African American Ethnic Heritage: Where in Africa are African Americans from?

Lol so what was in Jordan ? And what "other areas"? I'm not saying anything "originated" in.west Africa. We're clear that the oldest human remains are in East Africa, but those fossils are 200k years old. And 200k years ago, there were no known civilizations. I mention Sgyot because that's the place that had writing , architecture, artwork, that people revere worldwide. AT THE SAME TIME, the peoples in West Africa existed as well, and it's possible-- highly LIKELY, that our ancestors were already in West Africa , while Egypt, Ethiopia... Jordan, was there.

And again, the African descendants in the Caribbean and South America , cake.over on slave shops just like the ones who came.to America. Far more Africans were imorted to Cuba than the whole United States. No, they were not in those places already. Sea travel by humans across the Atlantic didn't come.from Africa.
Hasn't that been proven with genetics already? I know they mapped the mixture in north Africa with berbers. I posted it before. And to shut someone up about the mixture that happened 5,000+ years ago.

Why are people still concerned with coming from other areas of Africa when even the fucking religions brought here don't support that? The genetic tests line up with the religions of the Africans who came here. Had they come from Egypt, Ethiopia, North Africa, etc, there would be different religions. The small percentage of slaves who were Christians were recent converts.

Whites value not one damn thing in the areas the slaves were taken from, so as a result, most black folks in America don't value those areas and wish to skip over them to Moors/Egypt. Keep in mind we are talking the most diverse continent on the planet and folks want to claim it all. :smh:Slavery caused a huge identity crisis that might never be sorted out.

As for sea travel, remember that African king did send out hundreds of canoes into the ocean and only a few came back.
 
This website has a lot of info relevant to that:https://tracingafricanroots.com/



Older than some of the groups in Africa? How so?
And richest? How are you measuring? By income or GDP or net worth or what?

And dumbest? I’ll leave that alone as a troll statement.



Feel free to research and post that information when you find it. I am concentrating on my nation for now.
I'll tell you how. The term Yoruba , and the people it refers to were not all one group until The 1800s. Same with igbos. Sure, there were people who spoke those languages, and some kingdoms some of them.came from, but there not all united and didn't think.of themselves as one people until then. WE, in America, were already united, and old tribal.affiliations from whatever parts were long gone. Many cities in West Africa, were founded after intertribal wars. Lagos, Accra, freetown, cities like that were made and then populated well after we were building schools , banks, churches , and whatever else , over here. And im not joking when I say RICHER. Don't you think it's funny that Africans all over the world will hear the story about Blacks being ENSLAVED in America, and still wanna come ? Why are there more people migrating FROM THERE TO HERE, than the opposite ? Were the Black Americans who went to newly independent Haiti, but came BACK to America in the 1800s stupid? How about the people who didn't go to Liberia when given an opportunity?
 
Hasn't that been proven with genetics already? I know they mapped the mixture in north Africa with berbers. I posted it before. And to shut someone up about the mixture that happened 5,000+ years ago.

Why are people still concerned with coming from other areas of Africa when even the fucking religions brought here don't support that? The genetic tests line up with the religions of the Africans who came here. Had they come from Egypt, Ethiopia, North Africa, etc, there would be different religions. The small percentage of slaves who were Christians were recent converts.

Whites value not one damn thing in the areas the slaves were taken from, so as a result, most black folks in America don't value those areas and wish to skip over them to Moors/Egypt. Keep in mind we are talking the most diverse continent on the planet and folks want to claim it all. :smh:Slavery caused a huge identity crisis that might never be sorted out.

As for sea travel, remember that African king did send out hundreds of canoes into the ocean and only a few came back.
Yup.

What's funny is, that kinda thought even came.back to west africa, which is why Cheikh Ante Diop spent so much time , trying to prove even tbe Senegalese came from egyot, I stead of just showing us all the cool shit that happened in ancient Mali, or even before that.

It's funny how people spend so much timeTrying to prove we were in America so long ago, and not west africa at the same time. Like what's the name of the civilization that had the boats that left West Africa in the BC YEARS? Look at a map. Egypt only had access to tHe Atlantic via the Mediterranean thought eh strait of Gibraltar. They could've colonized all of Europe before coming all the way across the sea lol. Or all of West Africa. Yet, somehow, THEY ended up being the ones colonized by Greeks, then Turks, or whoever the hell else , all of this , during the rise of the Ghana empire, Mali, Songhai, etc... I don't get it.
 
