Eric Clapton is a racis pos

parisian

International
International Member

Eric Clapton was visibly intoxicated onstage at a concert in Birmingham on Aug. 5, 1976. But the message he spoke at the mike was clear. As he advocated his support for Enoch Powell, a controversial right-wing British politician well-known for his anti-immigration views, the guitarist took things even further, asking the audience if there were any foreigners present.

“I don’t want you here, in the room or in my country,” Clapton said. “Listen to me, man! I think we should vote for Enoch Powell. Enoch’s our man. I think Enoch’s right, I think we should send them all back."



His words echoed much of the sentiment Powell had espoused in his infamous 1968 Rivers of Blood speech, in which he staunchly criticized mass immigration and implied that the majority of immigrants arriving in the U.K. were doing so "with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow immigrants and then over the rest of the population."

Clapton, however, was much more blunt. "Stop Britain from becoming a black colony," he said. "Get the foreigners out. Get the wogs out. Get the coons out. Keep Britain white. I used to be into dope, now I’m into racism. It’s much heavier, man. Fucking wogs, man. Fucking Saudis taking over London. Bastard wogs. Britain is becoming overcrowded, and Enoch will stop it and send them all back. The black wogs and coons and Arabs and fucking Jamaicans and fucking … don’t belong here, we don’t want them here. This is England, this is a white country, we don’t want any black wogs and coons living here. We need to make clear to them they are not welcome. England is for white people, man. We are a white country. I don’t want fucking wogs living next to me with their standards. This is Great Britain, a white country. What is happening to us, for fuck’s sake?”

His comments were so inflammatory that they served as the kick-starter for 1976's Rock Against Racism (RAR) movement, a campaign of carnivals and tours created in reaction to a rise in racist attacks on the streets of Britain. Up until Clapton's rant, the campaign was "just an idea," but in the wake of his words, several of RAR's founders - Red Saunders, Roger Huddle, Jo Wreford and Pete Bruno - moved forward with their plan, even writing a letter to NME to protest their disgust.

"Come on Eric ... own up," they wrote. "Half your music is black. You're rock music's biggest colonist. ... We want to organize a rank-and-file movement against the racist poison music ... we urge support for Rock Against Racism." They concluded their open letter with a reference to Clapton's No. 1 cover of Bob Marley's "I Shot the Sheriff": "P.S. Who shot the sheriff, Eric? It sure as hell wasn't you!"

Just a few months after the incident, Clapton, who at that point was struggling with intense drug and alcohol addictions, was not quick to apologize, brushing the matter off as random and even comical to him.

"I thought it was quite funny, actually," he said in October 1976. "I don't know much about politics. I don't even know if it would be good or bad for him to get in. I don't even know who the prime minister is now. I just don't know what came over me that night. It must have been something that happened in the day, but it came out in this garbled thing."

The exact wording of Clapton's quote has been debated, as there is no official transcript from the concert, but multiple sources corroborate the event, and Clapton himself has effectively confirmed that it did happen. Even so, decades later he insisted the rhetoric doesn't sound like him. "There’s no way I could be a racist, it would make no sense," he said in 2004, noting that his opinion on immigration policies "hasn’t changed" and that Powell was "outrageously brave."

In 2018, Clapton stated that while he knew his comments were offensive, he wasn't the racist he appeared to be onstage that evening. "I was so ashamed of who I was, a kind of semi-racist, which didn't make sense," he said at a Q&A following a screening of Life in 12 Bars, a documentary film about his life. "Half of my friends were black, I dated a black woman and I championed black music.

"I'm not excusing myself, it was an awful thing to do," he reiterated in 2018, doubling down on an excuse he used decades earlier: "I think it's funny, actually."
 
also, the UK would not survive without immigrants. It's simple math. The youth are not producing enough children to support the old and to maintain the work needed to keep the country running. If you suddenly remove all the immigrants, the country would collapse.
 
This is Hollyweird after all and it was almost 50 years ago.
- People grow.
- People change.

Think about it:
Back in '76, Jim Brown was considered to be a prime example of strong Black masculinity.
- Today he's viewed negatively as a feeble old man who supports Donald Trump.


Back in '76, Bill Cosby was a beloved comic actor and producer of movies and The Fat Albert cartoon.
- Today he's hated by many and viewed as a hypocrite, as a unfaithful adulterer and a rapist.


Back in '76, OJ Simpson was viewed as a sports icon, as a popular pitchman and an up and coming actor.
- Today he's
hated and viewed as "that Black murderer who got away with it".

