are you retarded?
or are you just acting dumb as fuck, Cran?
I guess this is speculation right?
Report finds Paterno not only knew but willingly financed Sandusky
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
are you retarded?
or are you just acting dumb as fuck, Cran?
I guess this is speculation right?
there is a fucking subtitle
its tell you who the characters are....4th grade english
wtf
this lets you know its paterno
are you retarded?
or are you just acting dumb as fuck, Cran?
I guess this is speculation right?
no, i'm neither retarded or acting anything like it, AW. but thank you for asking.
it's clear you didn't read the report, but went for the cliff notes (summaries titled as key findings). i suspect the sports "journalist" did the same thing and decided to run with it.
if you bother to read the actual "evidence" presented, it's clear that coach paterno's name is included in much of the report merely for the publicity.
since you read the entire report, share with me how the title of the thread evolved. specifically the part about coach paterno "willingly financing sandusky". please.
dude im not about to play a question and answer game with you
you like to do that shit with these little niggas...fuck outta here
you clearly said paterno didnt know, when its clear as day (to anyone with a brain) he did
but go ahead pedo defender
the kobe shit was weird as fuck, dude...but i laughed it off as weird but funny
but this shit here is on some whole new level of weirdo wackiness
do you secretly like children?
im trying to figure out why youre trying to defend someone who is clearly guilty as fuck
once again, are you a fan of little boys, Cran?
im dead serious!
ah, ok.
now coach paterno was a pedophile and i'm defending that.
great. i guess the report had all kinds of evidence on that too.
i know sometimes it's too much to ask anyone here to think things through.
Paterno was a criminal who happened to be a college football coach.
He surrounded himself with good other good coach's who followed his instructions well,but as long as he remained the coach,winning so the betters and whomever else at the top, he was in bed with could make money;It was a GO!.He took that shit with him to his grave.
Now its time for Penn state to settle with the victims,remove that statue of Paterno,get rid of his family from the campus, sentce the pedophile and move on.
He surrounded himself with good other good coach's who followed his instructions well,but as long as he remained the coach,winning so the betters and whomever else at the top, he was in bed with could make money;It was a GO!.He took that shit with him to his grave.
Now its time for Penn state to settle with the victims,remove that statue of Paterno,get rid of his family from the campus, sentce the pedophile and move on.
exactly what is coach paterno guilty of?
you wanna follow the bandwagon, go right ahead.
dead serious about asking me if i'm a fan of little boys?
did you stop touching your little nephews?
youre king pedo defender when all the evidence points one way
so one has to come to the conclusion that you like little boy ass too
you sick mental bastard
its all speculation
gtfoh!
you actually think Joepa's bosses are calling Sandusky, coach?
either youre retarded or a pedo defender
maybe a combination of both
that might float if i was defending jerry sandusky. i'm not. last i checked, i wasn't defending anyone. i was challenging the evidence you've based your assumptions on.
i'm the sick mental bastard, but your first conclusion is that another man likes "little boy ass".
uh, if you had read the report (i don't know why you are claiming you did, when it's clear you did not), you would've known that louis freeh himself said it was speculative as to whom "Coach" was referring to.
jerry sandusky was employed as a coach through 1999, so it's more than reasonable to believe that tim curley and gary schultz referred to him by his title.
this isnt personal...just typical bgol shit talking
me and dude will be good tomorrow
but he is on some buuuuuuuullshit right now
i guess this is sandusky too, according to our resident pedo defender
of course you didn't post the email we were talking about.
and since you took the time to post this:
share the advertised notification or update to coach paterno. after all, if the report says there was one, it means they produced it as evidence, right?
that might float if i was defending jerry sandusky. i'm not. last i checked, i wasn't defending anyone. i was challenging the evidence you've based your assumptions on.
i'm the sick mental bastard, but your first conclusion is that another man likes "little boy ass".
uh, if you had read the report (i don't know why you are claiming you did, when it's clear you did not), you would've known that louis freeh himself said it was speculative as to whom "Coach" was referring to.
jerry sandusky was employed as a coach through 1999, so it's more than reasonable to believe that tim curley and gary schultz referred to him by his title.