Which. Ations in Africa did carribean and South American slaves come from?
Benin kingdom, Oyo empire, Asante, fante, Aro confederation, Dahomey, futa jallon, Futa Toro, allthe different mandinka kingdoms of the time, the kongolese kingdoms, and many others, depending on which years.
 
As for sea travel, remember that African king did send out hundreds of canoes into the ocean and only a few came back.


Yeah, that's the story of Abu Bakr II, Out of Mali, as told by Mansa Musa , to some Arab traveler. Could be ibn Batutta, could be someone else. That's what's supposed to explain how Mansa Musa got the position. Ivan Van sertima tried to use that as evidence that the Olmecs were African, problem is, the Olmecs existed and died off centuries before that story. And even if it were true, a couple of guys who got somewhere and couldn't get back home, nor repeat the voyage aren't explorers. They're stowaways. We are to assume that they landed in the Americas. Established a civIlization, changed their language, and the only evidence They left is some spear heads.
 
Nice post. Never let these cacs try to rewrite this period of history.

28535.jpg

These days it isn’t the cacs with the revisionist history that I am worried about.
 
Yup.

What's funny is, that kinda thought even came.back to west africa, which is why Cheikh Ante Diop spent so much time , trying to prove even tbe Senegalese came from egyot, I stead of just showing us all the cool shit that happened in ancient Mali, or even before that.

It's funny how people spend so much timeTrying to prove we were in America so long ago, and not west africa at the same time. Like what's the name of the civilization that had the boats that left West Africa in the BC YEARS? Look at a map. Egypt only had access to tHe Atlantic via the Mediterranean thought eh strait of Gibraltar. They could've colonized all of Europe before coming all the way across the sea lol. Or all of West Africa. Yet, somehow, THEY ended up being the ones colonized by Greeks, then Turks, or whoever the hell else , all of this , during the rise of the Ghana empire, Mali, Songhai, etc... I don't get it.
Well, a lot of it is feel-good history and isn't anything that gets cosigned by real historians. And it's not like cacs nowadays don't mind admitting when white people weren't involved in shit. People who really love history want the truth no matter what the fuck it shows.

Could SOME Egyptians have sailed away and landed somewhere? Of course. But there's a big difference between a one-way trip that you can't get back from and regular back-and-forth travel. Egyptians did have boats that could make the trip, but getting back is a bitch. And contrary to what folks want people to believe, the natives in the America's weren't playing nice. Fuck around land here and get killed.
 
What I’m concerned about are the so-called black people using white historical info as a base for their own and dismissing those that don’t because it doesn’t “fit the narrative”.

And there definitely was a mixture with the Neanderthal over 5,000 years ago to create whites.

These days it isn’t the cacs with the revisionist history that I am worried about.
 
What I’m concerned about are the so-called black people using white historical info as a base for their own and dismissing those that don’t because it doesn’t “fit the narrative”.

And there definitely was a mixture with the Neanderthal over 5,000 years ago to create whites.
Lol , "lwhite historical info"--- where's the Black historical info that you got? For your info, even the info that Ivan Van Sertima or Cheikh Ante Diop used to prove anything was based on "white historical info". And Cheikh was actually from a place where he would've had access to ancient oral history from Djelis in the area, as well as the languages spoken. But he was either speaking french , or skipping right over the west African history he lived in, just to prove ancient Egyptuans were Black. Why? Because the French and English, and the Greeks before them.have always been into Egypt. The whole.Afrocentric movement is Black guys reading "white historical info" , and just lazily flipping it. Sertimas theory about Blacks reaching America came from white guy info. But I bet you're still ok with it. When is "white historical info" ok and when is it not?
 
Do you know how many stories there are of a people originating from a tragedy? That would be damn near all. The reason Black people in America relate to the Jewish stories in the Bible , is because the stories talk about being slaves and overcoming it.

Muhammad started Islam after being chased out of and chastised in one city. His early followers were persecuted , and so on. Same with Rome, Egypt, name the place. Someone ran from somewhere and fought to earn their place.

You keep acting like there was ONE place called Africa that was some peaceful civilization, united from East to.west, north to south, and everyone was on one Accord, and they all loved the same way, ate the same food, shared one culture called "African culture". There were many, and they evolved over time, constantly changing due to whatever circumstances. and here we are, born from wars, sea travel, new terrain , slavery in a new land, war to end it, merging with cultures from.europe, and the people who were already here, and globalism. We don't need to be "madE whole". We are whole. History doesn't make you whole. You do.

