How has it been debunked or what about it is not true? Let me see this shit.
here we go...
****COLIN WARNING**** IF YOUR NOT GOING TO READ THE ENTIRE POST THEN DON'T BOTHER COMMENTING ON IT!
ok..lets get to the nitty gritty of what those "crime reduction programs" consist of specifically.... this is from
congress website...the actual law:
first the definition of hate crimes then the reason why the bill is neccesary:
(1) The incidence of violence known as hate crimes, or
crimes motivated by bias, poses a serious national problem.
(2) According to data obtained by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the incidence of such violence increased in 2019,
the most recent year for which data is available.
(3) In 1990, Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act
(Public Law 101-275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) to provide the Federal
Government, law enforcement agencies, and the public with data
regarding the incidence of hate crime. The Hate Crime Statistics
Act and the Matthew Shepard and James
[[Page 135 STAT. 267]]
Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (division E of Public Law
111-84; 123 Stat. 2835) have enabled Federal authorities to
understand and, where appropriate, investigate and prosecute
hate crimes.
(4) A more complete understanding of the national problem
posed by hate crime is in the public interest and supports the
Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence
referenced in section 249(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States
Code.
(5)
However, a complete understanding of the national
problem posed by hate crimes is hindered by incomplete data from
Federal, State, and local jurisdictions through the Uniform
Crime Reports program authorized under section 534 of title 28,
United States Code, and administered by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
(6) Multiple factors contribute to the provision of
inaccurate and incomplete data regarding the incidence of hate
crime through the Uniform Crime Reports program. A significant
contributing factor is the quality and quantity of training that
State and local law enforcement agencies receive on the
identification and reporting of suspected bias-motivated crimes.
(7) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently
serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant
Federal financial assistance to States and local jurisdictions.
(8) Federal financial assistance with regard to certain
violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and
local authorities to work together as partners in the
investigation and prosecution of such crimes.
this part is the actual implemention of those "crime reduction programs":
(d) <> Reporting of Hate
Crimes.--
(1) Implementation grants.--
(A) In general.--The Attorney General may make
grants to States and units of local government to assist
the State or unit of local government in implementing
the National Incident-Based Reporting System, including
to train employees in identifying and classifying hate
crimes in the National Incident-Based Reporting System.
(B) Priority.--In making grants under subparagraph
(A), the Attorney General shall give priority to States
and units of local government that develop and implement
the programs and activities described in subsection
(f)(2)(A).
(2) Reporting.--
(A) Compliance.--
(i) <> In
general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), in
each fiscal year beginning after the date that is
3 years after the date on which a State or unit of
local government first receives a grant under
paragraph (1), the State or unit of local
government shall provide to the Attorney General,
through the Uniform Crime Reporting system,
information pertaining to hate crimes committed in
that jurisdiction during the preceding fiscal
year.
the rest of those programs as follows.....I'll just bold the parts that are pertinent:
(e)
Grants for State-run Hate Crime Hotlines.--
(1) Grants authorized.--
(A) In general.--The Attorney General shall make
grants to States to create State-run hate crime
reporting hotlines.
(B) Grant period.--A grant made under subparagraph
(A) shall be for a period of not more than 5 years.
(2) Hotline requirements.--A State shall ensure, with
respect to a hotline funded by a grant under paragraph (1),
that--
(A) the hotline directs individuals to--
(i) law enforcement if appropriate; and
(ii) local support services;
[[Page 135 STAT. 269]]
(B) any personally identifiable information that an
individual provides to an agency of the State through
the hotline is not directly or indirectly disclosed,
without the consent of the individual, to--
(i) any other agency of that State;
(ii) any other State;
(iii) the Federal Government; or
(iv) any other person or entity;
(C) the staff members who operate the hotline are
trained to be knowledgeable about--
(i) applicable Federal, State, and local hate
crime laws; and
(ii) local law enforcement resources and
applicable local support services; and
(D) the hotline is accessible to--
(i) individuals with limited English
proficiency, where appropriate; and
(ii) individuals with disabilities.
(3) Best practices.--The Attorney General shall issue
guidance to States on best practices for implementing the
requirements of paragraph (2).
