Avonte Teasley Faces Murder Charge After His Baby Mom New Girlfriend Pulls A Gun on him

They need to start a new gofundme, cause I'd definitely donate. The cam just came out. When is this dude trial?

Man this court record is wild, dude had a continuance on his trial back in September 2024, he relieved one attorney and got another and has filed numerous motions to dismiss the case which has been denied and the judge appears to be forcing him to take a plea since there have been numerous "Mandatory Settlement Conferences" since December 2024


Case #: 24FE003769
 
Nah, the suv was blocking his view when she tossed the gun. Also, you don't know who was whistling. Could of been people in the house trying to call the dog's attention from going back outside.
:dunno:
naw he could clearly see she was laying there and not firing, she was no longer a threat. He fired 2 more shots into her before he jumped in his ride and sped off.
 
naw he could clearly see she was laying there and not firing, she was no longer a threat. He fired 2 more shots into her before he jumped in his ride and sped off.

He goes out of camera range so its hard to tell if he could see her hands at all, maybe she was waiting for him to get closer to shoot him.....

Yes, she was sitting there, but when she tossed the gun he wouldn't have seen it if he wasn't looking right at her..... there's too many variables especially with the gun being thrown so close behind the SUV. Its not like she clearly said "i quit, I'm unarmed"....etc

She said "The bitch ass N(word) shot me."

Then he shot her 2 more times and pulled off.


Said ass situation for the kid. Their dad is in jail and they're probably traumatized by the whole situation.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that's the tricky part....

She was shooting then tossed the gun behind the SUV but he couldn't see that, so he gave her 2 or 3 more shots to make sure the threat was eliminated.

Cops have done waaaaay worse and weren't even indicted.....

He will need a "pay attorney," but i think he could beat the Murder 1 charge.
Listen, if we using police standards of when to shoot and when to stop he's in the clear. Them muthafuckas don't stop shooting from ALL angles when it's mult t oBig back dyke did way She said she was gonna get her gun. She got the gun, he let off because showing her gun is more than enough to justify shooting someone. She fire back at him after she was shot and on the ground. She was still talking and moving so he finished neutralizing the threat. I don't wanna hear shit about what he should've been able to see or do after somebody ups a loaded weapon. All bets are off from there. He defense attorney needs to review all Sacramento police shooting and compare. This man is innocent.
 
He goes out of camera rang so its hard to tell if he could see her hands at all, maybe she was waiting for him to get closer to shoot him.....

Yes she was sitting there, but when she tossed the gun he wouldn't have seen it if he wasn't looking right at her..... there's too many variables especially with the gun being thrown so close behind the SUV. Its not like she clearly said "i quit, I'm unarmed"....etc

She said "The bitch ass N(word) shot me."

Then he shot her 2 more times and pulled off.


Said ass situation for the kid. Their dad is in jail and they're probably traumatized by the whole situation.

He could clearly see her. That is why he fired those last 2 (fuck you) shots and they both hit her.
 
Listen, if we using police standards of when to shoot and when to stop he's in the clear. Them muthafuckas don't stop shooting from ALL angles when it's mult t oBig back dyke did way She said she was gonna get her gun. She got the gun, he let off because showing her gun is more than enough to justify shooting someone. She fire back at him after she was shot and on the ground. She was still talking and moving so he finished neutralizing the threat. I don't wanna hear shit about what he should've been able to see or do after somebody ups a loaded weapon. All bets are off from there. He defense attorney needs to review all Sacramento police shooting and compare. This man is innocent.

It's obvious the deceased isn't an innocent victim in this.

But I think the issue is he appeared to have already had the gun before she got hers and fired before her.

The prosecution may be arguing that he had time to leave and instead had or grabbed his gun.

Also, if he wasn't a licensed gun owner and possibly had priors it's even worse for him.

Plus we don't know what happened prior to this shooting that may be a factor.
 
I would've done that same thing, may that bitch rot in shit and piss being a skeleton. Dudes not playing with these bitches anymore, you pull a gun on me then you better get your shot off before I do because I'm gonna bust back to kill you and if ya ass isn't dead when you go to the ground with you still holding that gun then I'm gonna finish the job. I rather be judged by 6, than to be carried by six.

Oh yeah, this isn't up for debate either and I'm not changing my opinion about what I said.
 
Last edited:
Bitch yelling all that on my momma shit thinking she hard. Deep down she didn’t want to shoot. If you going to let it fly you quietly go get the gun then let off. All that warning and bullshit frontin is what got her killed.
 
It's obvious the deceased isn't an innocent victim in this.

But I think the issue is he appeared to have already had the gun before she got hers and fired before her.

The prosecution may be arguing that he had time to leave and instead had or grabbed his gun.

Also, if he wasn't a licensed gun owner and possibly had priors it's even worse for him.

Plus we don't know what happened prior to this shooting that may be a factor.
I agree, but if he didn't have his gun, he would've been a dead man. I'm glad he had his permit though but that usually doesn't matter when they can still charge him for murder.

I don't care about getting into a argument because if things get out of hand then best believe I'm gonna defend myself by any means necessary and you always want to get the upper hand against your opps or else you're done.

