96 Year Old Woman in Court For Holocaust Crimes, The Jew Never Forgive Or Forget But Black Folks Are Told To Let Shit Go....

Simply_Black

International
International Member
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/europe/german-nazi-war-crimes-trial-96-year-old-intl/index.html





The trial of a 96-year-old former Nazi concentration camp secretary has finally began in Germany, weeks after she went on the run just before she was due in court.

The woman, named by German media as Irmgard Furchner, is accused of being an accessory to murder in more than 11,000 cases, when she was a stenographer and typist in the commandant's office at the Stutthof camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. She is alleged to have assisted those in charge of the camp in the systematic killing of prisoners between June 1943 and April 1945, according to a court indictment.

Furchner's trial in Itzehoe, northern Germany, started Tuesday, after being postponed from September 30 when she absconded for several hours before being caught by local authorities. The charges against her could not be read until she was present. She is one of the first women to go on trial in decades for alleged crimes during the Nazi era.

The woman, named by German media as Irmgard Furchner, is accused of being an accessory to murder in more than 11,000 cases.

As the 96-year-old was an adolescent at the time of the alleged crimes, Furchner faces trial before a Juvenile Court Chamber. The court's press office confirmed to CNN that she had appeared on Tuesday, and did not speak as the charges were read out. TV footage showed her being taken into the court in a wheelchair with her face barely visible behind a white mask and scarf pulled low over her eyes.

Furchner's lawyer Wolf Molkentin said in a written statement that his client "does not deny the crimes of the Shoah [Hebrew for "catastrophe"], not even those terrible acts which have just been brought to our attention by the reading of the indictment. She merely confronts the accusation at the heart of this trial: that she is personally guilty of a crime."

"Naturally, none of us, including the defense attorneys, has direct access to her own experience," he said, adding that the trial "will show how the available evidence is to be evaluated."

According to the Central Office in Ludwigsburg, which is responsible for investigating Nazi crimes, around 65,000 people died in the Stutthof concentration camp and its subcamps, as well as on the so-called death marches at the end of the war.
 
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/europe/german-nazi-war-crimes-trial-96-year-old-intl/index.html





The trial of a 96-year-old former Nazi concentration camp secretary has finally began in Germany, weeks after she went on the run just before she was due in court.

The woman, named by German media as Irmgard Furchner, is accused of being an accessory to murder in more than 11,000 cases, when she was a stenographer and typist in the commandant's office at the Stutthof camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. She is alleged to have assisted those in charge of the camp in the systematic killing of prisoners between June 1943 and April 1945, according to a court indictment.

Furchner's trial in Itzehoe, northern Germany, started Tuesday, after being postponed from September 30 when she absconded for several hours before being caught by local authorities. The charges against her could not be read until she was present. She is one of the first women to go on trial in decades for alleged crimes during the Nazi era.

The woman, named by German media as Irmgard Furchner, is accused of being an accessory to murder in more than 11,000 cases.

As the 96-year-old was an adolescent at the time of the alleged crimes, Furchner faces trial before a Juvenile Court Chamber. The court's press office confirmed to CNN that she had appeared on Tuesday, and did not speak as the charges were read out. TV footage showed her being taken into the court in a wheelchair with her face barely visible behind a white mask and scarf pulled low over her eyes.

Furchner's lawyer Wolf Molkentin said in a written statement that his client "does not deny the crimes of the Shoah [Hebrew for "catastrophe"], not even those terrible acts which have just been brought to our attention by the reading of the indictment. She merely confronts the accusation at the heart of this trial: that she is personally guilty of a crime."

"Naturally, none of us, including the defense attorneys, has direct access to her own experience," he said, adding that the trial "will show how the available evidence is to be evaluated."

According to the Central Office in Ludwigsburg, which is responsible for investigating Nazi crimes, around 65,000 people died in the Stutthof concentration camp and its subcamps, as well as on the so-called death marches at the end of the war.