(f) Information Collection by States and Units of Local
Government.--
(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) Covered agency.--The term ``covered agency''
means--
(i) a State law enforcement agency; and
(ii) a priority agency.
(B) Eligible entity.--The term ``eligible entity''
means--
(i) a State; or
(ii) a unit of local government that has a
priority agency.
(2) Grants.--
(A)
In general.--The Attorney General may make
grants to eligible entities to assist covered agencies
within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity in
conducting law enforcement activities or crime reduction
programs to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to
hate crime, particularly as those activities or programs
relate to reporting hate crimes through the Uniform
Crime Reports program, including--
(i) adopting a policy on identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developing a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence
of hate crime;
(iii) establishing a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and reporting hate
crimes;
(iv) engaging in community relations functions
related to hate crime prevention and education
such as--
(I) establishing a liaison with
formal community-based organizations or
leaders; and
[[Page 135 STAT. 270]]
(II) conducting public meetings or
educational forums on the impact of hate
crimes, services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant Federal,
State, and local laws pertaining to hate
crimes; and
(v) providing hate crime trainings for agency
personnel.
(B) Subgrants.--A State that receives a grant under
subparagraph (A) may award a subgrant to a unit of local
government within the State for the purposes under that
subparagraph, except that a unit of local government may
provide funding from such a subgrant to any law
enforcement agency of the unit of local government.
(3) Information required of states and units of local
government.--
(A) In general.--For each fiscal year in which a
State or unit of local government receives a grant or
subgrant under paragraph (2), the State or unit of local
government shall--
(i) collect information from each law
enforcement agency that receives funding from the
grant or subgrant summarizing the law enforcement
activities or crime reduction programs conducted
by the agency to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime, particularly as those
activities or programs relate to reporting hate
crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program;
and
(ii) <> submit to the
Attorney General a report containing the
information collected under clause (i).
(B) Semiannual law enforcement agency report.--
(i) <>
In general.--In
collecting the information required under
subparagraph (A)(i), a State or unit of local
government shall require each law enforcement
agency that receives funding from a grant or
subgrant awarded to the State or unit of local
government under paragraph (2) to submit a
semiannual report to the State or unit of local
government that includes a summary of the law
enforcement activities or crime reduction programs
conducted by the agency during the reporting
period to prevent, address, or otherwise respond
to hate crime, particularly as those activities or
programs relate to reporting hate crimes through
the Uniform Crime Reports program.
(ii) Contents.--In a report submitted under
clause (i), a law enforcement agency shall, at a
minimum, disclose--
(I) whether the agency has adopted a
policy on identifying, investigating,
and reporting hate crimes;
(II) whether the agency has
developed a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the
incidence of hate crime;
(III) whether the agency has
established a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and
reporting hate crimes;
(IV) whether the agency engages in
community relations functions related to
hate crime, such as--
[[Page 135 STAT. 271]]
(aa) establishing a liaison
with formal community-based
organizations or leaders; and
(bb) conducting public
meetings or educational forums
on the impact of hate crime,
services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant
Federal, State, and local laws
pertaining to hate crime; and
(V) the number of hate crime
trainings for agency personnel,
including the duration of the trainings,
conducted by the agency during the
reporting period.
(4) Compliance and redirection of funds.--
(A) <> In general.--Except as
provided in subparagraph (B), beginning not later than 1
year after the date of this Act, a State or unit of
local government receiving a grant or subgrant under
paragraph (2) shall comply with paragraph (3).
(B) Extensions; waiver.--The Attorney General--
(i) may provide a 120-day extension to a State
or unit of local government that is making good
faith efforts to collect the information required
under paragraph (3); and
(ii) shall waive the requirements of paragraph
(3) for a State or unit of local government if
compliance with that subsection by the State or
unit of local government would be unconstitutional
under the constitution of the State or of the
State in which the unit of local government is
located, respectively.