sandusky = individual
joepa = coach
im tired of destroying you and your pedo ways, man
i'm good with you right now.
i have a low threshold for bullshit, and when sports "journalists" in particular make a claim, i demand proof.
not allusions, not inferences, but factual evidence.
of course you didn't post the email we were talking about.
and since you took the time to post this:
share the advertised notification or update to coach paterno. after all, if the report says there was one, it means they produced it as evidence, right?
produce one piece of evidence that it isnt joe, dude
stop asking me to do something to support your pedo defense
WTF!!!
how much evidence can i present?
are you in nambla?
hell ray charles can see joe's bosses are talking about joe
live it with it...he knew!
that might've destroyed me if you had stuck with the original email you referenced (p. 49) and which i cited (p. 171).
you still haven't hurdled the obstacle where louis freeh himself said it's speculative.
a grown man should have some inferencing skills, dude
it doesnt matter what email i post...i proved theyre talking about joe
this is quite pathetic
you pointed to "notifications and updates to spanier, schultz, paterno and curley" with a date range of may 4th through may 30th 1998.
what notification and update did the sic produce "to" "paterno" in that date range?
cran produce one piece of evidence and stop asking me questions
i told you i dont fall for that weak shit
ill post proof that joe knew in 98 again
just for you:
its your job to present a case that says that coach is someone else on the penn st football team other than paterno
cause clearly the individual they mention is sandusky
cran produce one piece of evidence and stop asking me questions
i told you i dont fall for that weak shit
ill post proof that joe knew in 98 again
just for you:
its your job to present a case that says that coach is someone else on the penn st football team other than paterno
cause clearly the individual they mention is sandusky
AW,
i stipulate that the individual is jerry sandusky.
i further stipulate that in exhibit 2a "coach" is coach paterno.
would you stipulate that extracting meaning from "I have touched base" is a speculative at best?
only tim curley knows what communication took place between he and coach paterno on may 5th, 1998. only tim curley knows what was discussed.
speculation is not evidence.
no it's not.
it's my responsibility to point out that the statement "i have touched base with the coach." has ZERO probative value.
touched base could mean they said as little as hello in the hallway.
touched base could also have mean they hatched a nefarious cover up.
unfortunately for YOUR position, the point here is that this email contains proof of nothing concerning coach paterno.
AW,
i stipulate that the individual is jerry sandusky.
i further stipulate that in exhibit 2a "coach" is coach paterno.
would you stipulate that extracting meaning from "I have touched base" is a speculative at best?
only tim curley knows what communication took place between he and coach paterno on may 5th, 1998. only tim curley knows what was discussed.
speculation is not evidence.
Cran, im not following you at all dude
how is " I have touched base" speculation?
come on man that doesnt even make sense
touched base means hello now?
since when
are you willing to say anything to win an unwinnable debate
clearly.
tim curley emailed gary schultz and told him: "I have touched base with the coach."
so?
does it detail what the coach said?
does it indicate the coach said anything at all?
no.
where coach paterno is concerned, the email has ZERO probative value.
touched base could mean a lot of things.
which is exactly my point.
YOU have NO idea what it may or may not mean. speculative at best.
man its let you know that joepa knew
WTF!!!
and Cran, what did the next sentence say and who was the subject?
once again, where is the speculation?
the only thing it semi-reasonably allows anyone to infer is that coach paterno knew that tim curley had "touched base" with him. whatever that may mean.
you up here acting like tim curley states in his email some shit like: "yesterday i asked coach what his feelings were about the allegations regarding jerry sandusky".
again, all it said was "i have touched base with the coach".
you let your imaginations run wild with that.
the next sentence was: "keep us posted".
what did you infer that meant?
when i said next sentence, i meant the reply
and u knew that
what did the reply say cran?
clearly this completes the message and lets you know they informed joepa about the pedo
we have a copy of the original document. that is the best evidence!
why ask for a hypothetical?
"i have touched base with the coach".
you can try a million ways to spin it, but in an email from tim curley to gary schultz, it has NO value where coach paterno is concerned.
sad shit man
Similar threads