But there's a difference between American Blacks and those examples you listed. Those people were able to create a culture and history based on things that reflect themselves... Black Americans don't have that.

Hell the sheer fact we're called black is a testiment to that. Black is a designation not a culture or language. The religion we practice is the religion of our captors and reflect them. God looks like them...that in itself is a powerful thing. We live in a society that has consistently, methodically and purposefully told us that people who look like us haven't contributed to American history and certainly not human history. Also we're only 200 years removed from slavery which is only a few generations so we're at the beginning of our journey to self actualization.
 
But there's a difference between American Blacks and those examples you listed. Those people were able to create a culture and history based on things that reflect themselves... Black Americans don't have that.

Hell the sheer fact we're called black is a testiment to that. Black is a designation not a culture or language. The religion we practice is the religion of our captors and reflect them. God looks like them...that in itself is a powerful thing. We live in a society that has consistently, methodically and purposefully told us that people who look like us haven't contributed to American history and certainly not human history. Also we're only 200 years removed from slavery which is only a few generations so we're at the beginning of our journey to self actualization.
You seem to be confusing color with culture. European groups to Africa didn't invent imperialism. They were just the latest. And they did it over sea , instead of over land through mountains, forest, river and desert.


Int my prior example Just because all those groups eventually spoke Yoruba , doesn't mean that's their so called "Original" languages or cultures.

The different empires of those regions COLONIZED the others and "yorubized" them. The largest expansion was done during the Oyo empire. The word empire is used to describe a kingdom that expanded and took over others. Lagos itself was a colony of the Benin kingdom. The locals still call it Eko, which is the bini name for it. Before that c it was a fishing village of the Awori people. They ended up assimilating into Benin culture, just like anyone else has to. This is just one example. Empires all over the world force people to change and adapt their culture according to the dominant one wmthat comes along.

So no, that wasn't THEIR culture, just because the guys who colonized them were also Black. They were robbed of their language, robbed of their culture. Robbed of their religions, their Gods, and many of them ... Lol you know the line. Yoruba isn't even a name they called themselves until the Samuel Ajayi Crowther used the name that the Hausa called them, and the English copied.and "black people" in America were already a fully formed group well before that.

Our ancestors found themselves transported over an ocean, instead of just over a river like those prior to then. But just like the others before, they adopted and moved forward. They passed onnskme things , and also made the culture they found themselves in , adapt to them. That's what makes AMERICAN culture. All those European groups , mixed in with all those African groups, mixed in with all the indigenous groups, plus the terrain. Nothing's different but the distance. Plenty of people were taken from.rain forests and made to adapt to desert life, or coastal life, or mountainous life. Forced to learn a new language, forced to accept new gods. Nothing is new here. No one is lost. We right here.

And no, everyone knows how much we contirrbuted to American culture. We are a culture within a culture, and it's the most influential culture on the planet. That's why they copy our music, fashion, CULTURE. Just like they are within Nigerian culture overall. The stuff they wear at their weddings-- that didn't statt til 100 years ago, and the fabric came from the Dutch. Even the concept of weddings As they do it is European. Also, much of the food they eat, is a product of Columbian exchange. Much of their current staoles came from interactions with colonists and new plants they got from that. This isn't stuff that's been the same way for centuries. This is evolution just like what we have here.
 
Last edited:
But there's a difference between American Blacks and those examples you listed. Those people were able to create a culture and history based on things that reflect themselves... Black Americans don't have that.

Hell the sheer fact we're called black is a testiment to that. Black is a designation not a culture or language. The religion we practice is the religion of our captors and reflect them. God looks like them...that in itself is a powerful thing. We live in a society that has consistently, methodically and purposefully told us that people who look like us haven't contributed to American history and certainly not human history. Also we're only 200 years removed from slavery which is only a few generations so we're at the beginning of our journey to self actualization.
Fela copied James Brown. He wasn't doing Afrobeats until be came over to America and got put on to funk and soul. Before that , he was copying jazz, which highlife music incorporated into what they do. He wouldn't even have a piano or a saxophone if it wasn't for the Germans and the British. That's not 100% "traditional African". It's evolution. He went to a European music school in the Uk.

