Chicago Teachers Union Strike: ‘‘We Have Nearly 17,000 Homeless Students.’’

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Mayor says teachers holding up contract talks over affordable housing. Union replies: ‘We have nearly 17,000 homeless students.’
By DIANA WALLACE
CHICAGO TRIBUNE |
OCT 09, 2019

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has raised another issue that she said is holding up an agreement with the teachers union: affordable housing.

In a statement late Tuesday — nine days from a strike date set by the Chicago Teachers Union — the mayor said the union is “demanding that the city enact CTU’s preferred affordable housing policy as part of their contract.”

With the potential walkout looming, Lightfoot said the union laid out this demand rather than providing a response to what she called the city’s comprehensive contract offer. She said that Tuesday marked the 49th time that representatives from Chicago Public Schools and the CTU have been at the bargaining table and the 142nd day without a full counterproposal from the union.

In a response early Wednesday morning, the CTU tweeted that “we have nearly 17,000 homeless students in CPS.”

“Our proposals demand more staff to support families in danger of losing housing, and advocate for a program that financially helps (support staff members) and new teachers purchase a home,” the union continued. "The mayor finds them ‘unreasonable.’"


Lightfoot said she welcomes CTU’s input into her strategy for addressing the issue and said the union “shares much of our vision on affordable housing," which she called a “critical issue that affects residents across Chicago, and everyone’s voices need to be heard during this process.”

But she said the CTU’s collective bargaining agreement “is not the appropriate place for the city to legislate its affordable housing policy.”

“We are a week away from our deadline to resolve this contract and avoid a strike. We need CTU to come to the table with written proposals on the core issues we need to address in order to resolve the contract," the mayor said. "Once this contract is resolved, our Department of Housing will continue to work closely with stakeholders — including unions like the CTU — to ensure everyone in all of our communities has access to a safe, affordable, accessible place to live.”


In June, the union posted an essay on its website from its newly formed housing committee saying that because the teachers union contract is legally binding, it would be “an innovative tool to achieve housing goals that may be elusive in other arenas.”

To that end, the union said it wants in its contract language that would direct CPS to provide housing assistance to new teachers, to hire staff members to help students and their families who are in danger of losing housing, and to advocate for more affordable housing. The union also wants to ensure that TIF funds and other taxes are used to fund affordable housing units, and that housing is identified for 15,000 homeless students by 2020 through Section 8 voucher programs and housing rehabilitation.

Union officials also noted that other groups of public employees in Chicago, like police officers and firefighters, receive housing subsidies. The union also claims that about two-thirds of teaching assistants, school clerks and other paraprofessionals qualify for free or reduced lunch for their children, and many cannot afford a two-bedroom apartment based in any Chicago neighborhood based on prevailing rental rates.

“Any teacher could make a laundry list of needs for their schools and communities, but if families do not have a place to live, it is very difficult for them to stay in our neighborhoods. Without students, we cannot have schools. So, to fully support our public schools, we must address the lack of sustainable, affordable housing in our city,” the union’s housing committee wrote. “Access to stable, affordable housing is critical to the success of our schools and communities."


Union leaders have stressed that they want to negotiate on a wide range of issues that go beyond ones required to be handled through collective bargaining, such as pay and health insurance costs. Matters such as class size, enhanced staffing of social workers and school nurses, and other classroom conditions also big priorities, CTU officials have said.

CPS employs about 25,000 teachers and has roughly 360,000 students, about 300,000 of whom would be affected by any teachers strike (those who attend charter schools will not). The teachers union has set an Oct. 17 strike date, as have about 10,000 support staff and Park District employees who say they will also walk off the job that day without new contract deals.
 
Housing subsidies for new teachers? Folks in chi-town trying to pay extra taxes for that?
 
Reality check to teachers union: Affordable housing has no place at the bargaining table

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/1...t-talks-affordable-housing-suntimes-editorial

CTU should stop wasting precious bargaining time with far-fetched demands while a strike looms.