Hey I apologize in advance for the all caps but this has to be yelled from the mountaintops..

ALL THOSE FUCKIIN LYNCH MOBS THAT MURDERED OUR ANTCESTORS AND STOLE THEIR LAND

ARE STILL

ALIVE AND PROFITING OF OUR HERITAGE. YOU CAN LOOK AT SOME OF THOSE LYNCHING PICTURES AND PLACE

NAMES TO THE FACES..

THE CHILDREN STILL TO THIS DAY HAVE THE BODY PARTS OF OUR ANTCESTORS AS FUCKIN SOUVERNERS ON THEIR MANTLES AND HIDDEN IN THEIR ATTICS.

AND LETS NOT FORGET ABOUT THE CORPORATION THAT FORCIBLILY REMOVED US OFF OUR LAND BECAUSE THEY KNEW VALUABLE

RESOURCES WERE THERE, THEY ARE TOO EASY TO TRACE.. JUST LOOK AND SEE WHO PROFITED OFF ALL THE OIL

THAT WAS ON OUR INDIGENOUS LANDS WE WERE FORCED OFF OF...

Five Star Posting OP!!!!
 
Last edited:
Because it was a more modern day atrocity which makes it more relevant. Slavery was so long ago how can you ever avenge those crimes who would we really punish. :rolleyes:

***Every historic Fortune 500 company, corporation, American industry, and generation who benefited from slavery stands by nodding in agreement***
 
Modern day jews aren't even real jews.

All those cave/sand beasts in Israel are not the true Israelite.


mind-blown-explosion.gif


200.gif
 
That part

That part. I woulda choked the bitch
I don't think you would have. Of the trillions of injustices committed against black people, how many cases are there of us seeking and receiving “justice”? However, if we were to calculate us talking about what we would have done the statistics would be in the other direction.

But we stay worrying about Jews extracting ever ounce of whatever they need to keep the sun afloat. Oh, this woman 98? Yeah she had to see something bask in 1941. She had to.
 
Because it was a more modern day atrocity which makes it more relevant. Slavery was so long ago how can you ever avenge those crimes who would we really punish. :rolleyes:

***Every historic Fortune 500 company, corporation, American industry, and generation who benefited from slavery stands by nodding in agreement***
The Parkland Shooter has spent the week apologizing and admitting guilt in hopes of starving off the death penalty. It ain't going to work.

There's going to come a time when we too will be judged by the same system that encouraged and facilitated the ability to inflict harm and we too will be judged. I can't speak for y'all, but I have no intention of seeking atonement.
 
I'm sorry, but this looks suspicious as hell.

The government already knew that she was a third reich stenographer, did absolutely nothing about it for over 70 years and now they want to put her on trial all of a sudden?

On top of that, the idea that a stenographer can be an accessory to murder is absurd. They might as well go after the people who served food at the officer's mess hall. Accuse them of being accessories because they provided the sustenance the officers needed to carry out these atrocities. When it gets to that point you might as well accuse every German born before 1945 of being an accessory.

I suspect that the department in charge of going after German war criminals was about to have their funding cut because, as the article points out, she's the first person they've gone after in over 10 years. Her main role in this trial is to justify their existence.

Finally, how does a 96-year-old woman confined to a wheelchair go on the lam for over a month? How hard were they really looking for her in the first place?
 
I'm sorry, but this looks suspicious as hell.

The government already knew that she was a third reich stenographer, did absolutely nothing about it for over 70 years and now they want to put her on trial all of a sudden?

On top of that, the idea that a stenographer can be an accessory to murder is absurd. They might as well go after the people who served food at the officer's mess hall. Accuse them of being accessories because they provided the sustenance the officers needed to carry out these atrocities. When it gets to that point you might as well accuse every German born before 1945 of being an accessory.

I suspect that the department in charge of going after German war criminals was about to have their funding cut because, as the article points out, she's the first person they've gone after in over 10 years. Her main role in this trial is to justify their existence.