Tons of African artists do reggae, copying Jamaicans. You think Africans just sit around doing the same thing and don't get influenced by shit from Europe as well? The minute Christians showed up with the tech and knowledge that could bring them to their shores unharmed, and be able to come and go , consisteny, they wanted in. They adopted christianity in many regions, just as they did with Islam from the Arabs before that. And before that, they were influencing, trading, and dominating each other just the same.

While you think we don't have a culture, they're over their soaking it up. This is why a Black American artist , even fuckin Cardi B can go over there, do sold out shows , meet the president if she wants , and have all the top local stars show up to take a picture with her. Americans go to any part of Africa and get more love there than their own stars.

Also why we send philanthropy missions to THEM. You don't see Aliko Dangote saying "hey let's build a school for those poor African Americans. " If a Nigerian comes here with a doctorate from there, he may as well have a high school degree. And also why the first presidents of Nigeria AND Ghana went to Lincoln University, and HBCU, And pledged sigma. Also, it's why Barack Obama.was able to go to Kenya , and show up the current president, who is the SON of their first president - the man who ousted his own father from government , and ruined his life. This happened in less than 50 years. Face it fam, you live in the CURRENT center of the world. In thousands of years, they will be talking about this place like you guys love to talk about Egypt , the moors, and Timbuktu. And we have influenced it.
 
For anyone who is truly curious about our history and looking for somewhere to start:


PBS shows this almost every weekend. Its 6 hours of African history. Skip Gates in Africa, talking with scholars and researchers of all colors.

Buy it, stream it, whatever. But stop talking about our "hidden" history. These people are doing the work.

Props again @VAiz4hustlaz @exiledking
 
I don't believe that's the way it went for most. I think it may be that most slaves were sent to the Caribbean and Brazil because they banned the importation after the US. The founding father halted the importation of slaves in 1808 but the slave trade remained within the borders of the US. Slaves originally went to the Caribbean for the sugar trade but later they came directly to the US. South Carolina was full of sons of wealthy plantation owners from the West Indies who helped spread slavery in the 1700's. After the Haitian Revolt, many fled to Louisiana.
My understanding is that they were first sent to the Caribbeans to break the spirits of the slaves (train them) and then they sent them to their final destitation for sale.
 
For anyone who is truly curious about our history and looking for somewhere to start:


PBS shows this almost every weekend. Its 6 hours of African history. Skip Gates in Africa, talking with scholars and researchers of all colors.

Buy it, stream it, whatever. But stop talking about our "hidden" history. These people are doing the work.

Props again @VAiz4hustlaz @exiledking
Exactly. A he's done it in many forms.
Or you can order the UNESCO books for a start. Any specific regions you wanna study , Amazon is full of books by European AND African scholars. I know I disparaged Cheikh Ante Diop a little bit, but during his era, African students started movements to study their own shit. His group was in Senegal and that movement was called the. Negritude movement on France. In Nigeria, they had they the Ibadan school where many of them studied themselves. Toyin Falola is a guy who's stuff I like to check. Chinua achebes books tell us about precolonial Igbo culture. The list goes on. Since I got involved with these discussions a few years ago , and been challenged with different questions on these topics, I've gone from wiki to ordering THOUSANDS of dollars of books from Amazon and other sources. It became a hobby of mine thanks to this board, And now I can say I have a pretty impressive library that no longer includes titles like "what they stole from us!"

This whole"hidden history" shit is how people sell flea market books and DVDS. I've read the bulk of them and used to believe that shit, til I started recognized the inconsistencies and time skips ALLL over the place.
 
My understanding is that they were first sent to the Caribbeans to break the spirits of the slaves (train them) and then they sent them to their final destitation for sale.
See the way I understood our arrival it wasn’t directly to the states according to Henry Louis Gates Jr most the slaves arrived at Brazil and the Caribbean colonies first and from there were dropped in the American colonies.


You guys have to understand that this period of importing Africans to the Americas was a 300 year process, and from.many regions there to many regions here. So there is no ONE STORY that can encompass all of it. There wasnt even an America until 1776, and the differenr colonies all over were run by different European groups. What the French did, was not the same as the Portuguese, and what the Dutch did wasn't the same as the Brits.

Most of the slaves arrived in Brazil because the Portuguese were trading with the kingdom of Kongo, plus , them and the Spanish had exclusivity over the whole hemisphere as far as Europe was concerned. They developed sugar plantations. Same.with the Spanish in Cuba.

