repeated and debunked, there are still many programs set up in the U.S. to help women start businesses and integrate into the workforce. Alimony was set up to protect women from destitution in a time where a woman's reputation as a divorceé could ruin her and hold her back. That is not the case any more. Its a dated rule that needs to be abolished.
I'm all in favor of child support but alimony is a dated concept. Its not needed in the 21st century in the west.
Besides, according to feminism, its sexist. Where are all of those chest-beating feminists protesting this?
I can't lie. If my mother did this shit to my father and he was fighting for custody of me, I'd think she was a fucking scumbag. I would have zero respect for her and she'd lose all the child support because I'd be so intolerable she'd have to either put me in a home or give me to my dad. That ain't bullshit. Told my parents that shit in the 80s when I was in grade school and was still playing with star wars action figures.
On the real side, women need to think about how this shit looks to SOME children. Some children peep game at a young age, others will have to be adults before they realize how fucked up shit was.
On the whole, your post is on point.We're in an age where spousal support is a dated concept that's just hanging on the books because society is becoming more and more woman-centric.
Women are graduating college in higher numbers and despite the $.77-to-the-dollar myth that has been repeated and debunked, there are still many programs set up in the U.S. to help women start businesses and integrate into the workforce. Alimony was set up to protect women from destitution in a time where a woman's reputation as a divorceé could ruin her and hold her back. That is not the case any more. Its a dated rule that needs to be abolished.
I'm all in favor of child support but alimony is a dated concept. Its not needed in the 21st century in the west.
Besides, according to feminism, its sexist. Where are all of those chest-beating feminists protesting this?
However, I am in a lot of social and performative justice spaces and if it is true that the, actually 61 cents to every white male dollar, is untrue, then I need the data that debunks this so that I can evolve my strategy and support for Black women.
The ____cent on the dollar (everybody seems to have a different number) data is calculated by overall full time jobs, meaning it doesn't include part-time and freelance work; only salaried jobs. What it doesn't take into account is time off, which women take much more of than men. Men also spend more hours on the job as salaried workers because many woman also have families and children and split their time more. Many companies have maternity leave but offer nothing for men. Women take maternity leave and can stay off greater amounts of time.
Also, women are less inclined to ask for raises. This plays a big part in that number as well. Recent attention to this is bringing about changes, but there is still a gap. The discernable difference in wages is still, however, between higher paying jobs, which most people don't have. A fry cook makes $_____/hr whether the job is filled by a man or a woman, for example. When you start to include jobs done that pay per-hour, that number changes.
Another factor is the kinds of jobs women take on vs. men. Men tend to take on jobs that are more dangerous and therefore yield more pay. Also, men are much much more likely to die on the job or in job-related incidents than women.
Bottom line is this: Alimony is bullshit in the 21st century. Is should be abolished and all of those women who claim that feminism is about equality are dead silent when it comes to shit like this. Feminism is about female empowerment, not equality. So, I'm not trying to hear that b.s. about alimony when a broad can take her ass out there and get money just like a man can. Ask for a raise. Negotiate a higher salary. Do the same shit that men have to do.
If you don't get to still come over and fuck a chick after y'all are divorced, there is no reason in hell that she should still be getting money from a man if they aren't together anymore.
Similar threads
- Locked