By CST Editorial Board Oct 9, 2019, 7:44pm CDT

Solving Chicago’s affordable housing crisis?

What’s that got to do with a labor contract for educators?

It’s time for the Chicago Teachers Union to get real: Stop wasting precious bargaining time pushing far-fetched demands while a potential strike looms over the city next week.

A strike that would shut 296,752 students out of school for days or weeks.

Kids would sit at home. They would learn nothing.

If the CTU strikes over this one, we predict it will not go down well with most of the rest of the city.

Frankly, the CTU’S proposal to include provisions on affordable housing in its contract with Chicago Public Schools is more than far-fetched. It’s absurd. Yet the union spent Tuesday’s bargaining session pushing the idea, much to the exasperation of Mayor Lori Lightfoot.

It is especially absurd when matters such as salaries, health insurance contributions, teacher prep time and work conditions — issues legitimately part of any labor contract — remain unresolved.

We have to ask, what will the CTU demand next? That the school board solve gun violence in Chicago, improve mass transit, create more jobs and open grocery stores in food deserts?

We understand that many CPS students face very real social problems in their communities. We get why the CTU wants to use its leverage to address at least one of those big problems.


As the union points out, almost 17,000 CPS schoolchildren are homeless, and the city’s shrinking stock of housing for working families of modest means contributes to the problem.

But the shortage of affordable housing is a problem best addressed by all Chicagoans, who also understand that our city must contend with countervailing challenges, such as massively underfunded pension systems and high property taxes. Most pressing, the city must immediately fill a $838 million budget hole.

It does not help, we should add, that the CTU’s initial proposed solutions to the problem of affordable housing, such as rent control and a corporate head tax, are big and controversial. Public policies like that beg for the kind of inclusive citywide discussion that’s never going to happen in a contract negotiation with a single public union.

The CTU, to be blunt, does not speak for everybody. It speaks for its members.

The majority of Chicagoans, we believe, appreciate the union’s concerns about large class sizes and school staffing. They understand why those school-based issues have become sticking points in negotiations, though we and others would argue that such matters are best left to CPS management — who are better positioned to see the big picture.

But affordable housing? Really?

So let’s review what we’ve got here.

To begin with, the teachers have been offered a terrific raise of, effectively, 24% over five years. The average teacher in five years would be earning an income of close to six-figures.

Yet the CTU is threatening to strike.

Secondly, the union is demanding more teacher prep time, though that would mean shortening the real school day — the amount of time devoted to actually teaching children. Chicagoans fought long and hard for that longer school day, which once was among the shortest in the nation. Going back would be like stealing from the kids.

Yet the CTU is threatening to strike over that.

And now the CTU, running absurdly far afield, wants to impose its version of a solution — in a union contract — to the problem of affordable housing. Even as negotiations over more appropriate issues, like pay and benefits, go nowhere.

The union would strike over that?

How irresponsible.

The CTU is playing hooky from reality.
 


Chicago’s Teachers Are Making History. Again.
Rank-and-file workers are finally taking back their unions, and strikes are spreading across the country as a result.
By Jane McAlevey
The Nation
October 16th


The beginning of a resurgence of strength among America’s unions today can be traced to two seminal events: the September 2012 seven-day strike by Chicago’s teachers, and the less-noticed June 2010 internal union election at the Chicago Teachers Union. That was when a slate of progressive, forward-thinking educators won all the top seats inside their union, ending nearly three decades of do-nothing unionism at the third-largest teacher’s union in the country. Jackson Potter, a teacher and one of the architects of that victory—and the subsequent strike—told me back in the fall of 2013, Our ability to connect with the community has been key for us. But I worry about our ability to have much success over the long run if there aren’t other worker-led insurrections.”