No one was doing much in America , except tobacco and some rice. Also many Africans were brought over for specific trades, like smithing , and wood work, or whatever. Sugar wasn't growing the same here, so there wasn't any need for a massive influx like there was once cotton became a thing. By then, there were so many Africans over this side already , and American didn't have a presence on African shores because they weren't a world power yet,once they split with England . So they bought from the islands and Brazil. All this extra stuff about the islands being a slave making ground is a bit extra. It's just the place where they already were, for a country that didn't have much first hand shipping ability. Also, by the 1800s, the move became to influence the African.leaders to keep the people and put them to work in gathering resources from THERE, Rather than sending them to America to work the land here. By then the Brits needed palm oil to grease the Industrial machines they had begun making. There's just so many time periods and movements, one blanket statement doesn't cover it.
 
For anyone who is truly curious about our history and looking for somewhere to start:


PBS shows this almost every weekend. Its 6 hours of African history. Skip Gates in Africa, talking with scholars and researchers of all colors.

Buy it, stream it, whatever. But stop talking about our "hidden" history. These people are doing the work.

Props again @VAiz4hustlaz @exiledking
This isn't better than Hidden Colors is it?

JK, thanks for the drop. Very interesting and I'll be watching it piece by piece. This is their main page with the episode guide. http://www.pbs.org/weta/africas-great-civilizations/about/episode-guide/
 
My understanding is that they were first sent to the Caribbeans to break the spirits of the slaves (train them) and then they sent them to their final destitation for sale.

That may be true for some but from my studies, most came directly to the US. The Caribbean was notoriously hard on the slaves with many dying quickly due to disease and malnutrition. I can't imagine taking a chance on losing valuable slaves when you can easily break them here also. I think Barbados was considered the worse. The sons of the plantation owners in Barbados migrated to South Carolina and brought their viciousness there. Plus with all the slave rebellions going on in the Caribbean, I don't if they would want them exposed to that. The slave owners lived in constant fear of the slaves rebelling after the Haitian Revolution.

Slavery changed after the American Revolution. Prior to then, slavery was mostly tobacco and domestic work. The invention of the cotton gin really expanded slavery and made it vicious assemble-line type work.

I know I may sound callus but jut trying to be accurate.
 
What I’m concerned about are the so-called black people using white historical info as a base for their own and dismissing those that don’t because it doesn’t “fit the narrative”.

When is "white historical info" ok and when is it not?

This. Which is something I’ve called out on here. The same niggas who will cite slave laws and dictionaries written by “cacs” will dismiss and deride other well-researched historical info.

And when I ask what other info they have to present, they cop out with “you do the research yourself” or “you ain’t ready for this deep knowledge”.

And there definitely was a mixture with the Neanderthal over 5,000 years ago to create whites.

It’s well-known that some of the first Africans to leave the continent interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Hell, 23andMe will trace your Neanderthal variants, and if you’re Black American, then you probably have them, since you probably have Euro ancestry.

And the mixing was well over 5,000 years ago. Probably 200,000 or something.
 
Slavery changed after the American Revolution. Prior to then, slavery was mostly tobacco and domestic work. The invention of the cotton gin really expanded slavery and made it vicious assemble-line type work.

I know I may sound callus but jut trying to be accurate.
Exactly. In the United States. In the tropical weather of the islands , sugar was the crop , so that was going much longer and way more than in America. Nobody had an island strictly to house people and "break" them. If someone was on Barbados , they were working. If someone in South Carolina wanted to buy them and someone else wanted to sell them, it was done.

And yeah, it sounds rough, but there's no other way to discuss it
 
This. Which is something I’ve called out on here. The same niggas who will cite slave laws and dictionaries written by “cacs” will dismiss and deride other well-researched historical info.

And when I ask what other info they have to present, they cop out with “you do the research yourself” or “you ain’t ready for this deep knowledge”.



It’s well-known that some of the first Africans to leave the continent interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Hell, 23andMe will trace your Neanderthal variants, and if you’re Black American, then you probably have them, since you probably have Euro ancestry.

And the mixing was well over 5,000 years ago. Probably 200,000 or something.

:lol: the 1828 dictionary contradicts your statements as “copper colored like Ethiopians” are not mongoloids.

Also, the white race is not 200,000 years old. The original Europeans were also so-called black, like every other aboriginal.