(g) Requirements of the Attorney General.--
(1) Information collection and analysis; report.--In order
to improve the accuracy of data regarding the incidence of hate
crime provided through the Uniform Crime Reports program, and
promote a more complete understanding of the national problem
posed by hate crime, the Attorney General shall--
(A) collect and analyze the information provided by
States and units of local government under subsection
(f) for the purpose of developing policies related to
the provision of accurate data obtained under the Hate
Crime Statistics Act (Public Law 101-275; 28 U.S.C. 534
note) by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(B) <> for each
calendar year beginning after the date of enactment of
this Act, publish and submit to Congress a report based
on the information collected and analyzed under
subparagraph (A).
(2) <>
Contents of report.--A report
submitted under paragraph (1) shall include--
(A) a qualitative analysis of the relationship
between--
(i) the number of hate crimes reported by
State law enforcement agencies or other law
enforcement agencies that received funding from a
grant or subgrant awarded under paragraph (2)
through the Uniform Crime Reports program; and
(ii) the nature and extent of law enforcement
activities or crime reduction programs conducted
by
[[Page 135 STAT. 272]]
those agencies to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime; and
(B) a quantitative analysis of the number of State
law enforcement agencies and other law enforcement
agencies that received funding from a grant or subgrant
awarded under paragraph (2) that have--
(i) adopted a policy on identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developed a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence
of hate crime;
(iii) established a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and reporting hate
crimes;
(iv) engaged in community relations functions
related to hate crime, such as--
(I) establishing a liaison with
formal community-based organizations or
leaders; and
(II) conducting public meetings or
educational forums on the impact of hate
crime, services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant Federal,
State, and local laws pertaining to hate
crime; and
(v) conducted hate crime trainings for agency
personnel during the reporting period, including--
(I) the total number of trainings
conducted by each agency; and
(II) the duration of the trainings
described in subclause (I).
^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS IS THE CRIME REDUCTION PROGRAMS YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
thats what been
ENFORCED!
nowhere in there do you read about procedures and charges and how fast people need to be locked up....
nowhere in there do you read about charging people a certain amount of years....You know...the crime busting shit that YOU'RE thinking about.
and nowhere in there do you even see language that makes ANY OF THIS LAW specific to the asian community beyond the fucking title its given in the media.
This law is about as substantive and action pack as Juneteenth dude. All they did is allocate tax payer money to something they SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOING and called it THE ANTI ASIAN HATE CRIME LAW...and you guys went all
oh yeah...its mainly if not wholly a databasing function which means gathering information to do what??
STUDY! 
That is the "tangibles" Asians got.
guess what... Asian activist groups OPPOSED the damn thing...why???
Over 75 Asian, LGBTQ groups oppose anti-Asian hate crimes bill
What they're saying: In Wednesday's statement, published on writer Jenn Fang's blog, "Reappropriate," activists called the bill a contradiction of "Asian solidarity with Black, Brown, undocumented, trans, low-income, sex worker, and other marginalized communities whose liberation is bound together."
- The bill does not create "systemic change" and only increases "crime statistics collection," the organizations write.
- Relying on crime statistics does not actually prevent violence, they argue, pointing to the 2009 Matthew Shepard Act.
- The Matthew Shepard Act expanded federal hate crime categories to include sexual orientation and gender identity, but the statement notes that the U.S. continues to see high rates of deadly anti-trans violence.
- Bolstering law enforcement "ignores that police violence is also anti-Asian violence, which has disproportionately targeted Black and Brown Asians," they write.
- The statement cites the deaths of Christian Hall and Angelo Quinto, Asian Americans who were recently killed by police during mental health crises.
The organizations called on members of Congress to oppose the legislation and instead shift resources from law enforcement to communities.
- Investing in non-carceral alternatives and removing police presence from neighborhoods are among their demands.
Bolstering law enforcement would only hurt Asian communities' most vulnerable members, they say.
www.axios.com
but none this plays into the popular Asians got tangibles narratives black pseudo activists (especially on BGOL) like to play up....
**********CONGRATULATIONS!!! IF YOURE READING THIS LINE THEN YOU HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE "ANTI-ASIAN CRIME BILL" IS NOT A TANGIBLE!!!*************
so its been DEBUNKED!