Potter and 26,000 coworkers helped set the stage for the Chicago strikes, but they couldn’t have predicted the ensuing string of successes toward rebuilding a high-quality public school system, driven by educators from West Virginia to California. The strike that many people regard as the kickoff—the February 2018 West Virginia teacher’s strike—can also be traced back to Chicago. Despite a four-decade general assault against workers and unions, and a specific and especially vicious two-decade attack against America’s teachers, when the Chicago teachers walked in September 2012, the public sided decisively with them—and against Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Suddenly, expectations were raised that workers could fight, even strike—and win. Now with a strike date set for October 17, the focus returns to Chicago’s educators.

Much has changed since 2012, but one factor is refreshingly constant: The teachers’ union remains bottom-up, democratic, resilient and strong. Two other groups of workers in two different units, represented by SEIU local 73, have also voted to authorize strikes on October 17. These additional workers include an important group in the Chicago Public Schools, the 7,500 special-ed classroom assistants, security guards, bus aides, custodians, and parent workers, and a second group of 2,500 workers in the Chicago Park District. That group, which has never authorized a strike before, is comprised of supervisors, attendants, lifeguards, landscape laborers, and instructors. Taken together, that’s 35,000 workers whose day jobs are about empowering children—not to mention allowing the 180,000 parents of Chicago’s nearly 400,000 public school students to go to work. All this has set the stage for a massive crisis in America’s third-largest city.

Gone is the right-wing anti–public education, anti–teacher union billionaire governor, Bruce Rauner (though, given the preposterous nature of campaign finance laws in the United States, the new governor is also a billionaire, albeit a less hostile one). But in the driver’s seat sits Mayor Lori Lightfoot. “I think there are a ton of differences, not the least of which is I’m not Rahm,” she recently said.

Perhaps more important, there’s more money on the table for these contract talks. In large part, that’s due to the diligent efforts of the CTU itself, which won a substantial change in state education funding. The funding formula now puts more money into the poorest school districts, a reversal of the formula in force the last two times the CTU’s contract expired, Potter told me. The teachers also added to the schools’ budget by winning state and local funding for their long-neglected pension, as well as local funding for future increases. Combined, Potter said there’s now over $1 billion more a year for Chicago’s schools. The CTU is demanding restaffing Chicago’s schools with nurses and guidance counselors, and more robust social services to help the poorest students in a school district that primarily serves students of color.

“We feel it is our responsibility to figure out how to get the nearly 20,000 homeless students in our schools housed,” says Stacy Davis Gates, a high school social studies teacher and the current vice president of the union. “There is no way in the world you can expect the students to keep it together in a classroom, to take a test in a classroom, to complete homework in a classroom, if they don’t have what they need in terms of a stable home environment.” Although Lightfoot likes to point out she’s “not Rahm,” she’s actually retained the same chief contract negotiator as Rahm and many mayors before him. In fact, the current chief negotiator for the Chicago Public Schools, Jim Franczek (of the private law firm Franczek P.C.) has been the lead negotiator against front-line educators for decades. “I understood from an early age that it is management that makes things happen,” Franczek said in a 2015 interview, “and I wanted to make things happen.” Which just underlines the fact that it will be the mayor whose actions will ultimately determine whether the strike happens on the 17th.

According to members of the union’s negotiating team, Franczek’s style is to try to force victory for his side by holding back on serious settlement options till the very last minute. His strategy, repeated over many contracts, is to force a narrowing of the subjects that will get addressed by the educators, and then, with hours to go to a strike deadline, suddenly make a “take it or leave it,” offer—frequently with some things educators want—but far less than students or the broader education community needs and deserves. When you read mainstream press coverage of the dispute, it’s worth remembering that it’s management playing brinkmanship with the lives of hundreds of thousands of people, not the union.

A nearly identical management strategy failed this year in the Los Angeles teachers strike. After four days of robust picket lines, an outpouring of parent and community support and an all-out strike, Mayor Eric Garcetti summoned the head of the teacher’s union, Alex Caputo-Pearl, and, the LA Schools superintendent to his office, telling them to “narrow the topics to settle,” Caputo-Pearl told me. But Caputo-Pearl says he told Garcetti, “This strike won’t end until you expand the issues to include our proposals such as ending random searches, a green new deal, contractual provisions to help parents of students being threatened by ICE deportations, and, more.”