And we all know how reliable those DNA testing sites are -

 
The American Revolution, started by another so-called black Native American, Crispus Attucks.
 
For anyone who is truly curious about our history and looking for somewhere to start:


PBS shows this almost every weekend. Its 6 hours of African history. Skip Gates in Africa, talking with scholars and researchers of all colors.

Buy it, stream it, whatever. But stop talking about our "hidden" history. These people are doing the work.

Props again @VAiz4hustlaz @exiledking

Yeah. It's been shown time and time again in these types of threads that people don't want history. They want feel-good narratives. And there hasn't been any 'hidden' history in my lifetime. That shit corny as fuck.
Exactly. A he's done it in many forms.
Or you can order the UNESCO books for a start. Any specific regions you wanna study , Amazon is full of books by European AND African scholars. I know I disparaged Cheikh Ante Diop a little bit, but during his era, African students started movements to study their own shit. His group was in Senegal and that movement was called the. Negritude movement on France. In Nigeria, they had they the Ibadan school where many of them studied themselves. Toyin Falola is a guy who's stuff I like to check. Chinua achebes books tell us about precolonial Igbo culture. The list goes on. Since I got involved with these discussions a few years ago , and been challenged with different questions on these topics, I've gone from wiki to ordering THOUSANDS of dollars of books from Amazon and other sources. It became a hobby of mine thanks to this board, And now I can say I have a pretty impressive library that no longer includes titles like "what they stole from us!"

This whole"hidden history" shit is how people sell flea market books and DVDS. I've read the bulk of them and used to believe that shit, til I started recognized the inconsistencies and time skips ALLL over the place.
Yeah, these discussions over the years had me do a ton of reading that I wouldn't have done. Much like you, I used to believe the feel-good shit that was promoted heavily. But much like religion, as I dug deeper, shit didn't add up. Contradictions. Lack of sources. Dates off by centuries or even thousands of years.

The entire 'they hid it from us' shit is an old hustle. It used to be applicable in the 19th century.

I like how folks will use white sources in their books, selectively as hell. I've seen selective use of genetics. Ignore a bunch of shit, but only highlight the small example that helps the 'hidden' agenda. But when genetics is used as a counter, it's white shit.

This. Which is something I’ve called out on here. The same niggas who will cite slave laws and dictionaries written by “cacs” will dismiss and deride other well-researched historical info.

And when I ask what other info they have to present, they cop out with “you do the research yourself” or “you ain’t ready for this deep knowledge”.



It’s well-known that some of the first Africans to leave the continent interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Hell, 23andMe will trace your Neanderthal variants, and if you’re Black American, then you probably have them, since you probably have Euro ancestry.

And the mixing was well over 5,000 years ago. Probably 200,000 or something.
There were waves of mixing. I know one happened across the Medditeranean(sp) see about 5,000 years ago. Was a wave through Eurasia prior to that. Sand cac ain't new. Been around since before Egypt. That's where a lot of people get confused. They confuse the sand cacs with the ice cacs. The paler ones are new.

Some of the people that folks claim are new to Africa been there since before recorded history.
 
:lol: the 1828 dictionary contradicts your statements as “copper colored like Ethiopians” are not mongoloids.

Also, the white race is not 200,000 years old. The original Europeans were also so-called black, like every other aboriginal.

And we all know how reliable those DNA testing sites are -

The American Revolution, started by another so-called black Native American, Crispus Attucks.

 
The Jews in the Bible ARE so-called black people :lol:

The same ones exiled to the west.

No White person has ever been, is, or will ever be a Jew.

Do you know how many stories there are of a people originating from a tragedy? That would be damn near all. The reason Black people in America relate to the Jewish stories in the Bible , is because the stories talk about being slaves and overcoming it.

Muhammad started Islam after being chased out of and chastised in one city. His early followers were persecuted , and so on. Same with Rome, Egypt, name the place. Someone ran from somewhere and fought to earn their place.

You keep acting like there was ONE place called Africa that was some peaceful civilization, united from East to.west, north to south, and everyone was on one Accord, and they all loved the same way, ate the same food, shared one culture called "African culture". There were many, and they evolved over time, constantly changing due to whatever circumstances. and here we are, born from wars, sea travel, new terrain , slavery in a new land, war to end it, merging with cultures from.europe, and the people who were already here, and globalism. We don't need to be "madE whole". We are whole. History doesn't make you whole. You do.
 
Back
Top