Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors resigns amid controversy

Duece

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors resigns amid controversy
By Natalie O'Neill
May 27, 2021 | 6:04pm | Updated

Patrisse-Cullors.jpg


Co-founder of the Black Lives Matter movement Patrisse Cullors at the 90th Academy Awards in 2018.REUTERS

The embattled co-founder of Black Lives Matter announced on Thursday that she’s resigning as executive director amid criticism over her lavish lifestyle.

Patrisse Cullors, 37 — who has been at the helm of the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation for nearly six years — said she is leaving to focus on a book and TV deal.

Her last day with the foundation is Friday.

“I’ve created the infrastructure and the support, and the necessary bones and foundation, so that I can leave,” Cullors said. “It feels like the time is right.”

But her resignation comes amid controversy over the group’s finances and Cullors’ personal wealth — including an alleged real-estate buying spree in which she snagged four high-end homes for $3.2 million in the US, according to property records reported last month.

But Cullors said her departure has been in the works and is not tied to those “attacks.”

“Those were right-wing attacks that tried to discredit my character, and I don’t operate off of what the right thinks about me,” Cullors said.

The BLM foundation revealed in February that it took in just over $90 million last year, following the May 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man whose last breaths under the knee of a white Minneapolis police officer inspired protests globally.

The foundation said it ended 2020 with a balance of more than $60 million, after spending nearly a quarter of its assets on operating expenses, grants to Black-led organizations and other charitable giving.

Critics of the foundation contend more of that money should have gone to the families of Black victims of police brutality who have been unable to access the resources needed to deal with their trauma and loss.

“That is the most tragic aspect,” said the Rev. T. Sheri Dickerson, president of an Oklahoma City BLM chapter and a representative of the #BLM10, a national group of organizers that has publicly criticized the foundation over funding and transparency.

“I know some of (the families) are feeling exploited, their pain exploited, and that’s not something that I ever want to be affiliated with,” Dickerson said.

Cullors and the foundation have said they do support families without making public announcements or disclosing dollar amounts.
 
Collect the donated money, and spend it for Black issues, immediately. It's not that difficult to be proactive with 90 million.

She made her money, and brought property for her family. That is what you are supposed to do. It's unfortunate that this has turned into angst against a Black personal gaining financial freedom, which should be the model for all of us.

They let republican attack propaganda win again:smh:
 
It doesn't matter what they do with the money because nobody forced the people to donate. However, they should be super-transparent about it.
That’s the wrong way to look at it. This money was raised in the name of black men’s blood on the streets, it matters that they do right by those black men that they made money off of. If I say I’m raising money to build schools for young black boys and then go out and spend it on strippers and gambling that’s fraud and I should be locked up.
 
It doesn't matter what they do with the money because nobody forced the people to donate. However, they should be super-transparent about it.

She "probably" didn't do anything illegal because all non-profit info/money is public.

If they were pulling in big donations, then some of that money can be used to pay salaries, which is understandable. I guess folk thinks people that run nonprofits should live modestly? :dunno:
 
they should seriously consider changing the name of what ever organization this is from BLM to something else

BLM is a target...
 
She "probably" didn't do anything illegal because all non-profit info/money is public.

If they were pulling in big donations, then some of that money can be used to pay salaries, which is understandable. I guess folk thinks people that run nonprofits should live modestly? :dunno:

She bought 4 houses
I understand we always want to defend
But this ain't a lady who got a place to stay and then we're like you need to be homeless
 
She bought 4 houses
I understand we always want to defend
But this ain't a lady who got a place to stay and then we're like you need to be homeless
Sounds like a mega church argument.

I’m definitely not defending.

Im just stating, when it comes to nonprofits people have expectations how how they use the money, which seems like modesty.
 
False prophet?
Did BLM do what it was supposed to do?

She already got the money no need to stay. :lol: Next!!
 
It absolutely matters lol
These LGBT club members keep exposing themselves.

#BLM is an LGBT organization soliciting money under the guise that they are fighting for justice and equality for so-called black people when the reality is that they are for LGBT empowerment using murdered so-called blacks as a catalyst.

the name is a flat out lie/gimmick and needs to be abolished.
 
These LGBT club members keep exposing themselves.

#BLM is an LGBT organization soliciting money under the guise that they are fighting for justice and equality for so-called black people when the reality is that they are for LGBT empowerment using murdered so-called blacks as a catalyst.

the name is a flat out lie/gimmick and needs to be abolished.


 
That’s the wrong way to look at it. This money was raised in the name of black men’s blood on the streets, it matters that they do right by those black men that they made money off of. If I say I’m raising money to build schools for young black boys and then go out and spend it on strippers and gambling that’s fraud and I should be locked up.


You thinking it's the wrong way to look at it doesn't make it the wrong way to look at it. It's not fraud, nobody entered into any type of contract, nothing was promised in writing.
 
She "probably" didn't do anything illegal because all non-profit info/money is public.

If they were pulling in big donations, then some of that money can be used to pay salaries, which is understandable. I guess folk thinks people that run nonprofits should live modestly? :dunno:


Exactly.

Does no one remember the Red Cross getting the heat for their finances? But ultimately it's a personal choice to keep your money in your pocket or send it to someone who says they're going to do x, y, and z.

They have at least one website that shows what percentage of every dollar goes where because as you said, in order to be a nonprofit your records have to be public.

I swear motherfuckers on here get more ignorant every second. Makes my teeth hurt.
 
These LGBT club members keep exposing themselves.

#BLM is an LGBT organization soliciting money under the guise that they are fighting for justice and equality for so-called black people when the reality is that they are for LGBT empowerment using murdered so-called blacks as a catalyst.

the name is a flat out lie/gimmick and needs to be abolished.

Say it again!!! Over and over again!
 
Back
Top