Finally, how does a 96-year-old woman confined to a wheelchair go on the lam for over a month? How hard were they really looking for her in the first place?
That's the point: showing your ability to document history.

It's why I alternate between telling posters to organize and take notes of everything. There will come a time when it's time to judge and facilitate justice.
 
That's the point: showing your ability to document history.

It's why I alternate between telling posters to organize and take notes of everything. There will come a time when it's time to judge and facilitate justice.

The Nazis used the most advanced record-keeping technology known to man at the time. This means the post-war German government had already documented her involvement in the war.

Not arresting her sooner was a matter of inaction not ignorance.
 
The Nazis used the most advanced record-keeping technology known to man at the time. This means the post-war German government had already documented her involvement in the war.

Not arresting her sooner was a matter of inaction not ignorance.
Justice delayed isn't justice served. Grandma Nazi is about to get served.
 
Justice delayed isn't justice served. Grandma Nazi is about to get served.

Served for what though? Typing?

Suppose the FBI decided to reopen the investigation to the 1960s Church bombings. Wouldn't it be more than just a little suspicious if their chief suspect was the guy who ran the Klan mimeograph machine?

Yes, he would still be an awful person who deserves to be exposed and shamed, but calling him an accessory to murder is a pretty huge leap. One that would have all kinds of unintended consequences in future trials.
 
Served for what though? Typing?

Suppose the FBI decided to reopen the investigation to the 1960s Church bombings. Wouldn't it be more than just a little suspicious if their chief suspect was the guy who ran the Klan mimeograph machine?

Yes, he would still be an awful person who deserves to be exposed and shamed, but calling him an accessory to murder is a pretty huge leap. One that would have all kinds of unintended consequences in future trials.
She witnessed 11000 atrocities and still she persevered. If this was a just world she would be hung from a tree for the rest of her life. If she was a decent person she will take the Joe Paterno route.

Whenever I go to Lakewood, NJ, I am always humbled. They wanted all of those people gone. I will probably never see a Native American.
 
She witnessed 11000 atrocities and still she persevered. If this was a just world she would be hung from a tree for the rest of her life. If she was a decent person she will take the Joe Paterno route.

Whenever I go to Lakewood, NJ, I am always humbled. They wanted all of those people gone. I will probably never see a Native American.

The allied forces had no clue how bad conditions in the concentration camps were until they liberated them. The German public probably had even less information than they did. That means that more than likely she had little to no idea what was going on until she took the job.

At that point what is she really going to do? Go up against the entire camp on her own? Knowing what she knew do you really think they would just let her quit? If she wanted to go public who could she talk to?

If she had resisted in any way there's a very real chance she would have ended up in one of those camps. And for what? So she can choke in the gas chamber while they're training her replacement?

Now granted she could have been full on team Nazi, but even then we're judged by our actions not our intentions.

I understand the desire to hang her from a tree, but think about what kind of precedent that sets. Imagine your teenage daughter gets arrested for Medicare fraud because the hospital she was a candy striper at was ripping off the government. Or maybe your teenage son goes to jail for drug dealing because his boss at the convenience store had a secret second job off the clock.

That might sound comparatively petty, and it is! But that is exactly the kind of standard rioe for overreach
 
Because it was a more modern day atrocity which makes it more relevant. Slavery was so long ago how can you ever avenge those crimes who would we really punish. :rolleyes:

***Every historic Fortune 500 company, corporation, American industry, and generation who benefited from slavery stands by nodding in agreement***




But the Jews acts of revenge or claims for justice goes way beyond the times of the holocaust... they are still oppressing the Palestinians and forcibly taking land from them that they claim was given to them from Biblical times.... they never let shit from the past go now matter how far back it occurred.... and their acts of vengeance always seem to be accepted by much of western world powers.

.... on the other hand black folks are constantly told to forgive and put the shit of the past behind them... our fight for justice even for modern day atrocities that occurred in the 20th century seems to be taken lightly.
 
Back
Top