I believe they're gonna make the women the victim because she's dead even though she had a weapon as well. I just hate justice system that never see a man as the victim when there's been plenty of times women killing a man because they feel men are stronger than women that you shouldn't be able to defend yourself, fuck dat.
 
It's obvious the deceased isn't an innocent victim in this.

But I think the issue is he appeared to have already had the gun before she got hers and fired before her.

The prosecution may be arguing that he had time to leave and instead had or grabbed his gun.

Also, if he wasn't a licensed gun owner and possibly had priors it's even worse for him.

Plus we don't know what happened prior to this shooting that may be a factor.
If witnesses say he had his gun before she went and got hers, then yeah he's done. I'm not seeing anybody or any evidence saying otherwise. So outside of this video, it's only speculation. I'm just going off what we can see from the video.
1. She says she's getting a gun.
2. She gets gun and present it to the shooter.
3. He shoots when he sees gun.
4. She fires back from the ground.
5. He retreats out of camera sight to protect himself, keeps fire towards shooter on the ground.

From this video it's clear to me what happened, but yeah we don't know what the situation was before the video started. I would assume there's more footage than what it shows because doorbell cameras starting recording as soon as someone is in sight. I'm backing the brotha and yes I got bulldkye bias in most situations involving them. lol
 
They must be using Terrance Howard math.
terrence-howard-math.gif
 
Imagine if shootouts in public weren't a normal everyday thing. Imagine if the average American didn't think they were Yosemite sam and ready to gun it out with any wrascaly rabbit that comes their way. But unfortunately we live in a country where there are more Guns than people and everyone thinks they are John Wick. So all the 100 million Americans with Guns are ready to shoot it out over any perceived aggression and we are cool with that?

WE DON"T NEED GUNS. Clearly we have two Gun owners one is dead so her gun didn't protect her.
 
She didn't learn her lesson even after she got shot. She should have just sat there and waited for the ambulance

and those last two shots probably did dude in :smh:
 
Damn. She took a few and kept bucking.

What did him in was the kill shot. Although it could be argued he feared for his life.
 
Plus, he didn't see her toss her gun. He was just trying to get to the car and get away.

Hope he keeps his fuckin' mouth shut and let the attorneys handle this one.
I believe he can beat this case with the right lawyer while remaining silent.
 
Plus, he didn't see her toss her gun. He was just trying to get to the car and get away.

Hope he keeps his fuckin' mouth shut and let the attorneys handle this one.

I believe he can beat this case with the right lawyer while remaining silent.

Post in thread 'Avonte Teasley Faces Murder Charge After His Baby Mom New Girlfriend Pulls A Gun on him' https://www.bgol.us/forum/threads/a...iend-pulls-a-gun-on-him.1270784/post-25964605


Case#: 24FE003769
They just had another Mandatory Settlement Conference on 8/26 with no resolution.

Trial Readiness Conference is scheduled for 10/22

And then the trial is scheduled to finally begin 11/10
 
I hope he beats the charges. That bitch begged for those mood changing bullets. Back in the late 90's a friend of my mine wound up in a similar situation and ended up doing more than 20 years for pushing the scalp back on a reckless dyke bitch. When all he wanted to do was pick up his daughter.
 
Update:

Trial readiness conference was 10/22
Outcome listed as other

There's a pre-trial motion scheduled for 12/10 so maybe they're still trying to get him to plead......
 
Them last 2 shots are a bad look

He doesn't appear to have a "pay attorney," i think a decent lawyer would argue that trom his pov he couldn't see that she threw the gun away and she never verbalized that she surrendered or gave up, so he thought there was still a threat. He then neutralized that threat
 
Imagine if shootouts in public weren't a normal everyday thing. Imagine if the average American didn't think they were Yosemite sam and ready to gun it out with any wrascaly rabbit that comes their way. But unfortunately we live in a country where there are more Guns than people and everyone thinks they are John Wick. So all the 100 million Americans with Guns are ready to shoot it out over any perceived aggression and we are cool with that?

WE DON"T NEED GUNS. Clearly we have two Gun owners one is dead so her gun didn't protect her.
You are wasting your time typing this. Its not that cut and dry. Different people make different judgment calls and respond differently.
Also, with millions of guns, its a fantasy to think you can just wish them away.
Make them illegal and only criminals and the military will have them and sooner or later you will be taken over by one or the other.
I'll take my chances strapped up.
 
He doesn't appear to have a "pay attorney," i think a decent lawyer would argue that trom his pov he couldn't see that she threw the gun away and she never verbalized that she surrendered or gave up, so he thought there was still a threat. He then neutralized that threat
He’s a black male
 
The prosecution is probably looking at him continuing to shoot after she tossed the gun. However; since the suv was blocking his line of sight he couldn't see that she was unarmed when he delivered the last few shots. He clearly was trying to make sure that he could get into his car safely and leave without being shot at. Which he immediately did when he realized that she was down. DA wasting time and money with this case.
Police would have emptied the clip and said they feared for their lives.



and that dog got the fuck up outta there on that first shot.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top