If Eric Clapton apologized for his past statements and says he no longer subscribes to those particular beliefs, then why should I hold it against him...? :dunno:
 
This is Hollyweird after all and it was almost 50 years ago.
- People grow.
- People change.

Think about it:
Back in '76, Jim Brown was considered to be a prime example of strong Black masculinity.
- Today he's viewed negatively as a feeble old man who supports Donald Trump.


Back in '76, Bill Cosby was a beloved comic actor and producer of movies and The Fat Albert cartoon.
- Today he's hated by many and viewed as a hypocrite, as a unfaithful adulterer and a rapist.


Back in '76, OJ Simpson was viewed as a sports icon, as a popular pitchman and an up and coming actor.
- Today he's
hated and viewed as "that Black murderer who got away with it".

If Eric Clapton apologized for his past statements and says he no longer subscribes to those particular beliefs, then why should I hold it against him...? :dunno:
Why do some of you guys always seem intent on deflecting from white hatred and bigotry by drawing a false equivalence from irrelevant black individuals?

And on top of that, this was just a flatout horrendous attempt at analogy.
 
Why do some of you guys always seem intent on deflecting from white hatred and bigotry by drawing a false equivalence from irrelevant black individuals?

And on top of that, this was just a flatout horrendous attempt at analogy.
You consider Bill Cosby, OJ Simpson and Jim Brown "irrelevant"? :confused:
Yet you're keen about hating Eric Clapton for statements he made almost 50 years ago for which he has long apologized for....?

Seriously dude. When was the last time Clapton done anything newsworthy? :dunno:

And there's no deflection here, I'm just making a point.
- When it comes to Hollyweird, there ain't NOBODY truly clean or without personal blemish.
FACT.
 
You consider Bill Cosby, OJ Simpson and Jim Brown "irrelevant"? :confused:
To this discussion? Absolutely. What parallel do you draw between them and a racist tirade by a white man? Further, what made you group them all together to begin with? Why would you feel the need to round up a collective of elder black men in defense of a bigoted white male?
Yet you're keen about hating Eric Clapton for statements he made almost 50 years ago for which he has long apologized for....?
What did i say exactly that would give you the impression that "I" was the one who held hatred for another? Notice how the only one spewing outright hatred was the cac. yet, you felt compelled to toss in 3 black celebs and then accuse me of hatred? You're sick in the head man.
And there's no deflection here, I'm just making a point.
Whats the point exactly? Again, the analogy you attempted to draw was piss poor at best. There is nothing comparable to the parties you wedged into the discussion. How about holding Clapton accountable for his own shit? And even if you wanna say the comments were old and he apologized, do that, instead of inserting black men to deflect.
 

Nah just amazing how brain-damaged and traumatized some of you youngsters are.

SO there was a thread where a black woman got prison time for 1 count of theft and a whit woman with 22 counts got 2 years probation.

And of the few comments, a mofokr said stop stealing .....:smh:


And yet this shit from another decade from an irrelevant mofokr is a fight the power thread. Oh and organize a rally for DaBaby.
 
To this discussion? Absolutely. What parallel do you draw between them and a racist tirade by a white man? Further, what made you group them all together to begin with? Why would you feel the need to round up a collective of elder black men in defense of a bigoted white male?

What did i say exactly that would give you the impression that "I" was the one who held hatred for another? Notice how the only one spewing outright hatred was the cac. yet, you felt compelled to toss in 3 black celebs and then accuse me of hatred? You're sick in the head man.

Whats the point exactly? Again, the analogy you attempted to draw was piss poor at best. There is nothing comparable to the parties you wedged into the discussion. How about holding Clapton accountable for his own shit? And even if you wanna say the comments were old and he apologized, do that, instead of inserting black men to deflect.
Clearly you missed the point of my posts.
Let me try to clarify:
#1. People change. Opinions a person had 50 years ago can and often do change.
#2. He has apologized on multiple occasions over the years for his past statements and behavior.
#3. The social status of a celebrity if a fleeting thing. Today's A list celebrity can easily become tomorrow's social pariah.
#4. I mentioned those 3 Black celebrities because those heroes of yesterday are now vilified by today's social media crazed society.
Finally...
#5. How does bringing up statements a White celebrity made almost 50 years ago (for which he has long since apologized for) impact you today?
If you are a fan:
- You gonna stop buying his music?
- You gonna stop going to his concerts?
- You gonna cancel him on Twitter or social media?

