Supreme Court, in 5-4 decision, upholds 45’s travel ban
- Thread starter cold-n-cocky
- Start date
That is what the progressives were supposed to be but instead of them going at the GOP they busy fighting the establishments democrats.
They already ran off Ellison..and we see everyday in different primaries they go after the progressive candidate while the GOP watches.
They shouldn't be putting their fingers on the scale and support whoever the electorate wants
that should be marching orders with no confusion..
but what should be isn't always what is..
case in point.. Maxine going all in and Pelosi and Schumer go at her instead of going with her
simple as that..
Every dem that steps in front of a camera or microphone should be repeating this no matter what the question is....
Won't help with the Supreme Court or other federal appointed judges.
Gorsch is not a real jurist and is nothing more than a hack for the federalist society.. he’s not even qualified to be a judge in a municipality
GOP took their advice from Slim Charles and haven’t looked back since
So, they overturned the bakery case, because they said the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed religious animus towards the baker's religion, but this was allowed to stand, even though he called it a "Muslim ban"? Yeah, aight. Can we as a country do 2 things? 1) Stop pretending The Court is not political. And 2, stop saying "This is not what America is about!"? It is.
Travel bans are not unusual or unconstitutional, what is unconstitutional is issuing a ban on religion. We all know that 45's ban was going to be targeted at muslim countries, the problem was that his dumb ass actually said it. SCOTUS fucked this one "bigly", Gorsuch who claims to be a constitutional judge ignored 45's comments, showing his commitment to 45 and not the constitution.
Keep not voting and you will continue to get these types of situations. Is the system fair, nope, is there corruption, yep, but I have seen governments around the world and our unfair system beats other unfair systems.
45 is and idiot and hilary was the worst canidate to run against him, but no Gorsuch on bench if hilary won and the dems had a simple majority.
If necessary vote 'em in and vote 'em out but not voting and allowing ultra conservative judges to control the courts for decades is not an option. The Notorious RBG is holding on for the minimum Dem control congress. But if the Dems win 45 win roll over and join up, dude has no principles or loyalties.
Keep not voting and you will continue to get these types of situations. Is the system fair, nope, is there corruption, yep, but I have seen governments around the world and our unfair system beats other unfair systems.
45 is and idiot and hilary was the worst canidate to run against him, but no Gorsuch on bench if hilary won and the dems had a simple majority.
If necessary vote 'em in and vote 'em out but not voting and allowing ultra conservative judges to control the courts for decades is not an option. The Notorious RBG is holding on for the minimum Dem control congress. But if the Dems win 45 win roll over and join up, dude has no principles or loyalties.
Dems might be the same as repubs in the 80s; remember they use to call them Regan Democrats for a reason; so im not surprised by that; however the Dems today are not the same as the Repubs today; do they take money from their constituents yes. Outside of that, they have different agendas and it shows; now them being pussies, well thats a total different conversation
I’m down for whatever. But white people cannot hurt white people.
Well the gossip is that Pauly from Wisconsin is finally going to privatize social security this week. Let’s see if these white people in the Democratic Party will fight for its survival.
They’re pussy because subconsciously they don’t want minorities to get anything. It’s why they don’t have a fight in their body when it counts.Dems might be the same as repubs in the 80s; remember they use to call them Regan Democrats for a reason; so im not surprised by that; however the Dems today are not the same as the Repubs today; do they take money from their constituents yes. Outside of that, they have different agendas and it shows; now them being pussies, well thats a total different conversation
and that may be true....
Deporting brown folks at an alarming rate.
Warehousing children away from their parents
Banning Muslims from entering.
Wants to get rid of due process with regards to immigration.
For the folks saying it has nothing to do with us, I'm sure this racist tyrant will stop there.
Warehousing children away from their parents
Banning Muslims from entering.
Wants to get rid of due process with regards to immigration.
For the folks saying it has nothing to do with us, I'm sure this racist tyrant will stop there.
They will fight like a junkyard dog for white men to suck other white men off, but that anger dissolves when it’s time to get black families clean water. The Democratic Party likes the idea of being inclusive but idk ...
I feel that I do; I think that they fight where mostly money is involved. And thats the bigger issue; if they would just fight for things that make sense, they would win every election!
History is a great tool to understand the future. When slavery was abolished the blacks were entered into politics. But within a couple months the confederates seeped back into power and you had 100 years of him crow. Obama may have ushered in the next Jim Crow era.
But they won’t/can’t because it will help minorities. And we all know white people arent trying to help no non white person like that.
Let’s see the democratic response to the republicans finally having the guts to start getting rid of the safety nets.
Dems might be the same as repubs in the 80s; remember they use to call them Regan Democrats for a reason; so im not surprised by that; however the Dems today are not the same as the Repubs today; do they take money from their constituents yes. Outside of that, they have different agendas and it shows; now them being pussies, well thats a total different conversation
They take money from te same corporations. Banks, Insurance Companies Big Pharma, For-Profit Prisons, Banks and Credit Card companies.
Lets not forget that many Democrats just joined Republicans to weaken Dodd-Frank.
They also joined Republicans to gouge black borrows for car loans.
One group fucks you
The other group kisses you before they fuck you.
Have we heard Democrats say anything in regards to how Israel is treating Africans?
Democrats become millionaires when they get involved in politics just like those other assholes
I don’t even think the Democratic Party kisses us. They only talk of kissing us.
true true! although I do hope they get rid of Dodd-Frank; thats just a personal issue for me though...
Before the business
Diadora lenses
Diadora lenses
They needed to fix dodd-frank....no way should they allow banks to gamble with our money aND too big to fail is bullshit with no regulations. ..
Well said got damn!
Should have, yes.
Strategy-wise? Guarantee you he, and all his team, didn’t want to do ANYTHING that could have been seen as costing Clinton support, especially because their polling had to show it wasn’t a landslide victory she was cruising toward, but they (and 99% of American and pollsters), thought she’d win. So with that in mind, he stepped back.
Unfortunately, it backfire in his face.
The problem is they bailed the banks out and not the people out. Then the banks didn't even lend the money out; and the laws got stricter for them to lend the money out... and then the banks got all these compliance shit. I agree they should be allowed to fail; and if they wanna gamble they should gamble with their own money. They should also have split the banks up. Investment banks should be different than commercial banks or retail banks. But that's the government for you
...
The problem is they bailed the banks out and not the people out. Then the banks didn't even lend the money out; and the laws got stricter for them to lend the money out... and then the banks got all these compliance shit. I agree they should be allowed to fail; and if they wanna gamble they should gamble with their own money. They should also have split the banks up. Investment banks should be different than commercial banks or retail banks. But that's the government for you
That was Obamas weakness instead of demanding actions by the banks in exchange for the bailout he hoped they would do the right thing.
Same thing with the ACA..instead of mandating states join and create exchanges he gave them the choice hoping they would. And instead, they sabotaged the ACA and then pointed and said look its failing.
They let the Right Wingnuts define the narrative and then it was too late
Serious question
How does this affect me and my people in the USA?
How does this affect me and my people in the USA?