In Gates’s view, despite the media’s obsession with the mayor and other individuals exchanging often heated comments to the media,
“This is not about the people who are in charge as much as it’s about the systems of white supremacy that persist in every American institution and that must be dismantled in order for real justice and real equity to take place. And what we are seeing in this moment is that the institution is reluctant to release the resources that a school district with over 90 percent students of color deserve.”

There have been last-minute offers: negotiations this past Saturday that resulted in management moving slightly on some core demands of the educators; they have also promised what sounds like big numbers—$2 million over the next five years for school nurses. Mayor Lightfoot repeatedly stresses that she’s made an offer for large raises—16 percent over five years—but wages aren’t the key issue in this contract fight. They rarely have been, in the education strikes that have rocked the nation for the past two years. Educators—along with nurses and health care workers—have been walking off the job in record numbers, demanding that the superrich and corporations begin paying their fair share of the cost of democracy and keeping Americans in good health.

And while Mayor Lightfoot believes she’s got a mandate for her actions, she has said over and over that she can get a deal done. Her chief negotiator’s tactics might just bring an end to the honeymoon she’s still enjoying post-election, because a strike would likely result in a recently empowered Chicago City Council pouncing on her every move should the popular educators and their allies at SEIU be forced out onto the streets.

The strikes that spread from Chicago across the nation are happening because energetic, smart rank-and-file workers are finally taking back their own organizations—their unions—after too many years of risk-averse leaders whose unwillingness to use the strike weapon contributed to the downfall of the working class. Many teachers in Chicago are stellar educators: After an eight-year stint as a full-time leader of the union, Potter has returned to the high school classroom to teach eleventh-grade classes on “the theory of knowledge, civics and modern world history.” But it’s not just students at his school in the Back of the Yards neighborhood who benefit. Perhaps the most important lesson Chicago’s educators have taught us is that to build a country where policy makers favor the supermajority rather than the 1 percent means a return to massive, supermajority strikes. It is only through such strikes that we can rebuild the solidarity desperately needed among workers—and between workers and the broader society. Strikes are to democracy what water is to life: not a distraction or a disturbance but the foundation.
 
Fucking disgraceful.. and in the midst of this national emergency you got all these got dam cac "journalist" jumping at the opportunity to pounce on Lebron James about some fucking Chinese bullshit.. .
 
Fucking disgraceful.. and in the midst of this national emergency you got all these got dam cac "journalist" jumping at the opportunity to pounce on Lebron James about some fucking Chinese bullshit.. .

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

I agree that the pouncing on LeBron is overdone but we need to get past this tendency to denounce any action that doesn't speak to our hierarchy of needs. What's going on in China is not bullshit-- it's important. (A more legitimate outrage, IMO, is that these journalists and others don't sincerely care about China and are attacking LeBron James for clicks and their own personal gain... But that's a separate matter.) We don't have to attack the importance of other people's issues to elevate our own. It's enough to say that the conditions this country allows to persist in Chicago is a disgrace and a national emergency.
 
They are black children and citizens, so no one will give a fuck. Some non-citizen kids get a bad deal at the border and it's all over CNN and Rachel Maddow is in tears. :smh:
 
They are black children and citizens, so no one will give a fuck. Some non-citizen kids get a bad deal at the border and it's all over CNN and Rachel Maddow is in tears. :smh:

It is stupid and ineffective-- and actually counterproductive, unless your only desire is to promote your victim status-- for your only advocacy to always have to involve shitting on people who are not working against you.
 
Reality check to teachers union: Affordable housing has no place at the bargaining table
I was wondering what does that have to do with them?they really care about their homeless students than donate 10% of your salary to help them,if not move on.
 
Back
Top