And if you were never a fan, why would you care about any of this....?
:dunno:
 
Let me try to clarify:
#1. People change. Opinions a person had 50 years ago can and often do change.
#2. He has apologized on multiple occasions over the years for his past statements and behavior.
Then say this. And refrain from injecting black men to serve as misdirection or misplaced counterbalance. Again, let the white man stand trial alone.
#3. The social status of a celebrity if a fleeting thing. Today's A list celebrity can easily become tomorrow's social pariah.
Who mentioned anything about social status? This is about a racist rant either discovered or revisited. His lessened popularity doesnt negate his expressed mindset.
#4. I mentioned those 3 Black celebrities because those heroes of yesterday are now vilified by today's social media crazed society.
Right.. And that serves no purpose here. This isnt about a hero from yesterday being vilified today for rumors, accusations, or allegations. Its about actual race based hateful statements made by a man who made a living off of highjacking the culture of those he professed to hate.
#5. How does bringing up statements a White celebrity made almost 50 years ago (for which he has long since apologized for) impact you today?
How does YOU bringing up those black gentlemen impact me (or you)? Not about impact.. its about sharing of information and doing with it what one pleases. Again, your mentioning of uninvolved parties was horseshit and served no purpose other than distraction. If you wanted to defend the devil and note the age of the comments and that he apologized then you should have done just that.. Could have also shared the fucking apology for perspective. Instead you went out of your way to impugn some niggas. Shame on you.
 
I would support if their ancestors never brought their invasive asses into our countries wanting to trade conquer and subjugate the populace.

Racist countries that never exploited my people are cool by me. Good fences make great neighbors.
 
Then say this. And refrain from injecting black men to serve as misdirection or misplaced counterbalance. Again, let the white man stand trial alone.

Who mentioned anything about social status? This is about a racist rant either discovered or revisited. His lessened popularity doesnt negate his expressed mindset.

Right.. And that serves no purpose here. This isnt about a hero from yesterday being vilified today for rumors, accusations, or allegations. Its about actual race based hateful statements made by a man who made a living off of highjacking the culture of those he professed to hate.

How does YOU bringing up those black gentlemen impact me (or you)? Not about impact.. its about sharing of information and doing with it what one pleases. Again, your mentioning of uninvolved parties was horseshit and served no purpose other than distraction. If you wanted to defend the devil and note the age of the comments and that he apologized then you should have done just that.. Could have also shared the fucking apology for perspective. Instead you went out of your way to impugn some niggas. Shame on you.

Again, you aren't making any sense.
You've dismissed my points and refuse to acknowledge that the man has apologized and changed.

Eric Clapton never highjacked the Blues. That's like saying Darius Rooker or Charlie Pride "highjacked" Country Music.
And FYI, Clapton has LONG verbally acknowledged and given credit to Muddy Waters, B.B. King and Freddie King as his biggest influences.
He has also always singled out Robert Johnson as his greatest influence.

But if you want to hate him?
Then by all means, please continue to do you...

Oh, well.
Moving on.... :yawn:
 
Again, you aren't making any sense.
You've dismissed my points and refuse to acknowledge that the man has apologized and changed.
I cant dismiss a point that was never made. And if you want someone to acknowledge his apology then focus your post on that, provide said apology, and refrain from inserting black men that have no relevance to the discussion.
Eric Clapton never highjacked the Blues. That's like saying Darius Rooker or Charlie Pride "highjacked" Country Music.
See, there you go mentioning niggas again... And again you're creating poorly presented analogies in doing so. And how the fuck can Rucker or Pride highjack country music when country music has its roots in blues and southern bred negro spirituals? The original country music instrument is the banjo which is a instrument first used in this country by African Americans and created by west africans. Look here man, just stfu,, because you're sounding stupider by the post. Tom.
 
Anything negative Clapton has to say about black folks stems from him getting his head cut by Jimi Hendrix. He actually believed his own hype - rule #1 of things never to do when you get famous. (Ya hear that, Kanye?)
It was like that scene in 300 when Leonidas hit Xerxes with the spear; after Jimi was done, Clapton was no longer an untouchable guitar god. Jimi showed the world that he could not only be touched, but bested.
I bet dude still has nightmares about that night. He probably pictures everybody in the crowd laughing at him.

:lol:
 
Eric Clapton is a sack of shit. So he can blame racism spewing from his mouth because he had some alcohol in him?
 
This is disturbing considering Clapton's past. Clapton going back to the mid 60s was heavily involved with black music. Hell I remember Clapton playing for Aretha Franklin. Wow :hmm:
 
Back
Top