DEADLY POLICE SHOOTOUT WITH BLACK MAN
- Thread starter Deezz
- Start date
Yeah, that was a bitch move to pistol whip the man over that super minor accident!!!
He earned that lead sammich!
Off duty cop?
Agreed, but bruh was playing that game where you drive to the front of queue and try to squeeze in right quick.
Not worth crackin' someone in the jaw w/ a gun.
The lanes had to merge due to construction and the Bruh's car was further ahead of the cops car.
The cop was being an asshole and didn't want to let him merge and hit his car on purpose twice.
The Brotha knew that he hit his car on purpose and reacted. What would you do if someone hit your car on purpose?
Stoopid is as stoopid does.... just wait your turn and merge ..... dude jumped out of his car like a typical knuckle head trying to intimidate someone. He made a bitch move after hitting him pulling out his gun. Found out real quick that he tried to tenderize the the wrong mofo
sidebar: no one is required to let you in, especially when you wait to the last minute to merge when your lane is closed up ahead.... it's a courtesy
.
Last edited:
I'm not pistol whipping them. That's for sure!!
We don't know what happened before. If dude rushed to the front of the line and then tried to merge.
I would bet that's the case. Bruh was acting like an entitled asshole!
I've blocked people from passing me like the cop did if they do shit like that. Merge with everyone else and quit trying to jump the line!
Either way, to even bring out a gun after a simple traffic accident is absurd and ignorant!
I'm not talking about the reaction, I'm talking about the action that led to them getting out of their cars.
Yes the cop had the right of way, but the other car was in front and the cop purposefully sped up and hit the guy's car twice.
If someone purposefully hits another person's car, no one knows how that other person will react. The cop purposefully damaged the other man's car because he didn't want to let him over.
Speeding up to hit someone's is an aggressive action, which usually leads to an aggressive reaction.
I hear you, but in these scenarios, you don't speed ahead of the car in the correct lane due to upcoming construction; you have to yield and let the car pass you, then follow, as it reduces the chances of a collision.
You're right, but the cop sped up and hit him.
Just because you may have sped up to get to the front of the line, doesn't give you the right to now get in front of the other car that was already in the queue to bypass the construction.
That's like saying, I had my signal on and then blindly turn into someone. Just because the other car was slightly ahead, doesn't give that car the right to cut in! Bruh was 100% in the wrong.
In a car crash where a car sped up while you were merging, the merging driver is typically considered the one at fault, as they are responsible for merging safely. However, the other driver may share fault if they intentionally sped up to block you, and you can be found partially at fault if you could have reasonably avoided the collision. It's important to contact your insurance company and provide them with all the details, as they will determine liability based on the specific circumstances.
Liability for the accident
Liability for the accident
- Merging driver's responsibility:
The driver who is merging into traffic has the primary duty to do so safely and only when there is a sufficient gap.
- Other driver's responsibility:
Drivers already in the lane are not obligated to yield to a merging car, but they do have a duty to avoid a collision if possible.
- Shared blame:
If the other driver deliberately sped up to prevent you from merging, they could be found at fault for an unsafe and aggressive maneuver. However, you can also be held partially responsible if you could have reasonably slowed down or taken action to avoid the crash.
- Merging driver's responsibility:
- Contact your insurance company: They will investigate the accident and determine liability.
- Gather evidence: Collect all available information, such as any dashcam footage, photos of the damage, and witness information.
- Be prepared to explain the situation: Clearly and factually explain the sequence of events to the insurance adjuster. For instance, explain that the other driver sped up when you were merging and that you could not avoid the collision
- Contact your insurance company: They will investigate the accident and determine liability.
He hit him on purpose, the cop caused the accident which led to the getting out of their cars.
Agree to disagree on this one.
I have an intersection by my house where there's a stoplight that people merge in, but it's illegal.
There's 3 lanes, 2 going straight and the far right lane to turn. People use the turn lane to go straight by speeding up or merging. The right lane's a turning lane so legally they're in the wrong by going straight.
I like many go straight from the turn lane all the time. So if I mash on the gas from the turning lane to go straight I'm an asshole.
If I'm in the second lane and get upset at the turning lane for going straight trying to beat me and I ram their car, I'm still the asshole because I didn't have to ram their car.
I should've just let them go even though what they were doing's illegal even if I had the right of way.
If I sped up and hit them when they were already in front, I caused that if I hit them. And I'm man enough to admit that.
So he didn't hit him on purpose?
You'd think they'll learn by now.
So Bruh man didn't just speed up and started changing lanes like the cop was just supposed brake and let him in?!!So he didn't hit him on purpose?
If you watch the video, Bruh man just moved over into the cop's lane! He was trying to bully him.
C'mon Mayne!!
Last edited:
They were riding next to each other for 10 seconds in the vid before contact was made. So he didn't just swerve of all of a sudden.So Bruh man didn't just speed up and started changing lanes like the cop was just supposed brake and let him in?!!
C'mon Mayne!!
The cop was being an asshole by not letting him over, and he may have had a valid reason for it. But it was his choice to not let him merge, and also his choice to speed up and cause the accident.
And it looks like the Brotha hit the brakes because the car that was in front of him hit their brakes and he slowed down so that there wouldn't be an accident.
Like you said, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Last edited:
Honestly in todays society..... only Mexicans, Africans and Island mofos are carrying a machete
.
With that black-out limo tint he had on his whip, I doubt that he saw much of anything even tho it was daytime and I'd be willing to bet good money that he was high as fuck too doing something tht stoopid! When he opened his door you couldn't even see trough it....
.
Agreed PREACH!The truth shall set you freeeee! PREACH
- Merging driver's responsibility:
The driver who is merging into traffic has the primary duty to do so safely and only when there is a sufficient gap.
- Other driver's responsibility:
Drivers already in the lane are not obligated to yield to a merging car, but they do have a duty to avoid a collision if possible. - Shared blame:
If the other driver deliberately sped up to prevent you from merging, they could be found at fault for an unsafe and aggressive maneuver. However, you can also be held partially responsible if you could have reasonably slowed down or taken action to avoid the crash.
Something tells me he's a Mexican but don't sleep on those geeked-up meth-head, dirty white trash dudes. Because they are known for doing stupid shit like this.
Similar threads
